关于
This skill applies production-grade design standards when building or reviewing UI components and pages. It ensures designs meet key criteria for accessibility, visual hierarchy, spacing, and responsiveness. Use it for implementing design systems, tokens, and performing pre-ship quality checks on any web project.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skillsgit clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/design-standards在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Design Standards
Production design standards for any web project. Stack-agnostic. Tool-agnostic. Covers tokens, contrast, hierarchy, spacing, mobile rules, and the pre-ship checklist.
This skill complements brand-identity (which defines the visual system) and brand-style-guide (which documents it). This skill is for the day-to-day work of applying those standards in real components and pages.
When to use
- Building a new page, section, or component
- Reviewing UI for quality, accessibility, or consistency
- Setting up design tokens for a new project
- Fixing layout, contrast, or hierarchy issues
- Establishing a button or form standard
- Pre-ship design review
When NOT to use
- Defining a brand identity from scratch (use
brand-identity) - Documenting a finished brand system (use
brand-style-guide) - Building a formal component library (use
design-system) - Frontend code architecture (use
frontend-component-build) - Accessibility-only audits with WCAG remediation (use
accessibility-audit)
Required inputs
- The page or component being built or reviewed
- The brand's design tokens (colors, type, spacing) - or willingness to define them
- The target devices and viewports
If brand tokens are undefined, define a working set first using the template in references/design-tokens-template.md.
The framework: 6 standards
Six standards apply to every piece of UI. Hold the line on these and most design problems disappear.
1. Design tokens
Every project needs tokens defined before any UI gets built. Tokens are the source of truth.
Color tokens (minimum):
- Primary brand color
- Primary hover (typically 15 to 25 percent darker)
- Background variants (surface, alt-section, hero/dark, footer)
- Text scale (heading, body, muted, on-dark)
- Semantic (success, warning, error, info)
Spacing tokens:
- A consistent scale (e.g., 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96)
- Page max-width
- Section vertical padding (large, medium, small)
- Card padding
- Grid gaps
Type tokens:
- Display, H1 through H4, body large, body, small, caption
- Each with size, weight, line height, letter spacing
- Font fallback stacks
Radius tokens:
- Tight (cards, badges)
- Standard (buttons, inputs)
- Round (avatars, pill buttons)
Document the tokens once. Reference them everywhere. Hardcoded values are technical debt.
2. WCAG AA contrast (non-negotiable)
Contrast is not a preference. It is a baseline. A design that fails AA is broken, regardless of how it looks to designers with full vision.
| Element | Required ratio |
|---|---|
| Normal body text | 4.5:1 |
| Large text (18pt regular or 14pt bold) | 3:1 |
| UI components and graphical elements | 3:1 |
Common failures to avoid:
- Light gray body text on white that calculates to 2 to 4:1
- Brand color used for body text without a darker variant
- Light borders on form fields that compute under 3:1
- Bright orange or yellow on white at small sizes
For the math, the contrast checker, and brand-color strategies, see brand-identity/references/contrast-and-accessibility.md.
3. Visual hierarchy
A well-designed page has a clear scan order. Hierarchy comes from:
- Size. The largest element gets noticed first.
- Weight. Bold beats regular at the same size.
- Color. Saturated beats neutral. High-contrast beats low.
- Spacing. What sits alone gets emphasis. What gets crowded recedes.
- Position. Top-left and center get weight. Edges and corners recede.
Apply hierarchy intentionally. Every visual element should be reachable through the hierarchy. If three things compete for primary attention, none of them wins.
Common failures:
- Multiple elements styled as the "primary" CTA (creates ambiguity)
- Body text and headlines too close in size
- Hero image fighting the hero text for attention
- Icon, headline, and image at similar visual weight
4. Spacing and rhythm
Spacing is what separates a polished layout from a cluttered one.
Rules:
- Use the spacing scale, not arbitrary values
- Related elements sit closer together than unrelated ones (proximity principle)
- Section breathing room: minimum 64px desktop, 48px mobile
- Card padding: minimum 24px desktop, 16px mobile
- Form field spacing: minimum 16px between fields
- Touch targets: minimum 44 by 44 pixels
Common failures:
- Inconsistent spacing within similar contexts (one card has 24px padding, the next has 32px)
- Cramped sections that bleed into each other
- Touch targets under 44 pixels on mobile
- Headline butted directly against subheadline with no rhythm
5. Mobile rules
Most users are on mobile. Designing for desktop first guarantees mobile failures.
