run-chaos-experiment
About
This skill enables developers to design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. It allows for controlled fault injection to test system resilience, validate hypotheses, and improve failure recovery. Use it before major launches, after architectural changes, or during resilience drills to proactively identify weaknesses.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-chaos-experimentCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Run Chaos Experiment
Inject controlled failures. Test, improve resilience.
When Use
- Before major launches (load testing)
- After architecture changes (validate resilience)
- During GameDays or DR drills
- Validate assumptions about failure modes
- Part of SRE maturity program
Inputs
- Required: Kubernetes cluster (Litmus or Chaos Mesh)
- Required: Steady-state definition (what "normal" looks)
- Required: Hypothesis to test (e.g., "API stays up if one pod crashes")
- Optional: Observability stack (Prometheus, Grafana) to measure impact
- Optional: Rollback plan
Steps
Step 1: Define Steady State and Hypothesis
Document normal behavior.
## Steady State Definition
### Service: API Gateway
- **Availability**: 99.9% (< 0.1% error rate)
- **Latency**: p95 < 200ms
- **Throughput**: 1000 req/s
- **Dependencies**: Database (Postgres), Cache (Redis), Auth Service
### Metrics
- `rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[5m])`
- `histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))`
- `rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])`
## Hypothesis
**"If one API pod is killed, the remaining pods will handle the load with <5s
disruption and no increase in error rate."**
### Validation Criteria
- Error rate remains <1%
- p95 latency stays <300ms (50ms grace)
- Service recovers within 5 seconds
- No cascading failures to downstream services
Got: Clear, measurable definition of normal + success criteria.
If fail: Cannot define steady state? Observability insufficient. Add metrics first.
Step 2: Set Blast Radius Limits
Scope experiment to minimize risk.
# chaos-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: chaos-testing
---
# Label pods participating in chaos experiments
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
labels:
chaos-enabled: "true"
environment: staging # NEVER production for first run
Set safeguards.
## Blast Radius Controls
### Environment
- **Scope**: Staging only (first 5 runs)
- **Production**: Only after 5 successful staging runs
- **Timing**: Business hours (09:00-17:00 local), never weekends/holidays
### Target Selection
- **Limit**: Max 1 pod per service
- **Percentage**: Max 25% of replicas
- **Exclusions**: Database, payment service, auth service (critical path)
### Auto-Abort Conditions
- Error rate >10% for >30 seconds
- Customer-facing alerts fire
- Manual abort signal from on-call engineer
### Rollback Plan
- Kubernetes will auto-restart killed pods
- Manual rollback: `kubectl rollout undo deployment/api`
- Incident declared if recovery takes >5 minutes
Got: Experiment has clear bounds, will not take down whole system.
If fail: Blast radius too large? Narrow scope. Start with one non-critical service.
Step 3: Install Chaos Mesh
Deploy Chaos Mesh (Kubernetes-native).
# Add Chaos Mesh Helm repo
helm repo add chaos-mesh https://charts.chaos-mesh.org
helm repo update
# Install Chaos Mesh in isolated namespace
helm install chaos-mesh chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh \
--namespace chaos-mesh \
--create-namespace \
--set dashboard.create=true \
--set controllerManager.replicaCount=1
# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n chaos-mesh
# Access dashboard
kubectl port-forward -n chaos-mesh svc/chaos-dashboard 2333:2333
# Open http://localhost:2333
Alt: Litmus (vendor-neutral).
# Install Litmus
kubectl apply -f https://litmuschaos.github.io/litmus/litmus-operator-v2.14.0.yaml
# Wait for Litmus pods
kubectl get pods -n litmus
# Install Litmus CRDs
kubectl apply -f https://hub.litmuschaos.io/api/chaos/master?file=charts/generic/experiments.yaml
Got: Chaos Mesh or Litmus running, dashboard accessible.
If fail: Check RBAC perms. Chaos tools need cluster-wide access.
Step 4: Create and Execute Experiment
Example: Pod Kill (Chaos Mesh).
# pod-kill-experiment.yaml
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
name: api-pod-kill-test
namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
action: pod-kill
mode: one # Kill one pod only
selector:
namespaces:
- production
labelSelectors:
app: api-gateway
chaos-enabled: "true"
duration: "30s"
scheduler:
cron: "@every 5m" # Repeat every 5 minutes (for sustained testing)
Apply experiment.
# Apply experiment
kubectl apply -f pod-kill-experiment.yaml
# Watch experiment status
kubectl get podchaos -n chaos-testing -w
# View detailed status
kubectl describe podchaos api-pod-kill-test -n chaos-testing
# Check which pods were affected
kubectl get events -n production --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp | grep api-gateway
Monitor impact in Grafana.
