design-electromagnetic-device
关于
This Claude Skill helps developers design practical electromagnetic devices like motors, generators, and transformers by bridging theory to application. It assists in sizing components for target fields or forces, selecting topologies, and computing performance metrics like torque and efficiency. The tool also analyzes key losses from copper resistance, core hysteresis, and eddy currents.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-electromagnetic-device在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Design Electromagnetic Device
Spec perf → topology → compute from EM first principles → analyze losses + efficiency → validate vs thermal + saturation.
Use When
- Size electromagnet (solenoid/toroidal) for B-field, pull, hold force
- Select motor topology (DC brushed, BLDC, stepper, induction), compute torque + speed + eff
- Design generator → V, I, freq
- Design transformer → V ratio, power, freq
- Analyze + min losses: copper (I^2 R), core (hyst + eddy), stray flux
In
- Required: Device type (electromagnet, motor, generator, transformer)
- Required: Perf reqs (B, force, torque, V ratio, power, eff target)
- Required: Operating (V, I, freq, duty, ambient T)
- Optional: Core mat (silicon steel, ferrite, powdered iron, air) + B-H
- Optional: Size/weight
- Optional: Cost/mfg
Do
Step 1: Reqs + operating
Full targets before topology:
-
Primary metric:
- Electromagnet: B (T) at point, or pull force (N) on armature
- Motor: rated T (N.m) at RPM, or power (W) at RPM
- Generator: V, I, Hz at mech speed
- Transformer: V1, V2, VA, freq
-
Secondary: Eff (%), max T rise above ambient (K), duty (cont, intermittent, pulsed), envelope (max D, L, weight).
-
Supply: V, I, freq (DC/AC w/ Hz), waveform (sine, PWM, trapezoidal).
-
Environment: T range, cooling (nat convection, forced air, liquid), altitude, vibration/shock.
## Design Requirements
- **Device type**: [electromagnet / motor / generator / transformer]
- **Primary specification**: [value with units]
- **Efficiency target**: [%]
- **Supply**: [voltage, current, frequency]
- **Thermal limit**: [max temperature rise in K]
- **Size constraint**: [dimensions or weight]
- **Duty cycle**: [continuous / intermittent (on-time/off-time) / pulsed]
→ Complete quantified reqs, no ambiguity. Every req has val + units.
If err: Conflict (high T in tiny vol + high eff) → identify tradeoff explicit. EM scaling: force ~ volume, losses ~ surface area, thermal constrains power density.
Step 2: Topology
Config matches reqs:
-
Electromagnet:
- Solenoid (cylindrical): Simple wind, uniform B = mu_0 n I. Uniform-field apps. Air gap for pull.
- Toroid: No stray field. Min stray. Less uniform for partial.
- C-core / E-core: High force compact. Air gap concentrates. Relays + hold magnets.
- Helmholtz pair: 2 coils sep by 1 radius. Uniform center. Calibration + measurement.
-
Motor:
- DC brushed: Simple drive, good low-speed T. Brushes limit lifetime + speed. T = k_T * I.
- BLDC: Electronic commutation, higher speed + lifetime. Trapezoidal/sinusoidal. Modern dominant.
- Stepper: Precise open-loop (1.8 or 0.9 deg). Lower cont T than BLDC. Positioning w/o feedback.
- AC induction: Robust, no PM, simple. Speed = supply freq + slip. Industrial power.
-
Generator: Motors reversed. BLDC motor → BLDC gen (back-EMF = output). Induction above sync. PM gen for small (wind, hydro).
-
Transformer:
- Core type: Windings on single leg. Std power.
- Shell type: Core around windings. Better shielding. High-power.
- Toroidal: No gap, low stray, compact. Higher winding cost. Audio + sensitive electronics.
- Planar / PCB: PCB trace windings. Low profile. SMPS at high freq.
## Topology Selection
- **Topology chosen**: [specific configuration]
- **Justification**: [why it matches the requirements]
- **Key advantages**: [for this application]
- **Key limitations**: [and mitigation strategy]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why rejected]
→ Justified selection tied to Step 1 reqs w/ acknowledged limitations.
If err: No std topology meets all → hybrid (Halbach array) or relax secondary. Doc tradeoff.
