MCP HubMCP Hub
返回技能列表

exploratory-testing-advanced

proffesor-for-testing
更新于 Today
94 次查看
99
21
99
在 GitHub 上查看
其他exploratorysbtmrstheuristicstest-tourssession-based

关于

This skill provides advanced exploratory testing techniques for planning sessions, investigating bugs, and uncovering quality risks. It guides users through creating charters, applying RST heuristics like SFDIPOT, and executing systematic test tours. Use it when you need structured, session-based exploration to discover unknown issues in your software.

快速安装

Claude Code

推荐
插件命令推荐
/plugin add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Git 克隆备选方式
git clone https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.git ~/.claude/skills/exploratory-testing-advanced

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

技能文档

Advanced Exploratory Testing

<default_to_action> When exploring software or investigating quality risks:

  1. CREATE charter with mission, scope, and time-box (45-90 min)
  2. APPLY heuristics: SFDIPOT (quality criteria), FEW HICCUPPS (consistency oracles)
  3. EXPLORE systematically using test tours (Business District, Bad Neighborhood, Historical)
  4. DOCUMENT findings in real-time with notes, screenshots, evidence
  5. DEBRIEF: What learned? What's next? Share via agent memory

Quick Heuristic Selection:

  • What to test → SFDIPOT (Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, Time)
  • Recognize problems → FEW HICCUPPS (Familiar, Explainable, World, History, Image, Comparable, Claims, Users, Product, Purpose, Standards)
  • Navigate app → Test Tours (12 types for different exploration strategies)

Critical Success Factors:

  • Exploration is skilled, structured thinking - not random clicking
  • Document discoveries, not pre-planned test cases
  • Pair testing reveals more than solo exploration </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Investigating new or changed features
  • Finding bugs automation misses
  • Learning unfamiliar systems
  • Risk discovery before test planning

Session Structure (SBTM)

PhaseDurationActivity
Charter5 minDefine mission, scope, focus
Explore45-75 minSystematic investigation
NoteContinuousDocument findings real-time
Debrief10-15 minSummarize, prioritize, share

SFDIPOT Heuristic (What to Test)

LetterFocusExample Questions
StructureIs it properly composed?Code structure, UI layout, data schema
FunctionDoes it do what it should?Core features work correctly
DataHandles data correctly?CRUD, validation, persistence
InterfacesInteracts well?APIs, UI, integrations
PlatformWorks in environment?Browsers, OS, devices
OperationsCan be used/managed?Install, config, monitor
TimeHandles timing?Concurrency, timeouts, scheduling

FEW HICCUPPS Oracle (Recognize Problems)

Consistency WithCheck
Familiar problemsDoes this look like a known bug pattern?
ExplainableCan behavior be explained rationally?
WorldMatches real-world expectations?
HistoryConsistent with prior versions?
ImageMatches brand/product image?
ComparableSimilar to competing products?
ClaimsMatches specs/docs/marketing?
UsersMeets user expectations?
PurposeFulfills intended purpose?
StatementsMatches what devs said?

Test Tours (12 Types)

TourStrategy
Business DistrictCritical business flows
HistoricalWhere bugs clustered before
Bad NeighborhoodKnown problem areas
MoneyRevenue-impacting features
LandmarkNavigate by key features
IntellectualComplex, thinking-intensive features
FedExFollow data through system
Garbage CollectorCleanup and edge cases
MuseumHelp docs and examples
Rained-OutWhat happens when things fail?
Couch PotatoMinimal effort paths
Obsessive-CompulsiveRepetitive actions

Session Note Template

**Charter:** Explore [area] to discover [what] focusing on [heuristic]
**Time-box:** 60 min | **Tester:** [name] | **Date:** [date]

## Session Notes
- [timestamp] Observation/finding
- [timestamp] Bug: [description] - [severity]
- [timestamp] Question: [unclear behavior]

## Findings Summary
- Bugs: X (Critical: Y, Major: Z)
- Questions: X
- Ideas: X

## Coverage
- Areas explored: [list]
- Heuristics used: [SFDIPOT areas]
- % Time on: Bug investigation 30%, Exploration 50%, Setup 20%

## Next Steps
- [ ] Deep dive on [area]
- [ ] Follow up on question about [topic]

Agent-Assisted Exploration

// Collaborative exploration session
await Task("Exploratory Session", {
  charter: 'Explore checkout flow for payment edge cases',
  duration: '60min',
  heuristics: ['SFDIPOT', 'FEW_HICCUPPS'],
  tour: 'money',
  collaboration: 'human-navigator-agent-driver'
}, "qe-flaky-test-hunter");

// Agent generates test variations while human observes
await Task("Edge Case Generation", {
  area: 'payment-form',
  variations: ['boundary-values', 'invalid-inputs', 'concurrent-submits']
}, "qe-test-generator");

// Visual exploration
await Task("Visual Exploration", {
  tour: 'landmark',
  focus: 'responsive-breakpoints',
  compare: 'baseline-screenshots'
}, "qe-visual-tester");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/exploratory/
├── sessions/*           - Session notes and findings
├── charters/*           - Reusable charter templates
├── bug-clusters/*       - Historical bug patterns
└── heuristic-results/*  - What heuristics revealed

Fleet Coordination

const exploratoryFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'exploratory-testing',
  agents: [
    'qe-flaky-test-hunter',   // Pattern recognition
    'qe-visual-tester',       // Visual anomalies
    'qe-quality-analyzer'     // Risk assessment
  ],
  topology: 'mesh'
});

Pairing Patterns

PatternHuman RoleAgent Role
Driver-NavigatorNavigate strategyExecute variations
Strong-StyleDictate actionsRecord findings
Ping-PongObserve one areaExplore another

Related Skills


Remember

Exploratory testing = simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution.

Not random clicking. Structured, skilled investigation guided by heuristics and oracles. Document discoveries in real-time. Pair testing amplifies findings.

With Agents: Agents generate variations, recognize patterns, and maintain session notes while humans apply judgment and intuition. Combine agent thoroughness with human insight.

GitHub 仓库

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
路径: .claude/skills/exploratory-testing-advanced
agenticqeagenticsfoundationagentsquality-engineering

相关推荐技能

context-driven-testing

其他

这个Skill帮助开发者基于项目具体情境应用上下文驱动测试原则,而非盲目遵循通用"最佳实践"。它指导测试决策、质疑教条方法,并针对项目目标、约束和风险调整测试策略。关键特性包括分析上下文、评估实践价值,以及通过探索性测试验证软件是否真正解决问题。

查看技能

test-automation-strategy

其他

该Skill为开发者提供完整的测试自动化策略指导,涵盖测试金字塔设计、FIRST原则应用和CI/CD集成。它适用于构建新自动化框架或优化现有测试效率的场景,内置页面对象模式等最佳实践模板。通过结构化方法帮助团队建立可靠、可维护且与开发流程深度集成的自动化测试体系。

查看技能

testability-scoring

其他

该Skill基于10个内在可测试性原则,对Web应用进行AI驱动的可测试性评估。它使用Playwright并可选集成Vibium,帮助开发者评估测试就绪度、识别改进点并生成报告。适用于软件可测试性评估、测试准备度检查及生成可测试性改进建议等场景。

查看技能

shift-right-testing

其他

该Skill为开发者提供生产环境测试的标准化方法,特别适用于实施渐进式交付和可观测性场景。它通过功能开关、金丝雀发布、合成监控和混沌工程等关键能力,在真实生产环境中安全验证系统行为。开发者可依据其结构化步骤(1%→100%渐进发布、故障注入等)系统性地构建韧性并降低发布风险。

查看技能