deal-risk-scoring
À propos
Cette compétence analyse la santé des transactions en utilisant les signaux d'engagement, la cartographie des parties prenantes et l'analyse de la vélocité pour identifier les opportunités à risque. Elle est conçue pour être utilisée lors des revues de transactions, des nettoyages du pipeline et pour prioriser le coaching ou les ressources. L'outil aide les développeurs à évaluer les transactions en examinant le multi-threading, les signaux concurrentiels et l'alignement des délais.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/deal-risk-scoringCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Deal Risk Scoring
Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.
When to Use This Skill
- Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs
- Before QBRs to identify problem deals
- When deals stall or push close dates
- Prioritizing manager coaching time
- Allocating SE/executive resources
Methodology Foundation
Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:
- Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)
- Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)
- Competitive signals
- Timeline alignment
- Champion strength
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Scores deals on risk factors | Which deals to save vs. let go |
| Identifies missing elements | Resource allocation priorities |
| Suggests intervention actions | Executive sponsor assignments |
| Tracks velocity trends | Final stage/probability updates |
| Flags competitive threats | Win strategy adjustments |
What This Skill Does
- Multi-signal analysis - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition
- Risk scoring - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons
- Gap identification - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps
- Action recommendations - Specific interventions to reduce risk
- Trend tracking - Velocity changes over time
How to Use
Assess the risk for this deal:
Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $X
Stage: [Current Stage]
Close Date: [Target Date]
Days in Stage: X
Recent Activity:
- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]
Stakeholders:
- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]
Competition: [Known competitors]
Champion: [Name and strength assessment]
Instructions
Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Meeting in last 7 days | +10 |
| Email response in last 3 days | +5 |
| Multiple contacts engaged | +5 |
| Prospect initiating contact | +5 |
| No activity 14+ days | -15 |
Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Economic Buyer identified | +10 |
| Champion confirmed | +10 |
| Technical evaluator engaged | +5 |
| Only 1 contact | -10 |
| No C-level access | -5 |
Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Clear next step scheduled | +10 |
| Mutual action plan agreed | +10 |
| Decision timeline confirmed | +5 |
| Close date pushed 2+ times | -15 |
| No defined process | -10 |
Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| No competition | +15 |
| Differentiation clear | +10 |
| Incumbent advantage | -10 |
| Price pressure | -5 |
| Unknown competitive status | -5 |
Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score
| Score | Health | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 75-100 | 🟢 Green | Monitor, standard process |
| 50-74 | 🟡 Yellow | Intervention needed |
| 25-49 | 🟠 Orange | Escalate, major action |
| 0-24 | 🔴 Red | Rescue or disqualify |
Examples
Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal
Input:
Deal: TechCorp Global
Value: $250K ARR
Stage: 3 - Proposal
Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)
Days in Stage: 28
Recent Activity:
- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)
- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)
- Jan 29: Called, voicemail
- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)
Stakeholders:
- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)
- No other contacts
Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery
Champion: John - went silent
Output:
## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global
### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK
### Score Breakdown
| Factor | Score | Issues |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days |
| Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB |
| Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |
| Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking |
| **Total** | **28/100** | |
### Critical Risks
1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days
- Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor
2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships
- If John is out, deal is dead
3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker
- John may not have authority to close
### Recommended Actions
**This Week:**
1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?
2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral
3. Send "breakup email" to force response
4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval
**If No Response by Friday:**
- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost
- Free up forecast slot
### Red Flags to Watch
- If proposal was forwarded to competitor
- If budget was reallocated
- If project was deprioritized
### Save Probability: 25%
Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.
