MCP HubMCP Hub
返回技能列表

recursive-communicator

matteocervelli
更新于 Today
9 次查看
10
10
在 GitHub 上查看
测试ai

关于

The recursive-communicator skill automatically manages agent-to-agent communication for validation failures and recursive fix cycles. It handles failure notifications, fix requests, and re-validation triggers between validation specialists and the main agent, ensuring issues are resolved systematically. The skill also tracks iteration counts to prevent deadlocks in these recursive loops.

技能文档

Purpose

The recursive-communicator skill provides structured protocols for managing recursive communication loops between the validation orchestrator, validation specialists, and the main feature implementer agent. It handles failure notifications, fix requests, re-validation triggers, and loop termination to ensure validation issues are resolved systematically.

When to Use

This skill auto-activates when you:

  • Communicate validation failures to the main agent
  • Request fixes from the main agent for validation issues
  • Trigger re-validation after main agent fixes
  • Manage recursive fix loops (failure → fix → re-check → repeat)
  • Track iteration counts in recursive communication
  • Prevent deadlocks in recursive loops
  • Escalate unresolvable validation issues
  • Log communication history for traceability

Provided Capabilities

1. Failure Communication

  • Structured Failure Reports: Format validation failures for main agent
  • Detailed Error Information: Include file locations, line numbers, error messages
  • Suggested Fixes: Provide specialist recommendations for resolving issues
  • Priority Tagging: Mark critical vs. non-critical failures
  • Context Preservation: Include all relevant context for debugging

2. Fix Request Management

  • Clear Fix Requests: Explicitly request main agent to fix specific issues
  • Action Items: Provide actionable list of fixes needed
  • Deadline Awareness: Track iteration limits (max 5)
  • Fix Verification: Confirm when main agent completes fixes
  • Re-validation Triggering: Signal specialists to re-check after fixes

3. Re-validation Coordination

  • Re-check Signals: Trigger specialist re-validation after fixes
  • Iteration Tracking: Increment and track iteration counts
  • Status Updates: Communicate re-validation status to all parties
  • Loop Continuation: Determine if another iteration needed
  • Loop Termination: Identify when to exit recursive loop

4. Deadlock Prevention

  • Max Iteration Limits: Enforce maximum 5 iterations per specialist
  • Timeout Detection: Identify stalled communication
  • Escalation Triggers: Escalate after max iterations or timeout
  • User Intervention Requests: Flag when human input needed
  • Graceful Degradation: Handle unresolvable issues without blocking workflow

5. Communication Logging

  • Message History: Log all communication between agents
  • Iteration History: Track all iterations with timestamps
  • Fix History: Document all fixes attempted
  • Status Transitions: Log status changes (failed → fixing → re-checking → passed)
  • Audit Trail: Maintain complete communication audit trail

Usage Guide

Step 1: Detect Validation Failure

When a validation specialist reports failure:

**Validation Failure Detected**

**Specialist**: test-runner-specialist
**Phase**: Test Execution
**Issue**: 3 unit tests failing

**Failure Details**:
- test_validation_coordinator.py::test_sequential_invocation - AssertionError
- test_validation_coordinator.py::test_failure_tracking - KeyError
- test_validation_coordinator.py::test_workflow_completion - AttributeError

**Coverage**: 73.2% (target: ≥80%)

**Action Required**: Activate recursive-communicator skill

Step 2: Format Failure Report

Use communication-protocol.md and message-templates.md to format structured report:

Failure Report Structure:

## Validation Failure Report

**Report ID**: VFR-{issue-number}-{specialist-name}-{iteration}
**Generated**: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]
**Issue**: #{issue-number} - [Feature Name]
**Specialist**: [Specialist Name]
**Phase**: [Validation Phase]
**Iteration**: [Current] / [Max (5)]

---

### Failure Summary

**Status**: ❌ FAILED
**Failure Type**: [Test Failures / Quality Issues / Security Vulnerabilities / E2E Failures]
**Severity**: [Critical / High / Medium / Low]
**Impact**: Blocks progression to [Next Phase]

---

### Detailed Failures

#### Failure 1: [Test/Issue Name]
- **File**: [File path]
- **Line**: [Line number]
- **Error Type**: [AssertionError / TypeError / SecurityError / etc.]
- **Error Message**:

[Full error message from specialist]

- **Context**: [Additional context about the failure]

#### Failure 2: [Test/Issue Name]
- **File**: [File path]
- **Line**: [Line number]
- **Error Type**: [Error type]
- **Error Message**:

[Full error message]

- **Context**: [Additional context]

[... Additional failures ...]

