formulate-maxwell-equations
关于
This Claude skill provides tools for working with Maxwell's equations in both integral and differential forms. It enables developers to analyze electromagnetic fields, solve boundary value problems, derive wave equations, and compute energy transport via the Poynting vector. Use it for advanced electromagnetism tasks involving material interfaces, radiation, and connecting static fields to the full dynamic framework.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-maxwell-equations在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Formulate Maxwell Equations
EM phenomenon → state Maxwell eqs (int/diff) → apply BCs + symmetry → solve PDE → derive Poynting/pressure/impedance → verify limits.
Use When
- BVP for E, B w/ sources + interfaces
- Derive EM wave eq from first principles
- Compute Poynting vector + momentum density
- BCs at interfaces (dielectrics, conductors, magnetic)
- Displacement current role in Ampere-Maxwell
- Static limits (Coulomb, Biot-Savart) → unified time-dep
In
- Required: config (geometry, sources, material props)
- Required: target quantity (E, B, wave, flux, boundary value)
- Optional: symmetry (planar/cyl/sph/none)
- Optional: time-dep (static/harmonic omega/general)
- Optional: BCs at interfaces/conductors
Do
Step 1: State 4 eqs + select subset
-
Gauss E: div(E)=rho/epsilon_0 (diff) or ∮E·dA=Q_enc/epsilon_0 (int). Use w/ symmetry for E from charges.
-
Gauss B: div(B)=0 (diff) or ∮B·dA=0 (int). No monopoles. Consistency check.
-
Faraday: curl(E)=-dB/dt (diff) or ∮E·dl=-dPhi_B/dt (int). Changing B → curling E. Induction + waves.
-
Ampere-Maxwell: curl(B)=mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt (diff) or ∮B·dl=mu_0 I_enc + mu_0 epsilon_0 dPhi_E/dt (int). Displacement current mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt → essential for waves + continuity.
-
Form: diff for local/wave/PDE; int for symmetry problems.
-
Active subset: electrostatics → Gauss E + curl(E)=0. Magnetostatics → Gauss B + Ampere (no displacement).
## Maxwell Equations for This Problem
- **Form**: [differential / integral / both]
- **Active equations**: [list which of the four are non-trivial constraints]
- **Source terms**: rho = [charge density], J = [current density]
- **Time dependence**: [static / harmonic / general]
- **Displacement current**: [negligible / essential -- with justification]
→ 4 eqs stated, subset ID'd w/ justify, displacement current included/argued negligible.
If err: unclear displacement current → estimate |epsilon_0 dE/dt|/|J|. ≥1 → keep. Vacuum + no free charges → always essential.
Step 2: BCs + symmetry
-
BCs at interfaces (media 1,2, surface charge sigma_f, surface current K_f):
- Normal E: epsilon_1 E_1n - epsilon_2 E_2n = sigma_f
- Tangential E: E_1t = E_2t
- Normal B: B_1n = B_2n
- Tangential H: n_hat × (H_1-H_2) = K_f (n_hat: 2→1)
-
Conductor BCs (perfect):
- E_tan=0 (inside E=0)
- B_normal=0 (time-varying)
- sigma = epsilon_0 E_normal
- K = (1/mu_0) n_hat × B
-
Symmetry:
- Planar: fields depend on 1 coord → ODE
- Cylindrical: (rho,z) or rho
- Spherical: r only
- Translational invariance → Fourier transform
-
Gauge (potentials phi, A):
- Coulomb: div(A)=0 (separates static + radiation)
- Lorenz: div(A) + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(phi)/dt=0 (Lorentz-covariant, decouples wave eqs)
## Boundary Conditions and Symmetry
- **Interfaces**: [list with media properties on each side]
- **Boundary conditions applied**: [normal E, tangential E, normal B, tangential H]
- **Symmetry**: [planar / cylindrical / spherical / none]
- **Reduced coordinates**: [independent variables after symmetry reduction]
- **Gauge** (if using potentials): [Coulomb / Lorenz / other]
→ BCs at every interface, symmetry applied, ready for PDE.
