关于
This skill manages a queue for incoming engagement items (like notifications or messages) by ingesting, deduping, prioritizing, and rate-limiting them. It generates periodic digests for processing and enforces cooldown periods, acting as a buffer between platform signals and action cycles. It's designed to compose with a separate timing skill (du-dum), which handles the observation/action cadence.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/manage-engagement-buffer在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Manage Engagement Buffer
Ingest, dedup, prioritize, rate-limit incoming engagement items across platforms → hand off compact digest to action clock. Buffer between raw platform signals + deliberate action: absorbs bursts, merges dups, enforces cooldowns, ensures agent acts on highest-value first. W/o buffer → agent either processes in arrival order (missing urgent buried in noise) or attempts everything at once (hitting rate limits + spammy).
Composes w/ du-dum: du-dum decides when to observe + act; this skill decides what deserves action. Buffer = queue accumulating between du-dum's beats.
Use When
- Autonomous agent receives > engagement than can process per cycle
- Dup / near-dup items waste action budget
- Engagement needs priority ordering before action clock fires
- Cooldowns needed → prevent over-engagement / rate limiting
- Multi platform sources (GitHub, Slack, email) feed single agent's action loop
In
- Req:
buffer_path— path to JSONL buffer file - Opt:
platform_config— per-platform rate limits + cooldown settings - Opt:
digest_size— # top items in digest (default 5) - Opt:
ttl_hours— TTL for unacted items (default 48) - Opt:
cooldown_minutes— per-thread cooldown after action (default 60)
Do
Step 1: Define Buffer Schema
Design engagement item structure. Each in buffer = single JSON line:
{
"id": "gh-notif-20260408-001",
"source": "github:pjt222/agent-almanac",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T09:15:00Z",
"content_summary": "PR #218 review requested by contributor",
"priority": 4,
"state": "new",
"dedup_key": "github:pjt222/agent-almanac:pr-218:contributor-name",
"thread_id": "pr-218",
"ttl_hours": 48
}
Field definitions:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
id | string | Unique identifier (source prefix + date + sequence) |
source | string | Platform and channel (github:repo, slack:channel, email:inbox) |
timestamp | ISO 8601 | When the item was ingested |
content_summary | string | One-line description of the engagement item |
priority | int 1-5 | Composite priority (see Step 4) |
state | enum | new, acknowledged, acted, cooldown, merged, expired |
dedup_key | string | Composite key: source + thread + author |
thread_id | string | Conversation thread identifier for cooldown tracking |
ttl_hours | int | Hours until item expires if unacted (default: 48) |
Store JSONL (one JSON per line). Supports append-only writes, line-by-line processing, easy pruning by rewriting w/o expired lines.
→ JSONL buffer init at buffer_path w/ schema documented. Stable enough to support downstream.
If err: Buffer file can't be created (perms, path) → fallback in-mem list for current cycle + log err. Don't silently drop items.
Step 2: Implement Ingestion
Accept items from platform adapters → append to buffer w/ initial priority.
Priority by item type:
| Type | Priority | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Direct mention (@agent) | 5 | Someone explicitly asked for attention |
| Review request | 4 | Blocking someone else's work |
| Reply in tracked thread | 3 | Active conversation the agent participates in |
| Notification (assigned, subscribed) | 2 | Informational, may require action |
| Broadcast (release, announcement) | 1 | Awareness only, rarely actionable |
Per incoming:
- Construct item JSON from schema
- Assign initial priority
- Set
state=new - Set
timestamp= UTC now - Gen
dedup_keyfrom source + thread + author - Append JSON line to buffer file
# Pseudocode: ingest from GitHub adapter
for notification in github_adapter.fetch():
item = build_item(notification)
item.priority = priority_by_type(notification.reason)
item.state = "new"
append_jsonl(buffer_path, item)
log("ingested {item.id} priority={item.priority}")
→ New items in buffer w/ correct priorities + state=new. Each adapter produces well-formed items independently — failures don't block others.
If err: Platform adapter fails (auth expired, rate limited, network down) → log + skip source for cycle. Don't clear existing — stale > empty.
Step 3: Dedupe
Scan buffer for items sharing dedup_key within configurable window (default 24h). Keep highest-priority, mark others merged.
- Group by
dedup_key - Per group → sort priority desc, timestamp desc
- Keep first (highest priority, most recent); mark rest
state=merged - Detect thread bursts: same
thread_idw/ diff authors within 1h = burst → consolidate into single item w/ participant count appended tocontent_summary
# Dedup logic
groups = group_by(buffer, "dedup_key", window_hours=24)
for key, items in groups:
if len(items) > 1:
keeper = max(items, key=lambda i: (i.priority, i.timestamp))
for item in items:
if item.id != keeper.id:
item.state = "merged"
# Thread burst detection
thread_groups = group_by(buffer, "thread_id", window_hours=1)
for thread_id, items in thread_groups:
active_items = [i for i in items if i.state == "new"]
if len(active_items) >= 3:
keeper = max(active_items, key=lambda i: i.priority)
keeper.content_summary += f" ({len(active_items)} participants)"
for item in active_items:
if item.id != keeper.id:
item.state = "merged"
→ Buffer has no dup dedup_key w/in window. Thread bursts collapsed into single items w/ participant counts. Merged remain in file (audit) but excluded from downstream.
