du-dum
关于
The du-dum skill separates continuous observation from costly decision-making in autonomous agents using a two-clock architecture. A fast clock cheaply collects data into a digest, while a slow, expensive clock (e.g., an LLM call) only acts when the digest indicates pending work. Use this to drastically reduce costs when most observation cycles require no action, preventing expensive calls on every loop tick.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/du-dum在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Du-Dum: Batch-Then-Act Pattern
Split watching from acting. Two clocks run at different speeds. Fast clock (look) grab data cheap and write tight digest. Slow clock (do) read digest and pick act or skip. Digest empty? Action clock quit fast -- zero cost for idle tick.
Name come from heartbeat: du-dum, du-dum. First beat (du) watch; second beat (dum) act. Most time, only first beat fire.
When Use
- Build autonomous agent on budget; must watch often, act less
- Old heartbeat loop call LLM every tick even when nothing change
- Watch cheap (API read, file parse, log scan) but act costly (LLM call, write, ping)
- Need split failure: if watch break, last good digest still good for action clock
- Design cron-based agent where look and do run as separate jobs
Inputs
- Required: List of data sources fast clock must watch (APIs, files, logs, feeds)
- Required: Act slow clock must take when digest show pending work
- Optional: Fast clock gap (default: every 4 hours)
- Optional: Slow clock gap (default: once per day)
- Optional: Cost cap per day (to check clock config)
- Optional: Digest format pick (markdown, JSON, YAML)
Steps
Step 1: Spot Two Clocks
Split all work into watch (cheap, often) and act (costly, rare).
- List every op in current loop or planned flow
- Tag each as watch (read data, make summary) or act (call LLM, write out, send msg)
- Check split: watch ops should cost zero or near-zero edge cost; act ops should be costly ones
- Set speed: fast clock runs often enough to catch events; slow clock runs often enough to hit response-time goal
| Clock | Cost profile | Speed | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fast (look) | Cheap: API read, file parse, no LLM | 4-6x/day | Scan GitHub notifications, parse RSS, read logs |
| Slow (act) | Costly: LLM inference, write ops | 1x/day | Compose reply, update dashboard, send alerts |
Got: Clean two-column split. Every op put in exactly one clock. Fast clock has no LLM calls; slow clock has no data grab.
If fail: Op need both read and LLM (e.g., "summarize new issues")? Split: fast clock grab raw issues into digest; slow clock summarize. Digest is boundary.
Step 2: Design Digest Format
Digest is low-bandwidth message bridging two clocks. Must be tight, human-readable, machine-parse.
- Set digest file path and format (markdown good for human debug)
- Add header with timestamp and source meta
- Set "pending" section list items needing act
- Set "status" section with state now (for dashboards or logs)
- Add clear empty mark (e.g.,
pending: noneor empty section)
Example digest shape:
# Digest — 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z
## Pending
- PR #42 needs review response (opened 2h ago, author requested feedback)
- Issue #99 has new comment from maintainer (action: reply)
## Status
- Last analyzed: 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z
- Sources checked: github-notifications, rss-feed, error-log
- Items scanned: 14
- Items pending: 2
When nothing pending:
# Digest — 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z
## Pending
(none)
## Status
- Last analyzed: 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z
- Sources checked: github-notifications, rss-feed, error-log
- Items scanned: 8
- Items pending: 0
Got: Digest template with clear pending/empty states. Action clock can pick go/no-go by one field or section.
If fail: Digest too big (>50 lines)? Fast clock packing too much raw data. Move detail to separate data file; keep digest as summary with pointers.
Step 3: Build Fast Clock (Look)
Build watch scripts running on fast schedule.
- Make one script per data source (keep fails split)
- Each script read its source, pull relevant events, append or rewrite digest
- Use file lock or atomic write to block partial digest
- Log run (timestamp, items found, errors) to separate log file
- Never call LLM or do write ops beyond updating digest
# Pseudocode: analyze-notifications.sh
fetch_notifications()
filter_actionable(notifications)
format_as_digest_entries(filtered)
atomic_write(digest_path, entries)
log("analyzed {count} notifications, {pending} actionable")
Schedule example (cron):
# Fast clock: analyze every 4 hours
30 */4 * * * /path/to/analyze-notifications.sh >> /var/log/analysis.log 2>&1
0 6 * * * /path/to/analyze-pr-status.sh >> /var/log/analysis.log 2>&1
Got: One or more watch scripts, each make or update digest file. Scripts run split -- one fails, others still update their sections.
If fail: Source down short time? Script log err and leave old digest entry alone. Do not clear digest on source fail -- stale data better than missing data for action clock.
Step 4: Build Slow Clock (Act)
Build act script that read digest and pick act or skip.
- Read digest file (Step 0 of every act cycle)
- Check pending: empty or "none"? Quit fast with log entry
- Items pending? Fire costly op (LLM call, msg compose, etc.)
