Back to Skills

manage-change-control

pjt222
Updated 2 days ago
5 views
17
2
17
View on GitHub
Testingwordautomationdesign

About

This Claude Skill manages formal change control processes for validated systems in regulated environments. It handles request triage, impact assessment, approval workflows, and post-change verification. Use it when implementing software patches, infrastructure changes, or CAPA-driven modifications that require compliance documentation.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/manage-change-control

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

管變更控制

評、核、施、驗已驗證計算系統之變而保其已驗態。

適用時機

  • 已驗證系統需軟體升級、補丁或配置變
  • 基礎設施變(伺服器遷、OS 升、網路變)影響已驗證系統
  • CAPA 或審計發現需系統改
  • 業務程變需系統重配
  • 緊急變需加速核與事後記錄

輸入

  • 必要:變描述(何變並何以)
  • 必要:所影響系統及其當前已驗態
  • 必要:變請求者與業務理由
  • 選擇性:廠商發行說明或技術文件
  • 選擇性:相關 CAPA 或審計發現參
  • 選擇性:所影響系統之既有驗證文件

步驟

步驟一:創並分類變更請求

# Change Request
## Document ID: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### 1. Change Description
**Requestor:** [Name, Department]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**System:** [System name and version]
**Current State:** [Current configuration/version]
**Proposed State:** [Target configuration/version]

### 2. Justification
[Business, regulatory, or technical reason for the change]

### 3. Classification
| Type | Definition | Approval Path | Timeline |
|------|-----------|--------------|----------|
| **Emergency** | Urgent fix for safety, data integrity, or regulatory compliance | System owner + QA (retrospective CCB) | Implement immediately, document within 5 days |
| **Standard** | Planned change with potential impact on validated state | CCB approval before implementation | Per CCB schedule |
| **Minor** | Low-risk change with no impact on validated state | System owner approval | Documented before implementation |

**This change is classified as:** [Emergency / Standard / Minor]
**Rationale:** [Why this classification]

預期: 變更請求有唯一 ID、明描述,與有理之分類。 失敗時: 若分類有爭,默為 Standard 而令 CCB 裁決。

步驟二:行影響評估

於已驗態之所有維評變:

# Impact Assessment
## Change Request: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Impact Matrix
| Dimension | Affected? | Details | Risk |
|-----------|-----------|---------|------|
| Software configuration | Yes/No | [Specific parameters changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Source code | Yes/No | [Modules, functions, or scripts affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Database schema | Yes/No | [Tables, fields, constraints changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Infrastructure | Yes/No | [Servers, network, storage affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Interfaces | Yes/No | [Upstream/downstream system connections] | [H/M/L] |
| User access/roles | Yes/No | [Role changes, new access requirements] | [H/M/L] |
| SOPs/work instructions | Yes/No | [Procedures requiring update] | [H/M/L] |
| Training | Yes/No | [Users requiring retraining] | [H/M/L] |
| Data migration | Yes/No | [Data transformation or migration needed] | [H/M/L] |
| Audit trail | Yes/No | [Impact on audit trail continuity] | [H/M/L] |

### Regulatory Impact
- [ ] Change affects 21 CFR Part 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects EU Annex 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects data integrity (ALCOA+)
- [ ] Change requires regulatory notification

預期: 每維已評附明是/否與理由。 失敗時: 若影響不能於無測而定,將該維分為「未知——需調查」並令生產變前行沙箱評。

步驟三:定重驗範圍

依影響評估定何驗證活動所需:

# Revalidation Determination

| Revalidation Level | Criteria | Activities Required |
|--------------------|----------|-------------------|
| **Full revalidation** | Core functionality changed, new GAMP category, or major version upgrade | URS review, RA update, IQ, OQ, PQ, TM update, VSR |
| **Partial revalidation** | Specific functions affected, configuration changes | Targeted OQ for affected functions, TM update |
| **Documentation only** | No functional impact, administrative changes | Update validation documents, change log entry |
| **None** | No impact on validated state (e.g., cosmetic change) | Change log entry only |

### Determination for CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
**Revalidation level:** [Full / Partial / Documentation only / None]
**Rationale:** [Specific reasoning based on impact assessment]

### Required Activities
| Activity | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|-------|----------|
| [e.g., Execute OQ test cases TC-OQ-015 through TC-OQ-022] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update traceability matrix for URS-007] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update SOP-LIMS-003 section 4.2] | [Name] | [Date] |

