label-training-data
About
This skill sets up systematic data labeling workflows using tools like Label Studio, including quality control and inter-annotator agreement. It helps integrate labeled data into ML pipelines for text, image, audio, or video when starting supervised ML or when model performance is limited by insufficient labels. It also supports active learning to prioritize valuable examples for labeling.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/label-training-dataCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Label Training Data
See Extended Examples for complete config files + templates.
Systematically label data for supervised ML w/ QC + efficient workflows.
Use When
- Start supervised ML needing labeled data
- Model perf limited by insufficient examples
- Label text, images, audio, video
- Measure + improve annotation quality
- Team of annotators w/ diff expertise
- Active learning → prioritize valuable examples
- Track progress + costs
- Consistent labels across multi annotators
In
- Req: Unlabeled dataset (images, text, audio, video)
- Req: Label schema (classes, attributes, annotation types)
- Req: Labeling guidelines doc
- Opt: Pre-existing labels (quality compare)
- Opt: Model predictions for pre-annotation
- Opt: Budget + timeline
- Opt: Domain expert availability
Do
Step 1: Install + Config Label Studio
Setup labeling platform.
# Install Label Studio
pip install label-studio
# Or use Docker for production
docker pull heartexlabs/label-studio:latest
# Create project directory
mkdir -p labeling-project/{data,exports,config}
cd labeling-project
# Initialize Label Studio
label-studio init my_project
# Start Label Studio server
label-studio start my_project --port 8080
Access http://localhost:8080 (default creds: create on first visit).
Prod deploy w/ Docker:
# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
label-studio:
image: heartexlabs/label-studio:latest
ports:
- "8080:8080"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
docker-compose up -d
→ Label Studio running + accessible, PostgreSQL DB init for prod.
If err: Port 8080 busy → change port in config. Docker fails → check daemon running. Ensure disk space for data vols. Firewall allows 8080.
Step 2: Design Interface + Schema
Create labeling config for task type.
# labeling-project/config/labeling_config.py
"""
Label Studio configuration templates for common tasks.
"""
# Text Classification (single label)
TEXT_CLASSIFICATION = """
<View>
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
→ Interface configured w/ appropriate controls for task type, data imported, interface accessible to annotators.
If err: Validate XML config w/ Label Studio validator. Check data file format (JSON / CSV). Ensure image/audio URLs accessible if external storage. Verify API key perms.
Step 3: Prepare Data + Sampling Strategy
Format data for import + prioritize for labeling.
# labeling-project/prepare_data.py
import pandas as pd
import json
import random
from typing import List, Dict
from sklearn.cluster import KMeans
import numpy as np
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
→ Data formatted for Label Studio import, sampling prioritizes informative examples, tasks include metadata for tracking.
If err: Verify JSON w/ jq / Py json.load(). Check URLs accessible if remote images. Ensure no special chars break JSON. Validate column names match config.
Step 4: QC + IAA Measurement
Setup processes to measure + improve quality.
# labeling-project/quality_control.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.metrics import cohen_kappa_score, confusion_matrix
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
import logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
→ IAA measured (Cohen's Kappa > 0.6 = moderate, >0.8 = good), difficult tasks ID'd for review, annotator perf tracked.
If err: Kappa very low (<0.4) → review guidelines for clarity, retrain annotators, simplify schema, check ambiguous examples, consider expert annotators for gold std.
Step 5: Export + Integrate Labeled Data
Export labels + prep for ML training.
# labeling-project/export_labels.py
import requests
import pandas as pd
import json
from typing import List, Dict
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
→ Annotations exported training-ready format, label distribution balanced / documented, data quality validated before training.
If err: Verify API key perms. Check export format compat w/ ML framework. Handle missing annotations gracefully. Validate JSON matches expected.
Step 6: Continuous Labeling Pipeline
Automate workflow w/ active learning.
# labeling-project/active_learning_pipeline.py
import schedule
import time
import logging
from datetime import datetime
from prepare_data import DataSampler, prepare_label_studio_format
from export_labels import LabelStudioExporter, convert_to_training_format
import pandas as pd
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
→ Active learning selects informative examples auto, batches prep weekly, model retrained when sufficient new labels avail.
If err: Uncertainty sampling doesn't improve model → try diversity sampling. Annotators can't keep up → reduce batch size. Monitor queue length, backpressure if queue grows.
Check
- Label Studio accessible + responsive
- Interface intuitive (test w/ sample annotator)
- Data import successful w/ correct format
- IAA (Cohen's Kappa) > 0.6
- QC IDs problematic tasks
- Labels export training-ready
- Distribution matches expected (or intentionally imbalanced)
- Active learning pipeline runs w/o manual intervention
- Throughput meets timeline
Traps
- Unclear guidelines: Ambiguous → inconsistent labels. Invest detailed guidelines + examples.
- Insufficient overlap: Can't measure IAA w/o multi annotators per task. 10-20% overlap.
- Ignore difficult cases: Edge cases often skipped, critical for robustness. Flag for expert review.
- Batch effects: Annotator fatigue / learning → temporal inconsistency. Randomize task order.
- No quality feedback: Annotators don't improve w/o feedback. Regular accuracy reports.
- Wrong sampling: Random wastes budget on easy. Use uncertainty / diversity sampling.
- Labeling in isolation: Domain experts needed for complex tasks. Pair novices w/ experts initially.
- Not tracking costs: Labeling expensive. Monitor time per task + budget consumption.
→
version-ml-data— version control for labeled datasetstrack-ml-experiments— track model perf as labels added
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
executing-plans
DesignUse the executing-plans skill when you have a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints. It loads and critically reviews the plan, then executes tasks in small batches (default 3 tasks) while reporting progress between each batch for architect review. This ensures systematic implementation with built-in quality control checkpoints.
requesting-code-review
DesignThis skill dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to analyze code changes against requirements before proceeding. It should be used after completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to main. The review helps catch issues early by comparing the current implementation with the original plan.
connect-mcp-server
DesignThis skill provides a comprehensive guide for developers to connect MCP servers to Claude Code using HTTP, stdio, or SSE transports. It covers installation, configuration, authentication, and security for integrating external services like GitHub, Notion, and custom APIs. Use it when setting up MCP integrations, configuring external tools, or working with Claude's Model Context Protocol.
web-cli-teleport
DesignThis skill helps developers choose between Claude Code Web and CLI interfaces based on task analysis, then enables seamless session teleportation between these environments. It optimizes workflow by managing session state and context when switching between web, CLI, or mobile. Use it for complex projects requiring different tools at various stages.
