pymc
关于
This skill enables Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming using PyMC, allowing developers to build hierarchical models and perform MCMC sampling with NUTS. It supports variational inference, model comparison via LOO/WAIC, and posterior predictive checks for model validation. Use it when implementing Bayesian regression, time series analysis, or needing diagnostic tools for sampling convergence.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skillsgit clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/pymc在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
PyMC Bayesian Modeling
Overview
PyMC is a Python library for Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming. Build, fit, validate, and compare Bayesian models using PyMC's modern API (version 5.x+), including hierarchical models, MCMC sampling (NUTS), variational inference, and model comparison (LOO, WAIC).
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Building Bayesian models (linear/logistic regression, hierarchical models, time series, etc.)
- Performing MCMC sampling or variational inference
- Conducting prior/posterior predictive checks
- Diagnosing sampling issues (divergences, convergence, ESS)
- Comparing multiple models using information criteria (LOO, WAIC)
- Implementing uncertainty quantification through Bayesian methods
- Working with hierarchical/multilevel data structures
- Handling missing data or measurement error in a principled way
Standard Bayesian Workflow
Follow this workflow for building and validating Bayesian models:
1. Data Preparation
import pymc as pm
import arviz as az
import numpy as np
# Load and prepare data
X = ... # Predictors
y = ... # Outcomes
# Standardize predictors for better sampling
X_mean = X.mean(axis=0)
X_std = X.std(axis=0)
X_scaled = (X - X_mean) / X_std
Key practices:
- Standardize continuous predictors (improves sampling efficiency)
- Center outcomes when possible
- Handle missing data explicitly (treat as parameters)
- Use named dimensions with
coordsfor clarity
2. Model Building
coords = {
'predictors': ['var1', 'var2', 'var3'],
'obs_id': np.arange(len(y))
}
with pm.Model(coords=coords) as model:
# Priors
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=1)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='predictors')
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
# Linear predictor
mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X_scaled, beta)
# Likelihood
y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y, dims='obs_id')
Key practices:
- Use weakly informative priors (not flat priors)
- Use
HalfNormalorExponentialfor scale parameters - Use named dimensions (
dims) instead ofshapewhen possible - Use
pm.Data()for values that will be updated for predictions
3. Prior Predictive Check
Always validate priors before fitting:
with model:
prior_pred = pm.sample_prior_predictive(samples=1000, random_seed=42)
# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(prior_pred, group='prior')
Check:
- Do prior predictions span reasonable values?
- Are extreme values plausible given domain knowledge?
- If priors generate implausible data, adjust and re-check
4. Fit Model
with model:
# Optional: Quick exploration with ADVI
# approx = pm.fit(n=20000)
# Full MCMC inference
idata = pm.sample(
draws=2000,
tune=1000,
chains=4,
target_accept=0.9,
random_seed=42,
idata_kwargs={'log_likelihood': True} # For model comparison
)
Key parameters:
draws=2000: Number of samples per chaintune=1000: Warmup samples (discarded)chains=4: Run 4 chains for convergence checkingtarget_accept=0.9: Higher for difficult posteriors (0.95-0.99)- Include
log_likelihood=Truefor model comparison
5. Check Diagnostics
Use the diagnostic script:
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
results = check_diagnostics(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])
Check:
- R-hat < 1.01: Chains have converged
- ESS > 400: Sufficient effective samples
- No divergences: NUTS sampled successfully
- Trace plots: Chains should mix well (fuzzy caterpillar)
If issues arise:
- Divergences → Increase
target_accept=0.95, use non-centered parameterization - Low ESS → Sample more draws, reparameterize to reduce correlation
- High R-hat → Run longer, check for multimodality
6. Posterior Predictive Check
Validate model fit:
with model:
pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata, extend_inferencedata=True, random_seed=42)
# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(idata)
Check:
- Do posterior predictions capture observed data patterns?
- Are systematic deviations evident (model misspecification)?