Step 3: Design params
Physical dims + elec params from EM principles:
-
Electromagnet:
- Turns: N = B * l_core / (mu_0 * mu_r * I), or mag circuit: N * I = Phi * R_total
- Wire gauge: J (3-6 A/mm^2 cont, 15 A/mm^2 intermittent). A_wire = I / J.
- Core X-sec: A_core = Phi / B_max (below sat: 1.5-1.8 T silicon steel, 0.3-0.5 T ferrite)
- Gap force: F = B^2 * A_gap / (2 * mu_0) (Maxwell stress)
- R winding: R = rho_Cu * N * l_mean_turn / A_wire
-
Motor:
- Torque const: k_T = (2 * B * l * r * N) / phases (simplified BLDC)
- Back-EMF: k_E = k_T (SI)
- I_rated = T_rated / k_T
- omega_no_load = V_supply / k_E
- R from wire gauge + mean turn
-
Transformer:
- Turns ratio: N_1 / N_2 = V_1 / V_2
- Core X-sec: A_core = V_1 / (4.44 * f * N_1 * B_max) (sinusoidal)
- N_1 = V_1 / (4.44 * f * B_max * A_core)
- Window area: A_window = (N_1 * A_wire1 + N_2 * A_wire2) / k_fill (k_fill 0.3-0.5)
- Core vol: V_core = A_core * l_mean_path
-
Mag circuit (cores + gaps):
- R_core = l_core / (mu_0 * mu_r * A_core)
- R_gap = l_gap / (mu_0 * A_gap) (much > R_core for small gaps)
- R_total = R_core + R_gap (series), 1/R_total = sum(1/R_i) (parallel)
- Phi = N * I / R_total
## Design Parameters
- **Turns**: N = [value] (primary), N_2 = [value] (if applicable)
- **Wire gauge**: AWG [number] (diameter [mm], area [mm^2])
- **Core dimensions**: A_core = [mm^2], l_core = [mm], l_gap = [mm]
- **Core material**: [type], B_max = [T], mu_r = [value]
- **Winding resistance**: R = [Ohms]
- **Operating current**: I = [A], current density J = [A/mm^2]
- **Key performance**: [B-field / torque / voltage ratio = calculated value]
→ Numerical vals for all dims + elec params from EM equations w/ units at each step.
If err: Turns don't fit → bigger core (more window), finer wire (higher J, more heat), or reduce target. Core above B_max → bigger X-sec or more turns.
Step 4: Losses + eff
Quantify all mechanisms + eff:
-
Copper (I^2 R):
- P_Cu = I^2 * R_winding (DC)
- High freq: skin effect. R_AC / R_DC increases when diam > 2 * delta.
- Proximity effect in multi-layer → more AC R.
- Mitigate: Litz wire for >~10 kHz.
-
Core (hyst + eddy):
- Hyst vol per cycle: W_h = area B-H loop
- P_h = k_h * f * B_max^n * V_core (Steinmetz, n 1.6-2.0, k_h from data)
- Eddy: P_e = k_e * f^2 * B_max^2 * t^2 * V_core (t = lamination thick)
- Combined (gen Steinmetz): P_core = k * f^alpha * B_max^beta * V_core
- Mitigate: laminated (0.25-0.5 mm for 50/60 Hz, thinner higher freq), ferrite for >100 kHz
-
Eddy in conductors/structure:
- Stray flux → currents in frame, shields, conductors
- Big in large transformers + machines
- Mitigate: non-mag struct mat, mag shields
-
Mechanical (motors, gens):
- Bearing friction: P_friction = T_friction * omega
- Windage (air): P_windage ~ omega^3
- Brush friction (DC brushed): wear-dependent
-
Eff calc:
- Electromagnet: not primary metric → focus P = I^2 R for field/force
- Motor: eta = P_mech / P_elec = (T * omega) / (V * I)
- Generator: eta = P_elec / P_mech
- Transformer: eta = P_out / P_in = P_out / (P_out + P_Cu + P_core)
- Typ: small motors 60-85%, large 90-97%, transformers 95-99%
## Loss Analysis
| Loss Mechanism | Formula | Value (W) | Fraction of Total |
|---------------|---------|-----------|-------------------|
| Copper (I^2R) | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Core hysteresis | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Core eddy current | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Mechanical (if applicable) | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| **Total losses** | | [W] | 100% |
- **Efficiency**: eta = [%]
- **Temperature rise estimate**: Delta_T = P_total / (h * A_surface) = [K]
→ Loss breakdown, each quantified, eff, T rise for thermal feas.
