Back to Skills

finance-metrics-quickref

deanpeters
Updated 2 days ago
7 views
4,511
575
4,511
View on GitHub
Designdesign

About

This skill provides instant lookup of SaaS financial metrics, formulas, and industry benchmarks. It's designed for developers needing quick references during analysis or reviews without deep explanations. Use it to rapidly retrieve definitions, calculations, or decision frameworks like CAC Payback or the Rule of 40.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills.git ~/.claude/skills/finance-metrics-quickref

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

Purpose

Quick reference for any SaaS finance metric without deep teaching. Use this when you need a fast formula lookup, benchmark check, or decision framework reminder. For detailed explanations, calculations, and examples, see the related deep-dive skills.

This is not a teaching tool—it's a cheat sheet optimized for speed. Scan, find, apply.

Key Concepts

Metric Categories

Metrics are organized into four families:

  1. Revenue & Growth — Top-line money (revenue, ARPU, ARPA, MRR/ARR, churn, NRR, expansion)
  2. Unit Economics — Customer-level profitability (CAC, LTV, payback, margins)
  3. Capital Efficiency — Cash management (burn rate, runway, OpEx, net income)
  4. Efficiency Ratios — Growth vs. profitability balance (Rule of 40, magic number)

When to Use This Skill

Use this when:

  • You need a quick formula or benchmark
  • You're preparing for a board meeting or investor call
  • You're evaluating a decision and need to check which metrics matter
  • You want to identify red flags quickly

Don't use this when:

  • You need detailed calculation guidance (use saas-revenue-growth-metrics or saas-economics-efficiency-metrics)
  • You're learning these metrics for the first time (start with deep-dive skills)
  • You need examples and common pitfalls (covered in related skills)

