analyze-prime-numbers
À propos
Cette compétence fournit des algorithmes pour l'analyse des nombres premiers, incluant les tests de primalité, la factorisation et les calculs de distribution. Elle met en œuvre des méthodes comme Miller-Rabin, la division par essais et le crible d'Ératosthène pour des tâches de théorie des nombres computationnelle. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin de vérifier des nombres premiers, de trouver des facteurs premiers ou de générer des listes de nombres premiers dans le cadre de preuves ou d'applications.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/analyze-prime-numbersCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Analyze Prime Numbers
Select + apply right algo: primality, factorization, distribution. Verify computationally + relate to Prime Number Theorem.
Use When
- Int prime or composite?
- Complete prime factorization
- Count/list primes up to bound
- Verify PNT approx for range
- Investigate prime props in number-theoretic proof/compute
In
- Required: Int(s) to analyze, or bound for distribution
- Required: Task — primality, factorization, distribution
- Optional: Preferred algo (trial div, Miller-Rabin, Sieve Eratosthenes, Pollard's rho)
- Optional: Formal proof or computational verdict
- Optional: Out format (factor tree, prime list, count, table)
Do
Step 1: Determine Task
Classify → 1 of 3 + select algo path:
- Primality: Int n, prime?
- Factorization: Composite n, complete prime factorization
- Distribution: Bound N, analyze primes ≤ N (count, list, gaps, density)
Record task + in values.
→ Clear classification + in values recorded.
If err: Ambiguous ("analyze 60") → ask clarify primality vs factorization vs distribution. Default factorization for composites + primality confirm suspected primes.
Step 2: Primality Testing (if task = primality)
Test n prime, algo matched to size:
-
Trivial: n < 2 not prime. n = 2 or 3 prime. n even + n > 2 → composite.
-
Small n (<10^6): Trial division.
- Test div all primes p ≤ floor(sqrt(n)).
- Opt: test 2, then odd 3, 5, 7, ... or 6k +/- 1 wheel.
- No divisor → prime.
-
Large n (>=10^6): Miller-Rabin probabilistic.
- n - 1 = 2^s * d, d odd.
- Per witness a in {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37}:
- Compute x = a^d mod n.
- x = 1 or x = n - 1 → pass.
- Else square x up to s - 1 times. x = n - 1 ever → pass.
- No pass → composite (a = witness).
- n < 3.317 * 10^24 → witnesses give deterministic result.
-
Record verdict: prime or composite + witness/cert.
Small primes (1st 25):
| Index | Prime | Index | Prime | Index | Prime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 10 | 29 | 19 | 67 |
| 2 | 3 | 11 | 31 | 20 | 71 |
| 3 | 5 | 12 | 37 | 21 | 73 |
| 4 | 7 | 13 | 41 | 22 | 79 |
| 5 | 11 | 14 | 43 | 23 | 83 |
| 6 | 13 | 15 | 47 | 24 | 89 |
| 7 | 17 | 16 | 53 | 25 | 97 |
| 8 | 19 | 17 | 59 | ||
| 9 | 23 | 18 | 61 |
→ Definitive (prime/composite) + algo used + witnesses/divisors.
If err: Miller-Rabin "probably prime" + certainty needed → escalate deterministic (AKS or ECPP). Trial div too slow → Miller-Rabin.
Step 3: Factorization (if task = factorization)
Factor n completely → prime power decomposition:
-
Extract small factors by trial div:
- Divide 2 as many times as possible, record exponent.
- Divide odd primes 3, 5, 7, 11, ... up to cutoff (10^4 or sqrt(n) if small).
- After each div, update n → cofactor.
-
Cofactor > 1 + <10^12: Continue trial div ≤ sqrt(cofactor).
-
Cofactor >= 10^12: Pollard's rho.
- f(x) = x^2 + c (mod n), random c.
- Floyd cycle: x = f(x), y = f(f(y)).
- d = gcd(|x - y|, n) each step.
- 1 < d < n → non-trivial factor. Recurse d + n/d.
- d = n → retry diff c.
-
Verify: Multiply all prime factors + exponents = original n. Test each factor primality.
-
Present: n = p1^a1 * p2^a2 * ... * pk^ak, p1 < p2 < ... < pk.
Algo complexity:
| Algo | Complexity | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Trial division | O(sqrt(n)) | n < 10^12 |
| Pollard's rho | O(n^{1/4}) expected | n up to ~10^18 |
| Quadratic sieve | L(n)^{1+o(1)} | n up to ~10^50 |
| GNFS | L(n)^{(64/9)^{1/3}+o(1)} | n > 10^50 |
→ Complete prime factorization canonical form + multiplication verified.
If err: Pollard's rho fails after many iters (cycle w/o non-trivial gcd) → try diff c (≥5 attempts). All fail → cofactor may be prime → confirm primality.
Step 4: Distribution Analysis (if task = distribution)
Distribution of primes up to N:
-
Generate via Sieve Eratosthenes:
- Bool array size N + 1, true.
- Set 0 + 1 false (not prime).
- Per p from 2 to floor(sqrt(N)):
- Still true → mark multiples p^2, p^2 + p, p^2 + 2p, ... false.
- Collect indices still true.
-
Count: pi(N) = primes up to N.
