exploratory-testing-advanced
关于
This skill provides advanced exploratory testing techniques for planning sessions, investigating bugs, and uncovering quality risks. It guides users through creating charters, applying RST heuristics like SFDIPOT, and executing systematic test tours. Use it when you need structured, session-based exploration to discover unknown issues in your software.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐/plugin add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qegit clone https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.git ~/.claude/skills/exploratory-testing-advanced在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Advanced Exploratory Testing
<default_to_action> When exploring software or investigating quality risks:
- CREATE charter with mission, scope, and time-box (45-90 min)
- APPLY heuristics: SFDIPOT (quality criteria), FEW HICCUPPS (consistency oracles)
- EXPLORE systematically using test tours (Business District, Bad Neighborhood, Historical)
- DOCUMENT findings in real-time with notes, screenshots, evidence
- DEBRIEF: What learned? What's next? Share via agent memory
Quick Heuristic Selection:
- What to test → SFDIPOT (Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, Time)
- Recognize problems → FEW HICCUPPS (Familiar, Explainable, World, History, Image, Comparable, Claims, Users, Product, Purpose, Standards)
- Navigate app → Test Tours (12 types for different exploration strategies)
Critical Success Factors:
- Exploration is skilled, structured thinking - not random clicking
- Document discoveries, not pre-planned test cases
- Pair testing reveals more than solo exploration </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Investigating new or changed features
- Finding bugs automation misses
- Learning unfamiliar systems
- Risk discovery before test planning
Session Structure (SBTM)
| Phase | Duration | Activity |
|---|---|---|
| Charter | 5 min | Define mission, scope, focus |
| Explore | 45-75 min | Systematic investigation |
| Note | Continuous | Document findings real-time |
| Debrief | 10-15 min | Summarize, prioritize, share |
SFDIPOT Heuristic (What to Test)
| Letter | Focus | Example Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Is it properly composed? | Code structure, UI layout, data schema |
| Function | Does it do what it should? | Core features work correctly |
| Data | Handles data correctly? | CRUD, validation, persistence |
| Interfaces | Interacts well? | APIs, UI, integrations |
| Platform | Works in environment? | Browsers, OS, devices |
| Operations | Can be used/managed? | Install, config, monitor |
| Time | Handles timing? | Concurrency, timeouts, scheduling |
FEW HICCUPPS Oracle (Recognize Problems)
| Consistency With | Check |
|---|---|
| Familiar problems | Does this look like a known bug pattern? |
| Explainable | Can behavior be explained rationally? |
| World | Matches real-world expectations? |
| History | Consistent with prior versions? |
| Image | Matches brand/product image? |
| Comparable | Similar to competing products? |
| Claims | Matches specs/docs/marketing? |
| Users | Meets user expectations? |
| Purpose | Fulfills intended purpose? |
| Statements | Matches what devs said? |
Test Tours (12 Types)
| Tour | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Business District | Critical business flows |
| Historical | Where bugs clustered before |
| Bad Neighborhood | Known problem areas |
| Money | Revenue-impacting features |
| Landmark | Navigate by key features |
| Intellectual | Complex, thinking-intensive features |
| FedEx | Follow data through system |
| Garbage Collector | Cleanup and edge cases |
| Museum | Help docs and examples |
| Rained-Out | What happens when things fail? |
| Couch Potato | Minimal effort paths |
| Obsessive-Compulsive | Repetitive actions |
Session Note Template
**Charter:** Explore [area] to discover [what] focusing on [heuristic]
**Time-box:** 60 min | **Tester:** [name] | **Date:** [date]
## Session Notes
- [timestamp] Observation/finding
- [timestamp] Bug: [description] - [severity]
- [timestamp] Question: [unclear behavior]
## Findings Summary
- Bugs: X (Critical: Y, Major: Z)
- Questions: X
- Ideas: X
## Coverage
- Areas explored: [list]
- Heuristics used: [SFDIPOT areas]
- % Time on: Bug investigation 30%, Exploration 50%, Setup 20%
## Next Steps
- [ ] Deep dive on [area]
- [ ] Follow up on question about [topic]
Agent-Assisted Exploration
// Collaborative exploration session
await Task("Exploratory Session", {
charter: 'Explore checkout flow for payment edge cases',
duration: '60min',
heuristics: ['SFDIPOT', 'FEW_HICCUPPS'],
tour: 'money',
collaboration: 'human-navigator-agent-driver'
}, "qe-flaky-test-hunter");
// Agent generates test variations while human observes
await Task("Edge Case Generation", {
area: 'payment-form',
variations: ['boundary-values', 'invalid-inputs', 'concurrent-submits']
}, "qe-test-generator");
// Visual exploration
await Task("Visual Exploration", {
tour: 'landmark',
focus: 'responsive-breakpoints',
compare: 'baseline-screenshots'
}, "qe-visual-tester");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/exploratory/
├── sessions/* - Session notes and findings
├── charters/* - Reusable charter templates
├── bug-clusters/* - Historical bug patterns
└── heuristic-results/* - What heuristics revealed
Fleet Coordination
const exploratoryFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'exploratory-testing',
agents: [
'qe-flaky-test-hunter', // Pattern recognition
'qe-visual-tester', // Visual anomalies
'qe-quality-analyzer' // Risk assessment
],
topology: 'mesh'
});
Pairing Patterns
| Pattern | Human Role | Agent Role |
|---|---|---|
| Driver-Navigator | Navigate strategy | Execute variations |
| Strong-Style | Dictate actions | Record findings |
| Ping-Pong | Observe one area | Explore another |
Related Skills
- context-driven-testing - RST foundations
- risk-based-testing - Focus exploration on risk
- agentic-quality-engineering - Agent coordination
Remember
Exploratory testing = simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution.
Not random clicking. Structured, skilled investigation guided by heuristics and oracles. Document discoveries in real-time. Pair testing amplifies findings.
With Agents: Agents generate variations, recognize patterns, and maintain session notes while humans apply judgment and intuition. Combine agent thoroughness with human insight.
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
context-driven-testing
其他这个Skill帮助开发者基于项目具体情境应用上下文驱动测试原则,而非盲目遵循通用"最佳实践"。它指导测试决策、质疑教条方法,并针对项目目标、约束和风险调整测试策略。关键特性包括分析上下文、评估实践价值,以及通过探索性测试验证软件是否真正解决问题。
test-automation-strategy
其他该Skill为开发者提供完整的测试自动化策略指导,涵盖测试金字塔设计、FIRST原则应用和CI/CD集成。它适用于构建新自动化框架或优化现有测试效率的场景,内置页面对象模式等最佳实践模板。通过结构化方法帮助团队建立可靠、可维护且与开发流程深度集成的自动化测试体系。
testability-scoring
其他该Skill基于10个内在可测试性原则,对Web应用进行AI驱动的可测试性评估。它使用Playwright并可选集成Vibium,帮助开发者评估测试就绪度、识别改进点并生成报告。适用于软件可测试性评估、测试准备度检查及生成可测试性改进建议等场景。
shift-right-testing
其他该Skill为开发者提供生产环境测试的标准化方法,特别适用于实施渐进式交付和可观测性场景。它通过功能开关、金丝雀发布、合成监控和混沌工程等关键能力,在真实生产环境中安全验证系统行为。开发者可依据其结构化步骤(1%→100%渐进发布、故障注入等)系统性地构建韧性并降低发布风险。
