generate-status-report
À propos
Cette compétence génère des rapports d'état de projet complets en analysant des artefacts existants, tels que les chartes et les backlogs, pour calculer des métriques et identifier les blocages. Elle résume les progrès en utilisant des indicateurs RAG pour le calendrier, le périmètre, le budget et la qualité. Utilisez-la en fin de sprints, avant les réunions de gouvernance, ou lorsque de nouveaux risques émergent, pour tenir les parties prenantes informées.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/generate-status-reportCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Generate a Project Status Report
Make periodic status report. Analyze project artifacts, compute progress metrics, summarize accomplishments, blockers, upcoming work with RAG (Red/Amber/Green) health indicators.
When Use
- End of sprint or reporting period (weekly, biweekly, monthly)
- Stakeholder asks for project health update
- Before steering committee or governance meetings
- Project health indicators change (new blocker or risk)
- Periodic checkpoint vs charter milestones
Inputs
- Required: Reporting period (start + end date)
- Required: At least one project artifact (BACKLOG.md, SPRINT-PLAN.md, WBS.md, PROJECT-CHARTER.md)
- Optional: Previous status reports (trend comparison)
- Optional: Budget or resource tracking data
- Optional: Risk register updates
Steps
Step 1: Read Existing Artifacts
Scan project directory for PM artifacts:
- PROJECT-CHARTER.md — milestones, success criteria
- BACKLOG.md — item counts by status, burn-down data
- SPRINT-PLAN.md — sprint goal, committed items, task completion
- WBS.md — work package completion percentages
- Previous STATUS-REPORT-*.md files — trend data
Read available files. Not all will exist — adapt report to available data.
Got: At least one artifact read successful, key metrics extracted.
If fail: No artifacts exist? Report can't be generated. Create charter or backlog first with draft-project-charter or manage-backlog.
Step 2: Compute Progress Metrics
Compute metrics from available data:
Agile metrics (from BACKLOG.md / SPRINT-PLAN.md):
- Velocity: story points done this sprint
- Sprint completion: items done / items committed
- Backlog burn-down: total remaining points vs previous period
- Cycle time: average days from In Progress to Done
Classic metrics (from WBS.md):
- % complete: work packages done / total
- Schedule variance: planned milestone dates vs actual
- Effort variance: estimated effort vs actual
## Metrics
| Metric | Value | Previous | Trend |
|--------|-------|----------|-------|
| Velocity | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↑/↓/→ |
| Sprint Completion | [N]% | [N]% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Backlog Remaining | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↓ (good) |
| Schedule Variance | [+/-N days] | [+/-N days] | |
Got: 3-5 metrics computed with previous period comparison.
If fail: No historical data (first report)? Skip Previous + Trend columns. Data incomplete → note gaps in report footer with actions to establish tracking.
Step 3: Find Blockers, Risks, Issues
List active blockers + risks:
## Blockers & Risks
| ID | Type | Description | Severity | Owner | Status | Action Required |
|----|------|------------|----------|-------|--------|----------------|
| R-001 | Risk | [Description] | High | [Name] | Open | [Action] |
| B-001 | Blocker | [Description] | Critical | [Name] | Active | [Action by date] |
| I-001 | Issue | [Description] | Medium | [Name] | Investigating | [Action] |
Cross-reference vs charter risk register. Flag new risks not previously identified.
Got: All active blockers + top risks documented with owners + actions.
If fail: No blockers? State "No active blockers" — no empty section. Blocker without owner? Escalate to project manager.
Step 4: Summarize Accomplishments + Next Period Plan
Write two sections:
## Accomplishments (This Period)
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
## Planned (Next Period)
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
Got: 3-5 accomplishments with concrete evidence, 3-5 planned items for next period.
If fail: No accomplishments? Report reason (blocked, re-planning, team unavailable). Next period plan unclear → list "Planning session scheduled for [date]" as primary.
