manage-change-control
About
This skill manages the change control process for validated computerized systems in regulated environments. It handles change triage, impact assessment, approval workflows, and post-change verification for software updates, patches, or configuration changes. Use it when implementing modifications to validated systems while maintaining compliance documentation.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/manage-change-controlCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
管變控
評、批、施、驗確認計算系統之變而保確認態。
用
- 確認系統需軟件升、補、配變
- 基礎設施變(服遷、OS 升、網變)影確認系統
- CAPA 或審計識需系統改
- 業程變需系統重配
- 急變需加速批與回文
入
- 必:變述(何變與何故)
- 必:所影系統及當確認態
- 必:變請者與業理
- 可:供應商發行註或技文
- 可:相關 CAPA 或審計識
- 可:所影系統之現確認文
行
一:造並歸變請
# Change Request
## Document ID: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### 1. Change Description
**Requestor:** [Name, Department]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**System:** [System name and version]
**Current State:** [Current configuration/version]
**Proposed State:** [Target configuration/version]
### 2. Justification
[Business, regulatory, or technical reason for the change]
### 3. Classification
| Type | Definition | Approval Path | Timeline |
|------|-----------|--------------|----------|
| **Emergency** | Urgent fix for safety, data integrity, or regulatory compliance | System owner + QA (retrospective CCB) | Implement immediately, document within 5 days |
| **Standard** | Planned change with potential impact on validated state | CCB approval before implementation | Per CCB schedule |
| **Minor** | Low-risk change with no impact on validated state | System owner approval | Documented before implementation |
**This change is classified as:** [Emergency / Standard / Minor]
**Rationale:** [Why this classification]
得:變請有獨 ID、明述、有理之歸。 敗:歸有爭→默為 Standard 令 CCB 裁。
二:行影響評
評變對確認態諸維:
# Impact Assessment
## Change Request: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Impact Matrix
| Dimension | Affected? | Details | Risk |
|-----------|-----------|---------|------|
| Software configuration | Yes/No | [Specific parameters changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Source code | Yes/No | [Modules, functions, or scripts affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Database schema | Yes/No | [Tables, fields, constraints changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Infrastructure | Yes/No | [Servers, network, storage affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Interfaces | Yes/No | [Upstream/downstream system connections] | [H/M/L] |
| User access/roles | Yes/No | [Role changes, new access requirements] | [H/M/L] |
| SOPs/work instructions | Yes/No | [Procedures requiring update] | [H/M/L] |
| Training | Yes/No | [Users requiring retraining] | [H/M/L] |
| Data migration | Yes/No | [Data transformation or migration needed] | [H/M/L] |
| Audit trail | Yes/No | [Impact on audit trail continuity] | [H/M/L] |
### Regulatory Impact
- [ ] Change affects 21 CFR Part 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects EU Annex 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects data integrity (ALCOA+)
- [ ] Change requires regulatory notification
得:各維有明是否與理。 敗:影響不能定而需測→歸為「未知——需察」並令生前沙盒評。
三:定重確認範
按影響評定所需驗活動:
# Revalidation Determination
| Revalidation Level | Criteria | Activities Required |
|--------------------|----------|-------------------|
| **Full revalidation** | Core functionality changed, new GAMP category, or major version upgrade | URS review, RA update, IQ, OQ, PQ, TM update, VSR |
| **Partial revalidation** | Specific functions affected, configuration changes | Targeted OQ for affected functions, TM update |
| **Documentation only** | No functional impact, administrative changes | Update validation documents, change log entry |
| **None** | No impact on validated state (e.g., cosmetic change) | Change log entry only |
### Determination for CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
**Revalidation level:** [Full / Partial / Documentation only / None]
**Rationale:** [Specific reasoning based on impact assessment]
### Required Activities
| Activity | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|-------|----------|