Application

All Metrics Reference Table

MetricFormulaWhat It MeasuresGood BenchmarkRed Flag
RevenueTotal sales before expensesTop-line money earnedGrowth rate >20% YoY (varies by stage)Revenue growing slower than costs
ARPUTotal Revenue / Total UsersRevenue per individual userVaries by model; track trendARPU declining cohort-over-cohort
ARPAMRR / Active AccountsRevenue per customer accountSMB: $100-$1K; Mid: $1K-$10K; Ent: $10K+High ARPA + low ARPU (undermonetized seats)
ACVAnnual Recurring Revenue per ContractAnnualized contract valueSMB: $5K-$25K; Mid: $25K-$100K; Ent: $100K+ACV declining (moving downmarket unintentionally)
MRR/ARRMRR × 12 = ARRPredictable recurring revenueGrowth + quality matter; track componentsNew MRR declining while churn stable/growing
Churn RateCustomers Lost / Starting Customers% of customers who cancelMonthly <2% great, <5% ok; Annual <10% greatChurn increasing cohort-over-cohort
NRR(Start ARR + Expansion - Churn - Contraction) / Start ARR × 100Revenue retention + expansion>120% excellent; 100-120% good; 90-100% okNRR <100% (base is contracting)
Expansion RevenueUpsells + Cross-sells + Usage GrowthAdditional revenue from existing customers20-30% of total revenueExpansion <10% of MRR
Quick Ratio(New MRR + Expansion MRR) / (Churned MRR + Contraction)Revenue gains vs. losses>4 excellent; 2-4 healthy; <2 leaky bucketQuick Ratio <2 (leaky bucket)
Gross Margin(Revenue - COGS) / Revenue × 100% of revenue after direct costsSaaS: 70-85% good; <60% concerningGross margin <60% or declining
CACTotal S&M Spend / New CustomersCost to acquire one customerVaries: Ent $10K+ ok; SMB <$500CAC increasing while LTV flat
LTVARPU × Gross Margin % / Churn RateTotal revenue from one customerMust be 3x+ CAC; varies by segmentLTV declining cohort-over-cohort
LTV:CACLTV / CACUnit economics efficiency3:1 healthy; <1:1 unsustainable; >5:1 underinvestingLTV:CAC <1.5:1
Payback PeriodCAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %)Months to recover CAC<12 months great; 12-18 ok; >24 concerningPayback >24 months (cash trap)
Contribution Margin(Revenue - All Variable Costs) / Revenue × 100True contribution after variable costs60-80% good for SaaS; <40% concerningContribution margin <40%
Burn RateMonthly Cash Spent - RevenueCash consumed per monthNet burn <$200K manageable early; <$500K growthNet burn accelerating
RunwayCash Balance / Monthly Net BurnMonths until money runs out12+ months good; 6-12 ok; <6 crisisRunway <6 months
OpExS&M + R&D + G&ACosts to run the businessShould grow slower than revenueOpEx growing faster than revenue
Net IncomeRevenue - All ExpensesActual profit/lossEarly negative ok; mature 10-20%+ marginLosses accelerating without growth
Rule of 40Revenue Growth % + Profit Margin %Balance of growth vs. efficiency>40 healthy; 25-40 ok; <25 concerningRule of 40 <25
Magic Number(Q Revenue - Prev Q Revenue) × 4 / Prev Q S&MS&M efficiency>0.75 efficient; 0.5-0.75 ok; <0.5 fix GTMMagic Number <0.5
Operating LeverageRevenue Growth vs. OpEx GrowthScaling efficiencyRevenue growth > OpEx growthOpEx growing faster than revenue
Gross vs. Net RevenueNet = Gross - Discounts - Refunds - CreditsWhat you actually keepRefunds <10%; discounts <20%Refunds >10% (product problem)
Revenue ConcentrationTop N Customers / Total RevenueDependency on largest customersTop customer <10%; Top 10 <40%Top customer >25% (existential risk)
Revenue MixProduct/Segment Revenue / Total RevenuePortfolio compositionNo single product >60% idealSingle product >80% (no diversification)
Cohort AnalysisGroup customers by join date; track behaviorWhether business improving or degradingRecent cohorts same/better than oldNewer cohorts perform worse
CAC Payback by ChannelCAC / Monthly Contribution (by channel)Payback by acquisition channelCompare across channelsOne channel far worse than others
Gross Margin PaybackCAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %)Payback using actual profitTypically 1.5-2x simple paybackPayback using margin >36 months
Unit EconomicsRevenue per unit - Cost per unitProfitability of each "unit"Positive contribution requiredNegative contribution margin
Segment PaybackCAC / Monthly Contribution (by segment)Payback by customer segmentCompare to allocate resourcesOne segment unprofitable
IncrementalityRevenue caused by action - BaselineTrue impact of marketing/promoMeasure with holdout testsCelebrating revenue that would've happened anyway
Working CapitalCash timing between revenue and collectionCash vs. revenue timingAnnual upfront > monthly billingLong payment terms killing runway

Quick Decision Frameworks

Use these frameworks to combine metrics for common PM decisions.

Framework 1: Should We Build This Feature?

Ask:

  1. Revenue impact? Direct (pricing, add-on) or indirect (retention, conversion)?
  2. Margin impact? What's the COGS? Does it dilute margins?
  3. ROI? Revenue impact / Development cost

Build if:

  • ROI >3x in year one (direct monetization), OR
  • LTV impact >10x development cost (retention), OR
  • Strategic value overrides short-term ROI

Don't build if:

  • Negative contribution margin even with optimistic adoption
  • Payback period exceeds average customer lifetime

Metrics to check: Revenue, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin


Framework 2: Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?

Ask:

  1. Unit economics? CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC ratio
  2. Cash efficiency? Payback period
  3. Customer quality? Cohort retention, NRR by channel
  4. Scalability? Magic Number, addressable volume

Scale if:

  • LTV:CAC >3:1 AND
  • Payback <18 months AND
  • Customer quality meets/beats other channels AND
  • Magic Number >0.75

Don't scale if:

  • LTV:CAC <1.5:1 AND
  • No clear path to improvement

Metrics to check: CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, NRR, Magic Number


Framework 3: Should We Change Pricing?

