run-ab-test-models
About
This skill enables A/B testing for ML models in production using traffic splitting and statistical significance testing. It supports canary and shadow deployments to compare model versions and measure business impact. Use it to validate new models before full rollout or to make data-driven deployment decisions.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-ab-test-modelsCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Run A/B Test for Models
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Run controlled experiments comparing model versions with traffic split + statistical analysis.
When Use
- Deploy new model version, want validate before full rollout
- Compare multiple candidate models (different algorithms, features)
- Test impact of hyperparameter changes on business metrics
- Measure model performance in prod without risk full traffic
- Regulatory needs gradual rollout (medical ML)
- Judge cost-performance tradeoffs between model sizes
Inputs
- Required: Champion model (current prod)
- Required: Challenger model(s) (new version to test)
- Required: Traffic allocation % (e.g., 5% to challenger)
- Required: Success metrics (business + ML)
- Required: Min sample size or test duration
- Optional: Guardrail metrics (latency, error rate thresholds)
- Optional: User segments for stratified testing
Steps
Step 1: Design Experiment
Define test parameters, success criteria, statistical needs.
# ab_test/experiment_config.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import norm
@dataclass
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Experiment config with stat-sound sample size calc, typical 5-10k samples per variant for 5-10% MDE.
If fail: Sample too large? Up traffic allocation, extend duration, or accept larger MDE; verify baseline metric estimate; consider sequential testing.
Step 2: Implement Traffic Splitting
Set up routing — randomly assign requests to models.
# ab_test/traffic_router.py
import hashlib
import random
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Consistent user-to-variant assignment, accurate traffic split matches configured %, all assignments logged.
If fail: Verify hash uniform (test 10k user IDs), check user_id stable across requests (not session_id), logs capture all predictions, validate split in first 1000 requests.
Step 3: Implement Shadow Deployment (Optional)
Run challenger in parallel without affecting users (shadow mode).
# ab_test/shadow_deployment.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Any
import logging
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import time
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Champion served at normal latency, challenger logged async without blocking, prediction diffs captured.
If fail: Set challenger timeout < champion SLA, handle challenger errors gracefully, monitor memory (two models loaded), consider sampling (log 10% of shadow predictions).
Step 4: Collect and Analyze Metrics
Gather data, run statistical tests.
# ab_test/analysis.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from typing import Dict, Tuple
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Stat test results with p-values, CIs, clear decision (rollout/keep/inconclusive), typical after 7-14 days or sample size.
If fail: Verify ground truth labels available (delayed analysis maybe), check sample ratio mismatch (SRM = assignment bugs), enough sample size, look for novelty/primacy effects in early data, consider sequential testing if fixed-horizon too slow.
Step 5: Monitor Guardrail Metrics
Continuous check challenger does not violate safety thresholds.
# ab_test/guardrails.py
import pandas as pd
import logging
from typing import Dict, List
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Guardrail violations detected within 5-15 min, auto stop if critical thresholds breached (latency, errors), alerts to team.
If fail: Verify thresholds realistic (not too tight), monitoring loop runs continuous, check stop_experiment() updates routing, test alert delivery.
Step 6: Make Rollout Decision
From results, decide rollout challenger.
# ab_test/rollout_decision.py
import logging
from typing import Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Clear decision (full/gradual rollout, keep champion, extend test) with justification + action items.
If fail: Decision unclear? Subgroup analysis (segment, time, device), check interaction effects, review business context (2% lift worth eng cost?), consult stakeholders.
Checks
- Traffic split matches configured % (within 1%)
- Same user always to same variant
- Sample size calc reasonable (5-50k per variant)
- Stat tests produce p-values consistent with manual calc
- Guardrail violations trigger alerts within 5 min
- Shadow deployment shows <5% prediction divergence
- Reports include CIs
- Rollout decision documented
Pitfalls
- Sample ratio mismatch (SRM): Observed split differs from configured (95/5 becomes 92/8) = assignment bug; check hash uniformity
- Peeking: Check results before sample size inflates Type I error; use sequential testing or wait for pre-set end date
- Novelty effect: Users respond different to new model at first; run 2+ weeks for steady state
- Carryover effects: Prev variant exposure affects current; use new users or washout
- Multiple testing: Many metrics = false positive risk; correct with Bonferroni or single primary metric
- Insufficient power: Small allocation = months to detect; balance power with risk
- Ignore segments: Aggregate lift hides negative on important segments; subgroup analysis
- Attribution errors: Outcome metrics attributed to predictions (not other system changes)
See Also
deploy-ml-model-serving- Model deployment infra, versioningmonitor-model-drift- Post-rollout monitoring
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestingThis Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestingThis skill provides comprehensive knowledge for implementing Cloudflare Cron Triggers to schedule Workers using cron expressions. It covers setting up periodic tasks, maintenance jobs, and automated workflows while handling common issues like invalid cron expressions and timezone problems. Developers can use it for configuring scheduled handlers, testing cron triggers, and integrating with Workflows and Green Compute.
webapp-testing
TestingThis Claude Skill provides a Playwright-based toolkit for testing local web applications through Python scripts. It enables frontend verification, UI debugging, screenshot capture, and log viewing while managing server lifecycles. Use it for browser automation tasks but run scripts directly rather than reading their source code to avoid context pollution.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestingThis skill helps developers complete finished work by verifying tests pass and then presenting structured integration options. It guides the workflow for merging, creating PRs, or cleaning up branches after implementation is done. Use it when your code is ready and tested to systematically finalize the development process.
