go-interface-design
About
This skill provides guidance on Go interface design patterns including implicit interfaces, consumer-side definition, and the accept-interfaces-return-structs principle. Use it when designing interfaces, decoupling packages, defining contracts, or refactoring for testability. It covers interface composition, compliance verification, and common pitfalls to avoid.
Quick Install
Claude Code
Recommendednpx skills add eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/eduardo-sl/go-agent-skillsgit clone https://github.com/eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/go-interface-designCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
Documentation
Go Interface Design
Go interfaces are implicit. This is the single most important design feature of the language, and most people coming from Java or C# get it wrong at first.
1. The Cardinal Rule: Define Interfaces at the Consumer
The consumer of a behavior defines the interface, NOT the provider:
// ❌ Wrong — producer defines interface (Java thinking)
// package store
type UserStore interface { // defined alongside implementation
GetByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
Create(ctx context.Context, user *User) error
// ... 15 more methods
}
type PostgresStore struct { ... }
func (s *PostgresStore) GetByID(...) { ... }
func (s *PostgresStore) Create(...) { ... }
// ✅ Right — consumer defines what it needs
// package service
type UserReader interface { // only what THIS service needs
GetByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*domain.User, error)
}
type UserService struct {
store UserReader // depends on narrow interface
}
// package store (no interface defined here)
type PostgresStore struct { db *sql.DB }
func (s *PostgresStore) GetByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*domain.User, error) { ... }
func (s *PostgresStore) Create(ctx context.Context, user *domain.User) error { ... }
// PostgresStore satisfies service.UserReader implicitly — no declaration needed
Why this matters:
- Consumer depends only on what it uses (Interface Segregation Principle).
- Producer can add methods without breaking consumers.
- Testing requires only the methods the consumer calls.
- No import cycle: consumer doesn't import producer's package.
2. Keep Interfaces Small
The bigger the interface, the weaker the abstraction.
// ✅ Good — focused, composable
type Reader interface {
Read(p []byte) (n int, err error)
}
type Writer interface {
Write(p []byte) (n int, err error)
}
type ReadWriter interface {
Reader
Writer
}
// ❌ Bad — kitchen sink interface
type FileManager interface {
Read(path string) ([]byte, error)
Write(path string, data []byte) error
Delete(path string) error
List(dir string) ([]string, error)
Move(src, dst string) error
Copy(src, dst string) error
Stat(path string) (os.FileInfo, error)
Watch(path string) (<-chan Event, error)
}
Guideline: 1-3 methods is ideal. If you need more, compose smaller interfaces.
3. Accept Interfaces, Return Structs
// ✅ Good — accepts interface, returns concrete type
func NewUserService(store UserReader, logger Logger) *UserService {
return &UserService{store: store, logger: logger}
}
// ❌ Bad — returns interface (hides the concrete type for no reason)
func NewUserService(store UserReader) UserServiceInterface {
return &UserService{store: store}
}
Return a concrete type so callers get full access to the type's methods. Returning an interface only makes sense when the function genuinely returns different concrete types based on input (factory pattern).
4. Verify Interface Compliance at Compile Time
Use the blank identifier assignment to catch broken contracts early:
// Verify *PostgresStore implements service.UserReader at compile time
var _ service.UserReader = (*PostgresStore)(nil)
// Verify LogHandler implements http.Handler
var _ http.Handler = (*LogHandler)(nil)
// For value receivers:
var _ fmt.Stringer = Status(0)
Place these immediately after the type declaration. They cost nothing at runtime and prevent silent contract breakage.
5. Don't Use Pointers to Interfaces
// ❌ Bad — pointer to interface is almost never correct
func process(r *io.Reader) { ... }
// ✅ Good — interface is already a pointer internally
func process(r io.Reader) { ... }
An interface value is internally two pointers (type + data). A pointer to an interface is a pointer to a pointer — needless indirection.
The only exception: when you need to replace the interface value itself (swap the implementation at runtime), which is extremely rare.