預期: 重驗範圍與變之影響相稱——不過,不及。 失敗時: 若重驗範圍有爭,偏向更多測試。驗不足為法規險;驗過度僅資源本。

步驟四:獲批

循適核工作流送變:

# Change Approval

### Approval for: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

| Role | Name | Decision | Signature | Date |
|------|------|----------|-----------|------|
| System Owner | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| QA Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| IT Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| Validation Lead | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |

### Conditions (if any)
[Any conditions attached to the approval]

### Planned Implementation Window
- **Start:** [Date/Time]
- **End:** [Date/Time]
- **Rollback deadline:** [Point of no return]

預期: 施始前所有所需核者已簽(除緊急變)。 失敗時: 緊急變者,自系統擁有者與 QA 獲口頭核,施變,並於 5 個工作日內成正式記錄。

步驟五:施並驗

執變並行變後驗:

# Implementation Record

### Pre-Implementation
- [ ] Backup of current system state completed
- [ ] Rollback procedure documented and tested
- [ ] Affected users notified
- [ ] Test environment validated (if applicable)

### Implementation
- **Implemented by:** [Name]
- **Date/Time:** [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
- **Steps performed:** [Detailed implementation steps]
- **Deviations from plan:** [None / Description]

### Post-Change Verification
| Verification | Result | Evidence |
|--------------|--------|----------|
| System accessible and functional | Pass/Fail | [Screenshot/log reference] |
| Changed functionality works as specified | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Unchanged functionality unaffected (regression) | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Audit trail continuity maintained | Pass/Fail | [Audit trail screenshot] |
| User access controls intact | Pass/Fail | [Access review reference] |

### Closure
- [ ] All verification activities completed successfully
- [ ] Validation documents updated per revalidation determination
- [ ] SOPs updated and effective
- [ ] Training completed for affected users
- [ ] Change record closed in change control system

預期: 施匹核之計劃,所有驗活動過。 失敗時: 若驗敗,立執回滾程序並記敗為偏差。無 QA 同意勿行。

驗證

  • 變更請求有唯一 ID、描述與分類
  • 影響評估涵所有維(軟體、數據、基礎設施、SOP、訓練)
  • 重驗範圍已附理由定
  • 所有所需核於施前已獲(或緊急者於 5 日內)
  • 施前備份與回滾程序已記錄
  • 變後驗證變行而他未破
  • 驗證文件已反映變
  • 變更記錄正式閉

常見陷阱

  • 為「小」變略影響評估:即小變可有意外影響。似無害之配置切換可禁審計軌跡或變計算
  • 緊急變濫:若 >10% 變分為「緊急」,變程被繞。審並緊緊急標
  • 回滾計劃不全:假回滾乃「僅復備份」忽備份與回滾間所創數據。為每回滾境定數據處置
  • 施後核:追溯核(除已記緊急外)為合規違。CCB 必於工作始前核
  • 缺回歸測:僅驗已變功能不足。回歸測必確既驗功能仍不受影響

相關技能

  • design-compliance-architecture — 定含變更控制委員會之治框
  • write-validation-documentation — 創由變觸發之重驗證文件
  • perform-csv-assessment — 為需全重驗之主要變之全 CSV 再評
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — 更受變影響之 SOP
  • investigate-capa-root-cause — 當變因 CAPA 觸發

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Path: i18n/wenyan-lite/skills/manage-change-control
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Related Skills

evaluating-llms-harness

Testing

This Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.

View skill

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Testing

This skill provides comprehensive knowledge for implementing Cloudflare Cron Triggers to schedule Workers using cron expressions. It covers setting up periodic tasks, maintenance jobs, and automated workflows while handling common issues like invalid cron expressions and timezone problems. Developers can use it for configuring scheduled handlers, testing cron triggers, and integrating with Workflows and Green Compute.

View skill

webapp-testing

Testing

This Claude Skill provides a Playwright-based toolkit for testing local web applications through Python scripts. It enables frontend verification, UI debugging, screenshot capture, and log viewing while managing server lifecycles. Use it for browser automation tasks but run scripts directly rather than reading their source code to avoid context pollution.

View skill

finishing-a-development-branch

Testing

This skill helps developers complete finished work by verifying tests pass and then presenting structured integration options. It guides the workflow for merging, creating PRs, or cleaning up branches after implementation is done. Use it when your code is ready and tested to systematically finalize the development process.

View skill