crisis-detector
关于
This skill helps developers identify early warning signals of potential PR crises through pattern recognition and risk assessment. It's useful for setting up early warning systems, assessing crisis probability, and building escalation criteria. The tool is based on established crisis management frameworks to monitor signals and evaluate escalation triggers.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/crisis-detector在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Crisis Detector
Identify early warning signs of potential crises before they escalate through pattern recognition, signal monitoring, and risk assessment.
When to Use This Skill
- Setting up early warning systems
- Assessing crisis probability
- Training teams on signals
- Building escalation criteria
- Post-crisis prevention planning
Methodology Foundation
Based on Institute for Crisis Management research and Burson crisis frameworks, combining:
- Signal identification
- Pattern recognition
- Risk assessment matrices
- Escalation protocols
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Identifies warning signals | Risk tolerance |
| Assesses crisis probability | Response resources |
| Creates detection criteria | Escalation authority |
| Designs monitoring systems | Communication strategy |
| Suggests response triggers | Final action calls |
Instructions
Step 1: Map Crisis Types
Crisis Categories:
| Category | Examples | Warning Time |
|---|---|---|
| Operational | Outage, product failure | Hours to days |
| Reputational | Executive scandal, viral complaint | Minutes to hours |
| Legal/Regulatory | Lawsuit, investigation | Days to weeks |
| Financial | Earnings miss, fraud | Hours to days |
| Human | Workplace incident, harassment | Hours to days |
| External | Natural disaster, market crash | Variable |
Step 2: Identify Early Signals
Signal Types:
| Signal Type | Examples | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | Employee complaints, support tickets | HR, Support data |
| Customer | Review patterns, churn spikes | CX metrics |
| Social | Mention volume, sentiment shift | Social tools |
| Media | Press inquiries, journalist interest | PR inbox |
| Regulatory | Compliance notices, audit findings | Legal |
| Financial | Payment disputes, refund requests | Finance |
Step 3: Build Detection Matrix
Signal Strength Assessment:
| Signal | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume spike | +25% | +50% | +100% | +300% |
| Sentiment shift | -10% | -20% | -30% | -50% |
| Media inquiries | 1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6+ |
| Support tickets | +10% | +25% | +50% | +100% |
| Social influencer | 10K | 50K | 100K | 500K+ |
Step 4: Create Escalation Triggers
Trigger Framework:
| Level | Signals Present | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Watch | 1 moderate signal | Monitor closely |
| Alert | 2+ moderate or 1 strong | Notify team |
| Warning | Multiple strong signals | Assemble team |
| Crisis | Any critical signal | Activate protocol |
Step 5: Document and Improve
Post-Detection Review:
- How early did we detect?
- What signals did we miss?
- How accurate was assessment?
- What should we add to monitoring?
Examples
Example 1: Crisis Detection System Design
Input:
Design a crisis detection system for:
- E-commerce company (clothing)
- 500K customers
- Active on Instagram, TikTok, Twitter
- Past issue: Shipping delays during holiday
Output:
## Crisis Detection System: E-Commerce Fashion
### Crisis Risk Map
| Crisis Type | Probability | Impact | Priority |
|-------------|-------------|--------|----------|
| Shipping delays | High | High | P1 |
| Product quality issue | Medium | High | P1 |
| Social media backlash | Medium | High | P1 |
| Data breach | Low | Critical | P1 |
| Influencer controversy | Medium | Medium | P2 |
| Supply chain disruption | Medium | High | P2 |
| Payment fraud | Low | Medium | P3 |
---
### Early Warning Signals
#### P1: Shipping Delays
**Leading Indicators (3-5 days before crisis):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Carrier delay reports | Logistics API | >10% delayed |
| Warehouse backlog | WMS data | >24hr processing |
| Weather events | News/weather | Storm in hub |
| "Where's my order" tickets | Support | +50% daily |
**Lagging Indicators (crisis starting):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Social mentions | Social listening | "shipping" +100% |
| Review mentions | Trustpilot/G2 | Shipping 3/5 stars |
| Refund requests | Payment system | +30% |
| Chargeback rate | Payment processor | >1% |
---
#### P1: Product Quality Issue
**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Return rate spike | Returns data | >10% on SKU |
| Quality complaints | Support tickets | 3+ same issue |
| Photo complaints | Social | "damaged", "wrong color" |
| Batch-specific issues | QC data | Same lot number |
**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral unboxing | TikTok/Instagram | >10K views negative |
| Review bomb | Product pages | Multiple 1-stars |
| Media inquiry | PR inbox | Journalist question |
---
#### P1: Social Media Backlash
**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Sentiment shift | Social tools | -20% in 24hr |
| Controversial post | Your social | Negative comments >10% |
