关于
This skill performs blast-radius analysis for code symbols or files, showing callers, type hierarchies, and reference counts to assess impact before changes. It's designed for refactoring, deletions, or signature modifications, helping developers understand dependencies. The tool works with the agent-lsp MCP server and accepts either a symbol name or file path for comprehensive exported-symbol impact analysis.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add blackwell-systems/agent-lsp -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lspgit clone https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp.git ~/.claude/skills/lsp-impact在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Requires the agent-lsp MCP server.
lsp-impact
Blast-radius analysis for any symbol or file. Discovers all direct references, callers (via call hierarchy), and type relationships before you touch anything. Read-only — does not modify any files.
Run this skill before lsp-edit-export: impact tells you what exists and how widespread the change is; lsp-edit-export tells you how to execute the change safely.
Invocation:
- File path (e.g.
"internal/lsp/client.go") → use the File-level entry (Step 0) to surface all exported-symbol impact at once. - Symbol name in dot notation (e.g.
"codec.Encode","Buffer.Reset") → skip Step 0; start at Prerequisites, then Step 1.
Step 0 — File-level entry (when user provides a file path)
Use this shortcut when the user is changing or auditing an entire file rather
than a single symbol. blast_radius enumerates all exported symbols in
the file, resolves their references, and returns test callers (with enclosing
test function names) and non-test callers in a single call.
mcp__lsp__blast_radius({
"changed_files": ["/abs/path/to/file.go"],
"include_transitive": false // set true to surface second-order callers
})
Returns:
affected_symbols— each exported symbol with its reference counttest_callers— test files + enclosing test function namesnon_test_callers— production call sites
Decision after Step 0:
| Result | Action |
|---|---|
| 0 non-test callers | Low blast radius. Proceed with change. |
| Few callers, known files | Medium risk. Update each call site. |
| Many callers across packages | High risk. Consider staged rollout. |
| Want symbol-level detail | Continue to Steps 1–5 for any specific symbol. |
Skip Steps 1–5 if the file-level summary is sufficient.
Prerequisites (for symbol-level Steps 1–5)
If LSP is not yet initialized, call mcp__lsp__start_lsp with the workspace
root first.
Check what the server supports before proceeding — find_callers and
type_hierarchy are optional LSP features not implemented by all servers:
mcp__lsp__get_server_capabilities()
Note which tools appear in supported_tools. Steps 3 and 4 below depend on
this result.
Step 1 — Locate the symbol
Use go_to_symbol with the symbol name provided by the user:
mcp__lsp__go_to_symbol({
"symbol_path": "Package.SymbolName",
"workspace_root": "/abs/path" // optional, narrows scope
})
→ returns: file, line, column (1-indexed)
symbol_path uses dot notation. For a top-level function Encode in package
codec, use "codec.Encode". For a method Reset on type Buffer, use
"Buffer.Reset".
Record the returned file, line, and column — you will pass them to
every subsequent step.
Step 2 — Enumerate all direct references (always available)
Call find_references with include_declaration: false to find every usage
site across the workspace:
mcp__lsp__find_references({
"file_path": "<file from Step 1>",
"position_pattern": "func @@SymbolName(", // adjust prefix for symbol kind
"include_declaration": false
})
Collect all reference locations. Group results by file. Record the total count and list of files — these feed the Impact Report.
See references/patterns.md for position_pattern
examples by language and symbol kind.
Step 3 — Call hierarchy (callers and callees)
Only if find_callers appears in supported_tools from Step 0.
mcp__lsp__find_callers({
"file_path": "<file from Step 1>",
"line": <line from Step 1>,
"column": <column from Step 1>,
"direction": "incoming" // use "both" if callees are also needed
})
If find_callers is not in supported_tools, skip this step entirely.
Note "call hierarchy not supported by this server" in the Impact Report.
Step 4 — Type hierarchy (supertypes and subtypes)
Only applicable when the symbol is a type, interface, or class (not a
plain function or method). Only if type_hierarchy appears in supported_tools.
mcp__lsp__type_hierarchy({
"file_path": "<file from Step 1>",
"line": <line from Step 1>,
"column": <column from Step 1>,
"direction": "both"
})
If the symbol is a function or method: skip this step; note
"not applicable (function)" in the report.
