pymoo
关于
The pymoo skill enables multi-objective optimization in Python using algorithms like NSGA-II and MOEA/D to find Pareto-optimal solutions for engineering design problems with conflicting objectives. It provides constraint handling, benchmark problems (ZDT, DTLZ), and customizable genetic operators. Use this skill when you need to solve optimization problems requiring trade-off analysis between multiple competing goals.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skillsgit clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/pymoo在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Pymoo - Multi-Objective Optimization in Python
Overview
Pymoo is a comprehensive Python framework for optimization with emphasis on multi-objective problems. Solve single and multi-objective optimization using state-of-the-art algorithms (NSGA-II/III, MOEA/D, SPEA2), benchmark problems (ZDT, DTLZ), customizable genetic operators, and multi-criteria decision making methods. Excels at finding trade-off solutions (Pareto fronts) for problems with conflicting objectives. Current stable release: pymoo 0.6.1.6 (November 2025).
Installation
uv pip install pymoo
For reproducible environments, pin a version: uv pip install "pymoo==0.6.1.6".
Dependencies: NumPy (2.x compatible since 0.6.1.3), SciPy, matplotlib (visualization). Autograd is optional for gradient-based features (since 0.6.1.3).
Documentation: https://pymoo.org/ — LLM-friendly index: https://pymoo.org/llms.txt
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Solving optimization problems with one or multiple objectives
- Finding Pareto-optimal solutions and analyzing trade-offs
- Implementing evolutionary algorithms (GA, DE, PSO, NSGA-II/III)
- Working with constrained optimization problems
- Benchmarking algorithms on standard test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG)
- Customizing genetic operators (crossover, mutation, selection)
- Visualizing high-dimensional optimization results
- Making decisions from multiple competing solutions
- Handling binary, discrete, continuous, or mixed-variable problems
Core Concepts
The Unified Interface
Pymoo uses a consistent minimize() function for all optimization tasks:
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
result = minimize(
problem, # What to optimize
algorithm, # How to optimize
termination, # When to stop
seed=1,
verbose=True
)
Result object contains:
result.X: Decision variables of optimal solution(s)result.F: Objective values of optimal solution(s)result.G: Constraint violations (if constrained)result.algorithm: Algorithm object with history
Problem Definition Styles
Pymoo supports three problem definition styles:
Problem: Vectorized —_evaluatereceives a batch of solutions (matrix)ElementwiseProblem: One solution per call — recommended for custom problems and parallel evaluationFunctionalProblem: Define objectives and constraints as separate functions without subclassing
Problem Types
Single-objective: One objective to minimize/maximize Multi-objective: 2-3 conflicting objectives → Pareto front Many-objective: 4+ objectives → High-dimensional Pareto front Constrained: Objectives + inequality/equality constraints Mixed-variable: Continuous, integer, binary, and categorical variables in one problem Dynamic: Time-varying objectives or constraints
Quick Start Workflows
Workflow 1: Single-Objective Optimization
When: Optimizing one objective function
Steps:
- Define or select problem
- Choose single-objective algorithm (GA, DE, PSO, CMA-ES)
- Configure termination criteria
- Run optimization
- Extract best solution
Example:
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
# Built-in problem
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)
# Configure Genetic Algorithm
algorithm = GA(
pop_size=100,
eliminate_duplicates=True
)
# Optimize
result = minimize(
problem,
algorithm,
('n_gen', 200),
seed=1,
verbose=True
)
print(f"Best solution: {result.X}")
print(f"Best objective: {result.F[0]}")
See: scripts/single_objective_example.py for complete example
Workflow 2: Multi-Objective Optimization (2-3 objectives)
When: Optimizing 2-3 conflicting objectives, need Pareto front
Algorithm choice: NSGA-II (standard for bi/tri-objective)
Steps:
- Define multi-objective problem
- Configure NSGA-II
- Run optimization to obtain Pareto front
- Visualize trade-offs
- Apply decision making (optional)
Example:
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter
# Bi-objective benchmark problem
problem = get_problem("zdt1")
# NSGA-II algorithm
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 200), seed=1)
# Visualize Pareto front
plot = Scatter()
plot.add(result.F, label="Obtained Front")
plot.add(problem.pareto_front(), label="True Front", alpha=0.3)
plot.show()
print(f"Found {len(result.F)} Pareto-optimal solutions")
See: scripts/multi_objective_example.py for complete example
Workflow 3: Many-Objective Optimization (4+ objectives)
When: Optimizing 4 or more objectives
Algorithm choice: NSGA-III (designed for many objectives)
Key difference: Must provide reference directions for population guidance
Steps:
- Define many-objective problem
- Generate reference directions
- Configure NSGA-III with reference directions
- Run optimization
- Visualize using Parallel Coordinate Plot
Example:
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga3 import NSGA3
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.util.ref_dirs import get_reference_directions