Step 5: Assign RAG + Write Report
Assess project health across four dimensions:
| Dimension | Green | Amber | Red |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | On track or ahead | 1-2 weeks behind | >2 weeks behind or milestone missed |
| Scope | No uncontrolled changes | Minor scope adjustments | Scope creep affecting deliverables |
| Budget | Within 5% of plan | 5-15% over plan | >15% over plan or untracked |
| Quality | Tests pass, criteria met | Minor quality issues | Critical defects or acceptance failures |
Write complete report:
# Status Report: [Project Name]
## Report Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
## Reporting Period: [Start] to [End]
## Document ID: SR-[PROJECT]-[YYYY-MM-DD]
### Overall Health
| Dimension | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Schedule | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Scope | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Budget | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Quality | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: overall status, key achievement, biggest risk]
### Metrics
[From Step 2]
### Accomplishments
[From Step 4]
### Blockers & Risks
[From Step 3]
### Planned Next Period
[From Step 4]
### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1 — needed by date, from whom]
---
*Report prepared by: [Name/Agent]*
Save as STATUS-REPORT-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.
Got: Complete status report saved with RAG indicators, metrics, narrative.
If fail: Data insufficient for RAG assessment? Use ⚪ (Grey) = "insufficient data", list what data needs collecting for next report.
Checks
- Status report file created with date-stamped filename
- RAG indicators assigned for all four dimensions with justification
- At least 3 metrics computed from project artifacts
- Blockers section present (even if "No active blockers")
- Accomplishments listed with evidence
- Next period plan included
- Executive summary 2-3 sentences, not paragraph
- Every blocker + risk has owner + action with deadline
Pitfalls
- Report without data: Status reports must be evidence-based. Every claim references artifact or metric.
- All green always: Persistent green RAG without evidence = not honest. Challenge green assessments.
- Blocker without owner: Every blocker needs owner + action. Unowned blockers don't resolve.
- Metric without context: "Velocity = 18" means nothing without comparison. Always include previous period or target.
- Too long: Status report scannable in 2 min. Keep to 1-2 pages.
- Missing decisions section: Project needs stakeholder decisions? Make explicit with deadlines.
- Stale data: Outdated artifacts → misleading reports. Verify artifact dates match reporting period.
- Missing trend data: First-time reports can't show trends, but subsequent reports must compare.
See Also
draft-project-charter— charter provides milestones + success criteria for status trackingmanage-backlog— backlog metrics feed status reportplan-sprint— sprint results provide velocity + completion datacreate-work-breakdown-structure— WBS completion drives classic progress metricsconduct-retrospective— status report data feeds retrospective
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
content-collections
MétaCette compétence propose une configuration éprouvée en production pour Content Collections, un outil axé sur TypeScript qui transforme des fichiers Markdown/MDX en collections de données typées de manière sûre avec une validation Zod. Utilisez-la lors de la création de blogs, de sites de documentation ou d'applications Vite + React riches en contenu pour garantir la sécurité de typage et la validation automatique du contenu. Elle couvre tout, de la configuration du plugin Vite et de la compilation MDX à l'optimisation des déploiements et la validation des schémas.
polymarket
MétaCette compétence permet aux développeurs de créer des applications avec la plateforme de marchés prédictifs Polymarket, incluant l'intégration d'API pour le trading et les données de marché. Elle fournit également une diffusion de données en temps réel via WebSocket pour surveiller les transactions en direct et l'activité du marché. Utilisez-la pour mettre en œuvre des stratégies de trading ou pour créer des outils traitant les mises à jour de marché en direct.
creating-opencode-plugins
MétaCette compétence aide les développeurs à créer des plugins OpenCode qui s'interconnectent avec plus de 25 types d'événements tels que les commandes, les fichiers et les opérations LSP. Elle fournit la structure du plugin, les spécifications de l'API événementielle et les modèles d'implémentation pour les modules JavaScript/TypeScript. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin d'intercepter, de surveiller ou d'étendre le cycle de vie de l'assistant IA OpenCode avec une logique personnalisée pilotée par les événements.
sglang
MétaSGLang est un framework de service LLM haute performance spécialisé dans la génération rapide et structurée pour les workflows JSON, regex et agentiques grâce à son cache de préfixe RadixAttention. Il offre une inférence nettement plus rapide, particulièrement pour les tâches avec des préfixes répétés, ce qui le rend idéal pour les sorties complexes et structurées ainsi que les conversations multi-tours. Choisissez SGLang plutôt que des alternatives comme vLLM lorsque vous avez besoin d'un décodage contraint ou que vous construisez des applications avec un partage étendu de préfixes.
