SKILL·95834A

landing-page-copy

rampstackco
更新于 7 days ago
2 次查看
910
126
910
在 GitHub 上查看
元aitesting

关于

This skill generates conversion-focused landing page copy, covering key sections like the hero, value proposition, and CTAs. Use it for creating new pages like sales pages or opt-in forms from scratch. Choose the `cro-optimization` skill instead for improving the conversion rate of existing pages.

快速安装

Claude Code

推荐
主要方式
npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code
插件命令备选方式
/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills
Git 克隆备选方式
git clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/landing-page-copy

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

技能文档

Landing Page Copy

Write copy for pages with a single conversion goal: signup, purchase, demo request, download, lead capture. Stack-agnostic.

This skill is narrower than content-and-copy. Landing pages exist to drive a specific action, not to inform broadly.


When to use

  • Writing a hero section for a homepage or product page
  • Writing a sales page or long-form sales letter
  • Drafting opt-in or lead-capture page copy
  • Campaign-specific landing pages
  • Pricing page copy
  • Demo or signup CTAs

When NOT to use

  • Long-form blog content (use content-and-copy)
  • Email sequences (use email-sequences)
  • Brand voice definition (use brand-voice)
  • Page design and layout decisions (use design-standards)

Required inputs

  • The product, service, or offer
  • The target audience and the specific objection they bring
  • The conversion goal (one specific action)
  • Brand voice
  • Existing customer language (testimonials, support tickets, sales calls)
  • Any constraints (length, format, regulatory)

If audience is unclear or objections are unknown, run brand-discovery or pull from sales call recordings before writing.


The framework: 7 sections

A landing page does seven things in sequence. The structure can flex (combine, reorder, expand), but the elements stay constant.

1. Hero

The first 3 to 5 seconds. Decides whether the visitor stays.

Three components:

  • Headline. The promise. Specific, outcome-focused, free of cliche.
  • Subheadline. The mechanism. How you deliver the promise.
  • Primary CTA. The action. One button, descriptive label.

Strong hero patterns:

  • Outcome + audience + mechanism. "Ship features 3x faster, for engineering teams who hate meetings, with our async-first project tool."
  • Pain reversal. "Stop losing customers to slow page loads."
  • Surprising claim. "The note-taking app that gets used. We have data."
  • Direct address. "You have 47 unread Slack messages. Here's what to do about it."

Weak hero patterns:

  • Generic adjective stacking ("Powerful, intuitive, scalable")
  • "Welcome to our platform"
  • Brand-name-only headlines ("Acme: The Future of X")
  • Vague benefits ("Streamline your workflow")

2. Social proof (early)

Within the first scroll, prove someone else trusts you.

Forms:

  • Customer logos (recognizable beats unknown)
  • Quantitative trust signal ("Over 10,000 teams")
  • One strong testimonial with name and role
  • Press mentions (logos of where you've been featured)

Placement: Right below the hero, before the visitor invests in reading more.

3. Problem / promise

Establish that you understand the visitor's situation.

Pattern:

  • 1 to 3 paragraphs naming the specific problem
  • Use the visitor's language (mined from research, not your marketing language)
  • Stop before you sell. Resonate first.

Test: Read the problem section aloud. Does the target audience nod? If they don't, you don't understand them yet.

4. Solution / mechanism

How you solve the problem. The "what we actually do" section.

Effective structure:

  • One headline summarizing the solution
  • 3 to 5 specific features or capabilities, each with a 1-2 sentence explanation
  • Each feature framed as the benefit it produces, not the technical detail
  • Visual support (screenshots, illustrations, video clips)

Failure mode: Listing features without translating to outcomes. "Real-time collaboration" is a feature. "Edit together without copying-pasting from email" is the outcome.

5. Proof and detail

The expanded social proof and case studies section.

Components:

  • 1 to 3 detailed case studies (specific customer, specific outcome, specific numbers)
  • Multiple testimonials with attribution
  • Specific data points (usage stats, success metrics, growth)
  • Awards, certifications, or third-party validation

The deeper proof section is where committed visitors convert. Skim-readers won't make it here, but the ones who do are ready to buy.

6. Objection handling

Anticipate the reasons people say no. Address them directly.

Common objection types:

  • Price. "Is this worth it?"
  • Time. "Will this take forever to set up?"
  • Trust. "Will this actually work for my situation?"
  • Risk. "What if I commit and it's wrong?"
  • Comparison. "How is this different from [competitor]?"
  • Implementation. "Can my team handle the change?"

Handling formats:

  • FAQ section. Structured, scannable.
  • Comparison table. Vs. competitors or vs. alternatives.
  • Risk reversal. Money-back guarantee, free trial, no-contract terms.
  • Proof of effort needed. "Setup takes 5 minutes, not 5 weeks."

7. Final CTA

The closer. Re-state the offer. Re-state the action.

Strong final CTAs:

  • Repeat the primary CTA from the hero (consistency)
  • Frame in terms of the visitor's situation ("Get your team set up in 5 minutes")
  • Remove friction ("No credit card required")
  • One action only (avoid offering 5 alternatives that paralyze decision)

Avoid:

  • Multiple CTAs competing for attention at the bottom
  • New offers introduced only at the bottom (visitor is now confused)
  • Long forms that ask for more information than needed for the action

The CTA itself

Buttons matter. Treat the button copy as a whole-page-worth of attention.

