resolve-git-conflicts
About
This Claude Skill helps developers resolve Git merge, rebase, and cherry-pick conflicts by identifying conflict sources, reading markers, and choosing resolution strategies. It provides safe recovery options, including continuing operations or aborting failed merges/rebases. Use it when Git commands report conflicts or when you need to safely restart failed version control operations.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/resolve-git-conflictsCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Resolve Git Conflicts
Identify, resolve, recover from merge and rebase conflicts.
When Use
git mergeorgit rebasereports conflictsgit cherry-pickcannot apply cleanlygit pullresults in conflicting changesgit stash popconflicts with current working tree
Inputs
- Required: Repository with active conflicts
- Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
- Optional: Context about which changes should take priority
Steps
Step 1: Identify Conflict Source
Determine what operation caused conflict:
# Check current status
git status
# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict
Status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation in progress.
Got: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates active operation.
If fail: git status shows clean tree but you expected conflicts? Operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.
Step 2: Read Conflict Markers
Open each conflicting file. Locate conflict markers:
<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
<<<<<<< HEADto=======: Your current branch (or branch you are rebasing onto)=======to>>>>>>>: Incoming changes (branch being merged or commit being applied)
Got: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> markers.
If fail: No markers found but files show as conflicting? Conflict may be binary file or deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for full list.
Step 3: Choose Resolution Strategy
Manual merge (most common): Edit file to combine both changes logically. Then remove all conflict markers.
Accept ours (keep current branch version):
# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A
Accept theirs (keep incoming branch version):
# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A
Got: After resolution, file contains correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.
If fail: Chose wrong side? Re-read conflicting version from merge base. During merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates conflict markers so you can try again.
Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved
After editing each conflicting file:
# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R
# Check remaining conflicts
git status
Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".
Got: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.
If fail: git add fails or markers remain? Re-open file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> lines removed.
Step 5: Continue the Operation
Once all conflicts resolved:
For merge:
git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message
For rebase:
git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4
For cherry-pick:
git cherry-pick --continue
For stash pop:
# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"
Got: Operation completes. git status shows clean working tree (or moves to next commit during rebase).
If fail: Continue command fails? Check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continue.
Step 6: Abort if Needed
Resolution too complex or chose wrong approach? Abort safely:
# Abort merge
git merge --abort
# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort
# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort
Got: Repository returns to state before operation started. No data loss.
If fail: Abort fails (rare)? Check git reflog to find commit before operation. Then git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — discards uncommitted changes.
Step 7: Verify Resolution
After operation completes:
# Verify clean working tree
git status
# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1
# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)
Got: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.
If fail: Tests fail after resolution? Merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts resolved. Review diff careful and fix.
Checks
- No conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) remain in any file -
git statusshows clean working tree - Merge/rebase history correct in
git log - Tests pass after conflict resolution
- No unintended changes introduced
Pitfalls
- Blindly accept one side:
--oursor--theirsdiscards other side entirely. Only use when certain one version completely correct. - Leave conflict markers in code: Always search entire file for remaining markers after editing. Partial resolution breaks the code.
- Amend during rebase: During interactive rebase, do not
--amendunless rebase step specifically calls for it. Usegit rebase --continueinstead. - Lose work on abort:
git rebase --abortandgit merge --abortdiscard all resolution work. Only abort if want to start over. - No test after resolution: Syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
- Force-push after rebase: After rebasing shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing — it rewrites history.
See Also
commit-changes- committing after conflict resolutionmanage-git-branches- branch workflows that lead to conflictsconfigure-git-repository- repository setup and merge strategies
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
executing-plans
DesignUse the executing-plans skill when you have a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints. It loads and critically reviews the plan, then executes tasks in small batches (default 3 tasks) while reporting progress between each batch for architect review. This ensures systematic implementation with built-in quality control checkpoints.
requesting-code-review
DesignThis skill dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to analyze code changes against requirements before proceeding. It should be used after completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to main. The review helps catch issues early by comparing the current implementation with the original plan.
connect-mcp-server
DesignThis skill provides a comprehensive guide for developers to connect MCP servers to Claude Code using HTTP, stdio, or SSE transports. It covers installation, configuration, authentication, and security for integrating external services like GitHub, Notion, and custom APIs. Use it when setting up MCP integrations, configuring external tools, or working with Claude's Model Context Protocol.
web-cli-teleport
DesignThis skill helps developers choose between Claude Code Web and CLI interfaces based on task analysis, then enables seamless session teleportation between these environments. It optimizes workflow by managing session state and context when switching between web, CLI, or mobile. Use it for complex projects requiring different tools at various stages.
