tool-design-sprint-decide-and-storyboard
À propos
Cette Compétence Claude facilite la journée de prise de décision critique (mercredi) d'un Design Sprint, en guidant les équipes à travers des méthodes de vote structurées pour sélectionner la meilleure esquisse de solution. Elle aide ensuite à traduire le concept choisi en un storyboard détaillé de 5 à 15 étapes, qui sert de spécification de construction pour le prototype. Utilisez-la une fois les esquisses terminées pour converger vers un plan unique et actionnable pour le prototypage.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skillsgit clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/tool-design-sprint-decide-and-storyboardCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Design Sprint Decide and Storyboard (Wednesday)
Wednesday is the most decision-heavy day of the Design Sprint. The skill runs the art museum layout (sketches posted anonymously on the wall), heat map (silent dot-vote stickers on promising parts), speed critique (3 minutes per sketch summarizing what the team sees), straw poll (each team member's top choice), and the Decider's supervote (the call that triggers the storyboard). Then the team decides whether to rumble (storyboard two sketches as competing prototypes) or all-in-one (storyboard one). The day ends with a 5-15 step storyboard that drives Thursday's build.
Family contract: docs/reference/skill-families/design-sprint-skills-contract.md. This skill is a member of design-sprint-skills.
When to Use
- It is Day 3 of the Design Sprint and Tuesday's sketches are collected, attribution-stripped, and uploaded to the shared workspace.
- The Decider is present for the full morning (heat map plus critique plus straw poll plus supervote happen 09:00-12:30 canonically).
- The team has accepted that the supervote is the Decider's call, not a consensus average.
- Thursday's prototype build needs a storyboard by Wednesday end-of-day or the build cannot start clean Thursday morning.
When NOT to Use
- Tuesday is not closed. Return to
tool-design-sprint-sketch; without independent sketches, the heat-map is meaningless. - Sketcher attribution leaked into Wednesday morning. The Facilitator must re-strip before the heat-map begins; voting on sketchers contaminates the day.
- The Decider is absent. Wednesday's supervote cannot be delegated; without the Decider, the day produces a recommendation, not a decision.
- The team is treating the supervote as advisory. The supervote is the call. Re-litigating it Thursday morning is sprint failure.
What This Skill Produces
A single bundled artifact with seven sections:
- Art museum layout: how sketches are arranged for viewing (typically wall or shared Figma board); attribution stripped; sketches labeled A / B / C / D / etc. in randomized order.
- Heat map: silent dot-vote stickers (typically 3 small dots per voter) placed on the most compelling PARTS of any sketch; voters can stack dots on the same element.
- Speed critique notes: 3-minute structured walkthrough per sketch by the Facilitator (or rotated team member) summarizing what the team sees; the sketcher does NOT explain their own sketch; concerns are captured as "what would worry me" notes.
- Straw poll results: each team member places one larger sticker (typically 1 large dot per voter) on the sketch they would pick if it were their call. Non-binding; informs the Decider.
- Supervote: the Decider places their supervote sticker (typically 3 large dots or a distinctively-colored sticker). The supervote is the decision. The Decider can place multiple supervotes on different sketches if running a rumble.
- Rumble vs all-in-one decision: the Decider chooses to storyboard one sketch (all-in-one; default) or two sketches as competing prototypes (rumble; chosen when the supervotes split clearly across two distinct approaches).
- Storyboard: 5-15 step storyboard derived from the supervoted sketch(es); each panel shows what the customer sees and what they do; specific enough that Thursday's build can begin without re-debating the design.
See references/TEMPLATE.md for the canonical structure and references/EXAMPLE.md for the Brainshelf book-catalog Wednesday artifact.
Wednesday Time Structure
The full Wednesday workshop is approximately 7 hours (09:00-12:30 + 13:30-17:00). The skill's bundled artifact emerges across the day:
- 09:00-09:15: Welcome + Tuesday recap + Wednesday agenda
- 09:15-09:30: Art museum setup; Facilitator confirms sketches are attribution-stripped and labeled A/B/C/D
- 09:30-09:45: Heat map (silent; 15 minutes; team places dot stickers on compelling parts)
- 09:45-10:45: Speed critique (3 min per sketch; sketchers silent during their own sketch's critique)
- 10:45-11:00: Break
- 11:00-11:15: Straw poll (silent; each person places 1 large dot on their pick)
- 11:15-11:30: Decider's supervote and rumble vs all-in-one call
- 11:30-12:30: Storyboard framing (which panels matter most; which map steps to cover; storyboard scope)
- 12:30-13:30: Lunch
- 13:30-16:30: Storyboard build (Facilitator drives; team contributes panel content; storyboard reaches 5-15 panels)
- 16:30-17:00: Day-end review; Thursday build kickoff prep (who builds, who supports, what tools, what gets prebuilt overnight)
This skill's 210-minute timebox covers the Facilitator-led portions (heat map setup, critique, straw poll, supervote, storyboard build).
