foundation-meeting-agenda
关于
This skill generates structured, time-boxed agendas for ten common meeting types, from standups to exec briefings. It outputs both a shareable summary for communication channels and a detailed agenda with topic owners, prep work, and logistics. Developers can use it to quickly create professional meeting frameworks that clarify objectives and participant responsibilities.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skillsgit clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/foundation-meeting-agenda在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Meeting Agenda
A meeting agenda is the attendee-facing structural document that sets expectations before a meeting. It answers "what will we discuss, who owns each topic, how will we spend the time, and what does done look like?" Distinct from a meeting brief, which is the user's private strategic prep; the agenda is shared with participants and focused on structure and flow.
This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract, which defines shared frontmatter, file naming, the go-mode behavioral pattern, and universal output requirements across all meeting skills.
When to Use
- Running or chairing a cross-functional working session, project kickoff, stakeholder review, or decision meeting
- Any meeting with more than three attendees or more than thirty minutes
- Recurring meeting where a rolling structure (1-on-1, team sync) needs fresh framing each time
- Mid-initiative alignment moment where explicit desired outcomes prevent drift
When NOT to Use
- The user's preparation is private and tactical (positioning, stakeholder reads, asks). Use
/meeting-briefinstead. - The meeting has already happened. Use
/meeting-recapfor post-meeting summarization. - The user wants to communicate outcomes to non-attendees. Use
/stakeholder-updateafter the meeting.
Zero-friction execution
Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:
- Read all provided inputs (topic, any referenced files, attendee list, constraints)
- Run inference on missing values (meeting type from topic keywords, duration default, objective from topic phrasing, attendee roles from context)
- Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word
goor corrections - Produce the agenda
If invoked with --go, skip the inference summary and produce output directly using defaults (duration 30 min, meeting type other, and so on). If the user provides all values upfront, no checkpoint appears.
Blocking questions are used only when inference confidence is actively low on a load-bearing input and no reasonable default exists. This should be rare.
Anti-meeting check
This skill opens with an explicit question: "Does this need to be a meeting, or could it be handled async?"
v1.1.0: the check now requires a positive synchronous-value statement. The meeting passes the check only when at least one of these is named:
- Tradeoff to discuss. multiple options, uncertain preference
- Conflict to resolve. named stakeholders disagreeing
- Co-creation. shared whiteboarding or document-writing in the meeting
- Relationship-building. first-time stakeholder meeting, mutual calibration
- Blocker escalation. time-sensitive unblocking
If none apply, the skill recommends the async alternative (written update, doc review, Slack poll) and produces a short one-page "how to handle this async" framing instead of an agenda.
The v1.0.0 version of this check ("single-owner decision with no tradeoffs", "pure information broadcast", "status-only sync with >5 people") was bypassed too easily. users would stay at five attendees or add "decision" to the topic. The stricter v1.1.0 biases toward async; users can still override.
This check is shared with /meeting-brief and not run by the post-meeting skills (recap, synthesize, stakeholder-update).
Instructions
When asked to create a meeting agenda, follow these steps:
-
Run anti-meeting check Apply the trigger patterns above. If the user's objective matches, propose the async alternative and ask for override. Only proceed to step 2 on explicit override.
-
Parse and load inputs Read the topic or purpose. Load all
@filereferences provided. Extract any attendee list, time constraints, or linked documents. -
Infer missing values Apply these inference rules:
Value Inferred from Default Meeting type Topic keywords, attendee seniority mix other(low confidence)Duration Explicit in topic doc (rare); meeting-type-specific default when type is inferred at medium+ confidence v1.1.0: type-specific (see family contract). 30 min only for other,1-on-1,exec-briefing,customer-call. Kickoff = 60, working-session = 60, decision-making = 45, etc.Objective Topic phrasing Infer; surface in summary Attendee RACI Seniority, topic ownership cues Flag all inferences Desired outcomes Objective plus meeting type heuristics Offer strawman Load-bearing inference gates (v1.1.0): when attendee RACI or desired outcomes are inferred below-high confidence, flag in the go-mode summary with
⚠. See family contract "Zero-friction execution" section. -
Present go-mode inference summary Show the inferred values with confidence markers. Accept
goto proceed, or corrections to revise. Re-run inference after any correction and present the summary again. -
Design the time-boxed topic list Apply the meeting-type variant (see below). Size topic times so their sum equals the meeting duration. If the topic list overflows the available time, flag it explicitly and ask for reconciliation (do not silently trim).
