test-team-coordination
About
This skill executes test scenarios against a team to validate and observe its coordination patterns, evaluating against acceptance criteria. It generates a structured `RESULT.md` report to compare performance on equivalent workloads and establish a baseline. Use it to verify that a team's collaboration produces expected behaviors during realistic tasks.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/test-team-coordinationCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Test Team Coordination
Exec test scenario from tests/scenarios/teams/ vs target team. Observe coordination pattern behaviors, eval acceptance criteria, score rubric, produce RESULT.md in tests/results/.
Use When
- Validate team's coordination produces expected behaviors
- Run structured test after modifying team def | agent
- Compare patterns by running same scenario w/ diff teams
- Establish baseline perf metrics for team composition
- Regression tests after adding agents | changing membership
In
- Required: Path to test scenario file (e.g.
tests/scenarios/teams/test-opaque-team-cartographers-audit.md) - Optional: Run ID override (default:
YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNNauto) - Optional: Team size override (default: from scenario frontmatter)
- Optional: Skip scope change (default: false — inject if defined)
Do
Step 1: Load + Validate Scenario
1.1. Read scenario file specified in input.
1.2. Parse YAML frontmatter + extract:
target— team to testcoordination-pattern— expected patternteam-size— # members to spawn- Acceptance criteria table
- Scoring rubric (if present)
- Ground truth data (if present)
1.3. Verify file has all req sections:
- Objective
- Pre-conditions
- Task (w/ Primary Task subsection)
- Expected Behaviors
- Acceptance Criteria
- Observation Protocol
Got: Scenario loads, parses, has all req sections.
If err: Missing | unparseable → abort w/ err msg ID'ing missing/malformed. Optional sections (Rubric, Ground Truth, Variants) absent → note + continue.
Step 2: Verify Pre-conditions
2.1. Walk through each pre-condition checkbox.
2.2. File-existence → use Glob.
2.3. Registry count → parse _registry.yml + cmp total_* vs actual file counts.
2.4. Branch/git → git status --porcelain + git branch --show-current.
Got: All pre-conditions satisfied.
If err: Pre-condition fails → record BLOCKED. Decide: proceed (soft) | abort (hard like missing target team file). Doc decision.
Step 3: Load Coordination Pattern Criteria
3.1. Read tests/_registry.yml + locate coordination_patterns matching scenario's coordination-pattern.
3.2. Extract key_behaviors list.
3.3. Behaviors = observation checklist — each watched during exec + recorded observed/not.
Got: Pattern key behaviors loaded for observation.
If err: Pattern not in registry → use scenario's Expected Behaviors as sole source. Log warning.
Step 4: Execute Task
4.1. Create result dir: tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN/.
4.2. Record T0 (task start).
4.3. Read target team def from teams/<target>.md, extract CONFIG block, activate: call TeamCreate w/ team name, spawn teammates per subagent_type, create tasks from CONFIG tasks list. Use team-size from scenario. Pass Primary Task verbatim from scenario's Task section.
4.4. Observe team's exec phases. Record:
- T1: Form assessment / decomposition complete
- T2: Role assignments visible
4.5. Scenario defines Scope Change Trigger + skip-scope-change false:
- Wait until Phase 2 (role assignment) visible
- T3 (scope change injection)
- Send scope change prompt via SendMessage
- T4 (scope change absorbed — role adjustment visible)
4.6. Continue observing until output:
- T5 (integration begins)
- T6 (final report delivered)
4.7. Capture team's complete output.
Got: Team executes through coordination phases. Timestamps for all transitions. Scope change (if applicable) injected + absorbed.
If err: Team fails to produce output → record fail point + err msgs. Stalls → note last phase + timeout. Proceed to eval w/ partial.
Step 5: Evaluate Pattern Behaviors
5.1. Per key behavior from Step 3, determine observed during exec:
- Observed: Clear evidence in output | coordination
- Partial: Some evidence but incomplete | ambiguous
- Not observed: No evidence
5.2. Per task-specific behavior from scenario's Expected Behaviors, same eval.
5.3. Record findings in observation log.
Got: All/most pattern + task behaviors observed.