If err: Eff below target → ID dominant. Copper → bigger wire or fewer turns. Core → lower-loss mat or reduce B_max. Mech → better bearings. T rise exceeds → more cooling or reduce density.
Step 5: Validate
Meets specs + physically realizable:
-
Perf verify:
- Recompute primary from final params
- Meets/exceeds Step 1
- Margin: (achieved - required) / required %
-
Saturation:
- B_max < sat flux density of mat
- Every section (legs, yoke, gap fringing)
- Gap region lowest flux density, smallest X-sec has highest
-
Thermal:
- T_surface = T_ambient + P_total / (h * A_surface)
- Nat convection: h ~ 5-10 W/(m^2.K)
- Forced air: h ~ 25-100 W/(m^2.K)
- Insulation class: A (105°C), B (130°C), F (155°C), H (180°C)
- Core Curie: silicon steel ~770°C (rarely limit), ferrite ~200-300°C (can be limit)
-
Dims:
- Fits envelope
- Winding fits window w/ fill factor
- Clearance + creepage for HV
-
Margin + sensitivity:
- +/-10% var each key param (I, turns, gap, mu_r)
- ID most sensitive → drives mfg tolerance
- Air-gap: gap length almost always most sensitive
## Design Validation
| Requirement | Target | Achieved | Margin |
|------------|--------|----------|--------|
| [Primary metric] | [value] | [value] | [%] |
| Efficiency | [%] | [%] | [%] |
| Temperature rise | < [K] | [K] | [K margin] |
| Envelope | [dimensions] | [dimensions] | [fits / exceeds] |
## Sensitivity Analysis
| Parameter | Nominal | +10% Effect on Primary Metric | Most Sensitive? |
|-----------|---------|-------------------------------|----------------|
| Current | [A] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| Turns | [N] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| Air gap | [mm] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| mu_r | [value] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
→ All reqs met w/ docs margins, thermal OK, most sensitive param ID'd.
If err: Req not met → iterate topology (Step 2), params (Step 3), or loss mitigation (Step 4). Thermal infeasible → reduce duty, more size (cooling), higher-T insulation, active cooling. Doc each iter.
Check
- All reqs quantified w/ vals + units
- Topology justified + alts docs
- Mag circuit complete (reluctances, flux, NI)
- Wire gauge for J (3-6 A/mm^2 cont)
- Core below sat w/ margin
- All losses quantified (copper, hyst, eddy, mech)
- Eff meets target
- T rise w/in insulation class
- Fits envelope
- Sensitivity ID's tightest-tolerance param
- Complete for prototype build
Traps
- Ignoring mag circuit reluctance: Gap dominates (1 mm gap > 100 mm silicon steel core reluctance). No mag circuit model → devices far below expectations.
- Operating above sat: Above B-H knee, incremental mu drops. Doubling I ≠ doubling flux. Appears to "stop working". Always check B_max in narrowest X-sec.
- Undersize copper for thermal: J limits = thermal in disguise. 10 A/mm^2 free air → overheats in min. Cont-duty < 5-6 A/mm^2 w/o active cooling.
- Neglect fringing at gaps: Flux spreads → effective gap area bigger. Gaps ~ core dim → fringing 20-50%. Ignoring → underestimate flux + overestimate NI.
- DC R at high freq: 10 kHz skin depth in Cu ~ 0.66 mm. Magnet wire > 1.3 mm diam → AC R >> DC R. Litz or parallel thin strands.
- Confuse k_T vs k_E units: k_T (N.m/A) + k_E (V.s/rad) numerically equal SI. BUT k_E in V/kRPM (datasheets) → convert: k_T [N.m/A] = k_E [V/kRPM] * 60 / (2 * pi * 1000).
→
analyze-magnetic-field— B-field from current dist for detailed analysissolve-electromagnetic-induction— induction principles in motors/gens/transformersformulate-maxwell-equations— full EM for high-freq, waveguides, antennassimulate-cpu-architecture— digital ctrl sys driving motor controllers + power electronicsanalyze-tensegrity-system— tension-compression networks; shares prestress equilibrium
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
content-collections
元Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
polymarket
元这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
creating-opencode-plugins
元该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
sglang
元SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