6. The Empty Interface
interface{} (or any in Go 1.18+) means you've given up on type safety.
Use it sparingly:
// ✅ Acceptable — generic container before generics / stdlib compatibility
func Marshal(v any) ([]byte, error)
// ✅ Better (Go 1.18+) — use generics instead of any
func Map[T, U any](slice []T, fn func(T) U) []U { ... }
// ❌ Bad — lazy interface design
func Process(data any) any { ... } // what does this even do?
7. Functional Options Pattern
When a constructor needs optional configuration, use functional options instead of a config struct with an interface:
type Option func(*Server)
func WithTimeout(d time.Duration) Option {
return func(s *Server) { s.timeout = d }
}
func WithLogger(l Logger) Option {
return func(s *Server) { s.logger = l }
}
func NewServer(addr string, opts ...Option) *Server {
s := &Server{
addr: addr,
timeout: 30 * time.Second, // sensible default
logger: slog.Default(), // default stdlib logger
}
for _, opt := range opts {
opt(s)
}
return s
}
// Usage
srv := NewServer(":8080",
WithTimeout(60 * time.Second),
WithLogger(logger),
)
8. Common Interface Anti-Patterns
Premature interfaces:
// ❌ Bad — interface defined before second implementation exists
type Processor interface {
Process(ctx context.Context, data []byte) error
}
type processor struct { ... } // only one implementation ever
// ✅ Good — use concrete type until you need the abstraction
type Processor struct { ... }
// Add interface when you have 2+ implementations or need testing seam
"Don't design with interfaces, discover them." — Rob Pike
Interface pollution:
// ❌ Bad — wrapping every struct in an interface "for testability"
type UserServiceInterface interface { ... }
type OrderServiceInterface interface { ... }
type PaymentServiceInterface interface { ... }
// 50 more interfaces with exactly one implementation each
// ✅ Good — define interfaces where they're consumed
// Each consumer declares only the methods IT needs
Misusing interfaces for enums:
// ❌ Bad — interface used as enum/sum type
type Shape interface {
isShape()
}
type Circle struct{}
func (Circle) isShape() {}
// ✅ Better — sealed interface pattern (if you need it)
// Or just use constants with a type
type ShapeKind int
const (
ShapeCircle ShapeKind = iota
ShapeRectangle
)
Decision Checklist
- Do I need an interface here? — Only if you have 2+ implementations, need a testing seam, or are crossing a package boundary.
- Where should it be defined? — At the consumer, not the producer.
- How many methods? — Fewer is better. 1-3 is ideal.
- Am I returning an interface? — Probably shouldn't. Return concrete.
- Have I verified compliance? —
var _ Interface = (*Type)(nil)
GitHub Repository
Frequently asked questions
What is the go-interface-design skill?
go-interface-design is a Claude Skill by eduardo-sl. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform go-interface-design-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install go-interface-design?
Use the install commands on this page: add go-interface-design to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does go-interface-design belong to?
go-interface-design is in the Testing category, tagged testing, api, and design.
Is go-interface-design free to use?
Yes. go-interface-design is listed on AIMCP and free to install.
Related Skills
This Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.
This skill provides comprehensive knowledge for implementing Cloudflare Cron Triggers to schedule Workers using cron expressions. It covers setting up periodic tasks, maintenance jobs, and automated workflows while handling common issues like invalid cron expressions and timezone problems. Developers can use it for configuring scheduled handlers, testing cron triggers, and integrating with Workflows and Green Compute.
This Claude Skill provides a Playwright-based toolkit for testing local web applications through Python scripts. It enables frontend verification, UI debugging, screenshot capture, and log viewing while managing server lifecycles. Use it for browser automation tasks but run scripts directly rather than reading their source code to avoid context pollution.
This skill helps developers complete finished work by verifying tests pass and then presenting structured integration options. It guides the workflow for merging, creating PRs, or cleaning up branches after implementation is done. Use it when your code is ready and tested to systematically finalize the development process.
