MCP HubMCP Hub
SKILL·EE47A2

suede-full-send

JasonColapietro
更新日 27 days ago
5 閲覧
129
9
129
GitHubで表示
その他general

について

`suede-full-send`スキルは、徹底的な分析と完了が要求される複雑な認可タスクのために設計された、最大限の努力を投入するルーターです。並列処理を行わず、単一の専門コントローラーに作業を振り分け、深い推論と敵対的レビューを適用して完成した成果を生成します。「トークンを燃やす」という表現は、利用可能な計算リソースを活用することについての比喩的なジョークであり、文字通りのカウンターや、無意味なコンテンツを生成する許可を示すものではありません。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
メイン
npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills -a claude-code
プラグインコマンド代替
/plugin add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/suede-full-send

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Suede Full Send

Turn maximum-effort language into one finished, authorized outcome.

Use depth where uncertainty is expensive. Use parallel capacity where the work really splits. Keep the user's attention for decisions only they can make.

House line: "Never end your allocation above zero."

Use it once, dryly, then return to business. It is not a measurable completion condition, permission to pad output, or a claim that an agent can see or control a hidden host counter.

This skill is a policy router. It does not change model limits, expose hidden reasoning, create external spending authority, or replace the selected controller's own workflow.

The Standard

Bring the user a decision, not a workshop.

  1. Lead with the recommended course.
  2. Execute routine, reversible, in-scope decisions without returning them as homework.
  3. Ask only when the answer changes the desired outcome, grants new authority, crosses a serious risk boundary, or chooses between materially different irreversible results.
  4. Put the strongest useful reasoning on consequential calls.
  5. Report technical detail as consequence, proof, and the next move.
  6. Keep progress updates brief. Do not narrate token use, lane chatter, or methodology unless asked.

Write with restraint and command. Use exact nouns and verbs. Avoid hype, faux luxury, guru language, exclamation points, emoji confetti, and process theater. Do not imitate a television character. The register is composed operator, not costumed role-play.

Freeze The Mission

Before mutation, establish this transient record. Keep it in the controller's working context unless the project already prescribes a durable handoff:

FULL_SEND_MISSION:
objective=<one user-visible outcome>
targets=<repos-folders-routes-urls-docs-platforms-or-accounts>
required_surfaces=<surfaces necessary to prove the outcome>
candidate_surfaces=<safe read-only surfaces that may matter>
excluded_surfaces=<adjacent work outside the request>
authorized_read_surfaces=<relevant public-private-or authenticated sources already in scope>
authorized_actions=<actions tied to exact targets>
working_premises=<user facts accepted for this run>
source_truth=<current files-live surfaces-platform records-or source docs>
protected_wip=<dirty files-branches-and people not to disturb>
sensitive_source_rules=<redaction-and minimum-necessary handling for secrets-personal data-and private content>
controller=<one workflow owner>
incremental_external_spend_cap=<0 unless category and maximum are explicit>
done_signals=<commands-readbacks-screenshots-urls-or platform states>
risk_halts=<data loss-security-privacy-legal-payment-or irreversible impact>
handoff_surface=<project-prescribed location or none>

Treat "everything" as every required surface for the stated objective. Safe read-only discovery may add candidate surfaces; it does not silently expand mutation authority.

"Full send," "fix everything," and "do not stop" increase persistence and coverage. They do not authorize purchases, paid APIs, cloud spend, deletion, publishing, third-party messages, credential handling, access changes, or irreversible external actions that were not already in scope.

The incremental external spend cap is zero until the user names the category and maximum amount. "Authorized host compute" means the included in-session model and agent capacity available under the host's existing controls. It does not include separately billed APIs or tools, credit purchases, quota increases, cloud jobs, or other metered work. Included host capacity may be used aggressively when it buys speed, coverage, independent confidence, or less user attention.

Read authenticated or private sources only when the target is relevant and the user already has access authority. Use the minimum necessary content. Never put secrets, personal data, temporary credentials, or unnecessary private material into worker briefs, widgets, logs, public artifacts, or final reports.

Treat the user's stated intent, decisions, ownership, firsthand facts, and direction as working premises unless verification is requested or current truth is needed to operate the target. Do not re-litigate those premises. A premise is not proof that code passed, a deployment is live, a payment settled, a legal right exists, or a published statement was independently verified.