Example 2: Healthy Deal Review
Input:
Deal: GrowthCo Inc
Value: $85K ARR
Stage: 4 - Negotiation
Close Date: Feb 15
Days in Stage: 7
Recent Activity:
- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)
- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO
- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA
- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10
Stakeholders:
- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)
- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)
- Legal team (reviewing contract)
- 8 end users attended demo
Competition: None identified
Champion: Maria - actively selling internally
Output:
## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc
### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY
### Score Breakdown
| Factor | Score | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |
| Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |
| Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |
| Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified |
| **Total** | **88/100** | |
### Strengths
1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged
2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent
3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions
4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally
### Minor Risks
1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers
- Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines
2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown
- Mitigation: Ask directly in next call
### Recommended Actions
**Feb 10 Call Prep:**
1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues
2. Confirm decision process post-legal
3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?"
4. Get verbal commit from Maria
### Close Probability: 85%
Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Objective risk scoring from available data
- Identifying gaps in deal coverage
- Prioritizing which deals need attention
- Suggesting specific interventions
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Know information not provided (internal politics)
- Predict competitor moves
- Replace relationship judgment
- Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data
When to Escalate to Human
- Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
- Deals involving partnerships or M&A
- Unusual contract structures
- Competitive intelligence gathering
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "What's the single most important action for this deal?"
- "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals."
- "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?"
- "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion."
Refinement Cycle
- Initial assessment → Identify top risks
- Take action → Update activity log
- Re-score → Track improvement
- Weekly review → Trend analysis
Checklists & Templates
Deal Health Checklist
- Champion identified and engaged this week
- Economic Buyer met at least once
- Next step scheduled within 7 days
- Competition status known
- Close date validated by prospect
Risk Score Template
## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji]
### Quick Stats
- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]
### Scores
| Factor | Score | Key Issue |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Engagement | /25 | |
| Stakeholders | /25 | |
| Process | /25 | |
| Competition | /25 | |
### Top 3 Actions
1.
2.
3.
References
- Gong Deal Intelligence Research
- Winning by Design Revenue Architecture
- MEDDPICC Qualification Framework
- Force Management Command of the Message
Related Skills
pipeline-forecasting- Aggregate deal health into forecastlead-qualification-meddic- Deep qualification frameworkaccount-health- Post-sale relationship scoring
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 10 minutes per deal
- Prerequisites: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
llamaguard
AutreLlamaGuard est le modèle de Meta, doté de 7 à 8 milliards de paramètres, conçu pour modérer les entrées et sorties des LLM selon six catégories de sécurité comme la violence et les discours haineux. Il offre une précision de 94 à 95 % et peut être déployé avec vLLM, Hugging Face ou Amazon SageMaker. Utilisez cette compétence pour intégrer facilement le filtrage de contenu et des garde-fous de sécurité dans vos applications d'IA.
cost-optimization
AutreCette compétence de Claude aide les développeurs à optimiser les coûts du cloud grâce au redimensionnement des ressources, aux stratégies d'étiquetage et à l'analyse des dépenses. Elle fournit un cadre pour réduire les dépenses cloud et mettre en œuvre une gouvernance des coûts sur AWS, Azure et GCP. Utilisez-la lorsque vous devez analyser les coûts d'infrastructure, redimensionner les ressources ou respecter des contraintes budgétaires.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
AutreCette compétence quantifie les LLMs en précision 8 bits ou 4 bits à l'aide de bitsandbytes, permettant une réduction de 50 à 75 % de la mémoire utilisée avec une perte de précision minime. Elle est idéale pour exécuter des modèles plus volumineux sur une mémoire GPU limitée ou pour accélérer l'inférence, prenant en charge des formats comme INT8, NF4 et FP4. La compétence s'intègre à HuggingFace Transformers et permet l'entraînement QLoRA ainsi que l'utilisation d'optimiseurs en 8 bits.
dispatching-parallel-agents
AutreCette compétence Claude déploie plusieurs agents pour enquêter et résoudre simultanément 3 problèmes indépendants ou plus. Elle est conçue pour des scénarios impliquant des défaillances non liées qui peuvent être résolues sans état partagé ni dépendances. La capacité fondamentale est la résolution de problèmes en parallèle, en assignant un agent par domaine problématique indépendant afin de maximiser l'efficacité.