from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP
# Many-objective problem (5 objectives)
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5)
# Generate reference directions (required for NSGA-III)
ref_dirs = get_reference_directions("das-dennis", n_obj=5, n_partitions=12)
# Configure NSGA-III
algorithm = NSGA3(ref_dirs=ref_dirs)
# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 300), seed=1)
# Visualize with Parallel Coordinates
plot = PCP(labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(5)])
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()
See: scripts/many_objective_example.py for complete example
Workflow 4: Custom Problem Definition
When: Solving domain-specific optimization problem
Steps:
- Extend
ElementwiseProblemclass - Define
__init__with problem dimensions and bounds - Implement
_evaluatemethod for objectives (and constraints) - Use with any algorithm
Unconstrained example:
from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
import numpy as np
class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(
n_var=2, # Number of variables
n_obj=2, # Number of objectives
xl=np.array([0, 0]), # Lower bounds
xu=np.array([5, 5]) # Upper bounds
)
def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
# Define objectives
f1 = x[0]**2 + x[1]**2
f2 = (x[0]-1)**2 + (x[1]-1)**2
out["F"] = [f1, f2]
Constrained example:
class ConstrainedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(
n_var=2,
n_obj=2,
n_ieq_constr=2, # Inequality constraints
n_eq_constr=1, # Equality constraints
xl=np.array([0, 0]),
xu=np.array([5, 5])
)
def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
# Objectives
out["F"] = [f1, f2]
# Inequality constraints (g <= 0)
out["G"] = [g1, g2]
# Equality constraints (h = 0)
out["H"] = [h1]
Constraint formulation rules:
- Inequality: Express as
g(x) <= 0(feasible when ≤ 0) - Equality: Express as
h(x) = 0(feasible when = 0) - Convert
g(x) >= bto-(g(x) - b) <= 0
See: scripts/custom_problem_example.py for complete examples
Workflow 5: Constraint Handling
When: Problem has feasibility constraints
Approach options:
1. Feasibility First (Default - Recommended)
from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
# Works automatically with constrained problems
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, termination)
# Check feasibility
feasible = result.CV[:, 0] == 0 # CV = constraint violation
print(f"Feasible solutions: {np.sum(feasible)}")
2. Penalty Method
from pymoo.constraints.as_penalty import ConstraintsAsPenalty
# Wrap problem to convert constraints to penalties
problem_penalized = ConstraintsAsPenalty(problem, penalty=1e6)
3. Constraint as Objective
from pymoo.constraints.as_obj import ConstraintsAsObjective
# Treat constraint violation as additional objective
problem_with_cv = ConstraintsAsObjective(problem)
4. Specialized Algorithms
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.sres import SRES
# SRES has built-in constraint handling
algorithm = SRES()
See: references/constraints_mcdm.md for comprehensive constraint handling guide
Workflow 6: Decision Making from Pareto Front
When: Have Pareto front, need to select preferred solution(s)
Steps:
- Run multi-objective optimization
- Normalize objectives to [0, 1]
- Define preference weights
- Apply MCDM method
- Visualize selected solution
Example using Pseudo-Weights:
from pymoo.mcdm.pseudo_weights import PseudoWeights
import numpy as np
# After obtaining result from multi-objective optimization
# Normalize objectives
F_norm = (result.F - result.F.min(axis=0)) / (result.F.max(axis=0) - result.F.min(axis=0))
# Define preferences (must sum to 1)
weights = np.array([0.3, 0.7]) # 30% f1, 70% f2
# Apply decision making
dm = PseudoWeights(weights)
selected_idx = dm.do(F_norm)
# Get selected solution
best_solution = result.X[selected_idx]
best_objectives = result.F[selected_idx]
print(f"Selected solution: {best_solution}")
print(f"Objective values: {best_objectives}")
Other MCDM methods:
- Compromise Programming: Select closest to ideal point
- Knee Point: Find balanced trade-off solutions
- Hypervolume Contribution: Select most diverse subset
See:
scripts/decision_making_example.pyfor complete examplereferences/constraints_mcdm.mdfor detailed MCDM methods
Workflow 7: Visualization
Choose visualization based on number of objectives:
2 objectives: Scatter Plot
from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter
plot = Scatter(title="Bi-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F, color="blue", alpha=0.7)
plot.show()
3 objectives: 3D Scatter
plot = Scatter(title="Tri-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F) # Automatically renders in 3D
plot.show()
4+ objectives: Parallel Coordinate Plot
from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP
plot = PCP(
labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(n_obj)],
normalize_each_axis=True
)
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()
Solution comparison: Petal Diagram
from pymoo.visualization.petal import Petal
plot = Petal(
bounds=[result.F.min(axis=0), result.F.max(axis=0)],
labels=["Cost", "Weight", "Efficiency"]
)
plot.add(solution_A, label="Design A")
plot.add(solution_B, label="Design B")
plot.show()
See: references/visualization.md for all visualization types and usage
Workflow 8: Parallel Evaluation
When: Each _evaluate call is expensive (simulations, ML models, external solvers)
Approach: Pass an elementwise_runner to ElementwiseProblem using StarmapParallelization or JoblibParallelization.