Standards:
- Test on a 375 to 390 pixel viewport before declaring complete
- All interactive elements minimum 44 by 44 pixels
- Sticky bottom bars: page wrapper needs bottom padding equal to bar height
- No fixed pixel widths without max-width constraint
- Text never smaller than 14 pixels for body content
- Tap targets get 8 pixels of spacing minimum on all sides
- Modal and popover content scrolls; body locks
- Form inputs: at least 16px text size to prevent iOS auto-zoom
Common failures:
- Designs that work in browser dev tools but break on real devices
- Sticky navigation eating 80px of viewport without compensation
- Horizontal scroll appearing because of one over-wide element
- Tap targets that are visually fine but impossibly close to other tap targets
6. Component consistency
The same thing should look the same everywhere. Variations should be intentional.
Common consistency principles:
- Buttons: one primary style, one secondary style, one ghost style. Not five.
- Cards: one base card pattern with variants. Not bespoke cards per page.
- Icons: one stroke weight, one corner style across the icon set
- Avatars and brand marks: one shape rule (rounded-lg or fully round, pick one and stick to it)
- Form inputs: one set of input states (default, focus, error, disabled) used everywhere
Common failures:
- Three different "primary buttons" used inconsistently across pages
- Some cards with rounded-2xl corners, others with rounded-xl
- Iconography style drifting between sections
- Brand avatar that switches between square and round depending on the page
Workflow
- Confirm tokens. If tokens are not yet defined, define a working set first. Document them.
- Sketch hierarchy. Before writing markup, identify the primary action, secondary actions, and supporting content. Confirm the scan order makes sense.
- Build mobile-first. Lay out for the smallest target viewport before scaling up.
- Apply tokens. All values come from the token set. No hardcoded colors, sizes, or spacing.
- Run contrast checks. Every text-on-background combination passes AA. Every UI element passes 3:1.
- Test at viewport breakpoints. 375, 768, 1024, 1440 minimum. Confirm nothing breaks.
- Run the pre-ship checklist in
references/preship-checklist.md.
Failure patterns
- Designing without tokens. Hardcoded colors and spacing. Hard to maintain. Inconsistent at scale.
- Skipping contrast checks. Especially on brand colors used for text. Most brand colors fail AA.
- Designing only for desktop. Mobile reveals every layout sin. Test mobile first or last, but always.
- Rounded-everything. Treating "modern" as "rounded all the things." Rounded corners are a tool, not a default.
- Visual hierarchy mush. Three things competing as primary. Reader does not know where to look.
- Touch target violations. Visually nice 32px buttons that fail finger ergonomics on real devices.
- Component drift. Each page rebuilds the card or button from scratch. Design system erodes.
Output format
This skill produces design decisions and review notes more than artifacts. Outputs include:
- Design tokens file (when starting a project):
design-tokens.mdor equivalent - Component or page review: markdown notes scored against the 6 standards, with specific fixes
- Pre-ship checklist results: pass/fail across the checklist with notes
When generating component code (HTML, CSS, framework-specific markup), the SKILL.md remains stack-agnostic. Stack-specific patterns live in reference files.
Reference files
references/design-tokens-template.md- Template for setting up tokens for any project.references/preship-checklist.md- Final design review checklist before shipping.references/tailwind-patterns.md- Optional. Tailwind-specific component patterns (hero, cards, buttons, data rows) for projects on that stack.
GitHub 仓库
常见问题
什么是 design-standards Skill?
design-standards 是一个 Claude Skill,作者为 rampstackco。Skill 将 Claude 按需加载的说明和资源打包,让 Claude 无需额外提示即可执行与 design-standards 相关的任务。
如何安装 design-standards?
使用本页的安装命令:将 design-standards 作为插件添加到 Claude Code,或将其仓库克隆到 skills 目录,然后重启 Claude 以加载该 Skill。
design-standards 属于哪个分类?
design-standards 属于元分类。
design-standards 可以免费使用吗?
可以。design-standards 已收录在 AIMCP,可免费安装。
相关推荐技能
Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