Common Pitfalls
- Consensus drift instead of Decider supervote. The most common failure: the team votes, the Facilitator averages, and the Decider rubber-stamps the average. The Decider's call is the Decider's call; the straw poll is input, not result.
- Storyboard too vague. "User captures a book" is not a storyboard panel; "user opens camera surface, points at book held at arm's length, sees recognized cover appear in bottom card within 1.5 seconds, taps the card to commit" is. Vague storyboards force Thursday's builders to re-debate design.
- Skipping critique to save time. Critique surfaces concerns the storyboard must address. Skipping it produces a storyboard that hits Thursday and immediately re-surfaces every concern that should have been addressed Wednesday.
- Sketcher explaining their own sketch. During critique, the sketcher is silent. The point is to test whether the sketch communicates without the artist. If the team can't read the sketch, that's data, not a bug.
- Rumble chosen when all-in-one was right (or vice versa). Rumble is appropriate when 2 distinct supervoted approaches are both worth testing AND the team has Thursday capacity to build 2 prototypes. Default is all-in-one. Rumble is exception, not norm.
- Storyboard scope too broad. 5-15 panels, not 50. The storyboard covers the target moment (from Monday) plus 1-2 panels of setup and 1-2 panels of outcome; it does NOT cover the full product.
Cross-Skill Usage
Prerequisites: tool-design-sprint-sketch. Decide and Storyboard consumes Tuesday's sketches as input. Without independent sketches, this skill has no material to heat-map.
This skill invokes tool-note-and-vote twice during the morning: once for the heat-map (small-dot voting) and once for the straw poll (large-dot voting). The supervote itself is the Decider's call after seeing both vote distributions; it does NOT delegate to note-and-vote.
Next invocation in the sprint: tool-design-sprint-prototype-plan Thursday morning.
Canonical Sources
- Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., and Kowitz, B. Sprint. Simon and Schuster, 2016. Wednesday chapter (Chapters 11-13).
- GV Design Sprint Guide. "Sprint Week Wednesday." https://www.gv.com/sprint/
- Character Capital. "Design Sprint Day 3." https://www.character.vc
- Google Design Sprint Kit. "Wednesday agenda template + storyboard worksheet." https://designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/
Decider Checkpoint
This skill ends with a Decider Checkpoint in references/TEMPLATE.md. The Decider's supervote earlier in the day is the substantive decision; the end-of-day checkpoint confirms the storyboard is build-ready (specific enough; covers the target moment plus setup plus outcome panels; no remaining hand-waving). Without sign-off, Thursday's build begins with ambiguity and Friday's test risks being a test of the wrong artifact.
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
content-collections
MétaCette compétence propose une configuration éprouvée en production pour Content Collections, un outil axé sur TypeScript qui transforme des fichiers Markdown/MDX en collections de données typées de manière sûre avec une validation Zod. Utilisez-la lors de la création de blogs, de sites de documentation ou d'applications Vite + React riches en contenu pour garantir la sécurité de typage et la validation automatique du contenu. Elle couvre tout, de la configuration du plugin Vite et de la compilation MDX à l'optimisation des déploiements et la validation des schémas.
polymarket
MétaCette compétence permet aux développeurs de créer des applications avec la plateforme de marchés prédictifs Polymarket, incluant l'intégration d'API pour le trading et les données de marché. Elle fournit également une diffusion de données en temps réel via WebSocket pour surveiller les transactions en direct et l'activité du marché. Utilisez-la pour mettre en œuvre des stratégies de trading ou pour créer des outils traitant les mises à jour de marché en direct.
creating-opencode-plugins
MétaCette compétence aide les développeurs à créer des plugins OpenCode qui s'interconnectent avec plus de 25 types d'événements tels que les commandes, les fichiers et les opérations LSP. Elle fournit la structure du plugin, les spécifications de l'API événementielle et les modèles d'implémentation pour les modules JavaScript/TypeScript. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin d'intercepter, de surveiller ou d'étendre le cycle de vie de l'assistant IA OpenCode avec une logique personnalisée pilotée par les événements.
sglang
MétaSGLang est un framework de service LLM haute performance spécialisé dans la génération rapide et structurée pour les workflows JSON, regex et agentiques grâce à son cache de préfixe RadixAttention. Il offre une inférence nettement plus rapide, particulièrement pour les tâches avec des préfixes répétés, ce qui le rend idéal pour les sorties complexes et structurées ainsi que les conversations multi-tours. Choisissez SGLang plutôt que des alternatives comme vLLM lorsque vous avez besoin d'un décodage contraint ou que vous construisez des applications avec un partage étendu de préfixes.