- Consider alternative models if fit is poor
7. Analyze Results
# Summary statistics
print(az.summary(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']))
# Posterior distributions
az.plot_posterior(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])
# Coefficient estimates
az.plot_forest(idata, var_names=['beta'], combined=True)
8. Make Predictions
X_new = ... # New predictor values
X_new_scaled = (X_new - X_mean) / X_std
with model:
pm.set_data({'X_scaled': X_new_scaled})
post_pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(
idata.posterior,
var_names=['y_obs'],
random_seed=42
)
# Extract prediction intervals
y_pred_mean = post_pred.posterior_predictive['y_obs'].mean(dim=['chain', 'draw'])
y_pred_hdi = az.hdi(post_pred.posterior_predictive, var_names=['y_obs'])
Common Model Patterns
Linear Regression
For continuous outcomes with linear relationships:
with pm.Model() as linear_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)
Use template: assets/linear_regression_template.py
Logistic Regression
For binary outcomes:
with pm.Model() as logistic_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
logit_p = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p, observed=y_obs)
Hierarchical Models
For grouped data (use non-centered parameterization):
with pm.Model(coords={'groups': group_names}) as hierarchical_model:
# Hyperpriors
mu_alpha = pm.Normal('mu_alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
sigma_alpha = pm.HalfNormal('sigma_alpha', sigma=1)
# Group-level (non-centered)
alpha_offset = pm.Normal('alpha_offset', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='groups')
alpha = pm.Deterministic('alpha', mu_alpha + sigma_alpha * alpha_offset, dims='groups')
# Observation-level
mu = alpha[group_idx]
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)
Use template: assets/hierarchical_model_template.py
Critical: Always use non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models to avoid divergences.
Poisson Regression
For count data:
with pm.Model() as poisson_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
log_lambda = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Poisson('y', mu=pm.math.exp(log_lambda), observed=y_obs)
For overdispersed counts, use NegativeBinomial instead.
Time Series
For autoregressive processes:
with pm.Model() as ar_model:
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
rho = pm.Normal('rho', mu=0, sigma=0.5, shape=ar_order)
init_dist = pm.Normal.dist(mu=0, sigma=sigma)
y = pm.AR('y', rho=rho, sigma=sigma, init_dist=init_dist, observed=y_obs)
Model Comparison
Comparing Models
Use LOO or WAIC for model comparison:
from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models, check_loo_reliability
# Fit models with log_likelihood
models = {
'Model1': idata1,
'Model2': idata2,
'Model3': idata3
}
# Compare using LOO
comparison = compare_models(models, ic='loo')
# Check reliability
check_loo_reliability(models)
Interpretation:
- Δloo < 2: Models are similar, choose simpler model
- 2 < Δloo < 4: Weak evidence for better model
- 4 < Δloo < 10: Moderate evidence
- Δloo > 10: Strong evidence for better model
Check Pareto-k values:
- k < 0.7: LOO reliable
- k > 0.7: Consider WAIC or k-fold CV
Model Averaging
When models are similar, average predictions:
from scripts.model_comparison import model_averaging
averaged_pred, weights = model_averaging(models, var_name='y_obs')
Distribution Selection Guide
For Priors
Scale parameters (σ, τ):
pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)- Default choicepm.Exponential('sigma', lam=1)- Alternativepm.Gamma('sigma', alpha=2, beta=1)- More informative
Unbounded parameters:
pm.Normal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)- For standardized datapm.StudentT('theta', nu=3, mu=0, sigma=1)- Robust to outliers
Positive parameters:
pm.LogNormal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)pm.Gamma('theta', alpha=2, beta=1)
Probabilities:
pm.Beta('p', alpha=2, beta=2)- Weakly informativepm.Uniform('p', lower=0, upper=1)- Non-informative (use sparingly)
Correlation matrices:
pm.LKJCorr('corr', n=n_vars, eta=2)- eta=1 uniform, eta>1 prefers identity
For Likelihoods
Continuous outcomes:
pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma)- Default for continuous datapm.StudentT('y', nu=nu, mu=mu, sigma=sigma)- Robust to outliers
Count data:
pm.Poisson('y', mu=lambda)- Equidispersed countspm.NegativeBinomial('y', mu=mu, alpha=alpha)- Overdispersed countspm.ZeroInflatedPoisson('y', psi=psi, mu=mu)- Excess zeros
Binary outcomes:
pm.Bernoulli('y', p=p)orpm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p)
Categorical outcomes:
pm.Categorical('y', p=probs)
See: references/distributions.md for comprehensive distribution reference
Sampling and Inference
MCMC with NUTS
Default and recommended for most models:
idata = pm.sample(
draws=2000,
tune=1000,
chains=4,
target_accept=0.9,
random_seed=42
)
Adjust when needed:
- Divergences →
target_accept=0.95or higher - Slow sampling → Use ADVI for initialization
- Discrete parameters → Use
pm.Metropolis()for discrete vars
Variational Inference
Fast approximation for exploration or initialization:
with model:
approx = pm.fit(n=20000, method='advi')
# Use for initialization
start = approx.sample(return_inferencedata=False)[0]
idata = pm.sample(start=start)
Trade-offs:
- Much faster than MCMC
- Approximate (may underestimate uncertainty)
- Good for large models or quick exploration
See: references/sampling_inference.md for detailed sampling guide
Diagnostic Scripts
Comprehensive Diagnostics
from scripts.model_diagnostics import create_diagnostic_report
create_diagnostic_report(
idata,
var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'],
output_dir='diagnostics/'
)
Creates:
- Trace plots
- Rank plots (mixing check)
- Autocorrelation plots
- Energy plots
- ESS evolution
- Summary statistics CSV
Quick Diagnostic Check
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
results = check_diagnostics(idata)
Checks R-hat, ESS, divergences, and tree depth.