If type_hierarchy is not in supported_tools: skip this step; note
"not supported by this server" in the report.
Step 5 — Report impact surface
Produce the Impact Report using the format defined in references/patterns.md.
Include:
- Symbol name, kind, and definition location
- Reference count and list of files containing references
- Callers from
find_callersincoming (or skip note) - Supertypes and subtypes from
type_hierarchy(or skip note) - Blast radius: count of distinct files affected
Then apply the decision guide:
| Blast radius | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 0 references | Likely dead code. Confirm with lsp-dead-code before deleting. |
| 1–5 files | Low risk. Proceed. Update all callers. |
| 6–20 files | Medium risk. Plan changes carefully. Stage in waves. |
| > 20 files | High risk. Consider a deprecation path or feature flag. |
Example
Goal: assess blast radius of exported function `ParseConfig` in pkg/config
Prerequisites — get_server_capabilities:
→ supported_tools: [go_to_symbol, find_references, find_callers, ...]
→ type_hierarchy: not in supported_tools
Step 1 — go_to_symbol: symbol_path="config.ParseConfig"
→ pkg/config/parser.go:42:6
Step 2 — find_references: position_pattern="func @@ParseConfig("
→ 7 references in 4 files
→ cmd/main.go, internal/app.go, internal/loader.go, pkg/config/parser_test.go
Step 3 — find_callers: direction="incoming"
→ callers: cmd.main (cmd/main.go:14), app.Start (internal/app.go:31), ...
Step 4 — type_hierarchy: skipped (function), also not supported by server
Step 5 — Impact Report:
## Impact Report: ParseConfig
- Kind: function
- Definition: pkg/config/parser.go:42:6
- References: 7 across 4 files
...
- Risk level: low
Note on position_pattern
position_pattern with @@ is a agent-lsp extension. If your MCP client
does not support it, fall back to explicit line and column parameters from
the location returned by go_to_symbol in Step 1.
GitHub 仓库
常见问题
什么是 lsp-impact Skill?
lsp-impact 是一个 Claude Skill,作者为 blackwell-systems。Skill 将 Claude 按需加载的说明和资源打包,让 Claude 无需额外提示即可执行与 lsp-impact 相关的任务。
如何安装 lsp-impact?
使用本页的安装命令:将 lsp-impact 作为插件添加到 Claude Code,或将其仓库克隆到 skills 目录,然后重启 Claude 以加载该 Skill。
lsp-impact 属于哪个分类?
lsp-impact 属于其他分类。
lsp-impact 可以免费使用吗?
可以。lsp-impact 已收录在 AIMCP,可免费安装。
相关推荐技能
LlamaGuard是Meta推出的7-8B参数内容审核模型,专门用于过滤LLM的输入和输出内容。它能检测六大安全风险类别(暴力/仇恨、性内容、武器、违禁品、自残、犯罪计划),准确率达94-95%。开发者可通过HuggingFace、vLLM或Sagemaker快速部署,并能与NeMo Guardrails集成实现自动化安全防护。
这个Claude Skill帮助开发者优化云成本,通过资源调整、标记策略和预留实例来降低AWS、Azure和GCP的开支。它适用于减少云支出、分析基础设施成本或实施成本治理策略的场景。关键功能包括提供成本可视化、资源规模调整指导和定价模型优化建议。
该Skill为开发者提供体育博彩数据分析工具,可分析盘口、大小球和特殊投注,识别价值投注机会。它整合历史数据和情景统计,生成包含时间戳的结构化Markdown报告。适用于需要快速获取博彩市场洞察的娱乐或教育类应用开发。
这个Skill使用bitsandbytes库量化大语言模型,能在GPU内存有限时通过8位或4位量化减少50-75%内存占用,同时保持精度损失最小。它支持INT8、NF4、FP4等多种量化格式,可与HuggingFace Transformers无缝集成,适用于需要部署更大模型或加速推理的场景。还提供QLoRA训练和8位优化器支持,让开发者能轻松实现高效模型压缩。