---

### Suggested Fixes

#### Fix for Failure 1
**Recommendation**: [Specialist's suggestion for fixing the issue]
**Approach**: [Specific steps or code changes needed]
**Priority**: [Critical / High / Medium / Low]

#### Fix for Failure 2
**Recommendation**: [Specialist's suggestion]
**Approach**: [Specific steps]
**Priority**: [Priority level]

[... Additional fix suggestions ...]

---

### Required Actions

**Main Agent (@feature-implementer-main):**
1. Review failure details above
2. Implement suggested fixes (or alternative approach)
3. Verify fixes locally (if possible)
4. Signal completion to validation orchestrator
5. Await re-validation

**Expected Timeline**: [Estimated time to fix]
**Escalation**: If fixes cannot be completed, escalate to user

---

### Re-validation Plan

**After Fix Completion**:
1. Validation orchestrator will re-invoke [Specialist Name]
2. Specialist will re-run [Tests/Checks]
3. IF pass: Proceed to [Next Phase]
4. IF fail: Iteration [Current+1] / [Max (5)]
5. IF max iterations exceeded: Escalate to user intervention

---

**Sent by**: Validation Orchestrator (recursive-communicator skill)
**Awaiting**: Main Agent Fix Completion

Step 3: Send Failure Report to Main Agent

Communicate failure report to @feature-implementer-main:

Communication Protocol:

### Sending Failure Report

**To**: @feature-implementer-main
**From**: @validation-orchestrator (via recursive-communicator)
**Type**: Validation Failure Report
**Priority**: [High/Medium/Low based on severity]

**Message**:
---
@feature-implementer-main: Validation failure detected during [Phase] validation.

[Full Failure Report from Step 2]

Please review and fix the above issues. Signal completion when ready for re-validation.
---

**Status**: Sent
**Timestamp**: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]
**Awaiting Response**: Yes

Step 4: Wait for Main Agent Fix

Monitor main agent activity:

Waiting State:

### Awaiting Main Agent Fix

**Current Status**: Waiting for Fix
**Specialist**: [Specialist Name] (paused)
**Iteration**: [Current] / [Max (5)]
**Time Elapsed**: [MM:SS since failure report sent]
**Timeout**: 30 minutes (escalate if exceeded)

**Main Agent Actions Expected**:
- [ ] Review failure report
- [ ] Analyze failure root causes
- [ ] Implement fixes
- [ ] Verify fixes locally (optional)
- [ ] Signal completion to validation orchestrator

**Monitoring**:
- Check main agent status every 2 minutes
- Log any main agent communications
- Detect timeout if >30 minutes without response

Timeout Handling:

IF time_elapsed > 30 minutes WITHOUT main agent response:
  1. Log timeout event
  2. Send reminder to main agent
  3. IF still no response after reminder (5 minutes):
     a. Escalate to user intervention
     b. Flag as "unresponsive"
     c. Await user decision (abort / manual fix / extend timeout)

Step 5: Receive Fix Completion Signal

When main agent signals fix completion:

Fix Completion Confirmation:

### Main Agent Fix Completed

**Received From**: @feature-implementer-main
**Timestamp**: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]
**Fix Duration**: [MM:SS from failure report to completion]

**Main Agent Report**:
[Summary of fixes implemented by main agent]

**Fixes Applied**:
- Fix 1: [Description of fix]
- Fix 2: [Description of fix]
- [... Additional fixes ...]

**Verification**:
- [ ] Main agent confirmed fixes applied
- [ ] Files modified: [List of changed files]
- [ ] Ready for re-validation

