formulate-quantum-problem
关于
This skill helps developers formulate quantum mechanics or chemistry problems by defining the mathematical framework, including Hilbert space, operators, and boundary conditions. It assists in translating physical scenarios into formalisms like Schrödinger's equation and selecting appropriate solution methods such as perturbation theory or DFT. Use it when setting up a quantum problem for analytical or numerical solution.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-quantum-problem在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Formulate Quantum Problem
Physical system → well-posed QM problem: ID DOFs → build H + Hilbert space → BCs → pick approx method → validate vs known limits.
Use When
- Set up QM problem for analytic/numerical solution
- QChem calc (MOs, electronic structure)
- Physical scenario → Dirac/Schrödinger
- Choose perturbation / variational / DFT / exact diag
- Theoretical model for spectroscopic/scattering comparison
In
- Required: system desc (atom, molecule, solid, field)
- Required: target observable (spectrum, rates, ground state)
- Optional: experimental constraints
- Optional: accuracy / compute budget
- Optional: formalism (wave mech, matrix mech, 2nd quant, path int)
Do
Step 1: ID system + DOFs
- Particles: list (electrons, nuclei, photons, phonons) + quantum nums (spin, charge, mass)
- Symmetries: spatial (sph/cyl/trans/crystal), internal (spin/gauge), discrete (P, T)
- Energy scales: which DOFs active vs frozen/adiabatic
- Reduction: Born-Oppenheimer if nuclear/electronic timescales separate; collective coords for many-body
## System Characterization
- **Particles**: [list with quantum numbers]
- **Active degrees of freedom**: [coordinates, spins, fields]
- **Frozen degrees of freedom**: [and justification for freezing]
- **Symmetry group**: [continuous and discrete]
- **Energy scale hierarchy**: [e.g., electronic >> vibrational >> rotational]
→ Complete inventory: particles, QNs, symmetries, active vs frozen justified.
If err: hierarchy unclear → keep all DOFs, flag for scale analysis. Premature truncation → wrong physics.
Step 2: Build H + Hilbert space
- Hilbert space: finite-dim → basis (|↑>, |↓>). Infinite → function space (L²(R³) for 3D single particle).
- Kinetic: each particle. Position rep: T = -ℏ²/(2m) nabla².
- Potential: all interactions (Coulomb, harmonic, spin-orbit, external). Explicit form + coupling.
- Composite H: H = T + V, group by type. Multi-particle: exchange/correlation or note via approx.
- Operator algebra: H Hermitian? Constants of motion ([H,O]=0) → block-diagonalize.
## Hamiltonian Structure
- **Hilbert space**: [definition and basis]
- **H = T + V decomposition**:
- T = [kinetic terms]
- V = [potential terms, grouped by type]
- **Constants of motion**: [operators commuting with H]
- **Symmetry-adapted basis**: [if block diagonalization is possible]
→ Complete Hermitian H w/ all terms, Hilbert space defined, constants of motion ID'd.
If err: not Hermitian → missing conjugate / gauge phase. Ambiguous Hilbert space (relativistic) → specify formalism.
Step 3: BCs + initial conditions
- BCs: bound → normalizability (psi→0 at ∞). Scattering → incoming wave. Periodic → Bloch / Born-von Karman.
- Domain: spatial. Box walls. H atom: radial + angular. Lattice + topology.
- Initial state (time-dep): t=0 expansion in eigenbasis or wave packet w/ center + width.
- Constraints: indistinguishable → sym (bosons) / antisym (fermions). Gauge → gauge-fixing.
## Boundary and Initial Conditions
- **Spatial domain**: [definition]
- **Boundary type**: [Dirichlet / Neumann / periodic / scattering]
- **Normalization**: [condition]
- **Particle statistics**: [bosonic / fermionic / distinguishable]
- **Initial state** (if time-dependent): [specification]
→ BCs physically motivated, consistent w/ H domain, unique solution (or scattering matrix).
If err: over/under-determined → check self-adjointness on domain. Non-self-adjoint → handle deficiency indices.
Step 4: Pick approx method
-
Exact solvable: matches known model (HO, H atom, Ising)? → exact + perturbation corrections.
