manage-change-control
关于
This Claude Skill manages formal change control processes for validated systems in regulated environments. It handles request triage, impact assessment, approval workflows, and post-change verification for software updates, patches, or configuration changes. Use it when implementing modifications to systems under compliance regimes like GxP, ensuring proper documentation and revalidation.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/manage-change-control在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
管變更控制
評、准、施、驗已驗證計算系統之變,而保其已驗證之態。
用時
- 已驗證系統需升、補丁、或配置之變
- 基礎設施之變(伺服器遷、OS 升、網路變)影響已驗證系統
- CAPA 或審計之發現需系統之改
- 業務過程之變需系統重設
- 急變需速准與回溯記錄
入
- 必要:變之述(何變而何故)
- 必要:所影響之系統及其當前已驗證之態
- 必要:變之請者與業務理由
- 可選:供應商之釋出說明或技術文件
- 可選:相關 CAPA 或審計發現之參
- 可選:所影響系統既有之驗證文件
法
第一步:建變請並分類
# Change Request
## Document ID: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### 1. Change Description
**Requestor:** [Name, Department]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**System:** [System name and version]
**Current State:** [Current configuration/version]
**Proposed State:** [Target configuration/version]
### 2. Justification
[Business, regulatory, or technical reason for the change]
### 3. Classification
| Type | Definition | Approval Path | Timeline |
|------|-----------|--------------|----------|
| **Emergency** | Urgent fix for safety, data integrity, or regulatory compliance | System owner + QA (retrospective CCB) | Implement immediately, document within 5 days |
| **Standard** | Planned change with potential impact on validated state | CCB approval before implementation | Per CCB schedule |
| **Minor** | Low-risk change with no impact on validated state | System owner approval | Documented before implementation |
**This change is classified as:** [Emergency / Standard / Minor]
**Rationale:** [Why this classification]
**得:**變請具唯一 ID、清述、有理之分類。 **敗則:**若分類有爭,默為 Standard 並令 CCB 裁之。
第二步:行影響評估
於已驗證態諸維評變:
# Impact Assessment
## Change Request: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Impact Matrix
| Dimension | Affected? | Details | Risk |
|-----------|-----------|---------|------|
| Software configuration | Yes/No | [Specific parameters changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Source code | Yes/No | [Modules, functions, or scripts affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Database schema | Yes/No | [Tables, fields, constraints changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Infrastructure | Yes/No | [Servers, network, storage affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Interfaces | Yes/No | [Upstream/downstream system connections] | [H/M/L] |
| User access/roles | Yes/No | [Role changes, new access requirements] | [H/M/L] |
| SOPs/work instructions | Yes/No | [Procedures requiring update] | [H/M/L] |
| Training | Yes/No | [Users requiring retraining] | [H/M/L] |
| Data migration | Yes/No | [Data transformation or migration needed] | [H/M/L] |
| Audit trail | Yes/No | [Impact on audit trail continuity] | [H/M/L] |
### Regulatory Impact
- [ ] Change affects 21 CFR Part 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects EU Annex 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects data integrity (ALCOA+)
- [ ] Change requires regulatory notification
**得:**諸維皆有清之是否與理。 **敗則:**若影響不試不可定,標此維為「未知——需察」並於產線變前沙盒驗之。
第三步:定重驗證之範
依影響評估,定所需之驗證活動:
# Revalidation Determination
| Revalidation Level | Criteria | Activities Required |
|--------------------|----------|-------------------|
| **Full revalidation** | Core functionality changed, new GAMP category, or major version upgrade | URS review, RA update, IQ, OQ, PQ, TM update, VSR |
| **Partial revalidation** | Specific functions affected, configuration changes | Targeted OQ for affected functions, TM update |
| **Documentation only** | No functional impact, administrative changes | Update validation documents, change log entry |
