plan-capacity
À propos
Cette compétence prévoit les besoins en ressources en utilisant des métriques historiques et des modèles de croissance comme predict_linear. Elle identifie les contraintes, calcule la marge de manœuvre et recommande des actions de mise à l'échelle pour éviter la saturation. Utilisez-la avant les pics de trafic, les lancements ou lors des revues trimestrielles lorsque la tendance d'utilisation est à la hausse.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/plan-capacityCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Plan Capacity
Forecast resource needs, prevent saturation via data-driven capacity planning.
Use When
- Before seasonal traffic spikes (holidays, sales)
- New feature launches
- Quarterly capacity reviews
- Resource util trends up
- Before budget cycles
In
- Required: Historical metrics (CPU, mem, disk, net, req/s)
- Required: Time range for trend (min 4 weeks)
- Optional: Business growth projections (user growth, launches)
- Optional: Budget constraints
Do
Step 1: Collect Historical Metrics
Query Prometheus for key resources:
# CPU usage trend over 8 weeks
avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)
# Memory usage trend
avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) by (instance)
# Disk usage growth
avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes) by (instance, device)
# Request rate growth
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)
# Database connection pool usage
avg(db_connection_pool_used / db_connection_pool_max) by (instance)
Export → analyze:
# Export 8 weeks of CPU data
curl -G 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query_range' \
--data-urlencode 'query=avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)' \
--data-urlencode 'start=2024-12-15T00:00:00Z' \
--data-urlencode 'end=2025-02-09T00:00:00Z' \
--data-urlencode 'step=1h' | jq '.data.result' > cpu_8weeks.json
→ Clean time series per resource, no big gaps.
If err: missing data → forecast accuracy down. Check metric retention + scrape intervals.
Step 2: Calc Growth w/ predict_linear
Prometheus predict_linear() → forecast saturation:
# Predict when CPU will hit 80% (4 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:],
4*7*24*3600 # 4 weeks in seconds
) > 0.80
# Predict disk full date (8 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:],
8*7*24*3600
) > 0.95 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)
# Predict memory pressure (2 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes)[8w:],
2*7*24*3600
) / avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) > 0.90
# Predict request rate capacity breach (4 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))[8w:],
4*7*24*3600
) > 10000 # known capacity limit
Forecast dashboard:
{
"dashboard": {
"title": "Capacity Forecast",
"panels": [
{
"title": "CPU Saturation Forecast (4 weeks)",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "predict_linear(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!=\"idle\"}[5m]))[8w:], 4*7*24*3600)",
"legendFormat": "Predicted CPU"
},
{
"expr": "0.80",
"legendFormat": "Target Threshold (80%)"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Disk Full Date",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "(avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes) - predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 8*7*24*3600)) / avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)",
"legendFormat": "Predicted Usage %"
}
]
}
]
}
}
→ Clear viz → when resources breach thresholds.
If err: predictions wrong (negative, wild swings) → check:
- Insufficient history (need 4+ weeks)
- Step spikes (deploys, migrations) distorting trend
- Seasonal patterns not in linear model
Step 3: Calc Current Headroom
Safety margin before saturation:
# CPU headroom (percentage remaining before 80% threshold)
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 * 100
# Memory headroom (bytes remaining before 90% usage)
avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) - (avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) * 0.10)
# Request rate headroom (requests/sec before saturation)
10000 - sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
# Time until saturation (weeks until CPU hits 80%)
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) /
deriv(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:]) /
(7*24*3600)
Headroom summary report:
cat > capacity_headroom.md <<'EOF'
# Capacity Headroom Report (2025-02-09)
## Current Utilization
- **CPU**: 45% average (target: <80%)
- **Memory**: 62% (target: <90%)
- **Disk**: 71% (target: <95%)
- **Request Rate**: 4,200 req/s (capacity: 10,000)
## Headroom Analysis
- **CPU**: 35% headroom → ~12 weeks until saturation
- **Memory**: 28% headroom → ~16 weeks until saturation
- **Disk**: 24% headroom → ~8 weeks until full
- **Request Rate**: 5,800 req/s headroom → ~20 weeks until capacity
## Priority Actions
1. **Disk**: Implement log rotation or expand volume within 4 weeks
2. **CPU**: Plan horizontal scaling in next quarter
3. **Memory**: Monitor but no immediate action needed
EOF
→ Quantified headroom per resource w/ time-to-saturation.
If err: headroom already negative → reactive mode. Immediate scaling needed.
Step 4: Model Growth Scenarios
Factor in business projections:
# Example Python script for scenario modeling
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Load historical data
df = pd.read_json('cpu_8weeks.json')
# Calculate weekly growth rate
growth_rate_weekly = df['value'].pct_change(periods=7).mean()
# Scenario 1: Current trend
weeks_ahead = 12
current_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead
# Scenario 2: 2x user growth (marketing campaign)
accelerated_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly * 2) ** weeks_ahead
# Scenario 3: New feature launch (+30% baseline)
feature_launch = (df['value'].iloc[-1] * 1.30) * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead
print(f"Current Trend (12 weeks): {current_trend:.1%} CPU")
print(f"2x Growth Scenario: {accelerated_trend:.1%} CPU")
print(f"Feature Launch Scenario: {feature_launch:.1%} CPU")
print(f"Threshold: 80%")
→ Multiple scenarios → impact of business changes on capacity.
