返回技能列表

write-incident-runbook

pjt222
更新于 2 days ago
3 次查看
17
2
17
在 GitHub 上查看
wordai

关于

This Claude Skill generates structured incident runbooks with diagnostic steps, resolution procedures, and escalation paths. It's used to document response procedures for recurring alerts, standardize on-call response, and create training materials. The skill helps reduce MTTR by linking alerts directly to clear resolution steps.

快速安装

Claude Code

推荐
主要方式
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
插件命令备选方式
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git 克隆备选方式
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/write-incident-runbook

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

技能文档

Write Incident Runbook

Create actionable runbooks that guide responders through incident diagnosis and resolution.

When to Use

  • Documenting response procedures for recurring alerts or incidents
  • Standardizing incident response across on-call rotation members
  • Reducing mean time to resolution (MTTR) with clear diagnostic steps
  • Creating training materials for new team members on incident handling
  • Establishing escalation paths and communication protocols
  • Migrating tribal knowledge to written documentation
  • Linking alerts to resolution procedures (alert annotations)

Inputs

  • Required: Incident or alert name/description
  • Required: Historical incident data and resolution patterns
  • Optional: Diagnostic queries (Prometheus, logs, traces)
  • Optional: Escalation contacts and communication channels
  • Optional: Previous incident post-mortems

Procedure

Step 1: Choose Runbook Template Structure

See Extended Examples for complete template files.

Select an appropriate template based on incident type and complexity.

Basic runbook template structure:

# [Alert/Incident Name] Runbook
## Overview | Severity | Symptoms
## Diagnostic Steps | Resolution Steps
## Escalation | Communication | Prevention | Related

Advanced SRE runbook template (excerpt):

# [Service Name] - [Incident Type] Runbook

## Metadata
- Service, Owner, Severity, On-Call, Last Updated

## Diagnostic Phase
### Quick Health Check (< 5 min): Dashboard, error rate, deployments
### Detailed Investigation (5-20 min): Metrics, logs, traces, failure patterns
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete template)

Key template components:

  • Metadata: Service ownership, severity, on-call rotation
  • Diagnostic Phase: Quick checks → detailed investigation → failure patterns
  • Resolution Phase: Immediate mitigation → root cause fix → verification
  • Escalation: Criteria and contact paths
  • Communication: Internal/external templates
  • Prevention: Short/long-term actions

Got: Template selected matches incident complexity, sections appropriate for service type.

If fail:

  • Start with basic template, iterate based on incident patterns
  • Review industry examples (Google SRE books, vendor runbooks)
  • Adapt template based on team feedback after first use

Step 2: Document Diagnostic Procedures

See Extended Examples for complete diagnostic queries and decision trees.

Create step-by-step investigation procedures with specific queries.

Six-step diagnostic checklist:

  1. Verify Service Health: Health endpoint checks and uptime metrics

    curl -I https://api.example.com/health  # Expected: HTTP 200 OK
    
    up{job="api-service"}  # Expected: 1 for all instances
    
  2. Check Error Rate: Current error percentage and breakdown by endpoint

    sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
    / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) * 100  # Expected: < 1%
    
  3. Analyze Logs: Recent errors and top error messages from Loki

    {job="api-service"} |= "error" | json | level="error"
    
  4. Check Resource Utilization: CPU, memory, and connection pool status

    avg(rate(container_cpu_usage_seconds_total{pod=~"api-service.*"}[5m])) * 100
    # Expected: < 70%
    
  5. Review Recent Changes: Deployments, git commits, infrastructure changes

  6. Examine Dependencies: Downstream service health, database/API latency

Failure pattern decision tree (excerpt):

  • Service down? → Check all pods/instances
  • Error rate elevated? → Check specific error types (5xx, gateway, database, timeouts)
  • When did it start? → After deployment (rollback), gradual (resource leak), sudden (traffic/dependency)

Got: Diagnostic procedures are specific, include expected vs actual values, guide responder through investigation.

