Back to Skills

create-agent

pjt222
Updated 2 days ago
8 views
17
2
17
View on GitHub
Metaaidesign

About

The `create-agent` skill generates new agent definition files that follow the `agent-almanac` template and registry standards. It guides developers through persona design, tool/skill selection, and proper integration for specialized agents or Claude Code subagents. Use it when adding a domain-specific assistant with curated capabilities to your library.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/create-agent

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

Create a New Agent

Define Claude Code subagent persona. Focused purpose, curated tools, assigned skills, complete docs. Follow agent template and registry rules.

When Use

  • Adding new specialist agent to library for new domain
  • Converting recurring workflow or prompt pattern into reusable agent persona
  • Creating domain-specific assistant with curated skills and constrained tools
  • Splitting too-broad agent into focused single-responsibility agents
  • Designing new team member before composing multi-agent team

Inputs

  • Required: Agent name (lowercase kebab-case, e.g., data-engineer)
  • Required: One-line description of agent's primary purpose
  • Required: Purpose statement explaining problem agent solves
  • Optional: Model choice (default: sonnet; alternatives: opus, haiku)
  • Optional: Priority level (default: normal; alternatives: high, low)
  • Optional: List of skills from skills/_registry.yml to assign
  • Optional: MCP servers agent needs (e.g., r-mcptools, hf-mcp-server)

Steps

Step 1: Design the Agent Persona

Pick clear, focused identity for agent:

  • Name: lowercase kebab-case, describes role. Start with noun or domain qualifier: security-analyst, r-developer, tour-planner. Dodge generic names like helper or assistant.
  • Purpose: one paragraph explaining specific problem this agent solves. Ask: "What does this agent do that no existing agent covers?"
  • Communication style: think domain. Technical agents precise, citation-heavy. Creative agents can explore more. Compliance agents formal, audit-oriented.

Before moving on, check for overlap with existing 53 agents:

grep -i "description:" agents/_registry.yml | grep -i "<your-domain-keywords>"

Got: No existing agent covers same niche. Existing agent partially overlaps? Consider extending it instead of creating new one.

If fail: Agent with big overlap exists? Either extend that agent's skills list or narrow your new agent's scope to complement, not duplicate.

Step 2: Select Tools

Pick minimal tools agent needs. Principle of least privilege:

Tool SetWhen to UseExample Agents
[Read, Grep, Glob]Read-only analysis, review, auditingcode-reviewer, security-analyst, auditor
[Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch]Analysis plus external lookupssenior-researcher
[Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob]Full development — creating/modifying coder-developer, web-developer, devops-engineer
[Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch]Development plus external researchpolymath, shapeshifter

Do not include Bash for agents only analyzing code. Do not include WebFetch or WebSearch unless agent truly needs external lookups.

Got: Tool list has only tools agent will actually use in primary workflows.

If fail: Check agent's capabilities list — capability does not need tool? Remove tool.

Step 3: Choose Model

Pick model based on task complexity:

  • sonnet (default): Most agents. Good balance of reasoning and speed. Use for development, review, analysis, standard workflows.
  • opus: Complex reasoning, multi-step planning, nuanced judgment. Use for senior-level agents, architectural decisions, tasks needing deep domain expertise.
  • haiku: Simple, fast responses. Use for agents doing lookups, formatting, template-filling.

Got: Model matches cognitive demands of agent's primary use cases.

If fail: In doubt? Use sonnet. Upgrade to opus only if testing shows weak reasoning.

Step 4: Assign Skills

Browse skills registry. Pick skills fitting agent's domain:

# List all skills in a domain
grep -A3 "domain-name:" skills/_registry.yml

# Search for skills by keyword
grep -i "keyword" skills/_registry.yml

Build skills list for frontmatter:

skills:
  - skill-id-one
  - skill-id-two
  - skill-id-three

Important: All agents auto-inherit default skills (meditate, heal) from registry-level default_skills field. Do NOT list these in agent's frontmatter unless core to agent's methodology (e.g., mystic agent lists meditate because meditation facilitation is primary purpose).

Got: Skills list has 3-15 skill IDs existing in skills/_registry.yml.

If fail: Verify each skill ID exists: grep "id: skill-name" skills/_registry.yml. Drop any that do not match.