| **None** | No impact on validated state (e.g., cosmetic change) | Change log entry only |
### Determination for CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
**Revalidation level:** [Full / Partial / Documentation only / None]
**Rationale:** [Specific reasoning based on impact assessment]
### Required Activities
| Activity | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|-------|----------|
| [e.g., Execute OQ test cases TC-OQ-015 through TC-OQ-022] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update traceability matrix for URS-007] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update SOP-LIMS-003 section 4.2] | [Name] | [Date] |
**得:**重驗證之範與變之影響相稱——不過不及。 **敗則:**若重驗證之範有爭,寧過試勿少試。不足驗證乃法規之險;過驗證唯耗資。
第四步:得准
導變歷宜之准流:
# Change Approval
### Approval for: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
| Role | Name | Decision | Signature | Date |
|------|------|----------|-----------|------|
| System Owner | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| QA Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| IT Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| Validation Lead | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
### Conditions (if any)
[Any conditions attached to the approval]
### Planned Implementation Window
- **Start:** [Date/Time]
- **End:** [Date/Time]
- **Rollback deadline:** [Point of no return]
**得:**施前諸需准者皆已簽(急變除外)。 **敗則:**急變者,取系統主與 QA 之口頭准,施之,於五個工作日內完成正式記錄。
第五步:施並驗
行變並行後察驗:
# Implementation Record
### Pre-Implementation
- [ ] Backup of current system state completed
- [ ] Rollback procedure documented and tested
- [ ] Affected users notified
- [ ] Test environment validated (if applicable)
### Implementation
- **Implemented by:** [Name]
- **Date/Time:** [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
- **Steps performed:** [Detailed implementation steps]
- **Deviations from plan:** [None / Description]
### Post-Change Verification
| Verification | Result | Evidence |
|--------------|--------|----------|
| System accessible and functional | Pass/Fail | [Screenshot/log reference] |
| Changed functionality works as specified | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Unchanged functionality unaffected (regression) | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Audit trail continuity maintained | Pass/Fail | [Audit trail screenshot] |
| User access controls intact | Pass/Fail | [Access review reference] |
### Closure
- [ ] All verification activities completed successfully
- [ ] Validation documents updated per revalidation determination
- [ ] SOPs updated and effective
- [ ] Training completed for affected users
- [ ] Change record closed in change control system
**得:**施配所准之計,諸驗活動皆通。 **敗則:**若驗敗,即行回滾並記敗為偏。非 QA 同意,勿進。
驗
- 變請具唯一 ID、述、分類
- 影響評估覆諸維(軟體、數據、基礎設施、SOP、訓練)
- 重驗證之範與理已定
- 施前諸需准皆已得(急變於五日內)
- 施前備份與回滾規有記
- 後察驗示變奏效而餘未破
- 驗證文件已更以反變
- 變記正式閉
陷
- 「小」變略影響評估:即微變亦或有未期之影響。看似無害之配置切換或失審計軌或改算
- 濫用急變:若逾一成之變標為「急」,變規已被繞。審並緊急之準則
- 回滾計畫不全:假回滾「即復備份」略備份與回滾間所造之數據。為每回滾情定數據之處
- 施後准:追溯之准(記錄之急變除外)為合規之違。CCB 須於工啟前准
- 缺回歸試:唯驗已變之功不足。回歸試須證既驗證之功不受影響
參
design-compliance-architecture— 定含變更控制委員會之治理框write-validation-documentation— 建變所觸之重驗證文件perform-csv-assessment— 需全重驗證之大變之全 CSV 重評write-standard-operating-procedure— 更變所影響之 SOPinvestigate-capa-root-cause— 當變由 CAPA 所觸
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
evaluating-llms-harness
测试该Skill通过60+个学术基准测试(如MMLU、GSM8K等)评估大语言模型质量,适用于模型对比、学术研究及训练进度追踪。它支持HuggingFace、vLLM和API接口,被EleutherAI等行业领先机构广泛采用。开发者可通过简单命令行快速对模型进行多任务批量评估。
cloudflare-cron-triggers
测试这个Claude Skill提供了关于Cloudflare Cron Triggers的完整知识库,用于通过cron表达式定时执行Workers。它支持配置周期性任务、维护作业和自动化工作流,并能处理常见的cron触发错误。开发者可以用它来设置定时任务、测试cron处理器,并集成Workflows和Green Compute功能。
webapp-testing
测试该Skill为开发者提供了基于Playwright的本地Web应用测试工具集,支持自动化测试前端功能、调试UI行为、捕获屏幕截图和查看浏览器日志。它包含管理服务器生命周期的辅助脚本,可直接作为黑盒工具运行而无需阅读源码。适用于需要快速验证本地Web应用界面和交互功能的开发场景。
finishing-a-development-branch
测试这个Skill用于开发分支完成后的集成决策,当代码实现完成且测试通过时,它会引导开发者选择合适的工作流。它首先验证测试状态,然后提供合并、创建PR或清理等结构化选项。核心价值在于确保代码质量的同时,标准化分支收尾流程。