If fail:

  • Test queries in actual monitoring system before documenting
  • Include screenshots of dashboards for visual reference
  • Add "Common mistakes" section for frequently missed steps
  • Iterate based on feedback from incident responders

Step 3: Define Resolution Procedures

See Extended Examples for all 5 resolution options with full commands and rollback procedures.

Document step-by-step remediation with rollback options.

Five resolution options (brief summary):

  1. Rollback Deployment (fastest): For post-deployment errors

    kubectl rollout undo deployment/api-service
    

    Verify → Monitor → Confirm resolution (error rate < 1%, latency normal, no alerts)

  2. Scale Up Resources: For high CPU/memory, connection pool exhaustion

    kubectl scale deployment/api-service --replicas=$((current * 3/2))
    
  3. Restart Service: For memory leaks, stuck connections, cache corruption

    kubectl rollout restart deployment/api-service
    
  4. Feature Flag / Circuit Breaker: For specific feature errors or external dependency failures

    kubectl set env deployment/api-service FEATURE_NAME=false
    
  5. Database Remediation: For database connections, slow queries, pool exhaustion

    -- Kill long-running queries, restart connection pool, increase pool size
    

Universal verification checklist:

  • Error rate < 1%
  • Latency P99 < threshold
  • Throughput at baseline
  • Resource usage healthy (CPU < 70%, Memory < 80%)
  • Dependencies healthy
  • User-facing tests pass
  • No active alerts

Rollback procedure: If resolution worsens situation → pause/cancel → revert → reassess

Got: Resolution steps are clear, include verification checks, provide rollback options for each action.

If fail:

  • Add more granular steps for complex procedures
  • Include screenshots or diagrams for multi-step processes
  • Document command outputs (expected vs actual)
  • Create separate runbook for complex resolution procedures

Step 4: Establish Escalation Paths

See Extended Examples for full escalation levels and contact directory template.

Define when and how to escalate incidents.

When to escalate immediately:

  • Customer-facing outage > 15 minutes
  • SLO error budget > 10% depleted
  • Data loss/corruption or security breach suspected
  • Unable to identify root cause within 20 minutes
  • Mitigation attempts fail or worsen situation

Five escalation levels:

  1. Primary On-Call (5 min response): Deploy fixes, rollback, scale (up to 30 min solo)
  2. Secondary On-Call (auto after 15 min): Additional investigation support
  3. Team Lead (architectural decisions): Database changes, vendor escalation, incidents > 1 hour
  4. Incident Commander (cross-team coord): Multiple teams, customer comms, incidents > 2 hours
  5. Executive (C-level): Major impact (>50% users), SLA breach, media/PR, outages > 4 hours

Escalation process:

  1. Notify target with: current status, impact, actions taken, help needed, dashboard link
  2. Handoff if needed: share timeline, actions, access, remain available
  3. Don't go silent: update every 15 min, ask questions, provide feedback

Contact directory: Maintain table with role, Slack, phone, PagerDuty for:

  • Platform/Database/Security/Network teams
  • Incident Commander
  • External vendors (AWS, database vendor, CDN provider)

Got: Clear criteria for escalation, contact information readily accessible, escalation paths aligned with organizational structure.

If fail:

  • Validate contact information is current (test quarterly)
  • Add decision tree for when to escalate
  • Include examples of escalation messages
  • Document response time expectations for each level

Step 5: Create Communication Templates

See Extended Examples for all internal and external templates with full formatting.

Provide pre-written messages for incident updates.

