solve-electromagnetic-induction
À propos
Cette compétence résout les problèmes d'induction électromagnétique en appliquant la loi de Faraday, la loi de Lenz et l'analyse des circuits pour les régimes transitoires RL. Elle traite la force électromotrice induite par des champs magnétiques variables ou des conducteurs en mouvement, détermine le sens du courant et calcule l'inductance avec stockage d'énergie magnétique. Utilisez-la pour analyser l'induction dans des boucles/bobines, des scénarios de force électromotrice motrice ou le comportement des circuits RL lors de commutations.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/solve-electromagnetic-inductionCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Solve EM Induction
ID flux source → compute flux through surface → Faraday → EMF → Lenz → current direction → solve circuit eqns (RL transients + mag field energy).
Use When
- Induced EMF in loop/coil from time-varying B
- Motional EMF from conductor moving in static B
- Current direction via Lenz
- Mutual M (coupled coils) | self-L (single coil)
- RL transients (energize, de-energize, switch)
- Mag field energy | inductor energy
In
- Required: Source of changing flux (time-varying B, moving conductor, changing area)
- Required: Geometry of circuit/loop
- Required: Phys params (B mag, vel, R, L, geometry)
- Optional: Other circuit elements (R, additional L, sources)
- Optional: Initial conditions (I_0, U_0)
- Optional: Time interval
Do
Step 1: ID Flux Source
Classify mechanism producing time-varying flux:
- Changing B: B(t) varies. Loop static. (AC magnet, approaching magnet, current ramp in nearby coil)
- Changing area: A(t) varies. B may be static. (expanding/contracting loop, rotating coil in static field)
- Motional EMF: Straight conductor through static B. Flux change = conductor sweeping area.
- Combined: Both field + geometry change. Separate contributions for clarity.
Per mechanism, ID surface S bounded by loop C:
## Flux Change Classification
- **Mechanism**: [changing B / changing area / motional / combined]
- **Surface S**: [description of the surface bounded by the loop]
- **Time dependence**: [which quantities vary: B(t), A(t), v(t), theta(t)]
- **Relevant parameters**: [B magnitude, loop dimensions, velocity, angular frequency]
Got: Clear ID of why flux changes, surface to integrate, which quantities carry time dep.
If err: Ambiguous (deforming loop in non-uniform field) → decompose: field change at fixed geom + geom change in instantaneous field. Always valid.
Step 2: Calculate Magnetic Flux
Compute Phi_B = ∫ B·dA over S:
-
Uniform field, flat loop: Phi_B = B·A·cos(theta), theta = angle B vs n_hat. Most common.
-
Non-uniform: Parameterize S, eval integral:
- Coords aligned w/ surface (polar for circular loop)
- Express B(r) at each point
- Dot product B·dA = B·n_hat dA
- Integrate
-
Coupled coils (mutual M): Coil 2 linked to 1:
- B_1 (from coil 1) at coil 2 location
- Integrate B_1 over each turn of coil 2
- × N_2 → flux linkage Lambda_21 = N_2·Phi_21
- M = Lambda_21 / I_1
-
Self-L: Single coil w/ I:
- B inside from own current
- Integrate over one turn × N
- L = N·Phi/I = Lambda/I
- Known: solenoid L = mu_0·n²·A·l; toroid L = mu_0·N²·A/(2π·R)
-
Time dep: Express Phi_B(t) via time-varying quantities from Step 1.
## Flux Calculation
- **Flux expression**: Phi_B(t) = [formula]
- **Evaluation**: [analytic / numeric]
- **Flux linkage** (if multi-turn): Lambda = N * Phi_B = [formula]
- **Inductance** (if applicable): L = [value with units] or M = [value with units]
Got: Explicit Phi_B(t), correct units (Wb = T·m²), inductance in H.
If err: Integral can't be analytical (non-uniform B over non-trivial S) → numerical quadrature. Mutual M for complex geom → Neumann formula: M = (mu_0/4π)·∮∮(dl_1·dl_2)/|r_1 - r_2|.
Step 3: Faraday → EMF
Compute induced EMF from time deriv of flux:
-
Faraday: EMF = -dLambda/dt = -N·dPhi_B/dt. Negative sign = Lenz.
