pipeline-forecasting
À propos
La compétence de prévision de pipeline génère des prévisions de revenus fondées sur les données, avec intervalles de confiance et modélisation de scénarios pour la planification. Elle est utilisée pour les revues de pipeline, les projections pour le conseil d'administration et la planification des quotas, en appliquant une analyse pondérée du pipeline et des taux de conversion historiques. Les développeurs peuvent l'utiliser pour élaborer des prévisions basées sur des méthodologies telles que Revenue Operations de Clari et le B2B Revenue Waterfall de Forrester.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/pipeline-forecastingCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Pipeline Forecasting
Build accurate, data-driven revenue forecasts using historical conversion rates, deal velocity, and confidence-weighted projections.
When to Use This Skill
- Weekly/monthly pipeline reviews with leadership
- Board meeting revenue projections
- Quota setting and territory planning
- Identifying gaps between forecast and target
- Scenario planning for best/worst/likely outcomes
Methodology Foundation
Based on Clari's Revenue Operations methodology and Forrester's B2B Revenue Waterfall, combining:
- Weighted pipeline (probability × value)
- Historical stage conversion rates
- Deal velocity analysis
- Commit vs. upside categorization
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Calculates weighted pipeline by stage | Which deals to include/exclude |
| Applies historical conversion rates | Override factors for specific deals |
| Generates confidence intervals | Final commit number to leadership |
| Identifies forecast risks | Actions to close gaps |
| Models best/worst/likely scenarios | Which scenario to plan against |
What This Skill Does
- Ingests pipeline data - Current opportunities with stage, value, close date
- Applies conversion math - Historical win rates by stage, segment, rep
- Calculates weighted forecast - Probability-adjusted revenue projection
- Generates scenarios - Best case, commit, worst case with confidence bands
- Identifies risks - Deals pushing, pipeline gaps, coverage ratios
How to Use
I need a pipeline forecast for Q1. Here's our current pipeline:
[Paste pipeline data: Deal name, Stage, Value, Close Date, Rep]
Historical context:
- Average win rate: 25%
- Stage 3→Close rate: 45%
- Stage 4→Close rate: 70%
- Average sales cycle: 45 days
Target: $2.5M for Q1
Instructions
Step 1: Pipeline Categorization
Segment deals into:
- Commit - High confidence (Stage 4+, verbal commit)
- Best Case - Medium confidence (Stage 3, engaged)
- Upside - Low confidence (Stage 1-2, early)
Step 2: Weighted Calculation
Weighted Value = Deal Value × Stage Probability × Rep Factor
Stage Probabilities (adjust to your data):
- Stage 1 (Discovery): 10%
- Stage 2 (Qualification): 20%
- Stage 3 (Proposal): 40%
- Stage 4 (Negotiation): 70%
- Stage 5 (Verbal): 90%
Step 3: Coverage Analysis
Pipeline Coverage = Total Pipeline ÷ Target
- Healthy: 3-4x coverage
- At Risk: 2-3x coverage
- Critical: <2x coverage
Step 4: Scenario Modeling
- Worst Case: Commit only (90%+ probability deals)
- Likely Case: Commit + 50% of Best Case
- Best Case: Commit + Best Case + 25% of Upside
Step 5: Risk Identification
Flag deals with:
- Close date in past (needs update)
- No activity in 14+ days (stalled)
- Pushing from previous quarter (slip risk)
- Missing key fields (data quality)
Examples
Example 1: Quarterly Forecast
Input:
Pipeline for Q1:
- Acme Corp: Stage 4, $150K, Jan 30, Rep: Sarah
- Beta Inc: Stage 3, $80K, Feb 15, Rep: Mike
- Gamma Ltd: Stage 2, $200K, Mar 1, Rep: Sarah
- Delta Co: Stage 4, $120K, Feb 28, Rep: Lisa
- Echo Systems: Stage 1, $500K, Mar 15, Rep: Mike
Target: $400K
Output:
## Q1 Pipeline Forecast
### Weighted Pipeline
| Deal | Stage | Value | Probability | Weighted |
|------|-------|-------|-------------|----------|
| Acme Corp | 4 | $150K | 70% | $105K |
| Delta Co | 4 | $120K | 70% | $84K |
| Beta Inc | 3 | $80K | 40% | $32K |
| Gamma Ltd | 2 | $200K | 20% | $40K |
| Echo Systems | 1 | $500K | 10% | $50K |
| **Total** | | **$1.05M** | | **$311K** |
### Scenario Analysis
- **Worst Case (Commit)**: $189K (Acme + Delta at 70%)
- **Likely Case**: $245K (Commit + 50% Best Case)
- **Best Case**: $361K (All weighted)
### Coverage Ratio
- Pipeline: $1.05M
- Target: $400K
- Coverage: 2.6x ⚠️ (At Risk - need 3x+)
### Risks Identified
1. ⚠️ Echo Systems ($500K) is Stage 1 with Mar close - unlikely
2. ⚠️ Gap of $155K between Likely ($245K) and Target ($400K)
### Recommendations
1. Pressure test Acme and Delta for verbal commits
2. Accelerate Beta Inc to Stage 4 this week
3. Add $200K+ new pipeline to reach 3x coverage
Example 2: Monthly Roll-Up
Input:
January pipeline by rep:
Sarah: $450K weighted, $280K commit
Mike: $320K weighted, $150K commit
Lisa: $280K weighted, $200K commit