Ask:

  1. ARPU/ARPA impact? Will revenue per customer increase?
  2. Conversion impact? Help or hurt trial-to-paid conversion?
  3. Churn impact? Create churn risk or reduce it?
  4. NRR impact? Enable expansion or create contraction?

Implement if:

  • Net revenue impact positive after churn risk
  • Can test with segment before broad rollout

Don't change if:

  • High churn risk without offsetting expansion
  • Can't test hypothesis before committing

Metrics to check: ARPU, ARPA, Churn Rate, NRR, CAC Payback


Framework 4: Is the Business Healthy?

Check by stage:

Early Stage (Pre-$10M ARR):

  • Growth Rate >50% YoY
  • LTV:CAC >3:1
  • Gross Margin >70%
  • Runway >12 months

Growth Stage ($10M-$50M ARR):

  • Growth Rate >40% YoY
  • NRR >100%
  • Rule of 40 >40
  • Magic Number >0.75

Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR):

  • Growth Rate >25% YoY
  • NRR >110%
  • Rule of 40 >40
  • Profit Margin >10%

Metrics to check: Revenue Growth, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Gross Margin


Red Flags by Category

Revenue & Growth Red Flags

Red FlagWhat It MeansAction
Churn increasing cohort-over-cohortProduct-market fit degradingStop scaling acquisition; fix retention first
NRR <100%Base is contractingFix expansion or reduce churn before scaling
Revenue churn > logo churnLosing big customersInvestigate why high-value customers leave
Quick Ratio <2Leaky bucket (barely outpacing losses)Fix retention before scaling acquisition
Expansion revenue <10% of MRRNo upsell/cross-sell engineBuild expansion paths
Revenue concentration >50% in top 10 customersExistential dependency riskDiversify customer base

Unit Economics Red Flags

Red FlagWhat It MeansAction
LTV:CAC <1.5:1Buying revenue at a lossReduce CAC or increase LTV before scaling
Payback >24 monthsCash trap (long cash recovery)Negotiate annual upfront or reduce CAC
Gross margin <60%Low profitability per dollarIncrease prices or reduce COGS
CAC increasing while LTV flatUnit economics degradingOptimize conversion or reduce sales cycle
Contribution margin <40%Unprofitable after variable costsCut variable costs or increase prices

Capital Efficiency Red Flags

Red FlagWhat It MeansAction
Runway <6 monthsSurvival crisisRaise capital immediately or cut burn
Net burn accelerating without revenue growthBurning faster without resultsCut costs or increase revenue urgency
OpEx growing faster than revenueNegative operating leverageFreeze hiring; optimize spend
Rule of 40 <25Burning cash without growthImprove growth or cut to profitability
Magic Number <0.5S&M engine brokenFix GTM efficiency before scaling spend

When to Use Which Metric

Prioritizing features:

  • Revenue impact → Revenue, ARPU, Expansion Revenue
  • Margin impact → Gross Margin, Contribution Margin
  • ROI → LTV impact, Development cost

Evaluating channels:

  • Acquisition cost → CAC, CAC by Channel
  • Customer value → LTV, NRR by Channel
  • Payback → Payback Period, CAC Payback by Channel
  • Scalability → Magic Number

Pricing decisions:

  • Monetization → ARPU, ARPA, ACV
  • Impact → Churn Rate, NRR, Expansion Revenue
  • Efficiency → CAC Payback (will pricing change affect it?)

Business health:

  • Growth → Revenue Growth, MRR/ARR Growth
  • Retention → Churn Rate, NRR, Quick Ratio
  • Economics → LTV:CAC, Payback Period, Gross Margin
  • Efficiency → Rule of 40, Magic Number, Operating Leverage
  • Survival → Burn Rate, Runway

Board/investor reporting:

  • Key metrics: ARR, Revenue Growth %, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Burn Rate, Runway
  • Stage-specific: Early stage emphasize growth + unit economics; Growth stage emphasize Rule of 40 + Magic Number; Scale stage emphasize profitability + efficiency

Examples

Example 1: Feature Investment Sanity Check

You are deciding whether to build a premium export feature.

