返回技能列表

manage-change-control

pjt222
更新于 2 days ago
8 次查看
17
2
17
在 GitHub 上查看
测试wordautomationdesign

关于

This Claude Skill manages formal change control processes for validated systems in regulated environments. It handles request triage, impact assessment, approval workflows, and post-change verification. Use it when implementing software patches, infrastructure changes, or CAPA-driven modifications that require compliance documentation.

快速安装

Claude Code

推荐
主要方式
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
插件命令备选方式
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git 克隆备选方式
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/manage-change-control

在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能

技能文档

管變更控制

評、核、施、驗已驗證計算系統之變而保其已驗態。

適用時機

  • 已驗證系統需軟體升級、補丁或配置變
  • 基礎設施變(伺服器遷、OS 升、網路變)影響已驗證系統
  • CAPA 或審計發現需系統改
  • 業務程變需系統重配
  • 緊急變需加速核與事後記錄

輸入

  • 必要:變描述(何變並何以)
  • 必要:所影響系統及其當前已驗態
  • 必要:變請求者與業務理由
  • 選擇性:廠商發行說明或技術文件
  • 選擇性:相關 CAPA 或審計發現參
  • 選擇性:所影響系統之既有驗證文件

步驟

步驟一:創並分類變更請求

# Change Request
## Document ID: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### 1. Change Description
**Requestor:** [Name, Department]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**System:** [System name and version]
**Current State:** [Current configuration/version]
**Proposed State:** [Target configuration/version]

### 2. Justification
[Business, regulatory, or technical reason for the change]

### 3. Classification
| Type | Definition | Approval Path | Timeline |
|------|-----------|--------------|----------|
| **Emergency** | Urgent fix for safety, data integrity, or regulatory compliance | System owner + QA (retrospective CCB) | Implement immediately, document within 5 days |
| **Standard** | Planned change with potential impact on validated state | CCB approval before implementation | Per CCB schedule |
| **Minor** | Low-risk change with no impact on validated state | System owner approval | Documented before implementation |

**This change is classified as:** [Emergency / Standard / Minor]
**Rationale:** [Why this classification]

預期: 變更請求有唯一 ID、明描述,與有理之分類。 失敗時: 若分類有爭,默為 Standard 而令 CCB 裁決。

步驟二:行影響評估

於已驗態之所有維評變:

# Impact Assessment
## Change Request: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Impact Matrix
| Dimension | Affected? | Details | Risk |
|-----------|-----------|---------|------|
| Software configuration | Yes/No | [Specific parameters changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Source code | Yes/No | [Modules, functions, or scripts affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Database schema | Yes/No | [Tables, fields, constraints changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Infrastructure | Yes/No | [Servers, network, storage affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Interfaces | Yes/No | [Upstream/downstream system connections] | [H/M/L] |
| User access/roles | Yes/No | [Role changes, new access requirements] | [H/M/L] |
| SOPs/work instructions | Yes/No | [Procedures requiring update] | [H/M/L] |
| Training | Yes/No | [Users requiring retraining] | [H/M/L] |
| Data migration | Yes/No | [Data transformation or migration needed] | [H/M/L] |
| Audit trail | Yes/No | [Impact on audit trail continuity] | [H/M/L] |

### Regulatory Impact
- [ ] Change affects 21 CFR Part 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects EU Annex 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects data integrity (ALCOA+)
- [ ] Change requires regulatory notification

預期: 每維已評附明是/否與理由。 失敗時: 若影響不能於無測而定,將該維分為「未知——需調查」並令生產變前行沙箱評。

步驟三:定重驗範圍

依影響評估定何驗證活動所需:

# Revalidation Determination

| Revalidation Level | Criteria | Activities Required |
|--------------------|----------|-------------------|
| **Full revalidation** | Core functionality changed, new GAMP category, or major version upgrade | URS review, RA update, IQ, OQ, PQ, TM update, VSR |
| **Partial revalidation** | Specific functions affected, configuration changes | Targeted OQ for affected functions, TM update |
| **Documentation only** | No functional impact, administrative changes | Update validation documents, change log entry |
| **None** | No impact on validated state (e.g., cosmetic change) | Change log entry only |

### Determination for CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
**Revalidation level:** [Full / Partial / Documentation only / None]
**Rationale:** [Specific reasoning based on impact assessment]

### Required Activities
| Activity | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|-------|----------|
| [e.g., Execute OQ test cases TC-OQ-015 through TC-OQ-022] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update traceability matrix for URS-007] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update SOP-LIMS-003 section 4.2] | [Name] | [Date] |

預期: 重驗範圍與變之影響相稱——不過,不及。 失敗時: 若重驗範圍有爭,偏向更多測試。驗不足為法規險;驗過度僅資源本。

步驟四:獲批

循適核工作流送變:

# Change Approval

### Approval for: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

| Role | Name | Decision | Signature | Date |
|------|------|----------|-----------|------|
| System Owner | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| QA Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| IT Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| Validation Lead | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |

### Conditions (if any)
[Any conditions attached to the approval]

### Planned Implementation Window
- **Start:** [Date/Time]
- **End:** [Date/Time]
- **Rollback deadline:** [Point of no return]

預期: 施始前所有所需核者已簽(除緊急變)。 失敗時: 緊急變者,自系統擁有者與 QA 獲口頭核,施變,並於 5 個工作日內成正式記錄。

步驟五:施並驗

執變並行變後驗:

# Implementation Record

### Pre-Implementation
- [ ] Backup of current system state completed
- [ ] Rollback procedure documented and tested
- [ ] Affected users notified
- [ ] Test environment validated (if applicable)

### Implementation
- **Implemented by:** [Name]
- **Date/Time:** [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
- **Steps performed:** [Detailed implementation steps]
- **Deviations from plan:** [None / Description]

### Post-Change Verification
| Verification | Result | Evidence |
|--------------|--------|----------|
| System accessible and functional | Pass/Fail | [Screenshot/log reference] |
| Changed functionality works as specified | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Unchanged functionality unaffected (regression) | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Audit trail continuity maintained | Pass/Fail | [Audit trail screenshot] |
| User access controls intact | Pass/Fail | [Access review reference] |

### Closure
- [ ] All verification activities completed successfully
- [ ] Validation documents updated per revalidation determination
- [ ] SOPs updated and effective
- [ ] Training completed for affected users
- [ ] Change record closed in change control system

預期: 施匹核之計劃,所有驗活動過。 失敗時: 若驗敗,立執回滾程序並記敗為偏差。無 QA 同意勿行。

驗證

  • 變更請求有唯一 ID、描述與分類
  • 影響評估涵所有維(軟體、數據、基礎設施、SOP、訓練)
  • 重驗範圍已附理由定
  • 所有所需核於施前已獲(或緊急者於 5 日內)
  • 施前備份與回滾程序已記錄
  • 變後驗證變行而他未破
  • 驗證文件已反映變
  • 變更記錄正式閉

常見陷阱

  • 為「小」變略影響評估:即小變可有意外影響。似無害之配置切換可禁審計軌跡或變計算
  • 緊急變濫:若 >10% 變分為「緊急」,變程被繞。審並緊緊急標
  • 回滾計劃不全:假回滾乃「僅復備份」忽備份與回滾間所創數據。為每回滾境定數據處置
  • 施後核:追溯核(除已記緊急外)為合規違。CCB 必於工作始前核
  • 缺回歸測:僅驗已變功能不足。回歸測必確既驗功能仍不受影響

相關技能

  • design-compliance-architecture — 定含變更控制委員會之治框
  • write-validation-documentation — 創由變觸發之重驗證文件
  • perform-csv-assessment — 為需全重驗之主要變之全 CSV 再評
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — 更受變影響之 SOP
  • investigate-capa-root-cause — 當變因 CAPA 觸發

GitHub 仓库

pjt222/agent-almanac
路径: i18n/wenyan-lite/skills/manage-change-control
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

相关推荐技能

evaluating-llms-harness

测试

该Skill通过60+个学术基准测试(如MMLU、GSM8K等)评估大语言模型质量,适用于模型对比、学术研究及训练进度追踪。它支持HuggingFace、vLLM和API接口,被EleutherAI等行业领先机构广泛采用。开发者可通过简单命令行快速对模型进行多任务批量评估。

查看技能

cloudflare-cron-triggers

测试

这个Claude Skill提供了关于Cloudflare Cron Triggers的完整知识库,用于通过cron表达式定时执行Workers。它支持配置周期性任务、维护作业和自动化工作流,并能处理常见的cron触发错误。开发者可以用它来设置定时任务、测试cron处理器,并集成Workflows和Green Compute功能。

查看技能

webapp-testing

测试

该Skill为开发者提供了基于Playwright的本地Web应用测试工具集,支持自动化测试前端功能、调试UI行为、捕获屏幕截图和查看浏览器日志。它包含管理服务器生命周期的辅助脚本,可直接作为黑盒工具运行而无需阅读源码。适用于需要快速验证本地Web应用界面和交互功能的开发场景。

查看技能

finishing-a-development-branch

测试

这个Skill用于开发分支完成后的集成决策,当代码实现完成且测试通过时,它会引导开发者选择合适的工作流。它首先验证测试状态,然后提供合并、创建PR或清理等结构化选项。核心价值在于确保代码质量的同时,标准化分支收尾流程。

查看技能