If err: over-determined → check components vs conditions. Under-determined → missed BC (often tangential H or radiation at ∞).
Step 3: Solve PDE
-
Wave eq derivation (source-free, linear, homogeneous):
- curl(curl(E)) = -d/dt(curl(B)) = -mu epsilon d²E/dt²
- Identity: curl(curl(E)) = grad(div(E)) - nabla²(E)
- div(E)=0 → nabla²(E) = mu epsilon d²E/dt²
- v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon); vacuum c=1/sqrt(mu_0 epsilon_0)
- Same for B
-
Plane wave (z-prop):
- E(z,t)=E_0 exp[i(kz - omega t)], k=omega/v=omega*sqrt(mu epsilon)
- B=(1/v) k_hat × E
- |B|=|E|/v
- Polarization: linear/circular/elliptical
-
Laplace/Poisson (static):
- nabla²(phi)=-rho/epsilon_0 (Poisson) or nabla²(phi)=0 (Laplace)
- Separation of variables → match BCs
-
Guided waves/cavities:
- TE/TM decomposition
- Conducting-wall BCs
- Eigenvalue → propagation const / resonance
- Cutoff: omega_c = vpisqrt((m/a)²+(n/b)²) rect guide a×b
-
Skin depth:
- delta = sqrt(2/(omega mu sigma_c))
- Decay exp(-z/delta)
- 60 Hz Cu: ~8.5 mm; 1 GHz: ~2 micrometers
## Field Solution
- **Equation solved**: [wave equation / Laplace / Poisson / eigenvalue]
- **Solution method**: [separation of variables / Fourier transform / Green's function / numerical]
- **Result**: E(r, t) = [expression], B(r, t) = [expression]
- **Dispersion relation**: omega(k) = [if wave solution]
- **Characteristic scales**: [wavelength, skin depth, decay length]
→ Explicit E, B satisfying all eqs + BCs, dispersion/eigenvalues if applicable.
If err: can't separate → try new coord or numerics (FD/FE). Back-sub fails Maxwell → algebra err in curl/div.
Step 4: Derived quantities
-
Poynting: S = (1/mu_0) E × B (W/m²)
- Plane wave: S = (1/mu_0) |E|²/v in prop dir
- Time-avg: <S> = (1/2) Re(E × H*) harmonic
- Intensity: I = |<S>|
-
Energy density:
- u = (1/2)(epsilon_0 |E|² + |B|²/mu_0) vacuum
- u = (1/2)(E·D + B·H) linear media
- Conservation: du/dt + div(S) = -J·E (Poynting's thm)
-
Radiation pressure:
- Absorber: P_rad = I/c = <S>/c
- Reflector: P_rad = 2I/c = 2<S>/c
-
Wave impedance:
- Medium: eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon) = mu*v
- Vacuum: eta_0 = sqrt(mu_0/epsilon_0) ≈ 377 Ω
- |E| = eta |H|
- Reflection normal: r = (eta_2 - eta_1)/(eta_2 + eta_1)
-
Power + Q:
- Ohmic loss/vol: p_loss = sigma |E|²/2
- Q = omega * (stored energy)/(power dissipated/cycle)
- Bandwidth: Delta_omega = omega/Q
## Derived Quantities
- **Poynting vector**: S = [expression], <S> = [time-averaged]
- **Energy density**: u = [expression]
- **Radiation pressure**: P_rad = [value]
- **Wave impedance**: eta = [value]
- **Reflection/transmission**: r = [value], t = [value]
- **Q-factor** (if resonant): Q = [value]
→ All quantities w/ correct units, energy conservation via Poynting, reasonable magnitudes.
If err: Poynting thm not balanced → E/B inconsistent. Re-verify all 4 eqs. Common: E, B from different approx not mutually consistent.
Step 5: Verify limits
-
Static (omega→0):
- E → Coulomb / Laplace-Poisson
- B → Biot-Savart / Ampere (no displacement)
- Displacement → 0
-
Plane wave: v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon), correct polarization.
-
Perfect conductor (sigma→∞):
- delta → 0
- E_tan → 0 at surface
- r → -1 (phase inversion)
-
Vacuum (epsilon_r=1, mu_r=1): v=c, eta=eta_0 ≈ 377 Ω.
