About
The crit-cli skill enables programmatic creation and management of code review comments for multi-agent workflows, including syncing reviews with GitHub PRs. It provides CLI operations like crit comment, share, pull, and push for automated review workflows, but not interactive review sessions. Use this for scripting review processes rather than the interactive crit review loop.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add tomasz-tomczyk/crit -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/tomasz-tomczyk/critgit clone https://github.com/tomasz-tomczyk/crit.git ~/.claude/skills/crit-cliCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Crit CLI Reference
If a plan was just written and the user said "crit" or "review", use the
$critskill instead — it covers the full review loop. This skill covers CLI operations likecrit comment,crit pull/push, andcrit share.
Comments have three scopes:
- Line comments (
scope: "line") — tied to specific lines, stored infiles.<path>.comments - File comments (
scope: "file") — about a file overall, stored infiles.<path>.commentswithstart_line: 0 - Review comments (
scope: "review") — general feedback, stored in the top-levelreview_commentsarray
The review file path is shown by crit status.
Reading comments
When crit completes a review round, read stdout and follow its instructions. Unresolved comments are often embedded in that prompt as JSON. Check stderr for approved: true or approved: false.
When you need to read comments separately:
crit comments # human-readable, unresolved only (default)
crit comments --json # flat JSON for agents
crit comments --all # include resolved comments
crit comments --plan <slug> # plan reviews
crit comments [path] # explicit review.json or .crit directory
Review-level comments are listed first — easy to miss in raw review.json. Uses the same review resolution as crit comment (--output, --plan, daemon session).
Multiple active sessions
When more than one review session matches the current directory and branch, crit comment refuses to guess. Run crit status (or crit status --json) to list every active session, then target the intended review explicitly:
crit comment --session <id> --author <name> <path>:<line> <body>
crit comment --session <id> --json --file comments.json --author <name>
The JSON status output exposes the candidates in sessions.
Review file format
{
"review_comments": [
{
"id": "r_f1e2d3",
"body": "Overall the architecture looks good",
"scope": "review",
"author": "User Name",
"resolved": false,
"replies": [
{ "id": "rp_b4a5c6", "body": "Thanks, addressed the minor issues", "author": "Hermes" }
]
}
],
"files": {
"path/to/file.go": {
"comments": [
{
"id": "c_a1b2c3",
"start_line": 5,
"end_line": 10,
"body": "Comment text",
"quote": "the specific words selected",
"anchor": "The sessions table needs a complete rewrite...",
"author": "User Name",
"resolved": false,
"replies": [
{ "id": "rp_c7d8e9", "body": "Fixed by extracting to helper", "author": "Hermes" }
]
}
]
}
}
}
Field rules:
resolved:falseor missing — both mean unresolved. Onlytruemeans resolved.quote(optional): the specific text the reviewer selected — narrows scope within the line range. Focus changes on the quoted text rather than the entire range.anchor(line comments): full text of the commented lines when placed. When edits shift line numbers, locate content by anchor rather than trustingstart_line/end_line.drifted: true: original content was removed or heavily rewritten — line numbers are approximate at best.- Unresolved comments may have
replies— read them before acting.
Authoring comments
# Review-level (general feedback)
crit comment --author 'Hermes' '<body>'
# File-level (whole file, no line numbers)
crit comment --author 'Hermes' <path> '<body>'
# Line (single line or range)
crit comment --author 'Hermes' <path>:<line> '<body>'
crit comment --author 'Hermes' <path>:<start>-<end> '<body>'
# Reply to an existing comment
crit comment --reply-to <id> --author 'Hermes' '<body>'
Hard rules:
- Always pass
--author 'Hermes'so comments are attributed correctly. - Always single-quote the body — double quotes break on backticks and shell metachars.
- Line numbers reference the file on disk (1-indexed), not diff line numbers.
- Reply bodies support markdown — use code fences and inline code where helpful.
- Only pass
--resolvewhen the user explicitly asks. Never resolve proactively. Same rule applies to theresolvefield in--jsonmode.
Bulk commenting (3+ comments)
Use --json for atomicity (single write, no partial state) and speed (one process). The JSON can come from stdin or --file <path>:
# stdin — fine for short, single-line bodies:
echo '[
{"body": "overall feedback", "scope": "review"},
{"path": "session.go", "body": "restructure", "scope": "file"},
{"file": "src/auth.go", "line": 42, "body": "Missing null check"},
{"file": "src/auth.go", "line": "50-55", "body": "Extract to helper"},
{"reply_to": "c_a1b2c3", "body": "Fixed — added null check"},
{"reply_to": "r_f1e2d3", "body": "Done"}
]' | crit comment --json --author 'Hermes'
For multi-paragraph bodies, prefer --file. A literal newline inside a "body" string breaks JSON parsing, and shell-quoted heredocs make this easy to introduce by accident. Write the JSON to a temp file (use your file-edit tool), then:
crit comment --json --file /tmp/crit-bulk.json --author 'Hermes'
--file - is an explicit "read stdin" if you ever need it.
