返回技能列表

resolve-git-conflicts

pjt222
更新于 2 days ago
5 次查看
17
2
17
在 GitHub 上查看
设计aiapidesign

关于

This Claude Skill helps developers resolve Git merge, rebase, and cherry-pick conflicts by identifying conflict sources, reading markers, and choosing resolution strategies. It provides safe recovery options, including continuing operations or aborting failed merges/rebases. Use it when Git commands report conflicts or when you need to safely restart failed version control operations.

快速安装

Claude Code

推荐
主要方式
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
插件命令备选方式
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git 克隆备选方式
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/resolve-git-conflicts

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

技能文档

Resolve Git Conflicts

Identify, resolve, recover from merge and rebase conflicts.

When Use

  • git merge or git rebase reports conflicts
  • git cherry-pick cannot apply cleanly
  • git pull results in conflicting changes
  • git stash pop conflicts with current working tree

Inputs

  • Required: Repository with active conflicts
  • Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
  • Optional: Context about which changes should take priority

Steps

Step 1: Identify Conflict Source

Determine what operation caused conflict:

# Check current status
git status

# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict

Status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation in progress.

Got: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates active operation.

If fail: git status shows clean tree but you expected conflicts? Operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.

Step 2: Read Conflict Markers

Open each conflicting file. Locate conflict markers:

<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
  • <<<<<<< HEAD to =======: Your current branch (or branch you are rebasing onto)
  • ======= to >>>>>>>: Incoming changes (branch being merged or commit being applied)

Got: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> markers.

If fail: No markers found but files show as conflicting? Conflict may be binary file or deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for full list.

Step 3: Choose Resolution Strategy

Manual merge (most common): Edit file to combine both changes logically. Then remove all conflict markers.

Accept ours (keep current branch version):

# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R

# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A

Accept theirs (keep incoming branch version):

# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R

# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A

Got: After resolution, file contains correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.

If fail: Chose wrong side? Re-read conflicting version from merge base. During merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates conflict markers so you can try again.

Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved

After editing each conflicting file:

# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R

# Check remaining conflicts
git status

Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".

Got: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.

If fail: git add fails or markers remain? Re-open file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> lines removed.

Step 5: Continue the Operation

Once all conflicts resolved:

For merge:

git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message

For rebase:

git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4

For cherry-pick:

git cherry-pick --continue

For stash pop:

# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"

Got: Operation completes. git status shows clean working tree (or moves to next commit during rebase).

If fail: Continue command fails? Check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continue.

Step 6: Abort if Needed

Resolution too complex or chose wrong approach? Abort safely:

# Abort merge
git merge --abort

# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort

# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort

Got: Repository returns to state before operation started. No data loss.

If fail: Abort fails (rare)? Check git reflog to find commit before operation. Then git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — discards uncommitted changes.

Step 7: Verify Resolution

After operation completes:

# Verify clean working tree
git status

# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1

# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)

Got: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.

If fail: Tests fail after resolution? Merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts resolved. Review diff careful and fix.

Checks

  • No conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) remain in any file
  • git status shows clean working tree
  • Merge/rebase history correct in git log
  • Tests pass after conflict resolution
  • No unintended changes introduced

Pitfalls

  • Blindly accept one side: --ours or --theirs discards other side entirely. Only use when certain one version completely correct.
  • Leave conflict markers in code: Always search entire file for remaining markers after editing. Partial resolution breaks the code.
  • Amend during rebase: During interactive rebase, do not --amend unless rebase step specifically calls for it. Use git rebase --continue instead.
  • Lose work on abort: git rebase --abort and git merge --abort discard all resolution work. Only abort if want to start over.
  • No test after resolution: Syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
  • Force-push after rebase: After rebasing shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing — it rewrites history.

See Also

  • commit-changes - committing after conflict resolution
  • manage-git-branches - branch workflows that lead to conflicts
  • configure-git-repository - repository setup and merge strategies

GitHub 仓库

pjt222/agent-almanac
路径: i18n/caveman/skills/resolve-git-conflicts
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

相关推荐技能

executing-plans

设计

该Skill用于当开发者提供完整实施计划时,以受控批次方式执行代码实现。它会先审阅计划并提出疑问,然后分批次执行任务(默认每批3个任务),并在批次间暂停等待审查。关键特性包括分批次执行、内置检查点和架构师审查机制,确保复杂系统实现的可控性。

查看技能

requesting-code-review

设计

该Skill可在完成任务、实现主要功能或合并代码前自动调度代码审查子代理,确保实现符合需求和计划。它支持通过指定git SHA范围进行精准的代码变更审查,帮助开发者在关键节点及时发现潜在问题。核心原则是"早审查、勤审查",适用于开发流程的各个关键阶段。

查看技能

connect-mcp-server

设计

这个Skill指导开发者如何将MCP服务器连接到Claude Code,支持HTTP、stdio和SSE三种传输协议。它涵盖了从安装配置到认证安全的完整流程,适用于集成GitHub、Notion、数据库等外部服务。当开发者需要添加集成、配置外部工具或提及MCP相关功能时,这个Skill能提供实用的操作指南。

查看技能

web-cli-teleport

设计

该Skill帮助开发者根据任务特性选择Claude Code的Web或CLI界面,并指导如何在两种环境间无缝迁移会话。它能分析任务复杂度、迭代需求等要素,推荐最优工作界面和工作流。关键特性包括会话状态管理、环境切换指导和上下文优化建议。

查看技能