About
This skill reviews Go project architecture, analyzing package structure, dependencies, layering, and module boundaries. It helps when designing layouts, evaluating dependency graphs, or refactoring monoliths into modules. Use it for architectural reviews but not for code style or API design, which have separate skills.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/eduardo-sl/go-agent-skillsgit clone https://github.com/eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/go-architecture-reviewCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Go Architecture Review
Good architecture makes the next change easy. Bad architecture makes every change scary.
Operating Modes
Pick the mode that matches the request before starting:
- Layout review (default) — assess an existing codebase against the sections below and report violations with severity.
- Refactor plan — same assessment, but the deliverable is an ordered migration plan (smallest safe steps first), not just findings.
- New service consultation — asked "how should I structure X": apply sections 1-3 as prescriptive guidance instead of review checks.
Auditing Large Codebases
For repositories with many packages, build the dependency picture before judging it:
- Map the module:
go list ./...for packages, then import statements to trace dependency direction. - Run independent passes: (a) layout vs section 1, (b) dependency direction vs section 2, (c) wiring and config vs sections 3+5, (d) package design vs section 4.
- If your environment supports delegating work to parallel sub-agents or tasks, assign each pass to one; synthesize at the end — dependency findings often explain layout findings.
- Cite package paths and
file.go:linein every finding.
1. Standard Project Layout
myproject/
├── cmd/ # Main applications (one dir per binary)
│ ├── api-server/
│ │ └── main.go
│ └── worker/
│ └── main.go
├── internal/ # Private packages — cannot be imported externally
│ ├── domain/ # Core business types (entities, value objects)
│ │ ├── user.go
│ │ └── order.go
│ ├── service/ # Business logic (use cases)
│ │ ├── user.go
│ │ └── order.go
│ ├── store/ # Data access (repositories)
│ │ ├── postgres/
│ │ │ └── user.go
│ │ └── redis/
│ │ └── cache.go
│ ├── handler/ # HTTP/gRPC handlers (adapters)
│ │ └── user.go
│ └── config/ # Configuration loading
│ └── config.go
├── pkg/ # Public packages (use sparingly)
│ └── httputil/
│ └── response.go
├── migrations/ # Database migrations
├── api/ # API definitions (OpenAPI, proto files)
├── go.mod
├── go.sum
└── Makefile
Key Rules:
internal/enforces encapsulation at the compiler level. Use it aggressively.pkg/is for genuinely reusable packages. When in doubt, useinternal/.cmd/main packages should be thin — wire dependencies and callRun().- One
main.goper binary, minimal logic inside.
2. Dependency Direction
Dependencies MUST flow inward. Domain core has zero external dependencies:
handlers → services → domain ← stores
↓ ↓ ↓
(net/http) (pure Go) (database/sql)
Rules:
domain/imports NOTHING from the project. Nostore, nohandler, noconfig.service/depends ondomain/types and interfaces, NOT on concrete stores.handler/depends onservice/interfaces.store/implements interfaces defined inservice/ordomain/.- Circular dependencies are a 🔴 BLOCKER. The compiler catches them, but design should prevent them.
// ✅ Good — service defines the interface it needs
// internal/service/user.go
type UserStore interface {
GetByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*domain.User, error)
Create(ctx context.Context, user *domain.User) error
}
type UserService struct {
store UserStore // depends on interface, not postgres.Store
}
// internal/store/postgres/user.go
type Store struct { db *sql.DB }
// Implements service.UserStore without importing the service package
func (s *Store) GetByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*domain.User, error) { ... }
3. Main Package Wiring
main.go is the composition root. Wire everything here:
func main() {
cfg := config.Load()
logger := slog.New(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil))
db, err := sql.Open("postgres", cfg.DatabaseURL)
if err != nil {
logger.Error("connect db", slog.Any("error", err))
os.Exit(1)
}
defer db.Close()
// Wire dependencies
userStore := postgres.NewUserStore(db)
userService := service.NewUserService(userStore)
userHandler := handler.NewUserHandler(userService, logger)
// Setup router
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Mount("/api/v1/users", userHandler.Routes())
// Run server
srv := &http.Server{Addr: cfg.Addr, Handler: r}
// ... graceful shutdown
}
Avoid dependency injection frameworks. Go's explicit wiring is a feature.