- After act, clear or archive done entries
- Log run (items done, cost, time)
# Pseudocode: heartbeat.sh (the slow clock)
digest = read_file(digest_path)
if digest.pending is empty:
log("heartbeat: nothing pending, exiting")
exit(0)
# Only reaches here if work exists
response = call_llm(digest.pending, system_prompt)
execute_actions(response)
archive_digest(digest_path)
log("heartbeat: processed {count} items, cost: {tokens} tokens")
Schedule example (cron):
# Slow clock: act once per day at 7am
0 7 * * * /path/to/heartbeat.sh >> /var/log/heartbeat.log 2>&1
Got: Act script quits under 1 sec on idle cycle (only file read and empty check). On busy cycle, handle pending items and clear digest.
If fail: LLM call fail? Do not clear digest. Pending items stay for next act cycle. Think about retry count in digest to stop infinite retry on permanently broken items.
Step 5: Setup Idle Detect
Cost savings come from idle detect -- action clock must reliably pick "nothing to do" vs "something to do" with low cost.
- Set idle check as one fast op (file read + string check)
- Check idle path has zero outside calls (no API, no LLM, no net)
- Time idle path -- should be under 1 sec
- Log idle cycles different from busy cycles for watch
# Minimal idle check
if grep -q "^(none)$" "$DIGEST_PATH" || grep -q "pending: 0" "$DIGEST_PATH"; then
echo "$(date -u +%FT%TZ) heartbeat: idle" >> "$LOG_PATH"
exit 0
fi
Got: Idle path is one file read then string match. No net calls, no process spawning past script itself.
If fail: Idle check flaky (false hits miss work, or false miss cause bad LLM calls)? Simpler digest. One bool field (has_pending: true/false) at top is most reliable.
Step 6: Check Cost Model
Tally expected cost to confirm two-clock arch delivers savings.
- Count fast clock runs per day:
fast_runs = 24 / fast_interval_hours - Count slow clock runs per day: usually 1
- Watch cost:
fast_runs * cost_per_analysis_run(should be ~$0 if no LLM) - Act cost:
active_days_fraction * cost_per_action_run - Idle cost:
(1 - active_days_fraction) * cost_per_idle_check(should be ~$0) - Compare vs old single-loop cost
Example cost compare:
| Architecture | Daily cost (active) | Daily cost (idle) | Monthly cost (80% idle) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single loop (LLM every 30min) | $13.74/37h | $13.74/37h | ~$400 |
| Du-dum (6 analyses + 1 action) | $0.30 | $0.00 | ~$6 |
Got: Cost model show du-dum cheaper than old by at least 10x on idle day.
If fail: Cost model not show big savings? One likely true: (a) fast clock too fast, (b) fast clock has hidden LLM calls, or (c) system rarely idle. Du-dum helps high-idle systems. Always busy? Simpler poll may fit better.
Checks
- Fast and slow clocks clean split, no LLM calls in fast path
- Digest format has clear empty mark
- Idle detect quits under 1 sec with zero outside calls
- Fast clock fail not corrupt digest (stale data kept)
- Slow clock fail not clear pending items (retry next cycle)
- Cost model show at least 10x savings on idle day vs single-loop arch
- Both clocks log runs for watch and debug
- Digest not grow without bound (old entries archived or cleared after done)
Pitfalls
- Digest grow without bound: Fast clock append but slow clock never clear? Digest becomes growing log. Always clear or archive done entries after act cycle end.
- Fast clock too fast: Run look every 5 min when events land daily wastes API quota and disk I/O. Match fast clock speed to real event rate of data sources.
- Slow clock too slow: Act window once per day but events need same-hour reply? Slow clock too slow. Bump speed or add urgent-event shortcut that fires act fast.
- LLM calls in fast clock: Whole cost model break if fast clock has LLM inference. Audit every fast-clock script; confirm zero LLM calls. Need summary? Defer to slow clock.
- Coupled fast clock scripts: One look script depend on another's out? Fail in first cascades. Keep fast-clock scripts split -- each read own source and write own digest section.
- Silent idle log: Idle cycles make no log out? Cannot tell "running and idle" from "crashed and not running." Always log idle cycle, even just timestamp.
- Clear digest on look fail: Source down? Do not write empty digest. Slow clock would see "nothing pending" and skip work that actually pending. Keep last good digest on fail.
See Also
manage-token-budget-- cost control frame that du-dum make real; du-dum is arch pattern, token budget is count layercircuit-breaker-pattern-- handle fail case (tools break); du-dum handle normal case (nothing to do). Use together: du-dum for idle detect, circuit-breaker for fail recoveryobserve-- watch method for fast clock; du-dum shape when and how watch become act via digestforage-resources-- strategy roam layer; du-dum is run rhythm forage-resources sits incoordinate-reasoning-- stigmergic signal patterns; digest file is form of stigmergy (indirect coord through env artifacts)
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
content-collections
元Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
polymarket
元这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
creating-opencode-plugins
元该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
sglang
元SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
