dag-iteration-detector
About
This skill detects when task outputs need re-execution based on quality signals, unmet requirements, or explicit feedback like "try again." It triggers appropriate iteration strategies and pairs with other DAG skills for feedback and validation. Use it specifically to decide if an iteration loop should be activated, not for generating the feedback itself.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registrygit clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git ~/.claude/skills/dag-iteration-detectorCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
Verification & Quality Assurance
OtherThis skill provides automated quality verification for code and agent outputs using truth scoring and quality checks. It automatically rolls back changes that fall below a 0.95 accuracy threshold, ensuring codebase reliability. Use it for CI/CD integration and maintaining high-quality standards in development workflows.
Verification & Quality Assurance
OtherThis skill provides automated verification and quality assurance for code and agent outputs, including truth scoring and validation checks. It enables automatic rollback for failed quality checks and integrates with CI/CD pipelines. Use it to validate code changes before merging or to ensure the correctness of generated outputs.
quick-quality-check
TestingQuick Quality Check runs parallel command execution for lightning-fast code quality feedback in under 30 seconds. It simultaneously performs theater detection, linting, security scans, and basic tests, aggregating results by severity. Use this skill for instant, actionable feedback during rapid development cycles in Claude Code.
code-review-quality
OtherThis skill conducts automated code reviews focused on quality, testability, and maintainability, prioritizing critical feedback like bugs and security issues. It's designed for use during code reviews, when providing feedback, or when establishing review practices. The tool categorizes feedback by severity and emphasizes asking questions over issuing commands.