-
Differentiate Phi_B(t):
- B = B(t), A + theta const → EMF = -N·A·cos(theta)·dB/dt
- theta = omega·t (rotating in static B) → EMF = N·B·A·omega·sin(omega·t)
- Area changes (sliding rail) → EMF = -B·l·v (motional EMF)
- General → Leibniz integral rule
-
Motional EMF (alt): Conductor length l, vel v in B:
- Lorentz on charges: F = q(v × B)
- EMF = ∫(v × B)·dl along conductor
- Equiv to Faraday, more intuitive for moving conductors
-
Sign + magnitude check: Lab setups: mV-V. Power gen: V-kV.
## Induced EMF
- **EMF expression**: EMF(t) = [formula]
- **Peak EMF** (if AC): EMF_0 = [value with units]
- **RMS EMF** (if AC): EMF_rms = EMF_0 / sqrt(2) = [value]
- **Derivation method**: [Faraday's law / motional EMF / Leibniz rule]
Got: Explicit EMF(t), correct units (V), reasonable magnitude.
If err: Wrong units → trace flux calc; missing area factor | mixing CGS/SI. Wrong sign → re-examine surface normal vs loop direction (right-hand rule).
Step 4: Lenz → Current Direction
ID induced current direction + phys consequences:
-
Lenz: Induced current opposes the flux change that produced it. = Energy conservation.
-
Apply:
- Flux ↑ → induced current → B opposes ↑ (opposite external B through loop)
- Flux ↓ → induced current → B supports ↓ (same direction as external B)
- Right-hand rule → B direction → current direction
-
Force consequences: Induced current in external B → force:
- Eddy current braking: opposes relative motion (always decel)
- Mag levitation: repulsive supports weight (right geom)
- Lenz at mechanical level
-
Qual verify: Effects always resist change. Falling magnet through conductor tube falls slower than free fall. Generator needs mech work in → elec energy.
## Current Direction
- **Flux change**: [increasing / decreasing]
- **Induced B direction**: [opposing increase / supporting decrease]
- **Current direction**: [CW / CCW as viewed from specified direction]
- **Mechanical consequence**: [braking force / levitation / energy transfer]
Got: Clear current direction consistent w/ Lenz, phys consequence ID'd.
If err: Current amplifies flux change → surface normal | RH rule reversed. Re-examine loop convention. Current reinforcing change → violates energy conservation.
Step 5: Solve Circuit Eqn
Formulate + solve circuit eqn w/ inductance:
-
RL formation: Induced EMF drives I through R + L, KVL gives:
- Energize (switch → DC V_0): V_0 = L·dI/dt + R·I
- De-energize (source removed, loop closed): 0 = L·dI/dt + R·I
- General (time-varying EMF): EMF(t) = L·dI/dt + R·I
-
Solve 1st-order ODE:
- Energize: I(t) = (V_0/R)·[1 - exp(-t/tau)], tau = L/R
- De-energize: I(t) = I_0·exp(-t/tau)
- AC EMF = EMF_0·sin(omega·t) → phasor methods | particular + homogeneous
- Transient: ~63% final after 1·tau, ~95% after 3·tau, ~99.3% after 5·tau
-
Energy:
- Inductor: U_L = (1/2)·L·I²
- Mag field per vol: u_B = B²/(2·mu_0) vacuum, (1/2)·B·H mag materials
- R dissipation: P_R = I²·R
- Conservation: rate energy in = rate stored + rate dissipated
-
Mutual M coupling: Two coupled coils:
- V_1 = L_1·dI_1/dt + M·dI_2/dt + R_1·I_1
- V_2 = M·dI_1/dt + L_2·dI_2/dt + R_2·I_2
- Coupling k = M/sqrt(L_1·L_2), 0 ≤ k ≤ 1
- Solve coupled ODEs (matrix exp | Laplace)
-
Steady-state vs transient: AC drive → decompose transient (decaying exp) + steady-state (sinusoidal at drive freq). Report Z_L = j·omega·L + phase angle.
