Back to Skills

develop-spike-summary

product-on-purpose
Updated 2 days ago
4 views
238
33
238
View on GitHub
Designworddesign

About

This skill creates structured documentation for time-boxed technical explorations (spikes) to capture learnings, findings, and recommendations. It's used after completing a spike to help teams make informed implementation decisions based on the investigation's results. The summary consolidates key outcomes like feasibility, integration options, and viability assessments.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/develop-spike-summary

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Spike Summary

A spike summary documents the results of a time-boxed exploration . a focused investigation to reduce uncertainty before committing to implementation. Spikes answer specific questions like "Can we integrate with this API?" or "Is this technology viable for our use case?" The summary captures findings so the team can make informed decisions without the spike participants needing to repeat explanations.

When to Use

  • After completing a time-boxed technical exploration
  • When evaluating technology choices or vendor options
  • After proof-of-concept work that needs to inform team decisions
  • When investigating feasibility of a proposed solution
  • Before committing engineering resources to a new approach

Instructions

When asked to document a spike, follow these steps:

  1. State the Question Clearly Articulate the specific question the spike was designed to answer. Good spike questions are focused and answerable with the time-box available. If the question evolved during the spike, document both the original and final versions.

  2. Define the Time-Box Document the time allocated (e.g., 3 days) and actual time spent. If the spike exceeded its time-box, explain why and note any remaining work.

  3. Describe the Approach Explain what was tried, in what order, and why. This helps future readers understand the methodology and whether alternative approaches were considered.

  4. Present Findings with Evidence Document what was learned, supported by concrete evidence . code samples, performance benchmarks, screenshots, or API responses. Distinguish between verified findings and hypotheses that need more testing.

  5. Make a Clear Recommendation Answer the original question directly: proceed, do not proceed, or proceed with conditions. Avoid hedging . the team needs actionable guidance.

  6. Document Artifacts Link to any code, prototypes, diagrams, or documentation created during the spike. These artifacts often have ongoing value beyond the summary.

  7. Capture Open Questions Note what the spike didn't answer and what additional investigation might be needed.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Original question is clearly stated
  • Time-box is documented (allocated vs. actual)
  • Findings are supported by evidence, not just opinions
  • Recommendation directly answers the question
  • Artifacts (code, diagrams) are linked or attached
  • Open questions identify remaining unknowns

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

GitHub Repository

product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Path: skills/develop-spike-summary
0
agent-skillsai-skillsclaude-codeclaude-desktopdesign-sprintfoundation-sprint

Related Skills

executing-plans

Design

Use the executing-plans skill when you have a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints. It loads and critically reviews the plan, then executes tasks in small batches (default 3 tasks) while reporting progress between each batch for architect review. This ensures systematic implementation with built-in quality control checkpoints.

View skill

requesting-code-review

Design

This skill dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to analyze code changes against requirements before proceeding. It should be used after completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to main. The review helps catch issues early by comparing the current implementation with the original plan.

View skill

connect-mcp-server

Design

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for developers to connect MCP servers to Claude Code using HTTP, stdio, or SSE transports. It covers installation, configuration, authentication, and security for integrating external services like GitHub, Notion, and custom APIs. Use it when setting up MCP integrations, configuring external tools, or working with Claude's Model Context Protocol.

View skill

web-cli-teleport

Design

This skill helps developers choose between Claude Code Web and CLI interfaces based on task analysis, then enables seamless session teleportation between these environments. It optimizes workflow by managing session state and context when switching between web, CLI, or mobile. Use it for complex projects requiring different tools at various stages.

View skill