ship-decision
关于
This skill helps solo founders break decision paralysis on reversible product choices like feature prioritization or launch timing. It forces a concrete comparison of 2-3 named options using a regret-minimizing framework. Use it when a developer is stuck on a binary/tri-way decision and asks for a sanity check, but not for venting or major legal/financial commitments.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add rockscy/solo-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/rockscy/solo-skillsgit clone https://github.com/rockscy/solo-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/ship-decision在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Ship Decision / 出货决策
When to use
- The user has 2–3 concrete options on the table and can't pick.
- The decision is reversible within a week (otherwise escalate to a longer process).
- They are a solo operator (no committee to satisfy).
When NOT to use
- The user is just venting — they don't want a decision yet, they want to think out loud.
- The decision is legally or financially binding (contracts, equity splits) — those need a lawyer / accountant, not a quick framework.
- They have not yet named the options. Force them to articulate concrete options before applying this skill.
The framework
For each option, fill in four lines only:
- Cost — hours of focused work + dollars committed.
- Reversal cost — if this turns out wrong, how many hours to undo?
- Best-case 30-day signal — what observable thing tells you it's working?
- Worst-case 30-day signal — what tells you to kill it?
Then apply the regret-minimization tiebreaker:
"In 12 months, which choice will I regret not having tried?"
If reversal cost < 1 week of work AND you have a clear 30-day kill signal → ship the higher-regret option, no further deliberation.
Output format
Always produce a table. Keep cells under 12 words.
| Option A | Option B | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | … | … |
| Reversal cost | … | … |
| Best-case signal | … | … |
| Worst-case signal | … | … |
| Recommendation | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ |
Then one sentence on the why.
Worked example
User: "Should I rebuild my landing page in Framer or stick with my hand-coded Next.js page?"
Output:
| Framer | Stay Next.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | 6 hrs migration | 0 hrs |
| Reversal cost | 2 hrs (re-deploy old) | 0 hrs |
| Best-case signal | conv. rate +20% in 30 days | conv. unchanged |
| Worst-case signal | conv. drops, no analytics | no growth, blame self for not trying |
| Recommendation | ✅ | ❌ |
Framer wins: reversal cost is trivial, and the regret of not testing a dedicated landing tool is higher than 6 hours of migration.
中文版
何时使用
- 用户面前有 2–3 个具体选项,但拿不定主意。
- 决策一周内可逆转(否则需要更长的评估流程)。
- 用户是单兵作战(不需要照顾团队意见)。
何时不使用
- 用户只是在发牢骚——他们想自言自语,不是真要决策。
- 决策有法律或财务约束(合同、股权)——这种需要专业人士。
- 用户还没说清楚选项。强制他们先把选项具体化。
框架
每个选项只填四行:
- 成本——专注工时 + 投入金额。
- 反悔成本——如果错了,撤回需要几小时?
- 30 天最佳信号——什么可观测指标说明它成功了?
- 30 天最差信号——什么让你决定砍掉?
然后用遗憾最小化做平局裁定:
"12 个月后回头看,没尝试哪个选项我会更后悔?"
若反悔成本 < 1 周 且 有明确的 30 天止损信号 → 选遗憾更大的那个,不再纠结。
输出格式
始终用表格,每格 ≤ 12 个字,最后一句话说明理由。
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
content-collections
元Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
polymarket
元这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
creating-opencode-plugins
元该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
sglang
元SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