-
Perturbation (weak coupling):
- H = H0 + lambda V, H0 solvable
- lambda V small vs H0 level spacing
- Degeneracy? → degenerate perturbation
- Fits: weak interaction, few-body, analytic needed
-
Variational (ground state):
- Trial wf w/ params
- Satisfies BCs + symmetry
- Fits: ground state energy primary, many-body
-
DFT (many-electron):
- XC functional (LDA, GGA, hybrid)
- Basis (plane waves, Gaussian, NAOs)
- Fits: many-electron, ground state density + energy
-
Numerical exact (small/benchmark):
- Exact diag for small Hilbert
- QMC for ground state sampling
- DMRG for 1D/quasi-1D
- Fits: high accuracy, small system
## Approximation Method Selection
- **Method chosen**: [name]
- **Justification**: [why this method fits the problem structure]
- **Expected accuracy**: [order of perturbation, variational bound quality, DFT functional accuracy]
- **Computational cost**: [scaling with system size]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why they were rejected]
→ Justified method + expected accuracy + compute cost + alternatives.
If err: no single method fits → formulate for 2 + compare. Disagreement reveals difficulty.
Step 5: Validate vs limits
- Classical (ℏ→0 or large QNs): H reduces to classical mech.
- Non-interacting: couplings → 0 → product of single-particle states.
- Symmetry: respects all symmetries. H transforms correctly under group.
- Dimensional: every H term = energy. Length/energy/time scales reasonable.
- Known exact: special cases (H atom Z=1, HO quadratic) → reproduced.
## Validation Checks
| Check | Expected Result | Status |
|-------|----------------|--------|
| Classical limit (hbar -> 0) | [classical Hamiltonian] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Non-interacting limit | [product states] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Symmetry transformation | [correct representation] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Dimensional analysis | [all terms in energy units] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Known exact case | [reproduced result] | [Pass/Fail] |
→ All pass. Self-consistent, ready to solve.
If err: fail → err in H construction or BCs. Trace to specific term/condition, fix before solving.
Check
- Particles + QNs listed
- Hilbert space + basis
- H Hermitian + correct units
- Constants of motion used
- BCs physically + mathematically sufficient
- Statistics (bos/ferm) enforced
- Method justified + accuracy stated
- Classical, non-interacting, symmetry limits checked
- Known exact reproduced
- Reproducible
Traps
- Premature DOF drop: freeze w/o energy scale arg → wrong physics. Justify every reduction.
- Non-Hermitian H: missing conjugate in spin-orbit / complex V. Verify H=H† explicitly.
- Wrong scattering BCs: bound-state BCs for scattering → discards continuum. Match to question.
- Degeneracy in perturbation: non-deg perturbation on deg level → divergent. Check first.
- Single-method reliance: variational → upper bound but misses excited; perturbation diverges at strong coupling. Cross-validate.
- Unit inconsistency: mixing natural (ℏ=1) + SI. Pick consistent system, state explicitly.
→
derive-theoretical-result— analytic from formulated problemsurvey-theoretical-literature— prior work on similar QM systems
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
llamaguard
其他LlamaGuard是Meta推出的7-8B参数内容审核模型,专门用于过滤LLM的输入和输出内容。它能检测六大安全风险类别(暴力/仇恨、性内容、武器、违禁品、自残、犯罪计划),准确率达94-95%。开发者可通过HuggingFace、vLLM或Sagemaker快速部署,并能与NeMo Guardrails集成实现自动化安全防护。
cost-optimization
其他这个Claude Skill帮助开发者优化云成本,通过资源调整、标记策略和预留实例来降低AWS、Azure和GCP的开支。它适用于减少云支出、分析基础设施成本或实施成本治理策略的场景。关键功能包括提供成本可视化、资源规模调整指导和定价模型优化建议。
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
其他这个Skill使用bitsandbytes库量化大语言模型,能在GPU内存有限时通过8位或4位量化减少50-75%内存占用,同时保持精度损失最小。它支持INT8、NF4、FP4等多种量化格式,可与HuggingFace Transformers无缝集成,适用于需要部署更大模型或加速推理的场景。还提供QLoRA训练和8位优化器支持,让开发者能轻松实现高效模型压缩。
dispatching-parallel-agents
其他该Skill用于并行处理3个以上无依赖关系的独立故障,可为每个问题域分派专属Claude代理同时执行调查修复。它通过并发处理多个独立问题显著提升故障排查效率,特别适用于测试文件、子系统等无共享状态的场景。
