关于
The Shiva Bhaga skill helps developers clear context by identifying and intentionally dismantling stale patterns, outdated assumptions, and dead-code noise. It is designed for use when accumulated context has become cluttered or a major pivot requires a clean slate. This controlled dissolution creates space for new, more effective approaches.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/shiva-bhaga在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Shiva Bhaga
Controlled destruction + dissolution → stale patterns, outdated assumptions, accumulated noise. Clears ground for new growth.
Use When
- Ctx accumulated stale assumptions silently distorting reasoning
- Prev approach failed → temptation = patch not discard
- Conv long → earlier decisions don't serve current goal
- Dead code, abandoned plans, zombie tasks → noise + confusion
- Before major pivot → clearing precedes creation
- Attachment to approach blocks alternatives
In
- Required: Current conv state | proj ctx (implicit)
- Optional: Specific dissolution target (e.g., "this approach not working", "clear all DB layer assumptions")
- Optional: Scope boundary — what survives destruction
Do
Step 1: ID What Must End
Survey current state, mark stale, broken, no longer serving.
Dissolution Triage:
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Category | Symptoms | Action |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Stale Assumptions | Decisions made early that | List and re-evaluate |
| | no longer match current | each against current |
| | understanding | reality |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Failed Approaches | Approaches attempted and | Acknowledge failure |
| | abandoned but still | explicitly; release |
| | influencing thinking | the sunk cost |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Accumulated Noise | Context, variables, or | Identify and mark for |
| | plans that are no longer | removal |
| | referenced or relevant | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Attachment Points | "We already decided..." | Question whether the |
| | beliefs that resist | decision still holds |
| | re-examination | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Zombie Artifacts | Code, tasks, or plans | Delete or archive; |
| | that exist but serve no | do not leave in limbo |
| | current purpose | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
- Scan each category honest — resistance to examining = signal
- Each item: "If starting fresh now, would I create this?"
- No → mark for dissolution
Got: Clear inventory of release targets, specific items per category.
If err: Nothing stale → assess too shallow. Pick oldest decision, justify from scratch — forced justification = dissolution candidate.
Step 2: Preservation Boundary
Not everything destroyed. ID what survives.
- Core reqs: What user actually asked → survives.
- Verified knowledge: Facts confirmed via tools (file reads, test results) → survives.
- User prefs: Explicit prefs + constraints → survive.
- Working components: Demonstrably functioning code/approaches → survive.
Draw boundary: inside = preserved, outside = subject to dissolution.
Got: Clear distinction kept vs released.
If err: Boundary unclear → "What would I need to reconstruct if starting from scratch?" → answer = boundary.
Step 3: Dissolve w/ Intention
Execute dissolution → not abandonment, intentional clearing.
- Each marked item, release explicit:
- Stale assumption: "I assumed X, current evidence shows Y. Releasing X."
- Failed approach: "Approach A attempted, didn't work because Z. Releasing attachment to A."
- Noise: "Variable/plan/ctx Q no longer relevant. Removing."
- Don't justify/defend dissolved → point = release, not analysis
- Large body dissolved → summarize what + why in one sentence
- Clear workspace: close abandoned files, reset mental model, acknowledge clean slate
Got: Lighter, cleaner ctx, stale removed. Remaining feels accurate + current.
If err: Incomplete (released items still influence) → name explicit again. "I notice I'm still reasoning as if X true. X dissolved. Proceeding without X."
Step 4: Sit in Void
After destruction, resist immediate rebuild. Space between destruction + creation has value.
- Acknowledge cleared space: "Following dissolved: [list]"
- Note remains: "Surviving: [list]"
- Resist premature reconstruction → don't immediately propose replacement
- Let cleared space inform what comes next
- Void ≠ emptiness → potential. Next step (creation via
brahma-bhaga| preservation viavishnu-bhaga) emerges.
Got: Moment of clarity old → new. Next direction apparent from what remains, not forced.
If err: Void uncomfortable, strong pull to rebuild → urgency = signal of attachment to dissolved. Sit longer. Right next step emerges.
Check
- Stale assumptions ID'd + explicit released
- Failed approaches acknowledged no defensiveness
- Accumulated noise cleared
- Preservation boundary set before dissolution
- Core reqs + user prefs preserved
- Cleared space acknowledged before creation
Traps
- Destroy too much: No boundary → destroys working w/ stale. Boundary first.
- Destroy too little: Polite "release" while still influencing reasoning. True dissolution = actual letting go.
- Skip void: Rush destruction → creation w/o sitting → recreation of old w/ superficial changes.
- Performing destruction: Going through motions w/o updating internal model. Same assumptions next response = performative.
- Destruction as avoidance: Escape difficulty vs clear staleness. Problem persists after clearing → wasn't stale ctx, was problem itself.
→
brahma-bhaga— creation follows destructionvishnu-bhaga— preservation complements; what survives dissolution sustainedheal— subsystem assess may reveal dissolution needed before healingmeditate— clear ctx noise before → prevents reactive over-destructiondissolve-form— morphic equivalent for architectural dismantling w/ imaginal disc preservation
GitHub 仓库
Frequently asked questions
What is the shiva-bhaga skill?
shiva-bhaga is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform shiva-bhaga-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install shiva-bhaga?
Use the install commands on this page: add shiva-bhaga to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does shiva-bhaga belong to?
shiva-bhaga is in the Meta category, tagged ai.
Is shiva-bhaga free to use?
Yes. shiva-bhaga is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
相关推荐技能
Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