If wiring gets complex, use Google's wire for compile-time DI code generation.
4. Package Design Principles
One package = one purpose
// ✅ Good — clear purpose
package orderservice // business rules for orders
package postgres // PostgreSQL data access
package httphandler // HTTP transport layer
// ❌ Bad — grab-bag packages
package utils // what ISN'T a util?
package common // everything and nothing
package models // types without behavior
Avoid package stuttering
// ❌ Bad — package name repeated in type
package user
type UserService struct{} // user.UserService
// ✅ Good
package user
type Service struct{} // user.Service
Package cohesion over size
A package with 20 related files is better than 20 packages with 1 file each. Split packages when they have distinct responsibilities, not when they get big.
5. Configuration
type Config struct {
Addr string `env:"ADDR" envDefault:":8080"`
DatabaseURL string `env:"DATABASE_URL,required"`
LogLevel string `env:"LOG_LEVEL" envDefault:"info"`
Timeout time.Duration `env:"TIMEOUT" envDefault:"30s"`
}
Rules:
- All config from environment variables (12-factor).
- Validate at startup, fail fast with clear messages.
- No config scattered across packages — centralize in
internal/config. - Never hardcode values. Not even "just for now."
6. Init Functions
Avoid init(). It runs implicitly, makes testing harder, and creates hidden dependencies.
// ❌ Bad — hidden side effects
func init() {
db, _ = sql.Open("postgres", os.Getenv("DB_URL"))
}
// ✅ Good — explicit initialization
func NewStore(dsn string) (*Store, error) {
db, err := sql.Open("postgres", dsn)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("open db: %w", err)
}
return &Store{db: db}, nil
}
Exception: registering drivers or codecs is acceptable in init():
func init() {
sql.Register("custom", &CustomDriver{})
}
Architecture Review Checklist
- 🔴 No circular dependencies between packages
- 🔴 Domain types have zero infrastructure dependencies
- 🔴 No business logic in
cmd/main packages - 🔴 No
init()with side effects (DB connections, HTTP calls) - 🟡
internal/used for project-private packages - 🟡 Interfaces defined at the consumer, not the producer
- 🟡 Configuration centralized and validated at startup
- 🟡 Dependency direction flows inward (handlers → services → domain)
- 🟢 Package names are short, singular, descriptive
- 🟢 No
utils/,common/,helpers/packages - 🟢 Main package is a thin composition root
GitHub Repository
Frequently asked questions
What is the go-architecture-review skill?
go-architecture-review is a Claude Skill by eduardo-sl. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform go-architecture-review-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install go-architecture-review?
Use the install commands on this page: add go-architecture-review to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does go-architecture-review belong to?
go-architecture-review is in the Design category, tagged ai, api, and design.
Is go-architecture-review free to use?
Yes. go-architecture-review is listed on AIMCP and free to install.
Related Skills
Use the executing-plans skill when you have a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints. It loads and critically reviews the plan, then executes tasks in small batches (default 3 tasks) while reporting progress between each batch for architect review. This ensures systematic implementation with built-in quality control checkpoints.
This skill dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to analyze code changes against requirements before proceeding. It should be used after completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to main. The review helps catch issues early by comparing the current implementation with the original plan.
This skill provides a comprehensive guide for developers to connect MCP servers to Claude Code using HTTP, stdio, or SSE transports. It covers installation, configuration, authentication, and security for integrating external services like GitHub, Notion, and custom APIs. Use it when setting up MCP integrations, configuring external tools, or working with Claude's Model Context Protocol.
This skill helps developers choose between Claude Code Web and CLI interfaces based on task analysis, then enables seamless session teleportation between these environments. It optimizes workflow by managing session state and context when switching between web, CLI, or mobile. Use it for complex projects requiring different tools at various stages.
