decommission-validated-system
À propos
Cette compétence fournit un processus structuré pour la mise hors service d'un système informatisé validé dans un environnement réglementé. Elle prend en charge des tâches critiques de conformité telles que l'évaluation de la conservation des données, la validation de la migration, l'archivage et la notification des parties prenantes. Utilisez-la lors du remplacement ou de la retraite d'un système en raison de sa fin de vie, d'un support interrompu, d'une consolidation ou de changements réglementaires.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-systemCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Decommission Validated System
Plan and execute controlled retirement of validated computerized system. Preserve data integrity and meet regulatory retention requirements.
When Use
- Validated system being replaced by new system
- System reaching end-of-life with no replacement (business process eliminated)
- Vendor discontinues support for validated product
- Consolidation of many systems into single platform
- Regulatory or business changes make system obsolete
Inputs
- Required: System to be decommissioned (name, version, validation status)
- Required: Data retention requirements by regulation (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
- Required: Replacement system (if applicable) and migration scope
- Optional: Current validation documentation package
- Optional: Data volume and format inventory
- Optional: Business owner and stakeholder list
Steps
Step 1: Assess Data Retention Requirements
Determine how long data must be retained and in what form:
# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |
### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |
Got: Every data category has defined retention period, format requirement, planned disposition. If fail: Retention requirements unclear? Consult regulatory affairs and legal. Default to longest applicable retention period.
Step 2: Plan Data Migration (If Applicable)
If data migrating to replacement system:
# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |
### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |
### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |
Got: Migration plan has mapping, transformation rules, validation checks proving data integrity maintained. If fail: Migration validation fails? Do not proceed to decommission. Fix migration issues and re-validate.
Step 3: Define Archival Strategy
For data that will be archived rather than migrated:
# Archival Strategy
### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |
### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)
### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |
Got: Archived data readable, searchable, verifiable without original system. If fail: Data cannot be read independently of source system? Archive not compliant. Consider exporting to open, standard format (PDF/A, CSV) before decommission.
Step 4: Execute Decommissioning
# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)
### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture
### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved
### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |
Got: Decommissioning controlled, documented, approved — not just "turn it off." If fail: Any checklist item cannot be completed? Document exception and get QA approval before proceeding.
Checks
- Data retention requirements assessed for all data categories
- Data migration validated with record counts, sampling, checksums (if applicable)
- Archive created in format readable without source system
- Archive integrity verified with checksums
- All user access revoked
- Validation documentation archived with defined retention period
- SOPs updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- Decommission report approved by system owner, QA, IT
Pitfalls
- Premature decommission: Turning off system before data migration validated → permanent data loss risk. Complete all validation before pulling plug.
- Unreadable archives: Storing data in proprietary format needing original system to read defeats purpose of archival. Use open formats.
- Forgotten audit trails: Archiving data but not audit trail → data provenance cannot be shown. Always archive audit trails with their parent records.
- Orphaned SOPs: SOPs still referencing decommissioned system confuse users and make compliance gaps. Update or retire all affected SOPs.
- No periodic archive verification: Archives degrade. Without periodic integrity checks, data loss may go undetected until data is needed for inspection.
See Also
design-compliance-architecture— update system inventory and compliance architecture after decommissionmanage-change-control— decommissioning is major change requiring change controlwrite-validation-documentation— migration validation follows same IQ/OQ methodologywrite-standard-operating-procedure— retire or update SOPs referencing decommissioned systemprepare-inspection-readiness— archived data must stay accessible for regulatory inspections
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
evaluating-llms-harness
TestsCette compétence Claude exécute le lm-evaluation-harness pour évaluer les modèles de langage sur plus de 60 tâches académiques standardisées telles que MMLU et GSM8K. Elle est conçue pour permettre aux développeurs de comparer la qualité des modèles, de suivre les progrès de l'entraînement ou de rapporter des résultats académiques. L'outil prend en charge différents backends, incluant les modèles HuggingFace et vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestsCette compétence fournit une connaissance complète pour la mise en œuvre de Déclencheurs Cron Cloudflare afin de planifier des Workers à l'aide d'expressions cron. Elle couvre la configuration de tâches périodiques, de travaux de maintenance et de flux de travail automatisés, tout en traitant des problèmes courants tels que les expressions cron non valides et les problèmes de fuseau horaire. Les développeurs peuvent l'utiliser pour configurer des gestionnaires planifiés, tester des déclencheurs cron et intégrer avec Workflows et Green Compute.
webapp-testing
TestsCette Compétence Claude fournit une boîte à outils basée sur Playwright pour tester des applications web locales via des scripts Python. Elle permet la vérification frontend, le débogage d'interface utilisateur, la capture d'écrans et la consultation des journaux, tout en gérant les cycles de vie du serveur. Utilisez-la pour les tâches d'automatisation de navigateur, mais exécutez les scripts directement plutôt que de lire leur code source pour éviter la pollution du contexte.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestsCette compétence aide les développeurs à finaliser leur travail en vérifiant que les tests passent, puis en présentant des options d'intégration structurées. Elle guide le processus de fusion, de création de PRs ou de nettoyage des branches une fois l'implémentation terminée. Utilisez-la lorsque votre code est prêt et testé pour finaliser systématiquement le cycle de développement.