## Circuit Solution
- **Circuit type**: [RL energizing / de-energizing / AC driven / coupled coils]
- **Time constant**: tau = L/R = [value with units]
- **Current solution**: I(t) = [expression]
- **Energy stored**: U_L = [value at specified time]
- **Energy dissipated**: [total or rate]
- **Steady-state impedance** (if AC): Z_L = [value]
Got: Complete time-domain I solution, correct exp time constants, energy balance verified, reasonable magnitudes.
If err: Current grows unbounded → sign err in ODE (L term must oppose dI). Tau unreasonable → recheck L (Step 2) + R. Lab RL tau: μs to s.
Check
- Source of flux change clearly ID'd
- Flux integral over correct S w/ proper orientation
- Flux units Wb = T·m²
- L (self/mutual) units H, reasonable mag
- EMF units V, reasonable mag
- EMF sign consistent w/ Lenz
- Current dir via Lenz + RH rule
- RL ODE correct setup, proper signs
- tau = L/R units s, reasonable mag
- Energy balance: in = stored + dissipated
- Limits checked (t→0 init, t→∞ steady)
Traps
- Wrong sign Faraday: EMF = -dLambda/dt, NOT +. Negative = Lenz + energy conservation. Omit → current amplifies flux change → violates thermo.
- Flux vs flux linkage: Single-turn: Phi_B = Lambda. N-turn: Lambda = N·Phi_B. L = Lambda/I, NOT Phi_B/I. Missing N factor → L is N× too small.
- Surface normal inconsistency: n_hat must be RH-rule related to loop circulation. Independent → sign errs in flux + EMF.
- Ignore back-EMF (RL): Current changes in L → back-EMF opposes change. Omit from KVL → algebraic not differential → miss transient entirely.
- Instant current change: Current through ideal L can't change instant (needs ∞ V). Initial conds for RL transients must satisfy continuity across switches.
- Eddy currents bulk conductors: Faraday applies to ANY closed path in conductor, not just wire loops. Time-varying fields in bulk → distributed eddy currents → heating + shielding. Critical in transformer cores → minimize w/ lamination.
→
analyze-magnetic-field— compute B from current distributions = flux sourceformulate-maxwell-equations— generalize induction → full Maxwell + displacement currentdesign-electromagnetic-device— apply to motors, generators, transformersderive-theoretical-result— derive analytic L, EMF, transient solutions from first principles
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
executing-plans
DesignUtilisez la compétence executing-plans lorsque vous disposez d'un plan de mise en œuvre complet à exécuter par lots contrôlés avec des points de contrôle de revue. Elle charge et examine le plan de manière critique, puis exécute les tâches par petits lots (3 tâches par défaut) tout en rapportant la progression entre chaque lot pour une revue par l'architecte. Cela garantit une mise en œuvre systématique avec des points de contrôle de qualité intégrés.
requesting-code-review
DesignCette compétence délègue un sous-agent réviseur de code pour analyser les modifications apportées au code par rapport aux exigences avant de poursuivre. Elle doit être utilisée après avoir terminé des tâches, implémenté des fonctionnalités majeures, ou avant une fusion vers la branche principale. La revue aide à détecter précocement les problèmes en comparant l'implémentation actuelle avec le plan initial.
connect-mcp-server
DesignCette compétence fournit un guide complet permettant aux développeurs de connecter des serveurs MCP à Claude Code via les transports HTTP, stdio ou SSE. Elle couvre l'installation, la configuration, l'authentification et la sécurité pour intégrer des services externes tels que GitHub, Notion et des API personnalisées. Utilisez-la lors de la configuration d'intégrations MCP, de la configuration d'outils externes ou du travail avec le Protocole de Contexte de Modèle de Claude.
web-cli-teleport
DesignCette compétence aide les développeurs à choisir entre les interfaces Web et CLI de Claude Code en fonction de l'analyse des tâches, puis permet une téléportation transparente des sessions entre ces environnements. Elle optimise le flux de travail en gérant l'état et le contexte de la session lors du passage entre le web, la CLI ou le mobile. Utilisez-la pour des projets complexes nécessitant différents outils à diverses étapes.