-
Compare w/ PNT:
- PNT approx: pi(N) ~ N / ln(N).
- Logarithmic integral: Li(N) = integral 2 to N of 1/ln(t) dt.
- Relative err: |pi(N) - N/ln(N)| / pi(N).
-
Analyze gaps (optional):
- Gaps between consecutive primes.
- Max gap, avg gap, twin primes (gap = 2).
- Avg gap near N ~ ln(N).
-
Present summary:
Bound N: 1,000,000
pi(N): 78,498
N/ln(N): 72,382
Li(N): 78,628
Relative error (N/ln(N)): 7.79%
Relative error (Li(N)): 0.17%
Max prime gap: 148 (between 492113 and 492227)
Twin primes: 8,169 pairs
→ Count + PNT compare + optional gap analysis.
If err: N too large in-mem sieve (N > 10^9) → segmented sieve processes range in blocks. Count only (no list) → Meissel-Lehmer for pi(N) direct.
Step 5: Verify Computationally
Cross-check via independent method:
-
Primality: Trial div used → verify quick Miller-Rabin (or vice versa). Known primes → check published tables or OEIS.
-
Factorization: Multiply factors + confirm = original. Independently test each claimed prime.
-
Distribution: Spot-check 3-5 numbers from sieve out for primality. Compare pi(N) published values (pi(10^k) k = 1, ..., 9).
Published pi(N):
| N | pi(N) |
|---|---|
| 10 | 4 |
| 100 | 25 |
| 1,000 | 168 |
| 10,000 | 1,229 |
| 100,000 | 9,592 |
| 10^6 | 78,498 |
| 10^7 | 664,579 |
| 10^8 | 5,761,455 |
| 10^9 | 50,847,534 |
- Doc verification + method + outcome.
→ All results independently verified no discrepancies.
If err: Verification → discrepancy → re-run w/ extra checks (verbose trial div logging). Common: off-by-one sieve bounds, int overflow modular arithmetic, pseudoprime mistaken prime.
Check
- Task correctly classified (primality, factorization, distribution)
- Algo appropriate for in size
- Trivial cases (n < 2, n = 2, even n) handled pre-general
- Primality verdicts definitive (not "probably prime" unqualified)
- Factorizations multiply back to original
- Every claimed prime factor tested primality
- Sieve bounds include sqrt(N) coverage
- PNT compare uses correct formula (N/ln(N) or Li(N))
- Results verified by independent method or published values
- Edge cases (n = 0, 1, 2, neg) addressed
Traps
-
Forget n = 1 not prime: Convention — 1 neither prime nor composite. Many algos silently misclassify.
-
Int overflow modular exp: Computing a^d mod n for Miller-Rabin, naive exp overflows. Use modular exp (repeated squaring + mod each step).
-
Sieve off-by-one: Mark composites starting p^2, not 2p. 2p wastes time but correct; p+1 wrong.
-
Pollard's rho cycle w/ d = n: gcd(|x - y|, n) = n → algo found trivial factor. Retry diff c not just starting pt.
-
Carmichael nums fooling Fermat: Nums like 561 = 3 * 11 * 17 pass Fermat primality all coprime bases. Always Miller-Rabin, not plain Fermat.
-
Confuse pi(n) w/ constant pi: Prime counting fn pi(n) + circle constant 3.14159 share notation. Ctx unambiguous.
→
solve-modular-arithmetic— underpins Miller-Rabin + factorizationexplore-diophantine-equations— factorization prereq for solving manyformulate-quantum-problem— Shor's algo for factorization connects primes → quantum
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
evaluating-llms-harness
TestsCette compétence Claude exécute le lm-evaluation-harness pour évaluer les modèles de langage sur plus de 60 tâches académiques standardisées telles que MMLU et GSM8K. Elle est conçue pour permettre aux développeurs de comparer la qualité des modèles, de suivre les progrès de l'entraînement ou de rapporter des résultats académiques. L'outil prend en charge différents backends, incluant les modèles HuggingFace et vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestsCette compétence fournit une connaissance complète pour la mise en œuvre de Déclencheurs Cron Cloudflare afin de planifier des Workers à l'aide d'expressions cron. Elle couvre la configuration de tâches périodiques, de travaux de maintenance et de flux de travail automatisés, tout en traitant des problèmes courants tels que les expressions cron non valides et les problèmes de fuseau horaire. Les développeurs peuvent l'utiliser pour configurer des gestionnaires planifiés, tester des déclencheurs cron et intégrer avec Workflows et Green Compute.
webapp-testing
TestsCette Compétence Claude fournit une boîte à outils basée sur Playwright pour tester des applications web locales via des scripts Python. Elle permet la vérification frontend, le débogage d'interface utilisateur, la capture d'écrans et la consultation des journaux, tout en gérant les cycles de vie du serveur. Utilisez-la pour les tâches d'automatisation de navigateur, mais exécutez les scripts directement plutôt que de lire leur code source pour éviter la pollution du contexte.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestsCette compétence aide les développeurs à finaliser leur travail en vérifiant que les tests passent, puis en présentant des options d'intégration structurées. Elle guide le processus de fusion, de création de PRs ou de nettoyage des branches une fois l'implémentation terminée. Utilisez-la lorsque votre code est prêt et testé pour finaliser systématiquement le cycle de développement.