  1. Use Framework 1 (Should We Build This Feature?)
  2. Pull baseline metrics: ARPU, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin
  3. Model optimistic, base, and downside adoption
  4. Reject if contribution margin turns negative in downside case

Quick output:

  • Base case ROI: 3.8x
  • Contribution margin impact: +4 points
  • Decision: Build now, with a 90-day post-launch check on churn and expansion

Example 2: Channel Scale Decision

Paid social is generating many signups but weak retention.

  1. Use Framework 2 (Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?)
  2. Check CAC, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, and NRR by channel
  3. Compare against best-performing channel, not company average

Quick output:

  • LTV:CAC: 1.6:1
  • Payback: 26 months
  • NRR: 88%
  • Decision: Do not scale; cap spend and run targeted optimization tests

Common Pitfalls

  • Using blended company averages instead of cohort or channel-level metrics
  • Scaling acquisition when Quick Ratio is weak and retention is deteriorating
  • Treating high LTV:CAC as sufficient without checking payback and runway impact
  • Raising prices based on ARPU lift alone without modeling churn and contraction
  • Comparing benchmarks across mismatched company stages or business models
  • Tracking many metrics without a clear decision question

References

Related Skills (Deep Dives)

  • saas-revenue-growth-metrics — Detailed guidance on revenue, retention, and growth metrics (13 metrics)
  • saas-economics-efficiency-metrics — Detailed guidance on unit economics and capital efficiency (17 metrics)
  • feature-investment-advisor — Uses these metrics to evaluate feature ROI
  • acquisition-channel-advisor — Uses these metrics to evaluate channel viability
  • finance-based-pricing-advisor — Uses these metrics to evaluate pricing changes
  • business-health-diagnostic — Uses these metrics to diagnose business health

External Resources

  • Bessemer Venture Partners: "SaaS Metrics 2.0" — Comprehensive SaaS benchmarking
  • David Skok (Matrix Partners): "SaaS Metrics" blog series — Deep dive on unit economics
  • Tomasz Tunguz (Redpoint): SaaS benchmarking research and blog
  • ChartMogul, Baremetrics, ProfitWell: SaaS analytics platforms with metric definitions
  • SaaStr: Annual SaaS benchmarking surveys

Provenance

  • Adapted from research/finance/Finance_QuickRef.md
  • Formulas from research/finance/Finance for Product Managers.md
  • Decision frameworks from research/finance/Finance_For_PMs.Putting_It_Together_Synthesis.md

GitHub Repository

deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
Path: skills/finance-metrics-quickref
0
ai-agentsai-product-managementclaude-skillspm-frameworksproduct-management

Related Skills

executing-plans

Design

Use the executing-plans skill when you have a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints. It loads and critically reviews the plan, then executes tasks in small batches (default 3 tasks) while reporting progress between each batch for architect review. This ensures systematic implementation with built-in quality control checkpoints.

View skill

requesting-code-review

Design

This skill dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to analyze code changes against requirements before proceeding. It should be used after completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to main. The review helps catch issues early by comparing the current implementation with the original plan.

View skill

connect-mcp-server

Design

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for developers to connect MCP servers to Claude Code using HTTP, stdio, or SSE transports. It covers installation, configuration, authentication, and security for integrating external services like GitHub, Notion, and custom APIs. Use it when setting up MCP integrations, configuring external tools, or working with Claude's Model Context Protocol.

View skill

web-cli-teleport

Design

This skill helps developers choose between Claude Code Web and CLI interfaces based on task analysis, then enables seamless session teleportation between these environments. It optimizes workflow by managing session state and context when switching between web, CLI, or mobile. Use it for complex projects requiring different tools at various stages.

View skill