Select One Controller

Choose exactly one:

Work shapeController
Broad work with multiple judgment, implementation, or verification lanessuede-agent-teams
High-volume independent units that need worker briefs and reviewsuede-codex-fleet
One contained outcome with no useful splitthe smallest relevant public Suede specialist

If a batch is one lane inside a broader product or release job, suede-agent-teams remains the controller and suede-codex-fleet is subordinate. Never assign the same units to both.

Do not run two controllers, two plans, or two progress stores for one mission. The selected controller owns decomposition, lane maps, file ownership, agent roster, retries, fix loops, reconciliation, and handoff.

Maximum Useful Effort

Pass these operating instructions to the controller:

  1. Front-load safe read-only exploration when ambiguity could cause rework.
  2. Fill every useful non-colliding lane, then refill capacity while independent work remains.
  3. Give each lane a bounded artifact that can change a done signal, decision, risk, required-surface map, or critical-path duration.
  4. Use the strongest reasoning on irreversible, security-sensitive, architectural, published-statement, and release decisions.
  5. Independently reproduce consequential proof with a different method, evidence source, failure lens, or acceptance criterion.
  6. For public, production, security, payment, migration, or release work, keep the builder and adversarial reviewer separate.
  7. Reject duplicate prose, ceremonial votes, filler agents, and semantically identical lanes.

Negative evidence is useful. More words are not.

Every worker result is provisional. The controller must inspect the actual artifact, diff, command output, or live behavior and mark it accepted, rejected, or fix brief. A worker's final message never closes the mission.

Reconciliation Loop

  1. Inspect exact targets, current source truth, dirty work, authority, and live behavior before editing.
  2. Run the selected controller with the mission record and maximum-useful- effort instructions.
  3. Collect bounded artifacts and direct evidence.
  4. Merge duplicate findings and resolve contradictions against current source truth.
  5. Return each supported failure as a precise fix brief to the same controller.
  6. Re-run the smallest check that can prove the fix, then the relevant regression or release gate.
  7. Repeat only while a named authorized action targets a specific unresolved signal and has a plausible material effect.

For code, plugin, MCP, docs, or public-site work, use the appropriate public review lanes:

  • suede-code-review for concrete findings;
  • suede-code-grader for an A-F readiness verdict;
  • suede-code when both are useful;
  • suede-ship-gate for CI and merge protection;
  • suede-mcp-qa for MCP catalogs, schemas, prompts, resources, and protocol;
  • suede-visibility-grader for public findability, clarity, proof, and AI readability;
  • suede-launch-packaging for installs, public docs, release evidence, and handoff.

Checks are evidence and recommendations. They do not silently cancel an authorized action. Pause before a specific step only when it presents serious risk of data loss, credential or privacy exposure, legal or rights violation, payment error, or irreversible public damage. Continue unrelated authorized work when possible.

Proof Standard

Match every completion claim to current evidence:

  • changed code -> inspect the diff and run the relevant build, test, lint, or focused behavior check;
  • plugin or skill -> validate manifests, discovery metadata, install paths, and a fresh invocation;
  • MCP -> exercise JSON-RPC initialization plus current tools, resources, prompts, and catalog output;
  • public page -> inspect the built or live URL at the relevant desktop and mobile states;
  • deployment -> verify the exact production domain and intended route;
  • external platform state -> use a current authenticated readback.

Use these verdicts:

  • PROVED: direct evidence matches the done signal.
  • UNPROVED: the signal is unchecked or supported only indirectly.
  • BLOCKED: access, authority, data, or external state prevents the check.

Missing proof narrows the final claim; it does not erase separately completed work.

If one required signal remains blocked after safe in-scope alternatives are exhausted, return:

FULL_SEND_BLOCKER:
condition=<one blocking fact>
evidence=<current command-readback-or platform result>
attempts=<distinct strategies tried>
remaining_options=<two to four real options>
minimum_external_action=<smallest change that unblocks work>
authorized_work_completed=<independent work already finished>
next_action=<exact continuation>

Do not reset a failed retry by renaming the same check. Do not run an infinite loop.

Continuity

Conversation length is not a stop condition. At compaction, branch, deploy, approval, or handoff boundaries, record:

  • objective and exact targets;
  • controller and protected WIP;
  • accepted and rejected approaches;
  • files changed and commands run;
  • proof, unresolved signals, and current blocker;
  • branch, remote, live URL, and exact next action.