Internal templates (Slack #incident-response):

  1. Initial Declaration:

    🚨 INCIDENT: [Title] | Severity: [Critical/High/Medium]
    Impact: [users/services] | Owner: @username | Dashboard: [link]
    Quick Summary: [1-2 sentences] | Next update: 15 min
    
  2. Progress Update (every 15-30 min):

    📊 UPDATE #N | Status: [Investigating/Mitigating/Monitoring]
    Actions: [what we tried and outcomes]
    Theory: [what we think is happening]
    Next: [planned actions]
    
  3. Mitigation Complete:

    ✅ MITIGATION | Metrics: Error [before→after], Latency [before→after]
    Root Cause: [brief or "investigating"] | Monitoring 30min before resolved
    
  4. Resolution:

    🎉 RESOLVED | Duration: [time] | Root Cause + Impact + Follow-up actions
    
  5. False Alarm: No impact, no follow-up needed

External templates (status page):

  • Initial: Investigating, started time, next update in 15 min
  • Progress: Identified cause (customer-friendly), implementing fix, estimated resolution
  • Resolution: Resolved time, root cause (simple), duration, prevention measures

Customer email template: Timeline, impact description, resolution, prevention, compensation (if applicable)

Got: Templates save time during incidents, ensure consistent communication, reduce cognitive load on responders.

If fail:

  • Customize templates to match company communication style
  • Pre-fill templates with common incident types
  • Create Slack workflow/bot to populate templates automatically
  • Review templates during incident retrospectives

Step 6: Link Runbook to Monitoring

See Extended Examples for complete Prometheus alert configuration and Grafana dashboard JSON.

Integrate runbook with alerts and dashboards.

Add runbook links to Prometheus alerts:

- alert: HighErrorRate
  annotations:
    runbook_url: "https://wiki.example.com/runbooks/high-error-rate"
    dashboard_url: "https://grafana.example.com/d/service-overview"
    incident_channel: "#incident-platform"

Embed quick diagnostic links in runbook:

  • Service Overview Dashboard
  • Error Rate Last 1h (Prometheus direct link)
  • Recent Error Logs (Loki/Grafana Explore)
  • Recent Deployments (GitHub/CI)
  • PagerDuty Incidents

Create Grafana dashboard panel with runbook links (markdown panel listing all incident runbooks with on-call and escalation info)

Got: Responders can access runbooks directly from alerts or dashboards, diagnostic queries pre-filled, one-click access to relevant tools.

If fail:

  • Verify runbook URLs are accessible without VPN/login
  • Use URL shorteners for complex Grafana/Prometheus links
  • Test links quarterly to ensure they don't break
  • Create browser bookmarks for frequently used runbooks

Validation

  • Runbook follows consistent template structure
  • Diagnostic procedures include specific queries and expected values
  • Resolution steps are actionable with clear commands
  • Escalation criteria and contacts are current
  • Communication templates provided for internal and external audiences
  • Runbook linked from monitoring alerts and dashboards
  • Runbook tested during incident simulation or actual incident
  • Feedback from responders incorporated into runbook
  • Revision history tracked with dates and authors
  • Runbook accessible without authentication (or cached offline)

Pitfalls

  • Too generic: Runbooks with vague steps like "check the logs" without specific queries are not actionable. Be specific.
  • Outdated information: Runbooks referencing old systems or commands become useless. Review quarterly.
  • No verification steps: Resolution without verification leads to false positives. Always include "how to confirm it's fixed."
  • Missing rollback procedures: Every action should have a rollback plan. Don't trap responders in worse state.
  • Assuming knowledge: Runbooks for experts only exclude junior engineers. Write for the least experienced person on rotation.
  • No ownership: Runbooks without owners become stale. Assign team/person responsible for updates.
  • Hidden behind auth: Runbooks inaccessible during VPN/SSO issues are useless during crisis. Cache copies or use public wiki.

Related Skills

  • configure-alerting-rules - Link runbooks to alert annotations for immediate access during incidents
  • build-grafana-dashboards - Embed runbook links in dashboards and diagnostic panels
  • setup-prometheus-monitoring - Include diagnostic queries from Prometheus in runbook procedures
  • define-slo-sli-sla - Reference SLO impact in incident severity classification

GitHub 仓库

pjt222/agent-almanac
路径: i18n/caveman-lite/skills/write-incident-runbook
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

相关推荐技能

content-collections

Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。

查看技能

polymarket

这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。

查看技能

creating-opencode-plugins

该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。

查看技能

sglang

SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。

查看技能