**Next Action**: Trigger re-validation (Step 6)

Step 6: Trigger Re-validation

Re-invoke specialist for re-check:

Re-validation Trigger:

### Triggering Re-validation

**Specialist**: [Specialist Name]
**Iteration**: [Current+1] / [Max (5)]
**Previous Status**: Failed
**Current Status**: Re-checking

**Re-invocation**:
@[specialist-name] re-check [validation type] for feature #{issue-number}
Iteration: [Current+1] / [Max (5)]
Previous failures: [List of failures from previous iteration]
Fixes applied: [List of fixes from main agent]

**Expected Outcomes**:
1. **PASS**: All previous failures resolved
   - Exit recursive loop
   - Proceed to next validation phase
   - Log success with iteration count

2. **FAIL** (some/all failures persist):
   - Increment iteration count
   - Return to Step 1 (detect failure)
   - IF iteration <= 5: Repeat recursive loop
   - IF iteration > 5: Escalate (Step 7)

**Status**: Re-validation in Progress
**Timestamp**: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]

Step 7: Handle Re-validation Result

Process specialist re-check output:

Result: PASS

### Re-validation Success

**Specialist**: [Specialist Name]
**Iteration**: [Final] / [Max (5)]
**Status**: ✅ PASSED

**Previous Failures**: [Count] failures
**Current Failures**: 0 failures
**Resolution**: All issues fixed by main agent

**Iteration History**:
- Iteration 1: [X] failures
- Iteration 2: [Y] failures
- ...
- Iteration [Final]: 0 failures (PASS)

**Total Fix Time**: [HH:MM:SS across all iterations]

**Action**: Exit recursive loop, proceed to [Next Phase]
**Communication**: Notify main agent of success
**Logging**: Log successful resolution and iteration count

Result: FAIL

### Re-validation Failure (Iteration [Current] / 5)

**Specialist**: [Specialist Name]
**Iteration**: [Current] / [Max (5)]
**Status**: ❌ STILL FAILING

**Previous Failures**: [Count from previous iteration]
**Current Failures**: [Count from current iteration]
**New Failures**: [Count of new failures introduced]
**Persistent Failures**: [Count still failing]

**Analysis**:
- Failures resolved: [List]
- Failures persisting: [List]
- New failures introduced: [List]

**Decision**:
IF iteration < 5:
  ✅ Continue recursive loop
  ✅ Return to Step 2 (format new failure report)
  ✅ Increment iteration: [Current+1] / 5
ELSE (iteration >= 5):
  ⛔ Max iterations exceeded
  ⛔ Proceed to Step 8 (escalation)

Step 8: Escalate Unresolvable Issues

When max iterations (5) exceeded or timeout occurs:

Escalation Report:

## Escalation: Unresolvable Validation Issue

**Escalation ID**: ESC-{issue-number}-{specialist-name}-{timestamp}
**Generated**: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]
**Issue**: #{issue-number} - [Feature Name]
**Specialist**: [Specialist Name]
**Phase**: [Validation Phase]
**Escalation Reason**: [Max Iterations Exceeded / Timeout / Deadlock / Other]

---

### Escalation Summary

**Status**: ⛔ UNRESOLVABLE (Requires User Intervention)
**Total Iterations**: [Max (5)]
**Total Time**: [HH:MM:SS across all iterations]
**Persistent Failures**: [Count]

---

### Iteration History

| Iteration | Failures | Fixes Applied | Result |
|-----------|----------|---------------|--------|
| 1 | [Count] | [Summary] | FAIL |
| 2 | [Count] | [Summary] | FAIL |
| 3 | [Count] | [Summary] | FAIL |
| 4 | [Count] | [Summary] | FAIL |
| 5 | [Count] | [Summary] | FAIL |

**Pattern Analysis**: [Analysis of why failures persist across iterations]

---

### Persistent Failures

[List of failures that remain unresolved after 5 iterations]

#### Failure 1: [Test/Issue Name]
- **File**: [File path]
- **Line**: [Line number]
- **Error**: [Error message]
- **Iterations Failed**: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
- **Fixes Attempted**:
  - Iteration 1: [Fix attempted]
  - Iteration 2: [Fix attempted]
  - ...
- **Why Unresolved**: [Analysis of why this failure persists]

[... Additional persistent failures ...]