Common Issues and Solutions
Divergences
Symptom: idata.sample_stats.diverging.sum() > 0
Solutions:
- Increase
target_accept=0.95or0.99 - Use non-centered parameterization (hierarchical models)
- Add stronger priors to constrain parameters
- Check for model misspecification
Low Effective Sample Size
Symptom: ESS < 400
Solutions:
- Sample more draws:
draws=5000 - Reparameterize to reduce posterior correlation
- Use QR decomposition for regression with correlated predictors
High R-hat
Symptom: R-hat > 1.01
Solutions:
- Run longer chains:
tune=2000, draws=5000 - Check for multimodality
- Improve initialization with ADVI
Slow Sampling
Solutions:
- Use ADVI initialization
- Reduce model complexity
- Increase parallelization:
cores=8, chains=8 - Use variational inference if appropriate
Best Practices
Model Building
- Always standardize predictors for better sampling
- Use weakly informative priors (not flat)
- Use named dimensions (
dims) for clarity - Non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models
- Check prior predictive before fitting
Sampling
- Run multiple chains (at least 4) for convergence
- Use
target_accept=0.9as baseline (higher if needed) - Include
log_likelihood=Truefor model comparison - Set random seed for reproducibility
Validation
- Check diagnostics before interpretation (R-hat, ESS, divergences)
- Posterior predictive check for model validation
- Compare multiple models when appropriate
- Report uncertainty (HDI intervals, not just point estimates)
Workflow
- Start simple, add complexity gradually
- Prior predictive check → Fit → Diagnostics → Posterior predictive check
- Iterate on model specification based on checks
- Document assumptions and prior choices
Resources
This skill includes:
References (references/)
-
distributions.md: Comprehensive catalog of PyMC distributions organized by category (continuous, discrete, multivariate, mixture, time series). Use when selecting priors or likelihoods. -
sampling_inference.md: Detailed guide to sampling algorithms (NUTS, Metropolis, SMC), variational inference (ADVI, SVGD), and handling sampling issues. Use when encountering convergence problems or choosing inference methods. -
workflows.md: Complete workflow examples and code patterns for common model types, data preparation, prior selection, and model validation. Use as a cookbook for standard Bayesian analyses.
Scripts (scripts/)
-
model_diagnostics.py: Automated diagnostic checking and report generation. Functions:check_diagnostics()for quick checks,create_diagnostic_report()for comprehensive analysis with plots. -
model_comparison.py: Model comparison utilities using LOO/WAIC. Functions:compare_models(),check_loo_reliability(),model_averaging().
Templates (assets/)
-
linear_regression_template.py: Complete template for Bayesian linear regression with full workflow (data prep, prior checks, fitting, diagnostics, predictions). -
hierarchical_model_template.py: Complete template for hierarchical/multilevel models with non-centered parameterization and group-level analysis.
Quick Reference
Model Building
with pm.Model(coords={'var': names}) as model:
# Priors
param = pm.Normal('param', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='var')
# Likelihood
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=..., sigma=..., observed=data)
Sampling
idata = pm.sample(draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9)
Diagnostics
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
check_diagnostics(idata)
Model Comparison
from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models
compare_models({'m1': idata1, 'm2': idata2}, ic='loo')
Predictions
with model:
pm.set_data({'X': X_new})
pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata.posterior)
Additional Notes
- PyMC integrates with ArviZ for visualization and diagnostics
- Use
pm.model_to_graphviz(model)to visualize model structure - Save results with
idata.to_netcdf('results.nc') - Load with
az.from_netcdf('results.nc') - For very large models, consider minibatch ADVI or data subsampling
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
content-collections
元Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
polymarket
元这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
creating-opencode-plugins
元该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
sglang
元SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
