update-deps
について
このスキルは、変更を加える前にnpm/Bun依存関係を監査・更新し、サプライチェーンの完全性チェックを実施します。メンテナの確認、公開期間、tarball差分、およびプロバナンスを検証し、リスクの高いパッケージは手動レビューに回します。セキュリティと完全性を維持しながら依存関係を安全に更新するためにご利用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add backnotprop/plannotator -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotatorgit clone https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotator.git ~/.claude/skills/update-depsこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Update Dependencies
Audit outdated packages, verify supply chain integrity, bump what's safe, defer what needs review, and log everything.
This process has three phases: discovery, integrity audit, and execution. The integrity audit is the most important — every package gets checked before it touches the lockfile.
Phase 1: Discovery
Run bun outdated to get the full list of packages with available updates.
bun outdated
Parse the output into a structured list. For each package, note:
- Package name
- Current version
- Available update version
- Whether it's age-gated (indicated by
*in the output — the footnote "The * indicates that version isn't true latest due to minimum release age" confirms this) - Whether it's a runtime dep, dev dep, or peer dep
Also check whether any packages are blocked entirely by the age gate (like @pierre/diffs was when its minimum semver range couldn't resolve). Flag these separately — they may need minimumReleaseAgeExcludes in bunfig.toml.
Phase 2: Integrity Audit
This is the core of the process. Spawn one Sonnet sub-agent per package to run the integrity check in parallel. Sonnet is used here because these are independent, structured verification tasks that don't need heavier reasoning.
Each sub-agent receives the package name, current version, and target version, and performs the following checks:
Sub-agent prompt template
For each outdated package, spawn a Sonnet agent with this task:
You are auditing the npm package "{package}" for a version bump from {current} to {target}.
Run these checks and report back with a JSON object:
1. **Maintainer verification**: Check if maintainers changed between versions.
npm view {package}@{current} maintainers --json
npm view {package}@{target} maintainers --json
Compare the two lists. Flag any additions or removals.
2. **Publish date and age**: Get the publish timestamp.
npm view {package} time --json
Extract the date for version {target}. Calculate days since publication.
Flag if younger than 7 days.
3. **Provenance**: Check if the package has registry signatures or attestations.
npm audit signatures (if not already run this session)
Note whether the package has provenance attestations.
4. **Tarball diff**: Show what actually changed in the published package.
npm diff --diff={package}@{current} --diff={package}@{target}
Summarize the changes:
- How many files changed
- Are changes limited to version bumps, deps, and rebuilt dist? Or are there meaningful source changes?
- Any new runtime dependencies added?
- Any suspicious patterns (obfuscated code, eval(), network calls in unexpected places)
5. **Release notes**: Try to find what changed.
Check the package's repository for release notes or changelog:
npm view {package}@{target} repository.url
gh release view v{target} --repo <owner/repo> (try with and without v prefix)
Summarize the changelog if found.
Report your findings as JSON:
{{
"package": "{package}",
"from": "{current}",
"to": "{target}",
"age_days": <number>,
"maintainers_changed": <boolean>,
"maintainers_added": [],
"maintainers_removed": [],
"provenance": <boolean>,
"new_runtime_deps": [],
"files_changed": <number>,
"has_source_changes": <boolean>,
"changelog_summary": "<brief summary>",
"suspicious_patterns": [],
"verdict": "safe" | "review" | "defer",
"verdict_reason": "<one sentence explanation>"
}}
Verdict guidelines:
- "safe": Same maintainers, no new runtime deps, changes match what changelog describes, no suspicious patterns
- "review": Minor concerns (e.g., new maintainer who is clearly from the same org, small new dep from known publisher)
- "defer": Maintainer changes from unknown accounts, new runtime deps with unclear purpose, suspicious code patterns, substantive API changes that need integration testing
Collecting results
As sub-agents complete, collect their JSON reports. If a sub-agent fails or times out, mark that package as "defer" with reason "audit failed".
