返回技能列表

finance-metrics-quickref

deanpeters
更新于 2 days ago
3 次查看
4,511
575
4,511
在 GitHub 上查看
设计design

关于

This skill provides instant lookup of SaaS financial metrics, formulas, and industry benchmarks. It's designed for developers needing quick references during analysis or reviews without deep explanations. Use it to rapidly retrieve definitions, calculations, or decision frameworks like CAC Payback or the Rule of 40.

快速安装

Claude Code

推荐
主要方式
npx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills -a claude-code
插件命令备选方式
/plugin add https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
Git 克隆备选方式
git clone https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills.git ~/.claude/skills/finance-metrics-quickref

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

技能文档

Purpose

Quick reference for any SaaS finance metric without deep teaching. Use this when you need a fast formula lookup, benchmark check, or decision framework reminder. For detailed explanations, calculations, and examples, see the related deep-dive skills.

This is not a teaching tool—it's a cheat sheet optimized for speed. Scan, find, apply.

Key Concepts

Metric Categories

Metrics are organized into four families:

  1. Revenue & Growth — Top-line money (revenue, ARPU, ARPA, MRR/ARR, churn, NRR, expansion)
  2. Unit Economics — Customer-level profitability (CAC, LTV, payback, margins)
  3. Capital Efficiency — Cash management (burn rate, runway, OpEx, net income)
  4. Efficiency Ratios — Growth vs. profitability balance (Rule of 40, magic number)

When to Use This Skill

Use this when:

  • You need a quick formula or benchmark
  • You're preparing for a board meeting or investor call
  • You're evaluating a decision and need to check which metrics matter
  • You want to identify red flags quickly

Don't use this when:

  • You need detailed calculation guidance (use saas-revenue-growth-metrics or saas-economics-efficiency-metrics)
  • You're learning these metrics for the first time (start with deep-dive skills)
  • You need examples and common pitfalls (covered in related skills)