Team target: $500K
Output:
## January Team Forecast
| Rep | Weighted | Commit | % to Target |
|-----|----------|--------|-------------|
| Sarah | $450K | $280K | 56% |
| Mike | $320K | $150K | 30% |
| Lisa | $280K | $200K | 40% |
| **Team** | **$1.05M** | **$630K** | **126%** |
### Forecast Summary
- **Team Commit**: $630K (126% of $500K target) ✅
- **Confidence**: HIGH - commit exceeds target
### Risk Watch
- Mike at 30% commit coverage - needs deal acceleration
- Sarah carrying most weight - concentration risk
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Mathematical pipeline calculations
- Scenario modeling with clear assumptions
- Identifying data quality issues
- Coverage ratio analysis
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Predict which specific deals will close (human judgment)
- Account for market changes or competitive moves
- Replace rep-level deal knowledge
- Guarantee forecast accuracy
When to Escalate to Human
- Deals with unusual circumstances (M&A, champion left)
- Market disruptions affecting close rates
- Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
- Final commit numbers for board/investors
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "What if we lose the top 2 deals? Show me that scenario."
- "Apply a 20% haircut to all Stage 2 deals and recalculate."
- "Which deals have the highest impact on our forecast?"
- "Show me the gap between forecast and target by month."
Refinement Cycle
- Generate initial forecast → Review with reps
- Update deal probabilities based on rep input
- Re-run forecast with adjusted assumptions
- Lock commit number, track weekly variance
Checklists & Templates
Weekly Forecast Review Checklist
- All deals have current close dates
- Stage progression updated this week
- Commit deals have next steps scheduled
- Risks flagged and mitigation assigned
- Coverage ratio calculated
Forecast Template
## [Period] Revenue Forecast
**Generated:** [Date]
**Pipeline Cutoff:** [Date]
### Summary
- Target: $X
- Commit: $X (X% of target)
- Best Case: $X
- Coverage: Xx
### By Segment
[Table]
### Risks & Mitigations
[List]
### Actions This Week
[List]
References
- Clari Revenue Operations Playbook
- Forrester B2B Revenue Waterfall Model
- MEDDICC Deal Qualification Framework
- Gartner Sales Forecasting Best Practices
Related Skills
deal-risk-scoring- Assess individual deal healthlead-scoring- Qualify top-of-funnelaccount-health- Customer retention signals
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 15-30 minutes per forecast
- Prerequisites: Pipeline data export, historical win rates
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
content-collections
MétaCette compétence propose une configuration éprouvée en production pour Content Collections, un outil axé sur TypeScript qui transforme des fichiers Markdown/MDX en collections de données typées de manière sûre avec une validation Zod. Utilisez-la lors de la création de blogs, de sites de documentation ou d'applications Vite + React riches en contenu pour garantir la sécurité de typage et la validation automatique du contenu. Elle couvre tout, de la configuration du plugin Vite et de la compilation MDX à l'optimisation des déploiements et la validation des schémas.
polymarket
MétaCette compétence permet aux développeurs de créer des applications avec la plateforme de marchés prédictifs Polymarket, incluant l'intégration d'API pour le trading et les données de marché. Elle fournit également une diffusion de données en temps réel via WebSocket pour surveiller les transactions en direct et l'activité du marché. Utilisez-la pour mettre en œuvre des stratégies de trading ou pour créer des outils traitant les mises à jour de marché en direct.
creating-opencode-plugins
MétaCette compétence aide les développeurs à créer des plugins OpenCode qui s'interconnectent avec plus de 25 types d'événements tels que les commandes, les fichiers et les opérations LSP. Elle fournit la structure du plugin, les spécifications de l'API événementielle et les modèles d'implémentation pour les modules JavaScript/TypeScript. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin d'intercepter, de surveiller ou d'étendre le cycle de vie de l'assistant IA OpenCode avec une logique personnalisée pilotée par les événements.
sglang
MétaSGLang est un framework de service LLM haute performance spécialisé dans la génération rapide et structurée pour les workflows JSON, regex et agentiques grâce à son cache de préfixe RadixAttention. Il offre une inférence nettement plus rapide, particulièrement pour les tâches avec des préfixes répétés, ce qui le rend idéal pour les sorties complexes et structurées ainsi que les conversations multi-tours. Choisissez SGLang plutôt que des alternatives comme vLLM lorsque vous avez besoin d'un décodage contraint ou que vous construisez des applications avec un partage étendu de préfixes.