Strong CTA patterns:

  • Action + outcome. "Start your free trial," "Get my pricing," "Send me the guide"
  • First-person. "Show me how" outperforms "Show you how"
  • Specific. "Book a 15-minute demo" beats "Contact us"
  • Low-friction. "Free trial, no credit card" reduces commitment cost

Weak CTAs:

  • "Submit" (functional but lifeless)
  • "Click here" (no value statement)
  • "Learn more" (vague; about what?)
  • "Get started" (started doing what?)

Workflow

  1. Confirm the offer. What exactly is being offered? At what price (if any)? What does the visitor get?
  2. Confirm the audience and objection. Specific segment. The specific worry they bring.
  3. Mine the language. Customer testimonials, support tickets, sales calls. Use real customer phrases.
  4. Draft the hero. Headline, subheadline, CTA. Test 5 to 10 variations.
  5. Build the structure. All 7 sections in order. Sections can combine for shorter pages.
  6. Draft sections. Section by section. Don't polish until the structure is sound.
  7. Edit for friction. Remove every word that doesn't earn its place. Landing pages do not have words to spare.
  8. Test the CTA. Read the page aloud. By the end, is the visitor's next action obvious?
  9. Hand off with a post-import checklist. The deliverable is a markdown document, not a built page, so step 9 is not something you perform: it is a list you attach for whoever builds the page. Spell-check the copy yourself, then hand over the rest. Every destination URL resolves. Mobile preview of the built page. SEO basics if SEO is a goal. If the page is already built and you are revising it in place, run the checklist yourself instead of handing it over.

Failure patterns

  • Hero that explains instead of sells. "We're an X for Y" is description. "Get X without Y" is sell.
  • Feature lists with no outcomes. Features without benefits read as a spec sheet.
  • Generic testimonials. "Great product!" is worth less than nothing. "We cut onboarding time from 2 weeks to 4 days" is gold.
  • Multiple competing CTAs. Pick one primary action. Everything else is noise.
  • Walls of text. Visitors scan. Use short paragraphs, bullet lists, and visual breakpoints.
  • No social proof. Trust is the first hurdle. Without proof, the rest of the page does not earn the chance to be read.
  • Mismatched headline and CTA. Hero promises X, CTA asks for Y. Visitor confused.
  • Writing for everyone. "Our solution works for any business" appeals to no one. Specificity converts.
  • Ignoring mobile. Most visitors are on mobile. Test the page at 375px first.

Output format

Default output is a structured markdown document for the page, with each section labeled. The markdown is ready to import into the CMS or hand to design.

Structure:

# [Page Title]

## SECTION: Hero
- Headline: [text]
- Subheadline: [text]
- Primary CTA: [button text]
- Supporting cue: [optional, e.g., "No credit card required"]
- Hero visual notes: [if any]

## SECTION: Social proof (early)
- Logo bar: [list customer/press logos]
- Trust statistic: [if any]

## SECTION: Problem / promise
[2 to 3 paragraphs]

## SECTION: Solution
- Headline: [text]
- Feature 1: [headline + description]
- Feature 2: [headline + description]
- Feature 3: [headline + description]

## SECTION: Proof
- Case study 1: [customer, outcome, numbers, or state the gap per the data-availability rule]
- Testimonials: [list]
- Data points: [list]

## SECTION: Objection handling
- FAQ: [questions and answers]
- OR Comparison table: [vs alternatives]
- OR Risk reversal: [guarantee, terms]

## SECTION: Final CTA
- Headline: [text]
- Final CTA button: [text]
- Supporting cue: [optional]

## Variants for testing
- [Alternate headlines]
- [Alternate CTAs]
- [Alternate proof framings]

If required data is unavailable

This skill's output depends on data, measurements, or tool results it cannot generate on its own. When a required input, tool, or data source is unavailable or unverifiable, the sanctioned output is the deliverable with the gap stated: what was needed, what was actually obtained or verified, and which parts of the output are affected. Fabricating, estimating, or interpolating a required number to complete the deliverable is never sanctioned. A stated gap is a complete answer.


Reference files

GitHub 仓库

rampstackco/claude-skills
路径: dist/codex/.agents/skills/landing-page-copy
0
agent-skillsai-agentsanthropicclaudeclaude-aiclaude-code
FAQ

常见问题

什么是 landing-page-copy Skill?

landing-page-copy 是一个 Claude Skill,作者为 rampstackco。Skill 将 Claude 按需加载的说明和资源打包,让 Claude 无需额外提示即可执行与 landing-page-copy 相关的任务。

如何安装 landing-page-copy?

使用本页的安装命令:将 landing-page-copy 作为插件添加到 Claude Code,或将其仓库克隆到 skills 目录,然后重启 Claude 以加载该 Skill。

landing-page-copy 属于哪个分类?

landing-page-copy 属于元分类。

landing-page-copy 可以免费使用吗?

可以。landing-page-copy 已收录在 AIMCP,可免费安装。

相关推荐技能

content-collections
元

Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。

查看技能
polymarket
元

这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。

查看技能
creating-opencode-plugins
元

该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。

查看技能
sglang
元

SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。

查看技能