# Error rate during experiment
rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5..", job="api"}[1m])
# Latency spike
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job="api"}[1m]))
# Pod restarts
rate(kube_pod_container_status_restarts_total{pod=~"api-.*"}[5m])
Got: Pod killed, Kubernetes restarts it, service continues with minor blip.
If fail: Error rate spikes or service degrades hard? Abort and investigate.
Step 5: Analyze Results and Iterate
Make experiment report.
# Chaos Experiment Report: API Pod Kill
**Date**: 2025-02-09
**Hypothesis**: API stays available if one pod crashes
**Tool**: Chaos Mesh
**Environment**: Staging
**Duration**: 30 seconds (pod kill + recovery)
## Results
### Metrics During Experiment
- **Error Rate**: Increased from 0.1% to 2.3% (spike lasted 8 seconds)
- **p95 Latency**: Increased from 180ms to 450ms (spike lasted 12 seconds)
- **Recovery Time**: 8 seconds (pod restart + load balancer update)
### Hypothesis Outcome
**FAILED**: Error rate exceeded 1% threshold, latency spike >300ms
## Root Cause Analysis
- Load balancer continued routing to killed pod for 8 seconds (stale endpoint)
- Readiness probe set to 10s interval (too slow)
- No pre-stop hook to drain connections gracefully
## Improvements Made
1. **Reduced readiness probe interval**: 10s → 2s
2. **Added pre-stop hook**: 5-second sleep for connection draining
3. **Tuned load balancer**: Enabled faster endpoint updates
## Follow-Up Experiment
- Re-run with same parameters in 1 week
- Expected: Error rate <1%, recovery <5s
Track experiments in log.
# chaos-experiment-log.csv
date,experiment,environment,status,error_rate_peak,recovery_time_s,outcome
2025-02-09,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,2.3%,8,failed
2025-02-16,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,0.8%,4,passed
2025-02-23,network-delay-db,staging,aborted,15%,N/A,failed
Got: Learnings captured, fixes done, follow-up scheduled.
If fail: No action taken post-experiment? Chaos = theater. Prioritize fixes.
Step 6: Graduate to Production (Carefully)
Once staging consistent.
# Production pod-kill experiment (more conservative)
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
name: api-pod-kill-prod
namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
action: pod-kill
mode: one
selector:
namespaces:
- production
labelSelectors:
app: api-gateway
chaos-enabled: "true"
duration: "10s" # Shorter than staging
scheduler:
cron: "0 10 * * 2" # Tuesdays at 10 AM only (predictable, low-risk time)
Production safeguards.
# Create a kill switch for production chaos
kubectl create configmap chaos-killswitch \
-n chaos-testing \
--from-literal=enabled=true
# Update experiments to check kill switch
# (implementation depends on chaos tool)
Got: Prod experiments run during low-risk windows, kill switch ready.
If fail: Prod experiment causes incident? Disable immediately, post-mortem.
Checks
- Steady state, hypothesis clearly defined
- Blast radius limited (env, scope, timing)
- Chaos tool (Chaos Mesh or Litmus) installed, tested
- Experiment runs in staging
- Results documented with metrics + analysis
- Improvements done based on findings
- Follow-up validates fixes
- Prod experiments only after 5+ staging successes
Pitfalls
- No hypothesis: Run chaos "to see what happens" = waste. Always have hypothesis.
- Too broad scope: Kill all pods = tests DR not resilience. Start small.
- Production-first: Never first experiment in prod. Staging first, always.
- Ignore results: Chaos without action = theater. Fix what you learn.
- Alert fatigue: Chaos triggers alerts. Annotate Grafana or silence expected.
- No abort plan: If experiment goes wrong, need kill switch. Ready it.
See Also
setup-prometheus-monitoring- metrics to measure impactconfigure-alerting-rules- alerts that fire during chaos (expected)define-slo-sli-sla- steady state tied to SLOs
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestingThis Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestingThis skill provides comprehensive knowledge for implementing Cloudflare Cron Triggers to schedule Workers using cron expressions. It covers setting up periodic tasks, maintenance jobs, and automated workflows while handling common issues like invalid cron expressions and timezone problems. Developers can use it for configuring scheduled handlers, testing cron triggers, and integrating with Workflows and Green Compute.
webapp-testing
TestingThis Claude Skill provides a Playwright-based toolkit for testing local web applications through Python scripts. It enables frontend verification, UI debugging, screenshot capture, and log viewing while managing server lifecycles. Use it for browser automation tasks but run scripts directly rather than reading their source code to avoid context pollution.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestingThis skill helps developers complete finished work by verifying tests pass and then presenting structured integration options. It guides the workflow for merging, creating PRs, or cleaning up branches after implementation is done. Use it when your code is ready and tested to systematically finalize the development process.