If err: Unobserved = findings, not test fails. Record accurate — pattern didn't fully manifest.
Step 6: Evaluate Acceptance Criteria
6.1. Walk each acceptance criterion.
6.2. Per criterion, determination:
- PASS: Clearly met w/ observable evidence
- PARTIAL: Partially met (counts toward threshold at 0.5 weight)
- FAIL: Not met despite opportunity
- BLOCKED: Couldn't eval (pre-condition fail, timeout)
6.3. Scenario has Ground Truth → verify findings vs:
- Calc accuracy % per category
- Flag false +/false -
6.4. Scenario has Scoring Rubric → score each dim 1-5 w/ brief justification.
6.5. Calc summary metrics:
- Acceptance: X/N criteria passed (PARTIAL = 0.5)
- Threshold: PASS if ≥ scenario threshold
- Rubric total: X/Y points (if applicable)
Got: All criteria have determination. Summary metrics calc'd.
If err: < half criteria evaluable (too many BLOCKED) → inconclusive. Doc why + recommend re-run after fixing pre-conditions.
Step 7: Generate RESULT.md
7.1. Create tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN/RESULT.md using Recording Template from scenario's Observation Protocol.
7.2. Populate all sections:
- Run metadata (observer, timestamps, duration)
- Phase log w/ all timestamps
- Role emergence log (adaptive/team tests)
- Acceptance criteria results table
- Rubric scores table (if applicable)
- Ground truth verification table (if applicable)
- Key observations (narrative)
- Lessons learned
7.3. Include team's raw output as appendix | separate file (team-output.md) in same dir.
7.4. Add summary verdict at top:
**Verdict**: PASS | FAIL | INCONCLUSIVE
**Score**: X/N criteria (Y/Z rubric points)
**Duration**: Xm
Got: Complete RESULT.md w/ all sections + clear verdict.
If err: Result file can't be written → output to stdout fallback. Eval data never lost.
Check
- Scenario loaded + all req sections present
- Pre-conditions verified (or BLOCKED)
- Pattern key behaviors loaded from registry
- Team spawned + task delivered
- Scope change injected at right time (if applicable)
- All pattern behaviors evaluated (observed/partial/not)
- All criteria have determination (PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL/BLOCKED)
- Ground truth verified (if applicable)
- RESULT.md generated w/ all sections
- Summary verdict calc'd + recorded
Traps
- Eval output quality vs coordination: Tests how team coordinates, not whether output perfect. Team coordinating well but finding 7/9 broken refs still demonstrates pattern.
- Inject scope change too early: Wait until role assignment clearly visible. Too early → team hasn't differentiated, nothing to adapt.
- Conflate member output w/ team output: Opaque team should present unified output. Individual member reports = finding about opacity, not test infra problem.
- Exact ground truth matching: Ground truth counts approximate. Eval right ballpark, not exact match.
- Forget timestamps: Essential for phase durations + adaptation speed. Set as events happen, not retroactively.
→
review-codebase— deep codebase review complementing team-level testingreview-skill-format— validates individual skill format (this validates team coordination)create-team— creates defs this testsevolve-team— evolves defs based on test findingstest-a2a-interop— similar testing pattern for A2A protocol conformanceassess-form— morphic assessment opaque team lead uses internally
GitHub Repository
Related Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestingThis Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestingThis skill provides comprehensive knowledge for implementing Cloudflare Cron Triggers to schedule Workers using cron expressions. It covers setting up periodic tasks, maintenance jobs, and automated workflows while handling common issues like invalid cron expressions and timezone problems. Developers can use it for configuring scheduled handlers, testing cron triggers, and integrating with Workflows and Green Compute.
webapp-testing
TestingThis Claude Skill provides a Playwright-based toolkit for testing local web applications through Python scripts. It enables frontend verification, UI debugging, screenshot capture, and log viewing while managing server lifecycles. Use it for browser automation tasks but run scripts directly rather than reading their source code to avoid context pollution.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestingThis skill helps developers complete finished work by verifying tests pass and then presenting structured integration options. It guides the workflow for merging, creating PRs, or cleaning up branches after implementation is done. Use it when your code is ready and tested to systematically finalize the development process.