Application

All Metrics Reference Table

MetricFormulaWhat It MeasuresGood BenchmarkRed Flag
RevenueTotal sales before expensesTop-line money earnedGrowth rate >20% YoY (varies by stage)Revenue growing slower than costs
ARPUTotal Revenue / Total UsersRevenue per individual userVaries by model; track trendARPU declining cohort-over-cohort
ARPAMRR / Active AccountsRevenue per customer accountSMB: $100-$1K; Mid: $1K-$10K; Ent: $10K+High ARPA + low ARPU (undermonetized seats)
ACVAnnual Recurring Revenue per ContractAnnualized contract valueSMB: $5K-$25K; Mid: $25K-$100K; Ent: $100K+ACV declining (moving downmarket unintentionally)
MRR/ARRMRR × 12 = ARRPredictable recurring revenueGrowth + quality matter; track componentsNew MRR declining while churn stable/growing
Churn RateCustomers Lost / Starting Customers% of customers who cancelMonthly <2% great, <5% ok; Annual <10% greatChurn increasing cohort-over-cohort
NRR(Start ARR + Expansion - Churn - Contraction) / Start ARR × 100Revenue retention + expansion>120% excellent; 100-120% good; 90-100% okNRR <100% (base is contracting)
Expansion RevenueUpsells + Cross-sells + Usage GrowthAdditional revenue from existing customers20-30% of total revenueExpansion <10% of MRR
Quick Ratio(New MRR + Expansion MRR) / (Churned MRR + Contraction)Revenue gains vs. losses>4 excellent; 2-4 healthy; <2 leaky bucketQuick Ratio <2 (leaky bucket)
Gross Margin(Revenue - COGS) / Revenue × 100% of revenue after direct costsSaaS: 70-85% good; <60% concerningGross margin <60% or declining
CACTotal S&M Spend / New CustomersCost to acquire one customerVaries: Ent $10K+ ok; SMB <$500CAC increasing while LTV flat
LTVARPU × Gross Margin % / Churn RateTotal revenue from one customerMust be 3x+ CAC; varies by segmentLTV declining cohort-over-cohort
LTV:CACLTV / CACUnit economics efficiency3:1 healthy; <1:1 unsustainable; >5:1 underinvestingLTV:CAC <1.5:1
Payback PeriodCAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %)Months to recover CAC<12 months great; 12-18 ok; >24 concerningPayback >24 months (cash trap)
Contribution Margin(Revenue - All Variable Costs) / Revenue × 100True contribution after variable costs60-80% good for SaaS; <40% concerningContribution margin <40%
Burn RateMonthly Cash Spent - RevenueCash consumed per monthNet burn <$200K manageable early; <$500K growthNet burn accelerating
RunwayCash Balance / Monthly Net BurnMonths until money runs out12+ months good; 6-12 ok; <6 crisisRunway <6 months
OpExS&M + R&D + G&ACosts to run the businessShould grow slower than revenueOpEx growing faster than revenue
Net IncomeRevenue - All ExpensesActual profit/lossEarly negative ok; mature 10-20%+ marginLosses accelerating without growth
Rule of 40Revenue Growth % + Profit Margin %Balance of growth vs. efficiency>40 healthy; 25-40 ok; <25 concerningRule of 40 <25
Magic Number(Q Revenue - Prev Q Revenue) × 4 / Prev Q S&MS&M efficiency>0.75 efficient; 0.5-0.75 ok; <0.5 fix GTMMagic Number <0.5
Operating LeverageRevenue Growth vs. OpEx GrowthScaling efficiencyRevenue growth > OpEx growthOpEx growing faster than revenue
Gross vs. Net RevenueNet = Gross - Discounts - Refunds - CreditsWhat you actually keepRefunds <10%; discounts <20%Refunds >10% (product problem)
Revenue ConcentrationTop N Customers / Total RevenueDependency on largest customersTop customer <10%; Top 10 <40%Top customer >25% (existential risk)
Revenue MixProduct/Segment Revenue / Total RevenuePortfolio compositionNo single product >60% idealSingle product >80% (no diversification)
Cohort AnalysisGroup customers by join date; track behaviorWhether business improving or degradingRecent cohorts same/better than oldNewer cohorts perform worse
CAC Payback by ChannelCAC / Monthly Contribution (by channel)Payback by acquisition channelCompare across channelsOne channel far worse than others
Gross Margin PaybackCAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %)Payback using actual profitTypically 1.5-2x simple paybackPayback using margin >36 months
Unit EconomicsRevenue per unit - Cost per unitProfitability of each "unit"Positive contribution requiredNegative contribution margin
Segment PaybackCAC / Monthly Contribution (by segment)Payback by customer segmentCompare to allocate resourcesOne segment unprofitable
IncrementalityRevenue caused by action - BaselineTrue impact of marketing/promoMeasure with holdout testsCelebrating revenue that would've happened anyway
Working CapitalCash timing between revenue and collectionCash vs. revenue timingAnnual upfront > monthly billingLong payment terms killing runway

Quick Decision Frameworks

Use these frameworks to combine metrics for common PM decisions.

Framework 1: Should We Build This Feature?

Ask:

  1. Revenue impact? Direct (pricing, add-on) or indirect (retention, conversion)?
  2. Margin impact? What's the COGS? Does it dilute margins?
  3. ROI? Revenue impact / Development cost

Build if:

  • ROI >3x in year one (direct monetization), OR
  • LTV impact >10x development cost (retention), OR
  • Strategic value overrides short-term ROI

Don't build if:

  • Negative contribution margin even with optimistic adoption
  • Payback period exceeds average customer lifetime

Metrics to check: Revenue, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin


Framework 2: Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?

Ask:

  1. Unit economics? CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC ratio
  2. Cash efficiency? Payback period
  3. Customer quality? Cohort retention, NRR by channel
  4. Scalability? Magic Number, addressable volume

Scale if:

  • LTV:CAC >3:1 AND
  • Payback <18 months AND
  • Customer quality meets/beats other channels AND
  • Magic Number >0.75

Don't scale if:

  • LTV:CAC <1.5:1 AND
  • No clear path to improvement

Metrics to check: CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, NRR, Magic Number


Framework 3: Should We Change Pricing?

