MCP HubMCP Hub
Retour aux compétences

email-deliverability

rampstackco
Mis à jour 2 days ago
6 vues
239
27
239
Voir sur GitHub
Autreai

À propos

Cette compétence Claude aide les développeurs à garantir la délivrabilité des e-mails en mettant en œuvre et en résolvant les problèmes liés aux protocoles d'authentification comme SPF, DKIM et DMARC. Elle assiste dans le diagnostic des problèmes de classement en spam, la surveillance de la réputation de l'expéditeur et la sécurisation des domaines contre l'usurpation d'identité. Utilisez-la lors de la configuration de systèmes de messagerie ou lorsque les e-mails marketing ou transactionnels n'atteignent pas les utilisateurs.

Installation rapide

Claude Code

Recommandé
Principal
npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code
Commande PluginAlternatif
/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills
Git CloneAlternatif
git clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/email-deliverability

Copiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence

Documentation

Email Deliverability

Get email into inboxes, not spam folders. Set up authentication. Monitor reputation. Diagnose problems before they hurt the business.


When to use

  • Setting up email for a new domain
  • A meaningful percentage of email is going to spam
  • Customers report they're not receiving emails
  • Setting up DMARC, SPF, or DKIM
  • Hardening against domain spoofing
  • Migrating email service providers
  • Sender reputation has dropped
  • Pre-launch audit before sending volume increases

When NOT to use

  • Writing the email content itself (use email-sequences)
  • Designing the email program strategy (use email-sequences)
  • DNS records in general (use domain-strategy)
  • Outbound spam coming FROM your account (different problem; investigate compromised credentials)

Required inputs

  • The sending domain(s)
  • The email service provider (ESP, transactional service, mail server)
  • Current DNS records (or access to them)
  • Email volume (transactional vs marketing, daily volume)
  • Current deliverability state (if known: bounce rate, spam complaints)

The framework: 3 pillars

Email deliverability rests on three pillars. Weakness in any one limits the others.

Pillar 1: Authentication

Mailbox providers verify email is actually from who it claims to be from. Three records.

SPF (Sender Policy Framework)

Lists which servers are authorized to send mail for the domain. Published as a TXT record at the apex.

v=spf1 include:_spf.mailprovider.com -all
  • include: adds another sender's authorized list
  • -all (hard fail): mail from unlisted senders fails authentication
  • ~all (soft fail): unlisted senders are suspicious but pass; useful during rollout
  • +all: never use; allows anyone to send

Only one SPF record per domain. Multiple SPF records break SPF entirely. Combine senders into a single record.

SPF has a 10-DNS-lookup limit. Each include: may use multiple lookups. Hit the limit and SPF stops working. Watch this carefully.

DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail)

A cryptographic signature on each outgoing email. The mail server signs with a private key; the public key is published in DNS.

selector1._domainkey.example.com    TXT    "v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0G..."

Selectors differ by ESP. Some use default._domainkey, some use unique selectors per service. Most ESPs walk you through publishing the records.

DKIM proves the message wasn't modified in transit and that the sender controls the domain.

DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance)

The policy layer. Tells receivers what to do when SPF or DKIM fails, and where to send reports.

_dmarc.example.com    TXT    "v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s"

Components:

  • p=: policy. none, quarantine, or reject.
  • rua=: aggregate reports (daily, summary). Always set this.
  • ruf=: forensic reports (per-message). Optional, can be high volume.
  • pct=: percentage of failing mail subject to the policy. Useful for gradual rollout.
  • adkim=, aspf=: alignment mode. s (strict), r (relaxed). Strict means From: domain must match exactly.

DMARC is the most important record. It's what makes spoofing your domain hard.

Pillar 2: Reputation

Mailbox providers (Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo) score every sender. Reputation drives delivery.

Reputation factors:

  • Authentication pass rates (SPF, DKIM, DMARC)
  • Engagement signals (opens, replies, marking as not-spam)
  • Negative signals (spam complaints, deletions without opens, blocking)
  • List hygiene (low bounce rates, no spam traps)
  • Volume consistency (sudden spikes look like spam)
  • Content patterns (link reputation, attachment patterns)
  • IP and domain history

Reputation is per (sending domain × mailbox provider). Gmail's view of you is independent of Outlook's.