Example (thread pool):
from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.parallelization.starmap import StarmapParallelization
class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
def __init__(self, elementwise_runner=None, **kwargs):
super().__init__(
n_var=10, n_obj=1, xl=-5, xu=5,
elementwise_runner=elementwise_runner, **kwargs,
)
def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
out["F"] = (x ** 2).sum() # Replace with expensive evaluation
pool = ThreadPool(4)
runner = StarmapParallelization(pool.starmap)
problem = MyProblem(elementwise_runner=runner)
result = minimize(problem, GA(), ("n_gen", 50), seed=1)
pool.close()
See: references/parallelization.md for process pools, joblib, and pickling notes
Workflow 9: Mixed-Variable Optimization
When: Decision variables include continuous, integer, binary, and/or categorical types
Approach: Define a vars dict with typed variables; use MixedVariableGA (SOO) or add MOO survival.
Example:
from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
from pymoo.core.variable import Real, Integer, Choice, Binary
from pymoo.core.mixed import MixedVariableGA
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
class MixedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
vars = {
"b": Binary(),
"x": Choice(options=["nothing", "multiply"]),
"y": Integer(bounds=(0, 2)),
"z": Real(bounds=(0, 5)),
}
super().__init__(vars=vars, n_obj=1, **kwargs)
def _evaluate(self, X, out, *args, **kwargs):
b, x, z, y = X["b"], X["x"], X["z"], X["y"]
f = z + y
if b:
f = 100 * f
if x == "multiply":
f = 10 * f
out["F"] = f
algorithm = MixedVariableGA(pop_size=20)
result = minimize(MixedProblem(), algorithm, ("n_evals", 1000), seed=1)
For multi-objective mixed-variable problems, use MixedVariableGA(pop_size=20, survival=RankAndCrowdingSurvival()). For single-objective mixed search, pymoo also wraps Optuna via pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.optuna.Optuna.
See: references/algorithms.md for MixedVariableGA and Optuna details
Algorithm Selection Guide
Single-Objective Problems
| Algorithm | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| GA | General-purpose | Flexible, customizable operators |
| DE | Continuous optimization | Good global search |
| PSO | Smooth landscapes | Fast convergence |
| CMA-ES | Difficult/noisy problems | Self-adapting |
Multi-Objective Problems (2-3 objectives)
| Algorithm | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| NSGA-II | Standard benchmark | Fast, reliable, well-tested |
| SPEA2 | Archive-based MOO | Strength-based fitness, external archive |
| R-NSGA-II | Preference regions | Reference point guidance |
| MOEA/D | Decomposable problems | Scalarization approach |
Many-Objective Problems (4+ objectives)
| Algorithm | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| NSGA-III | 4-15 objectives | Reference direction-based |
| RVEA | Adaptive search | Reference vector evolution |
| AGE-MOEA | Complex landscapes | Adaptive geometry |
Constrained Problems
| Approach | Algorithm | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility-first | Any algorithm | Large feasible region |
| Specialized | SRES, ISRES | Heavy constraints |
| Penalty | GA + penalty | Algorithm compatibility |
See: references/algorithms.md for comprehensive algorithm reference
Benchmark Problems
Quick problem access:
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
# Single-objective
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)
problem = get_problem("rosenbrock", n_var=10)
# Multi-objective
problem = get_problem("zdt1") # Convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt2") # Non-convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt3") # Disconnected front
# Many-objective
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5, n_var=12)
problem = get_problem("dtlz7", n_obj=4)
See: references/problems.md for complete test problem reference
Genetic Operator Customization
Standard operator configuration:
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.operators.crossover.sbx import SBX
from pymoo.operators.mutation.pm import PM
algorithm = GA(
pop_size=100,
crossover=SBX(prob=0.9, eta=15),
mutation=PM(eta=20),
eliminate_duplicates=True
)
Operator selection by variable type:
Continuous variables:
- Crossover: SBX (Simulated Binary Crossover)