Tier classification
After collecting all results, classify packages into tiers. This helps the user understand the risk profile at a glance:
| Tier | Description | Typical action |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime, high surface | Libraries your code calls directly (parsers, diff engines, UI libs) | Check provenance, review diff, run tests |
| SDK/API deps | Third-party service SDKs (agent SDKs, platform integrations) | Read changelog for API changes, test integration |
| Dev-only | Type definitions, build tools, test frameworks | Update freely — these don't ship |
| Build toolchain | Bun itself, compilers, bundlers | Most caution — breakage affects all outputs |
Phase 3: Execution
Bump safe packages
For all packages with verdict "safe":
bun update pkg1@version1 pkg2@version2 ...
If the update fails due to age gate conflicts (a package's minimum semver can't resolve), add it to minimumReleaseAgeExcludes in bunfig.toml and document why.
Log to supply chain notes
Write the full audit results to ~/.supply-chain/notes/<YYYY-MM-DD>.json:
{
"date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"project": "plannotator",
"bumped": [
{
"package": "...",
"from": "...",
"to": "...",
"age_days": 0,
"maintainers_changed": false,
"provenance": false,
"notes": "..."
}
],
"deferred": [
{
"package": "...",
"current": "...",
"available": "...",
"age_days": 0,
"maintainers_changed": false,
"reason": "...",
"review_by": "YYYY-MM-DD"
}
],
"excluded_from_age_gate": [
{
"package": "...",
"reason": "..."
}
]
}
Set review_by to 7 days from today for deferred packages.
Check previously deferred packages
Read all files in ~/.supply-chain/notes/ and collect any deferred packages from previous audits that are still at the same version in the current lockfile. These are packages that were deferred before and still haven't been updated.
To check: for each previously deferred entry, see if the current installed version matches the current field from the deferral note. If it does, the package is still deferred.
Phase 4: Recap
Present a clear summary to the user:
Updated
List each bumped package with version change and one-line reason it was safe.
Deferred
List each deferred package with version change and reason for deferral.
Still Deferred (from previous audits)
List any packages that were deferred in previous audit sessions and still haven't been bumped. Include the original deferral date and reason. This is the "you've been putting this off" section — it keeps deferred packages from being forgotten.
If the still-deferred list is empty, say so — that's a good sign.
Age Gate Exclusions
If any packages were added to minimumReleaseAgeExcludes, note them and why.
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
llamaguard
その他LlamaGuardは、暴力やヘイトスピーチなど6つの安全性カテゴリーにおいて、LLMの入力と出力をモデレートするMetaの70-80億パラメータモデルです。94〜95%の精度を提供し、vLLM、Hugging Face、Amazon SageMakerを使用してデプロイ可能です。このスキルを使用して、AIアプリケーションにコンテンツフィルタリングと安全策を簡単に統合できます。
cost-optimization
その他このClaudeスキルは、リソースの適正サイジング、タグ付け戦略、支出分析を通じて、開発者がクラウドコストを最適化することを支援します。AWS、Azure、GCPにわたるクラウド支出の削減とコストガバナンスの実施のためのフレームワークを提供します。インフラコストの分析、リソースの適正サイジング、または予算制約への対応が必要な際にご利用ください。
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
その他このスキルは、bitsandbytesを使用してLLMを8ビットまたは4ビット精度に量子化し、精度の低下を最小限に抑えつつ50〜75%のメモリ削減を実現します。限られたGPUメモリでより大規模なモデルを実行したり、推論を高速化するのに理想的で、INT8、NF4、FP4などのフォーマットをサポートしています。HuggingFace Transformersと統合され、QLoRAトレーニングや8ビットオプティマイザーを可能にします。
dispatching-parallel-agents
その他このClaudeスキルは、複数のエージェントを配備し、3つ以上の独立した問題を並行して調査・修正します。共有状態や依存関係がなく解決可能な、無関係な障害が発生するシナリオ向けに設計されています。中核となる機能は並列問題解決であり、効率を最大化するために独立した問題領域ごとに1つのエージェントを割り当てます。