Ask:

  1. ARPU/ARPA impact? Will revenue per customer increase?
  2. Conversion impact? Help or hurt trial-to-paid conversion?
  3. Churn impact? Create churn risk or reduce it?
  4. NRR impact? Enable expansion or create contraction?

Implement if:

  • Net revenue impact positive after churn risk
  • Can test with segment before broad rollout

Don't change if:

  • High churn risk without offsetting expansion
  • Can't test hypothesis before committing

Metrics to check: ARPU, ARPA, Churn Rate, NRR, CAC Payback


Framework 4: Is the Business Healthy?

Check by stage:

Early Stage (Pre-$10M ARR):

  • Growth Rate >50% YoY
  • LTV:CAC >3:1
  • Gross Margin >70%
  • Runway >12 months

Growth Stage ($10M-$50M ARR):

  • Growth Rate >40% YoY
  • NRR >100%
  • Rule of 40 >40
  • Magic Number >0.75

Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR):

  • Growth Rate >25% YoY
  • NRR >110%
  • Rule of 40 >40
  • Profit Margin >10%

Metrics to check: Revenue Growth, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Gross Margin


Red Flags by Category

Revenue & Growth Red Flags

Red FlagWhat It MeansAction
Churn increasing cohort-over-cohortProduct-market fit degradingStop scaling acquisition; fix retention first
NRR <100%Base is contractingFix expansion or reduce churn before scaling
Revenue churn > logo churnLosing big customersInvestigate why high-value customers leave
Quick Ratio <2Leaky bucket (barely outpacing losses)Fix retention before scaling acquisition
Expansion revenue <10% of MRRNo upsell/cross-sell engineBuild expansion paths
Revenue concentration >50% in top 10 customersExistential dependency riskDiversify customer base

Unit Economics Red Flags

Red FlagWhat It MeansAction
LTV:CAC <1.5:1Buying revenue at a lossReduce CAC or increase LTV before scaling
Payback >24 monthsCash trap (long cash recovery)Negotiate annual upfront or reduce CAC
Gross margin <60%Low profitability per dollarIncrease prices or reduce COGS
CAC increasing while LTV flatUnit economics degradingOptimize conversion or reduce sales cycle
Contribution margin <40%Unprofitable after variable costsCut variable costs or increase prices

Capital Efficiency Red Flags

Red FlagWhat It MeansAction
Runway <6 monthsSurvival crisisRaise capital immediately or cut burn
Net burn accelerating without revenue growthBurning faster without resultsCut costs or increase revenue urgency
OpEx growing faster than revenueNegative operating leverageFreeze hiring; optimize spend
Rule of 40 <25Burning cash without growthImprove growth or cut to profitability
Magic Number <0.5S&M engine brokenFix GTM efficiency before scaling spend

When to Use Which Metric

Prioritizing features:

  • Revenue impact → Revenue, ARPU, Expansion Revenue
  • Margin impact → Gross Margin, Contribution Margin
  • ROI → LTV impact, Development cost

Evaluating channels:

  • Acquisition cost → CAC, CAC by Channel
  • Customer value → LTV, NRR by Channel
  • Payback → Payback Period, CAC Payback by Channel
  • Scalability → Magic Number

Pricing decisions:

  • Monetization → ARPU, ARPA, ACV
  • Impact → Churn Rate, NRR, Expansion Revenue
  • Efficiency → CAC Payback (will pricing change affect it?)

Business health:

  • Growth → Revenue Growth, MRR/ARR Growth
  • Retention → Churn Rate, NRR, Quick Ratio
  • Economics → LTV:CAC, Payback Period, Gross Margin
  • Efficiency → Rule of 40, Magic Number, Operating Leverage
  • Survival → Burn Rate, Runway

Board/investor reporting:

  • Key metrics: ARR, Revenue Growth %, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Burn Rate, Runway
  • Stage-specific: Early stage emphasize growth + unit economics; Growth stage emphasize Rule of 40 + Magic Number; Scale stage emphasize profitability + efficiency

Examples

Example 1: Feature Investment Sanity Check

You are deciding whether to build a premium export feature.