---

### Recommended Actions

**Option 1: User Manual Fix**
- User reviews failures and provides manual fix
- Validation orchestrator re-runs after user fix
- Risk: Requires user expertise

**Option 2: Skip Validation**
- Mark validation as "failed but proceeding"
- Document known issues
- Risk: Deploy with known failures

**Option 3: Abort Feature**
- Stop implementation
- Return feature to design phase
- Risk: Wasted effort on implementation

**Option 4: Extend Max Iterations**
- Allow additional iterations (e.g., 3 more)
- Continue recursive loop
- Risk: Potentially infinite loop

---

**Escalated To**: User / Main Orchestrator
**Awaiting Decision**: [Option 1 / Option 2 / Option 3 / Option 4]
**Validation Workflow**: PAUSED

---

**Sent by**: Validation Orchestrator (recursive-communicator skill)

Step 9: Log Communication History

Maintain complete audit trail:

Communication Log Entry:

### Communication Log

**Entry ID**: LOG-{issue-number}-{specialist-name}-{iteration}-{timestamp}

**Participants**:
- Validation Orchestrator (@validation-orchestrator)
- Specialist (@[specialist-name])
- Main Agent (@feature-implementer-main)

**Communication Flow**:

**[Timestamp 1]** Specialist → Orchestrator: Validation failure detected
- Failures: [Count]
- Details: [Summary]

**[Timestamp 2]** Orchestrator → Main Agent: Failure report sent (Iteration 1/5)
- Report ID: VFR-{issue-number}-{specialist-name}-1
- Status: Awaiting Fix

**[Timestamp 3]** Main Agent → Orchestrator: Fix completion signal
- Duration: [MM:SS]
- Fixes: [Summary]

**[Timestamp 4]** Orchestrator → Specialist: Re-validation triggered (Iteration 2/5)
- Status: Re-checking

**[Timestamp 5]** Specialist → Orchestrator: Re-validation result (PASS)
- Status: ✅ All failures resolved
- Final iteration: 2/5

**[Timestamp 6]** Orchestrator → Main Agent: Success notification
- Status: Validation passed
- Proceed to: [Next Phase]

---

**Total Messages**: 6
**Total Iterations**: 2
**Total Duration**: [HH:MM:SS]
**Outcome**: Success

Best Practices

1. Clear Communication

  • Use structured message templates (from message-templates.md)
  • Include all relevant context (files, lines, errors)
  • Provide actionable fix suggestions
  • Specify expected outcomes clearly

2. Iteration Tracking

  • Always track current/max iterations
  • Log every iteration with timestamp
  • Document fixes attempted in each iteration
  • Analyze patterns across iterations

3. Timeout Management

  • Set reasonable timeouts (default: 30 minutes)
  • Send reminders before escalation
  • Log timeout events
  • Escalate gracefully when timeout exceeded

4. Deadlock Prevention

  • Enforce strict max iterations (5)
  • Detect circular failures (same failure across iterations)
  • Escalate when progress stalls
  • Provide escape routes (skip validation, user intervention)

5. Comprehensive Logging

  • Log all messages between agents
  • Track status transitions
  • Document fix attempts
  • Maintain audit trail for troubleshooting

6. Graceful Escalation

  • Provide context when escalating
  • Offer multiple resolution options
  • Include iteration history and analysis
  • Make escalation actionable for user

Resources

communication-protocol.md

Comprehensive protocol for agent-to-agent communication including:

  • Message formatting standards
  • Communication flow patterns
  • Status signaling conventions
  • Timeout and escalation procedures
  • Error handling protocols

message-templates.md

Pre-defined message templates for common scenarios:

  • Failure report template
  • Fix request template
  • Re-validation trigger template
  • Success notification template
  • Escalation report template
  • Communication log template

Example Usage

Input (Validation Failure)

**Specialist**: test-runner-specialist
**Status**: FAILED
**Failures**:
- 3 unit tests failing
- Coverage: 73.2% (target: 80%)

**Error Details**:
test_validation_coordinator.py::test_sequential_invocation - AssertionError
test_validation_coordinator.py::test_failure_tracking - KeyError
test_validation_coordinator.py::test_workflow_completion - AttributeError

Output (Recursive Communication Flow)

## Recursive Communication: Feature #47 (Iteration 1/5)

### Step 1: Failure Detection
**Status**: ❌ Test failures detected by test-runner-specialist
**Failures**: 3 tests, coverage below target

### Step 2: Failure Report Formatted
**Report ID**: VFR-47-test-runner-1
**Sent To**: @feature-implementer-main
**Content**: Detailed failure report with error messages and fix suggestions

### Step 3: Awaiting Fix
**Status**: Waiting for main agent fix
**Elapsed**: 00:08:32
**Timeout**: 30 minutes

### Step 4: Fix Completed
**Status**: Main agent fixed issues
**Duration**: 00:08:32
**Fixes**: Implementation logic errors in validation_coordinator.py

### Step 5: Re-validation Triggered
**Status**: Re-invoking test-runner-specialist (Iteration 2/5)
**Action**: Re-run tests with fixed implementation

### Step 6: Re-validation Result
**Status**: ❌ 1 test still failing (improvement from 3)
**Action**: Continue to Iteration 2

[Iteration 2 begins... follows same flow]

### Final Result (Iteration 3)
**Status**: ✅ ALL TESTS PASS, Coverage 87.3%
**Total Iterations**: 3/5
**Total Time**: 00:24:15
**Outcome**: Exit recursive loop, proceed to Code Quality phase

Integration

This skill is used by:

  • validation-orchestrator agent during Phase 5: Validation
  • Activates automatically when validation failures occur
  • Works in conjunction with validation-coordinator skill for workflow management
  • Enables recursive communication pattern between validation specialists and main agent
  • Critical for resolving validation issues before deployment

Version: 2.0.0 Auto-Activation: Yes (when validation failures occur) Phase: 5 (Validation) Created: 2025-10-29

快速安装

/plugin add https://github.com/matteocervelli/llms/tree/main/recursive-communicator

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

GitHub 仓库

matteocervelli/llms
路径: .claude/skills/recursive-communicator

相关推荐技能

llamaguard

其他

LlamaGuard是Meta推出的7-8B参数内容审核模型,专门用于过滤LLM的输入和输出内容。它能检测六大安全风险类别(暴力/仇恨、性内容、武器、违禁品、自残、犯罪计划),准确率达94-95%。开发者可通过HuggingFace、vLLM或Sagemaker快速部署,并能与NeMo Guardrails集成实现自动化安全防护。

查看技能

sglang

SGLang是一个专为LLM设计的高性能推理框架,特别适用于需要结构化输出的场景。它通过RadixAttention前缀缓存技术,在处理JSON、正则表达式、工具调用等具有重复前缀的复杂工作流时,能实现极速生成。如果你正在构建智能体或多轮对话系统,并追求远超vLLM的推理性能,SGLang是理想选择。

查看技能

evaluating-llms-harness

测试

该Skill通过60+个学术基准测试(如MMLU、GSM8K等)评估大语言模型质量,适用于模型对比、学术研究及训练进度追踪。它支持HuggingFace、vLLM和API接口,被EleutherAI等行业领先机构广泛采用。开发者可通过简单命令行快速对模型进行多任务批量评估。

查看技能

langchain

LangChain是一个用于构建LLM应用程序的框架,支持智能体、链和RAG应用开发。它提供多模型提供商支持、500+工具集成、记忆管理和向量检索等核心功能。开发者可用它快速构建聊天机器人、问答系统和自主代理,适用于从原型验证到生产部署的全流程。

查看技能