If err: Dedup produces unexpected merges (legit distinct items sharing key) → narrow dedup window / refine key construction. Adding content hash distinguishes items sharing source+thread+author but diff content.
Step 4: Prioritize
Re-sort by composite score (recency decay + escalation).
Composite score formula:
score = base_priority * recency_weight * escalation_factor
recency_weight = 0.9 ^ hours_since_ingestion
escalation_factor = 1.0 + (resubmission_count * 0.2)
# Cap effective priority at 5
effective_priority = min(5, score)
Behavior:
- P-3 item 0h ago:
3 * 1.0 * 1.0 = 3.0 - P-3 item 8h ago:
3 * 0.43 * 1.0 = 1.29(decayed below P-2) - P-2 resubmitted 2×:
2 * 1.0 * 1.4 = 2.8(escalated near P-3)
Sort state=new items by effective_priority desc. Sorted order → digest (Step 6).
→ Buffer sorted by score. Fresh high-priority at top. Old decayed. Resubmitted escalated. No item > 5.
If err: Scoring produces unintuitive rankings (1h-old P-2 > fresh P-3) → adjust decay. 0.95/h gentler; 0.85/h aggressive. Tune to match tempo.
Step 5: Rate Limits + Cooldowns
Prevent over-engaging → per-platform write limits + per-thread cooldowns.
Per-platform (via platform_config):
| Platform | Default limit | Window |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub comments | 1 per 20 seconds | rolling |
| GitHub reviews | 3 per hour | rolling |
| Slack messages | 1 per 10 seconds | rolling |
| Email replies | 5 per hour | rolling |
Per-thread cooldown: After acting → thread in cooldown for cooldown_minutes (default 60). During cooldown, new items for thread ingested but not surfaced in digest.
Err backoff: On 429/rate-limit from platform → double cooldown for that platform. Reset to default after successful action.
# Rate limit check before action
def can_act(platform, thread_id):
if rate_limit_exceeded(platform):
return False, "rate limited"
if thread_in_cooldown(thread_id):
return False, "thread cooldown active"
return True, "clear"
# After action
def record_action(platform, thread_id):
increment_rate_counter(platform)
set_cooldown(thread_id, cooldown_minutes)
# After rate-limit error
def handle_rate_error(platform):
current_cooldown = get_platform_cooldown(platform)
set_platform_cooldown(platform, current_cooldown * 2)
→ Agent never exceeds rate limits. Threads have cooldowns. Rate-limit errs → auto backoff. Buffer accumulates during cooldown w/o losing items.
If err: Rate limits hit despite enforcement (clock skew, concurrent agents) → increase safety margin → limits to 80% of actual. Cooldowns too aggressive (missing time-sensitive threads) → reduce cooldown_minutes for high-priority only.
Step 6: Gen Digest
Produce compact summary for du-dum's action beat. Digest = handoff point: du-dum reads this, not raw buffer.
Digest contents:
- Total pending: count of
state=new - Top-N: highest-priority (default N=5 from
digest_size) - Expiring soon: items w/in 20% of TTL
- Threads in cooldown: active cooldowns + time remaining
- Buffer health: total items, merged count, expired count
# Engagement Digest — 2026-04-08T12:00:00Z
## Pending: 12 items
### Top 5 by Priority
| # | Priority | Source | Summary | Age |
|---|----------|--------|---------|-----|
| 1 | 5.0 | github:pr-218 | Review requested by contributor | 2h |
| 2 | 4.2 | github:issue-99 | Maintainer question (escalated) | 6h |
| 3 | 3.0 | slack:dev | Build failure alert | 1h |
| 4 | 2.8 | github:pr-215 | CI check feedback (3 participants) | 3h |
| 5 | 2.1 | email:inbox | Collaboration inquiry | 8h |
### Expiring Soon
- github:issue-85 — 4h remaining (TTL 48h, ingested 44h ago)
### Cooldowns Active
- pr-210: 22 min remaining
- issue-92: 45 min remaining
### Buffer Health
- Total items: 47 | New: 12 | Merged: 18 | Acted: 11 | Expired: 6
Write digest to known path (e.g., buffer_path.digest.md) that du-dum's action clock reads.
→ Digest < 50 lines du-dum can parse in one read. Enough info to decide what to act on, not full buffer. Nothing pending → digest says so clearly.
If err: Digest > 50 lines → reduce digest_size / summarize expiring+cooldown sections aggressively. Digest = summary — approaches buffer size → lost purpose.