- Mutation: PM (Polynomial Mutation)
Binary variables:
- Crossover: TwoPointCrossover, UniformCrossover
- Mutation: BitflipMutation
Permutations (TSP, scheduling):
- Crossover: OrderCrossover (OX)
- Mutation: InversionMutation
See: references/operators.md for comprehensive operator reference
Performance and Troubleshooting
Common issues and solutions:
Problem: Algorithm not converging
- Increase population size
- Increase number of generations
- Check if problem is multimodal (try different algorithms)
- Verify constraints are correctly formulated
Problem: Poor Pareto front distribution
- For NSGA-III: Adjust reference directions
- Increase population size
- Check for duplicate elimination
- Verify problem scaling
Problem: Few feasible solutions
- Use constraint-as-objective approach
- Apply repair operators
- Try SRES/ISRES for constrained problems
- Check constraint formulation (should be g <= 0)
Problem: High computational cost
- Reduce population size
- Decrease number of generations
- Use simpler operators
- Enable parallel evaluation via
elementwise_runner(see Workflow 8)
Best practices:
- Normalize objectives when scales differ significantly
- Set random seed for reproducibility
- Save history to analyze convergence:
save_history=True - Visualize results to understand solution quality
- Compare with true Pareto front when available
- Use appropriate termination criteria (generations, evaluations, tolerance)
- Tune operator parameters for problem characteristics
Resources
This skill includes comprehensive reference documentation and executable examples:
references/
Detailed documentation for in-depth understanding:
- algorithms.md: Complete algorithm reference with parameters, usage, and selection guidelines
- problems.md: Benchmark test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG) with characteristics
- operators.md: Genetic operators (sampling, selection, crossover, mutation) with configuration
- visualization.md: All visualization types with examples and selection guide
- constraints_mcdm.md: Constraint handling techniques and multi-criteria decision making methods
- parallelization.md: Parallel evaluation with StarmapParallelization and JoblibParallelization
Search patterns for references:
- Algorithm details:
grep -r "NSGA-II\|NSGA-III\|MOEA/D" references/ - Constraint methods:
grep -r "Feasibility First\|Penalty\|Repair" references/ - Visualization types:
grep -r "Scatter\|PCP\|Petal" references/
scripts/
Executable examples demonstrating common workflows:
- single_objective_example.py: Basic single-objective optimization with GA
- multi_objective_example.py: Multi-objective optimization with NSGA-II, visualization
- many_objective_example.py: Many-objective optimization with NSGA-III, reference directions
- custom_problem_example.py: Defining custom problems (constrained and unconstrained)
- decision_making_example.py: Multi-criteria decision making with different preferences
Run examples:
python3 scripts/single_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/multi_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/many_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/custom_problem_example.py
python3 scripts/decision_making_example.py
Additional Notes
Common patterns:
- Use
ElementwiseProblemfor custom problems (orFunctionalProblemfor function-based definitions) - Use
varsdict with typed variables for mixed-variable problems - Constraints formulated as
g(x) <= 0andh(x) = 0 - Reference directions required for NSGA-III
- Normalize objectives before MCDM
- Use appropriate termination:
('n_gen', N)orget_termination("f_tol", tol=0.001)
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
executing-plans
设计该Skill用于当开发者提供完整实施计划时,以受控批次方式执行代码实现。它会先审阅计划并提出疑问,然后分批次执行任务(默认每批3个任务),并在批次间暂停等待审查。关键特性包括分批次执行、内置检查点和架构师审查机制,确保复杂系统实现的可控性。
requesting-code-review
设计该Skill可在完成任务、实现主要功能或合并代码前自动调度代码审查子代理,确保实现符合需求和计划。它支持通过指定git SHA范围进行精准的代码变更审查,帮助开发者在关键节点及时发现潜在问题。核心原则是"早审查、勤审查",适用于开发流程的各个关键阶段。
connect-mcp-server
设计这个Skill指导开发者如何将MCP服务器连接到Claude Code,支持HTTP、stdio和SSE三种传输协议。它涵盖了从安装配置到认证安全的完整流程,适用于集成GitHub、Notion、数据库等外部服务。当开发者需要添加集成、配置外部工具或提及MCP相关功能时,这个Skill能提供实用的操作指南。
web-cli-teleport
设计该Skill帮助开发者根据任务特性选择Claude Code的Web或CLI界面,并指导如何在两种环境间无缝迁移会话。它能分析任务复杂度、迭代需求等要素,推荐最优工作界面和工作流。关键特性包括会话状态管理、环境切换指导和上下文优化建议。