Each topic must have:
- Type tag:
Discussion | Decision | Information | Working - Owner (name or team)
- Goal (what done looks like)
- Time allocation
- Pre-read link if any
- Type tag:
-
Specify attendee prep List required prep with links and estimated prep time. Add recommended context for attendees who want deeper background. Add "come ready to" expectations that force clarity on what each attendee contributes.
-
Add parking lot and logistics placeholders Parking lot is a placeholder for off-topic items raised during the meeting. Logistics covers join link, materials needed, recording ownership.
-
Render the TEMPLATE.md with filled values Remove all guidance blockquotes from the final artifact.
-
Validate output
- Frontmatter shape conforms to the family contract's universal base fields plus agenda-specific fields (
meeting_duration_minutes,desired_outcomes) - Sum of topic times equals meeting duration (+/- 2 min tolerance)
- At least one desired outcome is listed
- Anti-meeting check result is recorded in
Generation context
- Frontmatter shape conforms to the family contract's universal base fields plus agenda-specific fields (
Meeting-type variants
Applied in step 5. Each variant reshapes the topic list to match the meeting's purpose.
- 1-on-1: Rolling structure. Last time's items, this time's topics, growth or development, blockers. Default 30 min.
- standup: Status round-robin, escalations, decisions needed. Default 15 min.
- planning: Commitments focus, capacity check, dependencies. Default 60 min.
- review: Presentation-first, heavy pre-read, explicit feedback-capture mechanism. Default 60 min.
- decision-making: Options upfront, decision criteria, explicit decision ask. Pre-read with proposal required. Default 45 min.
- brainstorm: Minimal agenda, generative prompts, no decision pressure. Default 45 min.
- stakeholder-review: TL;DR first, business-impact framing, explicit asks upfront. Default 45 min.
- project-kickoff: Scope, roles, success criteria, risks, communication plan. Default 60 min.
- working-session: Minimal agenda, pre-work required, explicit deliverable. Default 60 to 90 min.
- exec-briefing: TL;DR first, supporting detail after. Default 30 min.
- other: Generic topic structure, default 30 min.
Quality checklist
Before delivering the agenda, verify:
- Anti-meeting check was applied and recorded
- Meeting type is set (or explicitly
otherwith low-confidence flag) - Duration is set (default 30 min if not provided, flagged as default)
- Desired outcomes are concrete and verifiable (not "discuss X" but "decide whether to ship X")
- Every topic has type tag, owner, goal, time
- Topic times sum to meeting duration
- Pre-read prep time is listed (attendees skip prep when duration is not stated)
- Logistics section has join link and materials references
- Shareable summary is 5-6 lines, Slack-paste-ready
- Sources and References section includes Generation context with defaults applied and inferences made
See also
- Meeting Skills Family Contract. shared behavioral and structural requirements
/meeting-brief. user's private prep (shares anti-meeting check)/meeting-recap. downstream: recap auto-populates from this agenda's topic list/stakeholder-update. downstream: translates meeting outcomes to non-attendees
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
executing-plans
设计该Skill用于当开发者提供完整实施计划时,以受控批次方式执行代码实现。它会先审阅计划并提出疑问,然后分批次执行任务(默认每批3个任务),并在批次间暂停等待审查。关键特性包括分批次执行、内置检查点和架构师审查机制,确保复杂系统实现的可控性。
requesting-code-review
设计该Skill可在完成任务、实现主要功能或合并代码前自动调度代码审查子代理,确保实现符合需求和计划。它支持通过指定git SHA范围进行精准的代码变更审查,帮助开发者在关键节点及时发现潜在问题。核心原则是"早审查、勤审查",适用于开发流程的各个关键阶段。
connect-mcp-server
设计这个Skill指导开发者如何将MCP服务器连接到Claude Code,支持HTTP、stdio和SSE三种传输协议。它涵盖了从安装配置到认证安全的完整流程,适用于集成GitHub、Notion、数据库等外部服务。当开发者需要添加集成、配置外部工具或提及MCP相关功能时,这个Skill能提供实用的操作指南。
web-cli-teleport
设计该Skill帮助开发者根据任务特性选择Claude Code的Web或CLI界面,并指导如何在两种环境间无缝迁移会话。它能分析任务复杂度、迭代需求等要素,推荐最优工作界面和工作流。关键特性包括会话状态管理、环境切换指导和上下文优化建议。