Pillar 3: List quality and engagement

Authentication and reputation rest on list quality. Bad list = bad reputation eventually.

  • Only send to people who explicitly opted in
  • Confirmed (double) opt-in for marketing wherever feasible
  • Honor unsubscribes immediately and reliably
  • Remove hard bounces immediately
  • Sunset disengaged contacts (no opens in 6 months: reduce frequency or remove)
  • Avoid third-party lists, scraped emails, or "purchased opt-ins"

The single biggest deliverability lever for most senders is list hygiene.


Workflow

Step 1: Audit current state

Check the current DNS records:

dig +short txt example.com
dig +short txt selector1._domainkey.example.com
dig +short txt _dmarc.example.com

Also check:

  • Current bounce rate (target: under 2%)
  • Current spam complaint rate (target: under 0.1%)
  • Current open rate (varies by industry; falling trend is a warning)
  • Current sending volume

Tools: mxtoolbox.com, dmarcian.com, mail-tester.com (for individual messages).

Step 2: Fix authentication

If any of SPF, DKIM, DMARC is missing or misconfigured, fix first.

SPF fix order:

  1. Identify all legitimate senders (transactional ESP, marketing ESP, support tools, etc.)
  2. Get the include: value or IP for each
  3. Combine into a single SPF record
  4. Verify lookup count is under 10
  5. Use -all for hard fail (or ~all if rolling out gradually)

DKIM fix order:

  1. Generate a new selector per sending service
  2. Publish the public key in DNS
  3. Configure the ESP to sign with the private key
  4. Verify with a test send (check headers for dkim=pass)

DMARC fix order:

  1. Publish DMARC with p=none initially (monitoring mode)
  2. Set up an aggregate report endpoint (use a DMARC analytics service or your own)
  3. Watch reports for at least 2-4 weeks
  4. Identify any legitimate senders failing alignment; fix them
  5. Move to p=quarantine with pct=10, gradually increase
  6. Move to p=reject once confidence is high

The full progression typically takes 2-3 months. Rushing causes legitimate mail to bounce.

Step 3: Set up monitoring

Ongoing visibility:

  • DMARC aggregate reports: parsed daily. Watch for new sources, alignment failures, volume changes.
  • Bounce rate: per ESP dashboard. Target under 2% for transactional, under 5% for marketing.
  • Spam complaint rate: target under 0.1%.
  • Reputation tools: Google Postmaster Tools (free), Microsoft SNDS, Talos, Sender Score.
  • Blacklist monitoring: most ESPs include this; otherwise mxtoolbox.com or hetrixtools.com.

Step 4: Address list hygiene

  • Remove hard bounces from your sending lists immediately (most ESPs do this; verify)
  • Set up suppression lists (unsubscribes, manual blocks, deliverability sinkholes)
  • Sunset disengaged contacts (re-engagement campaigns or just remove)
  • Review opt-in flows: do people know what they're signing up for?

Step 5: Content and pattern audit

If reputation is good and authentication passes, check content:

  • HTML-only emails (no plain-text alternative) raise flags
  • Heavy image-to-text ratios raise flags
  • Suspicious link patterns (bare IPs, URL shorteners, hijacked domains)
  • Specific spam-trigger words in subject lines (less important than it used to be, still real)
  • Lots of mismatched domains in URLs
  • Generic from-name like "info@" rather than a real-sounding sender

Step 6: Plan for growth

Email volume affects reputation. Sudden spikes look like spam.

  • Warm up new sending IPs gradually (start at 50/day, 2x daily)
  • Warm up new domains gradually (similar pattern)
  • Spread sends throughout the day
  • Don't switch ESPs the week before a big launch

Step 7: Set up BIMI (optional but valuable)

BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) shows your logo next to authenticated emails in supporting clients (Gmail, Apple Mail, Yahoo, others).

Requires:

  • DMARC at p=quarantine or p=reject (so this comes after the DMARC progression)
  • A trademarked logo as an SVG (specific format requirements)
  • A Verified Mark Certificate (VMC) from a CA, for Gmail and others
  • A _bimi DNS record pointing to the SVG and VMC

BIMI improves trust signals and engagement. Worth doing once DMARC enforcement is in place.