Per-entry schema:
| Field | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
file / path | string | line/file comments | Relative path. path alone (no line) → file-level. |
line | int/string | line comments | 42 or "45-47" |
end_line | int | optional | Defaults to line |
body | string | always | |
author | string | optional | Per-entry override; falls back to --author |
scope | string | optional | "review" / "file" — usually inferred |
reply_to | string | replies | Comment ID (c_… or r_…) |
resolve | bool | optional | Only when user explicitly asks |
Scope inference (when scope omitted): has reply_to → reply; no file/path and no line → review-level; path but no line → file-level; file/path + line → line.
Multi-file disambiguation
Comment IDs are unique per session, but the same ID can collide across files. If crit comment errors with "comment found in multiple files", disambiguate with --path:
crit comment --reply-to c_a1b2c3 --path src/auth.go --author 'Hermes' 'Fixed the null check'
In --json mode, set the file field on the entry. Review-level IDs (r_…) are globally unique and never need this.
Plan-mode comments
Plan reviews (via crit plan or the ExitPlanMode hook) store the review file in ~/.crit/plans/<slug>/. Always pass --plan <slug> — without it, crit comment looks in the project root and won't find the comments. The slug is shown in the review feedback prompt.
crit comment --plan my-plan-2026-03-23 --reply-to c_a1b2c3 --author 'Hermes' 'Updated the plan'
GitHub PR Integration
crit pull [pr-number] # Fetch PR review comments into the review file
crit push [--dry-run] [--event <type>] [-m <msg>] [pr] # Post review comments as a GitHub PR review
Requires gh CLI installed and authenticated. PR number is auto-detected from the current branch.
--event values: comment (default), approve, request-changes. -m adds a review-level body message.
Sharing
crit share <file> [file...] # Upload and print URL
crit share --qr <file> # Also print QR code (terminal only)
crit share --org <slug> <file> # Share under an organization
crit share --org <slug> --visibility unlisted <file> # Org share with explicit visibility
crit unpublish [file...] # Remove shared review
- Always relay the output — copy the URL (and QR if used) into your response. Don't make the user dig through tool output.
--qris terminal-only — skip in mobile apps, web chat UIs, or anywhere Unicode block characters won't render correctly.--org <slug>shares under an organization. Visibility defaults toorganization(members only). Override with--visibility(organization,unlisted,public).- If a review file exists, comments for the shared files are included automatically.
- Unpublish uses the persisted delete token in the review file — no extra args needed.
GitHub Repository
Frequently asked questions
What is the crit-cli skill?
crit-cli is a Claude Skill by tomasz-tomczyk. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform crit-cli-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install crit-cli?
Use the install commands on this page: add crit-cli to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does crit-cli belong to?
crit-cli is in the Meta category, tagged automation.
Is crit-cli free to use?
Yes. crit-cli is listed on AIMCP and free to install.
Related Skills
This skill provides a production-tested setup for Content Collections, a TypeScript-first tool that transforms Markdown/MDX files into type-safe data collections with Zod validation. Use it when building blogs, documentation sites, or content-heavy Vite + React applications to ensure type safety and automatic content validation. It covers everything from Vite plugin configuration and MDX compilation to deployment optimization and schema validation.
This skill enables developers to build applications with the Polymarket prediction markets platform, including API integration for trading and market data. It also provides real-time data streaming via WebSocket to monitor live trades and market activity. Use it for implementing trading strategies or creating tools that process live market updates.
This skill helps developers create OpenCode plugins that hook into 25+ event types like commands, files, and LSP operations. It provides the plugin structure, event API specifications, and implementation patterns for JavaScript/TypeScript modules. Use it when you need to intercept, monitor, or extend the OpenCode AI assistant's lifecycle with custom event-driven logic.
SGLang is a high-performance LLM serving framework that specializes in fast, structured generation for JSON, regex, and agentic workflows using its RadixAttention prefix caching. It delivers significantly faster inference, especially for tasks with repeated prefixes, making it ideal for complex, structured outputs and multi-turn conversations. Choose SGLang over alternatives like vLLM when you need constrained decoding or are building applications with extensive prefix sharing.