If err: scenarios exceed capacity → prioritize scaling before event.
Step 5: Generate Scaling Recommendations
Actionable recs:
## Capacity Scaling Plan
### Immediate Actions (Next 4 Weeks)
1. **Disk Expansion** [Priority: HIGH]
- Current: 500GB, 71% used
- Projected full date: 2025-04-01 (8 weeks)
- Action: Expand to 1TB by 2025-03-15
- Cost: $50/month additional
- Justification: 5 weeks lead time needed
2. **Log Rotation Policy** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: Logs retained 90 days
- Action: Reduce to 30 days, archive to S3
- Savings: ~150GB disk space
- Cost: $5/month S3 storage
### Near-Term Actions (Next Quarter)
3. **Horizontal Scaling - API Tier** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: 4 instances, 45% CPU
- Projected: 65% CPU by 2025-05-01
- Action: Add 2 instances (to 6 total)
- Cost: $400/month
- Trigger: When CPU avg exceeds 60% for 7 days
4. **Database Connection Pool** [Priority: LOW]
- Current: 50 max connections, 40% used
- Projected: 55% by Q3
- Action: Increase to 75 in Q2
- Cost: None (configuration change)
### Long-Term Planning (Next 6 Months)
5. **Migration to Auto-Scaling** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: Manual scaling
- Action: Implement Kubernetes HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler)
- Timeline: Q3 2025
- Benefit: Automatic response to load spikes
→ Prioritized list w/ costs, timelines, trigger conditions.
If err: recs rejected on cost → revisit thresholds or accept risk.
Step 6: Set Up Capacity Alerts
Alerts on low headroom:
# capacity_alerts.yml
groups:
- name: capacity
interval: 1h
rules:
- alert: CPUCapacityLow
expr: |
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 < 0.20
for: 24h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "CPU headroom below 20%"
description: "Current CPU headroom: {{ $value | humanizePercentage }}. Scaling needed within 4 weeks."
- alert: DiskFillForecast
expr: |
predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 4*7*24*3600) < 0.10 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)
for: 1h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Disk projected to fill within 4 weeks"
description: "Expand disk volume soon."
- alert: MemoryCapacityLow
expr: |
avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) < 0.15 * avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes)
for: 6h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Memory headroom below 15%"
→ Alerts fire before saturation → time to scale proactively.
If err: alerts fire too often (alert fatigue) or too late (reactive) → tune thresholds.
Check
- Historical metrics ≥ 8 weeks
-
predict_linear()returns sensible forecasts (no negatives) - Headroom calc'd for all critical resources
- Scenarios include business projections
- Scaling recs have costs + timelines
- Capacity alerts configured + tested
- Report reviewed w/ eng leadership + finance
Traps
- Insufficient history: Linear predictions need 4+ weeks. Less → unreliable.
- Ignore step changes: Deploys, migrations, launches → spikes distort trends. Filter or annotate.
- Linear assumption: Not all growth linear. Exponential (viral) needs other models.
- Forget lead time: Cloud provision fast, but procurement, budgets, migrations take weeks. Plan early.
- No budget alignment: Planning w/o budget buy-in → last-min scramble. Involve finance early.
→
setup-prometheus-monitoring— collect metrics used for capacity planningbuild-grafana-dashboards— viz forecasts + headroomoptimize-cloud-costs— balance capacity vs cost
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
executing-plans
DesignUtilisez la compétence executing-plans lorsque vous disposez d'un plan de mise en œuvre complet à exécuter par lots contrôlés avec des points de contrôle de revue. Elle charge et examine le plan de manière critique, puis exécute les tâches par petits lots (3 tâches par défaut) tout en rapportant la progression entre chaque lot pour une revue par l'architecte. Cela garantit une mise en œuvre systématique avec des points de contrôle de qualité intégrés.
requesting-code-review
DesignCette compétence délègue un sous-agent réviseur de code pour analyser les modifications apportées au code par rapport aux exigences avant de poursuivre. Elle doit être utilisée après avoir terminé des tâches, implémenté des fonctionnalités majeures, ou avant une fusion vers la branche principale. La revue aide à détecter précocement les problèmes en comparant l'implémentation actuelle avec le plan initial.
connect-mcp-server
DesignCette compétence fournit un guide complet permettant aux développeurs de connecter des serveurs MCP à Claude Code via les transports HTTP, stdio ou SSE. Elle couvre l'installation, la configuration, l'authentification et la sécurité pour intégrer des services externes tels que GitHub, Notion et des API personnalisées. Utilisez-la lors de la configuration d'intégrations MCP, de la configuration d'outils externes ou du travail avec le Protocole de Contexte de Modèle de Claude.
web-cli-teleport
DesignCette compétence aide les développeurs à choisir entre les interfaces Web et CLI de Claude Code en fonction de l'analyse des tâches, puis permet une téléportation transparente des sessions entre ces environnements. Elle optimise le flux de travail en gérant l'état et le contexte de la session lors du passage entre le web, la CLI ou le mobile. Utilisez-la pour des projets complexes nécessitant différents outils à diverses étapes.