Step 5: Write the Agent File

Copy template. Fill in frontmatter:

cp agents/_template.md agents/<agent-name>.md

Fill in YAML frontmatter:

---
name: agent-name
description: One to two sentences describing primary capability and domain
tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob]
model: sonnet
version: "1.0.0"
author: Philipp Thoss
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
tags: [domain, specialty, relevant-keywords]
priority: normal
max_context_tokens: 200000
skills:
  - assigned-skill-one
  - assigned-skill-two
# Note: All agents inherit default skills (meditate, heal) from the registry.
# Only list them here if they are core to this agent's methodology.
# mcp_servers: []  # Uncomment and populate if MCP servers are needed
---

Got: YAML frontmatter parses without errors. All required fields (name, description, tools, model, version, author) present.

If fail: Validate YAML syntax. Common issues: missing quotes around version strings, wrong indentation, unclosed brackets in tool lists.

Step 6: Write Purpose and Capabilities

Replace template placeholder sections:

Purpose: One paragraph explaining specific problem this agent solves and value it gives. Be concrete — name domain, workflow, outcome.

Capabilities: Bulleted list with bold lead-ins. Group by category if agent has many:

## Capabilities

- **Primary Capability**: What the agent does best
- **Secondary Capability**: Additional functionality
- **Tool Integration**: How it leverages its tools

Available Skills: List each assigned skill with brief description. Use bare skill IDs (slash-command names):

## Available Skills

- `skill-id` - Brief description of what the skill does

Got: Purpose is specific (not "helps with development"), capabilities are concrete and verifiable, skills list matches frontmatter.

If fail: Purpose feels vague? Answer: "What specific task would user ask this agent to do?" Use that as purpose.

Step 7: Write Usage Scenarios and Examples

Give 2-3 usage scenarios showing how to spawn agent:

### Scenario 1: Primary Use Case
Brief description of the main scenario.

> "Use the agent-name agent to [specific task]."

### Scenario 2: Alternative Use Case
Description of another common use case.

> "Spawn the agent-name to [different task]."

Add 1-2 concrete examples showing user request and expected agent behavior:

### Example 1: Basic Usage
**User**: [Specific request]
**Agent**: [Expected response pattern and actions taken]

Got: Scenarios are realistic, examples show real value, invocation patterns match Claude Code conventions.

If fail: Test examples in head — would agent actually fulfill request with its assigned tools and skills?

Step 8: Write Limitations and See Also

Limitations: 3-5 honest constraints. What agent cannot do, should not be used for, or where results poor:

## Limitations

- Cannot execute code in language X (no runtime available)
- Not suitable for tasks requiring Y — use Z agent instead
- Requires MCP server ABC to be running for full functionality

See Also: Cross-reference complementary agents, relevant guides, related teams:

## See Also

- [complementary-agent](complementary-agent.md) - handles the X side of this workflow
- [relevant-guide](../guides/guide-name.md) - background knowledge for this domain
- [relevant-team](../teams/team-name.md) - team that includes this agent

Got: Limitations honest and specific. See Also references existing files.

If fail: Check referenced files exist: ls agents/complementary-agent.md.

Step 9: Add to Registry

Edit agents/_registry.yml. Add new agent entry in alphabetical position:

  - id: agent-name
    path: agents/agent-name.md
    description: Same one-line description from frontmatter
    tags: [domain, specialty]
    priority: normal
    tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob]
    skills:
      - skill-id-one
      - skill-id-two

Bump total_agents count at top of file.

Got: Registry entry matches agent file frontmatter. total_agents equals actual number of agent entries.

If fail: Count entries with grep -c "^ - id:" agents/_registry.yml. Verify matches total_agents.

Step 10: Verify Discovery

Claude Code discovers agents from .claude/agents/ directory. In this repo, that dir is symlink to agents/:

# Verify the symlink exists and resolves
ls -la .claude/agents/
readlink -f .claude/agents/<agent-name>.md

If .claude/agents/ symlink intact, no extra action needed — new agent file auto-discoverable.

Run README automation to update agents README:

npm run update-readmes

Got: .claude/agents/<agent-name>.md resolves to new agent file. agents/README.md includes new agent.