-
Energy conservation: integrate Poynting thm over closed vol → total field energy rate + outflow = -power from currents. Imbalance = err.
## Limiting Case Verification
| Limit | Condition | Expected | Obtained | Match |
|-------|-----------|----------|----------|-------|
| Static | omega -> 0 | Coulomb / Biot-Savart | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Plane wave | unbounded medium | v = c/n, eta = eta_0/n | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Perfect conductor | sigma -> inf | delta -> 0, r -> -1 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Vacuum | epsilon_r = mu_r = 1 | c, eta_0 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Energy conservation | Poynting's theorem | balanced | [check] | [Yes/No] |
→ All limits match. Energy conserved to numerical precision.
If err: Static fail → source/BC err. Plane wave fail → wave eq derivation err. Energy conservation fail → E/B inconsistent. Trace + fix before accepting.
Check
- 4 eqs stated, subset ID'd
- Displacement current included or justified negligible
- BCs applied at every interface
- Symmetry reduces PDE dim
- Wave eq / Laplace / Poisson correctly derived
- Solutions back-sub satisfy all 4 eqs
- Poynting + energy density correct units (W/m², J/m³)
- Poynting thm verified
- Impedance + r, t reasonable
- Static limit = Coulomb + Biot-Savart
- Plane wave limit: v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon), E⊥B⊥k
- Solution reproducible
Traps
- Drop displacement: div(curl B)=0 → div(J)=0 contradicts charge conservation → mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt essential. Never drop w/o checking dE/dt vs J/epsilon_0.
- Inconsistent E, B: solving independently can violate Faraday + Gauss B. Always verify all 4.
- Wrong n_hat dir: n_hat × (H_1-H_2)=K_f requires 2→1. Reverse flips sign.
- D/E/B/H confusion: vacuum D=epsilon_0 E, B=mu_0 H. Media D=epsilon E, B=mu H. Maxwell uses D,H for free sources, E,B for force. Mixing → epsilon_r/mu_r errors.
- Phase vs group v: v=omega/k phase. Energy/info → v_g=d(omega)/dk. Dispersive media: differ.
- Forget radiation condition: scattering in unbounded → Sommerfeld (outgoing at ∞). Missing → non-unique + unphysical incoming.
→
analyze-magnetic-field— static B (magnetostatic limit)solve-electromagnetic-induction— Faraday + RL circuitsformulate-quantum-problem— quantize EM (QED)derive-theoretical-result— rigorous wave/Green's/dispersionanalyze-diffusion-dynamics— diffusion eq from Maxwell (skin effect)
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
llamaguard
其他LlamaGuard是Meta推出的7-8B参数内容审核模型,专门用于过滤LLM的输入和输出内容。它能检测六大安全风险类别(暴力/仇恨、性内容、武器、违禁品、自残、犯罪计划),准确率达94-95%。开发者可通过HuggingFace、vLLM或Sagemaker快速部署,并能与NeMo Guardrails集成实现自动化安全防护。
cost-optimization
其他这个Claude Skill帮助开发者优化云成本,通过资源调整、标记策略和预留实例来降低AWS、Azure和GCP的开支。它适用于减少云支出、分析基础设施成本或实施成本治理策略的场景。关键功能包括提供成本可视化、资源规模调整指导和定价模型优化建议。
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
其他这个Skill使用bitsandbytes库量化大语言模型,能在GPU内存有限时通过8位或4位量化减少50-75%内存占用,同时保持精度损失最小。它支持INT8、NF4、FP4等多种量化格式,可与HuggingFace Transformers无缝集成,适用于需要部署更大模型或加速推理的场景。还提供QLoRA训练和8位优化器支持,让开发者能轻松实现高效模型压缩。
dispatching-parallel-agents
其他该Skill用于并行处理3个以上无依赖关系的独立故障,可为每个问题域分派专属Claude代理同时执行调查修复。它通过并发处理多个独立问题显著提升故障排查效率,特别适用于测试文件、子系统等无共享状态的场景。