Step 7: Track State Transitions
After du-dum processes items from digest → update states + maintain audit.
State machine:
new → acknowledged → acted → cooldown → expired
↑ │
└───── (re-ingested) ───┘
merged → (terminal, no further transitions)
expired → (terminal, archived)
Per transition:
- Update
statein buffer file - Append transition log:
{"item_id": "...", "from": "new", "to": "acknowledged", "timestamp": "...", "reason": "du-dum digest pickup"} - After acting → set thread cooldown (feeds back to Step 5)
Retention + pruning:
- Archive
state=acted/state=expiredolder than 7 days (configurable) - Archive by moving to separate file (
buffer_path.archive.jsonl), not delete - Prune
state=mergedolder than 24h (served dedup purpose) - Run pruning at end of cycle, after state updates
# End-of-cycle maintenance
for item in buffer:
if item.state == "new" and age_hours(item) > item.ttl_hours:
transition(item, "expired", reason="TTL exceeded")
if item.state in ("acted", "expired") and age_days(item) > retention_days:
archive(item)
if item.state == "merged" and age_hours(item) > 24:
archive(item)
rewrite_buffer(buffer_path, active_items_only)
→ Every transition logged w/ timestamp + reason. Buffer file has only active items (new, acknowledged, cooldown). Archived preserved separately for audit. Buffer doesn't grow unbounded.
If err: Buffer corrupted during rewrite (partial write, crash) → restore from pre-rewrite backup. Always write temp + atomic rename — never rewrite in place. Archive too large → compress / rotate monthly.
Check
- Schema incl all req fields (id, source, timestamp, content_summary, priority, state, dedup_key, thread_id, ttl_hours)
- Ingestion assigns correct initial priorities by type
- Dedup merges items sharing dedup_key w/in window
- Thread bursts detected + consolidated w/ participant counts
- Composite scoring applies recency decay + escalation, capped at 5
- Per-platform rate limits enforced before write action
- Per-thread cooldowns prevent re-engagement w/in window
- Digest compact (<50 lines), top-N, clear empty state
- State transitions logged w/ timestamps for audit
- Expired + acted items archived, not deleted
- Buffer doesn't grow unbounded over cycles
Traps
- No TTL: Buffer grows unbounded; stale crowds out fresh. Every item needs TTL + pruning runs every cycle.
- Ignore thread cooldowns: Rapid-fire replies in same thread feel spammy. Cooldowns = social norm, not just rate-limit technicality.
- Priority w/o decay: Old high-priority block newer indefinitely. Decay ensures buffer reflects current relevance, not historical importance.
- Dedup window too narrow: 1h misses dups arriving hours apart (notification + reminder). Start 24h, narrow only if legit items merged incorrectly.
- Couple buffer to single platform: Design adapter pattern from start. Each platform adapter produces std buffer items; buffer itself platform-agnostic.
- Skip digest step: Du-dum needs summary, not raw buffer. Passing full buffer defeats two-clock architecture — action clock reads compact digest + decides quickly.
→
du-dum— cadence pattern this buffer composes w/; du-dum decides when, this skill decides whatmanage-token-budget— cost accounting; buffer respects token budget when sizing digests + limiting action throughputcircuit-breaker-pattern— failure handling for platform adapters feeding buffer; circuit opens → ingestion degrades gracefullycoordinate-reasoning— stigmergic signals between buffer + action systems; buffer file itself = stigmergic artifactforage-resources— discovery of new engagement sources → feed buffer's ingestion adapters
GitHub 仓库
Frequently asked questions
What is the manage-engagement-buffer skill?
manage-engagement-buffer is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform manage-engagement-buffer-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install manage-engagement-buffer?
Use the install commands on this page: add manage-engagement-buffer to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does manage-engagement-buffer belong to?
manage-engagement-buffer is in the Meta category, tagged general.
Is manage-engagement-buffer free to use?
Yes. manage-engagement-buffer is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
相关推荐技能
Content Collections 是一个 TypeScript 优先的构建工具,可将本地 Markdown/MDX 文件转换为类型安全的数据集合。它专为构建博客、文档站和内容密集型 Vite+React 应用而设计,提供基于 Zod 的自动模式验证。该工具涵盖从 Vite 插件配置、MDX 编译到生产环境部署的完整工作流。
这个Claude Skill为开发者提供完整的Polymarket预测市场开发支持,涵盖API调用、交易执行和市场数据分析。关键特性包括实时WebSocket数据流,可监控实时交易、订单和市场动态。开发者可用它构建预测市场应用、实施交易策略并集成实时市场预测功能。
该Skill帮助开发者创建OpenCode插件,用于接入命令、文件、LSP等25+种事件。它提供了插件结构、事件API规范和JavaScript/TypeScript实现模式,适合需要拦截操作、扩展功能或自定义事件处理的场景。开发者可通过它快速构建响应式模块来增强OpenCode AI助手的能力。
SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。