  1. Use Framework 1 (Should We Build This Feature?)
  2. Pull baseline metrics: ARPU, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin
  3. Model optimistic, base, and downside adoption
  4. Reject if contribution margin turns negative in downside case

Quick output:

  • Base case ROI: 3.8x
  • Contribution margin impact: +4 points
  • Decision: Build now, with a 90-day post-launch check on churn and expansion

Example 2: Channel Scale Decision

Paid social is generating many signups but weak retention.

  1. Use Framework 2 (Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?)
  2. Check CAC, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, and NRR by channel
  3. Compare against best-performing channel, not company average

Quick output:

  • LTV:CAC: 1.6:1
  • Payback: 26 months
  • NRR: 88%
  • Decision: Do not scale; cap spend and run targeted optimization tests

Common Pitfalls

  • Using blended company averages instead of cohort or channel-level metrics
  • Scaling acquisition when Quick Ratio is weak and retention is deteriorating
  • Treating high LTV:CAC as sufficient without checking payback and runway impact
  • Raising prices based on ARPU lift alone without modeling churn and contraction
  • Comparing benchmarks across mismatched company stages or business models
  • Tracking many metrics without a clear decision question

References

Related Skills (Deep Dives)

  • saas-revenue-growth-metrics — Detailed guidance on revenue, retention, and growth metrics (13 metrics)
  • saas-economics-efficiency-metrics — Detailed guidance on unit economics and capital efficiency (17 metrics)
  • feature-investment-advisor — Uses these metrics to evaluate feature ROI
  • acquisition-channel-advisor — Uses these metrics to evaluate channel viability
  • finance-based-pricing-advisor — Uses these metrics to evaluate pricing changes
  • business-health-diagnostic — Uses these metrics to diagnose business health

External Resources

  • Bessemer Venture Partners: "SaaS Metrics 2.0" — Comprehensive SaaS benchmarking
  • David Skok (Matrix Partners): "SaaS Metrics" blog series — Deep dive on unit economics
  • Tomasz Tunguz (Redpoint): SaaS benchmarking research and blog
  • ChartMogul, Baremetrics, ProfitWell: SaaS analytics platforms with metric definitions
  • SaaStr: Annual SaaS benchmarking surveys

Provenance

  • Adapted from research/finance/Finance_QuickRef.md
  • Formulas from research/finance/Finance for Product Managers.md
  • Decision frameworks from research/finance/Finance_For_PMs.Putting_It_Together_Synthesis.md

GitHub 仓库

deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
路径: skills/finance-metrics-quickref
0
ai-agentsai-product-managementclaude-skillspm-frameworksproduct-management

相关推荐技能

executing-plans

设计

该Skill用于当开发者提供完整实施计划时,以受控批次方式执行代码实现。它会先审阅计划并提出疑问,然后分批次执行任务(默认每批3个任务),并在批次间暂停等待审查。关键特性包括分批次执行、内置检查点和架构师审查机制,确保复杂系统实现的可控性。

查看技能

requesting-code-review

设计

该Skill可在完成任务、实现主要功能或合并代码前自动调度代码审查子代理,确保实现符合需求和计划。它支持通过指定git SHA范围进行精准的代码变更审查,帮助开发者在关键节点及时发现潜在问题。核心原则是"早审查、勤审查",适用于开发流程的各个关键阶段。

查看技能

connect-mcp-server

设计

这个Skill指导开发者如何将MCP服务器连接到Claude Code,支持HTTP、stdio和SSE三种传输协议。它涵盖了从安装配置到认证安全的完整流程,适用于集成GitHub、Notion、数据库等外部服务。当开发者需要添加集成、配置外部工具或提及MCP相关功能时,这个Skill能提供实用的操作指南。

查看技能

web-cli-teleport

设计

该Skill帮助开发者根据任务特性选择Claude Code的Web或CLI界面,并指导如何在两种环境间无缝迁移会话。它能分析任务复杂度、迭代需求等要素,推荐最优工作界面和工作流。关键特性包括会话状态管理、环境切换指导和上下文优化建议。

查看技能