If fail: Symlink broken? Recreate: ln -sf ../agents .claude/agents. npm run update-readmes fails? Check scripts/generate-readmes.js exists and js-yaml installed.

Step 11: Scaffold Translations

Required for all agents. This step applies to both human authors and AI agents following this procedure. Do not skip — missing translations pile into stale backlog.

Scaffold translation files for all 4 supported locales right after committing new agent:

for locale in de zh-CN ja es; do
  npm run translate:scaffold -- agents <agent-name> "$locale"
done

Then translate scaffolded prose in each file (code blocks and IDs stay English). Finally regenerate status files:

npm run translation:status

Got: 4 files created at i18n/{de,zh-CN,ja,es}/agents/<agent-name>.md, all with source_commit matching current HEAD. npm run validate:translations shows 0 stale warnings for new agent.

If fail: Scaffold fails? Verify agent exists in agents/_registry.yml. Status files don't update? Run npm run translation:status explicitly — CI does not trigger it automatically.

Checks

  • Agent file exists at agents/<agent-name>.md
  • YAML frontmatter parses without errors
  • All required fields present: name, description, tools, model, version, author
  • name field matches filename (no .md)
  • All sections present: Purpose, Capabilities, Available Skills, Usage Scenarios, Examples, Limitations, See Also
  • Skills in frontmatter exist in skills/_registry.yml
  • Default skills (meditate, heal) NOT listed unless core to agent methodology
  • Tools list follows least-privilege
  • Agent listed in agents/_registry.yml with correct path and matching metadata
  • total_agents count in registry updated
  • .claude/agents/ symlink resolves to new agent file
  • No big overlap with existing agents

Pitfalls

  • Tool over-provisioning: Giving Bash, Write, or WebFetch when agent only needs to read and analyze. Breaks least-privilege, can cause unintended side effects. Start minimal, add tools only when capability needs them.
  • Missing or wrong skill assignments: Listing skill IDs not in registry, or forgetting skills entirely. Always verify each skill ID with grep "id: skill-name" skills/_registry.yml before adding.
  • Listing default skills unnecessarily: Adding meditate or heal to frontmatter when already inherited from registry. Only list if core to agent's methodology (e.g., mystic, alchemist, gardener, shaman).
  • Scope overlap with existing agents: Making new agent duplicating existing 53 agents. Search registry first. Consider extending existing agent's skills instead.
  • Vague purpose and capabilities: Writing "helps with development" instead of "scaffolds R packages with complete structure, documentation, CI/CD config." Specificity makes agent useful and discoverable.

See Also

  • create-skill - parallel procedure for creating SKILL.md files instead of agent files
  • create-team - compose many agents into coordinated team (planned)
  • commit-changes - commit new agent file and registry update

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Path: i18n/caveman/skills/create-agent
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Related Skills

content-collections

Meta

This skill provides a production-tested setup for Content Collections, a TypeScript-first tool that transforms Markdown/MDX files into type-safe data collections with Zod validation. Use it when building blogs, documentation sites, or content-heavy Vite + React applications to ensure type safety and automatic content validation. It covers everything from Vite plugin configuration and MDX compilation to deployment optimization and schema validation.

View skill

polymarket

Meta

This skill enables developers to build applications with the Polymarket prediction markets platform, including API integration for trading and market data. It also provides real-time data streaming via WebSocket to monitor live trades and market activity. Use it for implementing trading strategies or creating tools that process live market updates.

View skill

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

This skill helps developers create OpenCode plugins that hook into 25+ event types like commands, files, and LSP operations. It provides the plugin structure, event API specifications, and implementation patterns for JavaScript/TypeScript modules. Use it when you need to intercept, monitor, or extend the OpenCode AI assistant's lifecycle with custom event-driven logic.

View skill

sglang

Meta

SGLang is a high-performance LLM serving framework that specializes in fast, structured generation for JSON, regex, and agentic workflows using its RadixAttention prefix caching. It delivers significantly faster inference, especially for tasks with repeated prefixes, making it ideal for complex, structured outputs and multi-turn conversations. Choose SGLang over alternatives like vLLM when you need constrained decoding or are building applications with extensive prefix sharing.

View skill