| [e.g., Execute OQ test cases TC-OQ-015 through TC-OQ-022] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update traceability matrix for URS-007] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update SOP-LIMS-003 section 4.2] | [Name] | [Date] |
得:重確認範按變影成比——不多不少。 敗:範有爭→向多測偏。不足確認乃規險;過確認僅本。
四:獲批
按適批流路變:
# Change Approval
### Approval for: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
| Role | Name | Decision | Signature | Date |
|------|------|----------|-----------|------|
| System Owner | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| QA Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| IT Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| Validation Lead | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
### Conditions (if any)
[Any conditions attached to the approval]
### Planned Implementation Window
- **Start:** [Date/Time]
- **End:** [Date/Time]
- **Rollback deadline:** [Point of no return]
得:諸所需批者於施前簽(急變除)。 敗:急變→由系統所有者與 QA 得口頭批,施變,並於 5 業日內畢正式記。
五:施並驗
執變並後驗:
# Implementation Record
### Pre-Implementation
- [ ] Backup of current system state completed
- [ ] Rollback procedure documented and tested
- [ ] Affected users notified
- [ ] Test environment validated (if applicable)
### Implementation
- **Implemented by:** [Name]
- **Date/Time:** [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
- **Steps performed:** [Detailed implementation steps]
- **Deviations from plan:** [None / Description]
### Post-Change Verification
| Verification | Result | Evidence |
|--------------|--------|----------|
| System accessible and functional | Pass/Fail | [Screenshot/log reference] |
| Changed functionality works as specified | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Unchanged functionality unaffected (regression) | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Audit trail continuity maintained | Pass/Fail | [Audit trail screenshot] |
| User access controls intact | Pass/Fail | [Access review reference] |
### Closure
- [ ] All verification activities completed successfully
- [ ] Validation documents updated per revalidation determination
- [ ] SOPs updated and effective
- [ ] Training completed for affected users
- [ ] Change record closed in change control system
得:施匹批計,諸驗活動過。 敗:驗敗→即執回滾並記敗為偏。無 QA 同意勿進。
驗
- 變請有獨 ID、述、歸
- 影響評覆諸維(軟、數據、基、SOP、訓)
- 重確認範定附理
- 諸所需批於施前得(急 5 日內)
- 前備份與回滾法記
- 後驗示變行且他無破
- 確認文更以反變
- 變記正式閉
忌
- 「小」變略影評:即微變可有意外影。似無害之配切換可禁審計跡或變算
- 急變濫:若 > 10% 為「急」→變程被繞。審緊急準
- 回滾計不全:以回滾為「復備份」忽備至滾間生之數據。各回滾情定數據處
- 施後批:回批(除記急外)為合規違。CCB 須於工始前批
- 缺回歸測:僅驗變功不足。回歸測須證現確認功無受影
參
design-compliance-architecture— 定變控委之治理框write-validation-documentation— 造變觸之重確認文perform-csv-assessment— 為需全重確認之大變行全 CSV 重評write-standard-operating-procedure— 更變影之 SOPinvestigate-capa-root-cause— 變由 CAPA 觸
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestingThis Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestingThis skill provides comprehensive knowledge for implementing Cloudflare Cron Triggers to schedule Workers using cron expressions. It covers setting up periodic tasks, maintenance jobs, and automated workflows while handling common issues like invalid cron expressions and timezone problems. Developers can use it for configuring scheduled handlers, testing cron triggers, and integrating with Workflows and Green Compute.
webapp-testing
TestingThis Claude Skill provides a Playwright-based toolkit for testing local web applications through Python scripts. It enables frontend verification, UI debugging, screenshot capture, and log viewing while managing server lifecycles. Use it for browser automation tasks but run scripts directly rather than reading their source code to avoid context pollution.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestingThis skill helps developers complete finished work by verifying tests pass and then presenting structured integration options. It guides the workflow for merging, creating PRs, or cleaning up branches after implementation is done. Use it when your code is ready and tested to systematically finalize the development process.