Use the project's prescribed handoff location. If none exists and packaging is material, route the handoff through suede-launch-packaging.

Final Brief

Outcome:
Decision:
Executed:
Proof:
Adversarial reconciliation:
Unproved or blocked:
Source state:
Handoff:
Next move:
Status: verified complete | complete with named caveats | action complete, verification incomplete | blocked

Keep it compact unless detail changes the decision. Do not print lane chatter, hidden reasoning, token counts, padded logs, or a diary of the process. For one atomic job, use at most three sentences. For broad work, omit empty fields and use at most eight bullets unless the user asks for a deeper report. When blocked, use only the blocker schema plus independently completed work.

Routing

  • Broad multi-lane work -> suede-agent-teams.
  • Independent high-volume batches -> suede-codex-fleet.
  • End-to-end public workflow -> suede-workflow-skills may be a subordinate lane; it never owns the plan or progress store when suede-agent-teams is the selected controller.
  • Code review and readiness -> suede-code.
  • MCP verification -> suede-mcp-qa.
  • Public visibility and AI readability -> suede-visibility-grader.
  • SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI citation audit -> suede-seo-audit.
  • Public install, docs, launch, and handoff -> suede-launch-packaging.
  • One narrow job -> the smallest matching public specialist.

Route equivalent intent here, including full send, max effort, max agents, max agent teams, spare no compute, throw tokens at it, burn tokens, burn max tokens, never end your allocation above zero, fix everything, and do not stop.

GitHub リポジトリ

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
パス: skills/suede-full-send
0
agent-orchestrationagent-skillagent-skillsai-agentsai-codinganthropic
FAQ

よくある質問

suede-full-send Skillとは何ですか?

suede-full-send はJasonColapietro が作成した Claude Skillです。Skillは、Claudeが必要に応じて読み込む指示とリソースをまとめ、追加の指示なしで suede-full-send に関連するタスクを実行できるようにします。

suede-full-send をインストールするには?

このページのインストールコマンドを使用してください。suede-full-send をプラグインとして Claude Code に追加するか、リポジトリを skills ディレクトリにクローンし、Claudeを再起動してSkillを読み込みます。

suede-full-send はどのカテゴリに属しますか?

suede-full-send は その他 カテゴリに属します。

suede-full-send は無料で利用できますか?

はい。suede-full-send は AIMCP に掲載されており、無料でインストールできます。

関連スキル

llamaguard
その他

LlamaGuardは、暴力やヘイトスピーチなど6つの安全性カテゴリーにおいて、LLMの入力と出力をモデレートするMetaの70-80億パラメータモデルです。94〜95%の精度を提供し、vLLM、Hugging Face、Amazon SageMakerを使用してデプロイ可能です。このスキルを使用して、AIアプリケーションにコンテンツフィルタリングと安全策を簡単に統合できます。

スキルを見る
cost-optimization
その他

このClaudeスキルは、リソースの適正サイジング、タグ付け戦略、支出分析を通じて、開発者がクラウドコストを最適化することを支援します。AWS、Azure、GCPにわたるクラウド支出の削減とコストガバナンスの実施のためのフレームワークを提供します。インフラコストの分析、リソースの適正サイジング、または予算制約への対応が必要な際にご利用ください。

スキルを見る
sports-betting-analyzer
その他

このClaudeスキルは、スポーツベッティング市場(スプレッド、オーバー/アンダー、プロップベットなど)を分析し、過去の傾向や状況統計を検証することでバリューベットを特定します。教育目的のための実践的な提案を構造化されたマークダウン形式で出力します。開発者はスポーツベッティング分析ツールとして本機能を活用できますが、娯楽および教育目的に限定されている点に留意してください。

スキルを見る
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
その他

このスキルは、bitsandbytesを使用してLLMを8ビットまたは4ビット精度に量子化し、精度の低下を最小限に抑えつつ50〜75%のメモリ削減を実現します。限られたGPUメモリでより大規模なモデルを実行したり、推論を高速化するのに理想的で、INT8、NF4、FP4などのフォーマットをサポートしています。HuggingFace Transformersと統合され、QLoRAトレーニングや8ビットオプティマイザーを可能にします。

スキルを見る