Step 8: Document and revisit

Document the email architecture:

  • Sending domains and subdomains
  • Each ESP and what it sends
  • DNS records for each
  • Monitoring setup
  • Escalation if deliverability degrades

Revisit quarterly or when a new ESP is added.


Failure patterns

Multiple SPF records. Two or more SPF records on the same domain breaks SPF. Combine into one.

SPF DNS lookup limit exceeded. Too many include: directives or chained includes. Flatten or simplify.

DMARC at p=none forever. Monitoring without enforcement. Spoofing remains easy. Move to enforcement.

DMARC at p=reject too quickly. Legitimate mail bounces because alignment wasn't verified. Use the gradual rollout.

Sending from a different domain than the From: address. Causes alignment failures. Fix the From: domain or ensure proper alignment.

Using a shared ESP IP without ESP-specific configuration. Some ESPs don't sign with your DKIM by default; the signature is the ESP's, not yours. Configure custom DKIM.

Sending from a domain that also sends marketing. A spam complaint on a marketing email hurts transactional deliverability. Use a subdomain for transactional (transactional.example.com) or marketing (mail.example.com).

No bounce monitoring. Hard bounces accumulate, reputation tanks, deliverability cliff-falls. Monitor.

Bought lists or scraped contacts. Spam traps in those lists destroy reputation. Don't.

No double opt-in for marketing. Single opt-in lets bots and typos onto the list. Bots generate spam complaints, destroy reputation.

Ignoring DMARC reports. Reports show problems early. Set up a parser. Look weekly.

Treating "marked as not-spam" as the goal. The goal is to never land in spam in the first place. Once reputation is bad, recovery takes months.


Output format

A deliverability audit document includes:

  • Domain inventory: every sending domain
  • Authentication status: SPF, DKIM, DMARC per domain
  • Sender inventory: every ESP or service that sends mail, what's configured
  • Reputation status: per major mailbox provider where measurable
  • List hygiene: bounce rate, complaint rate, opt-in process
  • Findings: prioritized issues
  • Roadmap: SPF/DKIM/DMARC fixes, BIMI plan, monitoring plan
  • Monitoring setup: what's watched, where alerts go

Reference files

Dépôt GitHub

rampstackco/claude-skills
Chemin: skills/email-deliverability
0
agent-skillsai-agentsanthropicclaudeclaude-aiclaude-code

Compétences associées

media-asset-management

Autre

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à concevoir et optimiser les pipelines média pour les images, les vidéos et les ressources téléchargeables. Elle fournit des conseils sur le stockage, la sélection de formats modernes (comme WebP/AVIF), les images responsives, l'hébergement vidéo et l'organisation des bibliothèques de ressources. Utilisez-la lors de la construction, de l'audit ou de l'amélioration des systèmes de diffusion média, en particulier pour des problèmes de performance ou d'organisation.

Voir la compétence

security-baseline

Autre

La compétence de base de sécurité aide les développeurs à établir et à auditer les configurations de sécurité web essentielles. Elle fournit des conseils pour la configuration HTTPS/TLS, les en-têtes de sécurité, la CSP (Politique de Sécurité du Contenu), la gestion des secrets et le durcissement pré-lancement. Utilisez-la pour les revues de conformité, les évaluations de vulnérabilités et les audits de sécurité périodiques.

Voir la compétence

monitoring-and-alerting

Autre

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à concevoir et mettre en œuvre un système de surveillance, couvrant la définition des SLO, les contrôles de disponibilité et le suivi des erreurs. Elle guide la configuration d'alertes actionnables, la mise en place de rotations de garde et la résolution de la fatigue d'alerte. Utilisez-la lors de la mise en place de l'observabilité ou lorsqu'un incident révèle une lacune dans la surveillance.

Voir la compétence

backup-and-disaster-recovery

Autre

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à planifier et mettre en œuvre des stratégies de sauvegarde et des procédures de reprise après sinistre. Elle assiste dans la définition des objectifs RPO/RTO, la conception de l'architecture de sauvegarde et la réalisation d'exercices de restauration. Utilisez-la lors de la configuration des sauvegardes, de la planification des interruptions ou de la réponse à des incidents révélant des lacunes de récupération.

Voir la compétence