| Influencer complaint | Social | >50K follower post |
| Screenshot spreading | Twitter/Reddit | Same image 5+ times |
**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral negative | Any platform | >50K engagements |
| Hashtag trending | Twitter | Brand + negative |
| Media pickup | News sites | Article published |
| Competitor amplification | Social | Competitor sharing |
---
### Detection Dashboard
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CRISIS DETECTION DASHBOARD 🟢 NORMAL │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ SHIPPING STATUS 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Carrier delays: 3% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Backlog: 4 hours (threshold: 24hr) │ │ └─ "Where's my order": 45 (baseline: 50) │ │ │ │ PRODUCT QUALITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Return rate: 5.2% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Quality tickets: 2 (threshold: 3+ same) │ │ └─ Photo complaints: 1 (threshold: 5) │ │ │ │ SOCIAL SENTIMENT 🟡 Watch │ │ ├─ Sentiment: -15% (threshold: -20%) │ │ ├─ Volume: +40% (threshold: +50%) │ │ └─ Influencer: None flagged │ │ │ │ SECURITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Login anomalies: Normal │ │ └─ Payment fraud: 0.3% │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
---
### Escalation Matrix
| Level | Criteria | Notification | Response |
|-------|----------|--------------|----------|
| 🟢 Normal | All metrics in range | None | Standard ops |
| 🟡 Watch | 1 metric at threshold | Slack alert | Increased monitoring |
| 🟠 Alert | 2+ metrics or 1 exceeded | Team notification | Standby team |
| 🔴 Crisis | Critical threshold breached | All-hands alert | Activate protocol |
---
### Alert Routing
| Signal Type | Primary | Backup | Escalation |
|-------------|---------|--------|------------|
| Shipping | Operations | COO | CEO |
| Product quality | Product | VP Ops | CEO |
| Social media | Marketing | CMO | CEO |
| Security | IT | CTO | CEO + Legal |
| Legal/PR | Legal | CEO | Board |
---
### Holiday Season Adjustments
During high-volume periods (Nov 15 - Dec 31):
| Metric | Normal Threshold | Holiday Threshold |
|--------|------------------|-------------------|
| Carrier delays | 10% | 15% |
| Support volume | +50% | +100% |
| Social volume | +50% | +75% |
| Response time | 4 hours | 8 hours |
**Rationale:** Higher baseline expected; adjust to avoid false alerts
while maintaining genuine crisis detection.
Example 2: Real-Time Crisis Assessment
Input:
Assess this situation:
- Support tickets up 80% in 2 hours
- Twitter mentions up 150%
- Hashtag #[Brand]Scam trending locally
- 3 refund requests mentioning "charged twice"
- No known system issues
Output:
## Crisis Assessment: Potential Payment Issue
### Alert Level: 🔴 CRISIS
---
### Signal Analysis
| Signal | Value | Normal | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Support spike | +80% | <25% | CRITICAL |
| Social spike | +150% | <50% | CRITICAL |
| Trending hashtag | Yes | No | CRITICAL |
| Duplicate charge reports | 3 | 0 | CONCERNING |
---
### Probable Cause
**Most likely: Payment processing error**
Evidence:
1. Multiple "charged twice" complaints
2. No known system issues rules out outage
3. Sudden spike suggests batch problem
4. #Scam hashtag = customers think fraud
---
### Immediate Actions
| Priority | Action | Owner | Timeline |
|----------|--------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Check payment processor logs | Engineering | NOW |
| 2 | Identify affected transactions | Finance | 30 min |
| 3 | Prepare holding statement | Comms | 15 min |
| 4 | Alert customer service team | CX Lead | NOW |
| 5 | Monitor hashtag spread | Social | Ongoing |
---
### Holding Statement (Draft)
We're aware some customers may have experienced duplicate charges. Our team is investigating urgently. If you've been affected, please DM us or email [support] - we'll make this right immediately.
Updates to follow shortly.
---
### Escalation Path
**Now:** CTO + CFO + CMO notified
**+30 min:** CEO briefing if not resolved
**+1 hour:** External statement if ongoing
---
### Crisis Trajectory
**If unaddressed (next 2-4 hours):**
- Hashtag goes national
- Media inquiries begin
- Trust pilot review bomb
- Social influencers amplify
**If addressed quickly (next 1-2 hours):**
- Contain to affected customers
- Flip narrative to "responsive company"
- Prevent media escalation
- Build goodwill through fast resolution
---
### Resolution Checklist
- [ ] Root cause identified
- [ ] Affected customers identified
- [ ] Refunds initiated
- [ ] Proactive communication sent
- [ ] Social response deployed
- [ ] Hashtag monitoring active
- [ ] Post-incident review scheduled
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Identifying early warning signals
- Creating detection frameworks
- Assessing crisis probability
- Designing escalation systems
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access your actual systems
- Monitor in real-time
- Make response decisions
- Know your specific thresholds
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts:
- "Design detection for [specific crisis type]"
- "Create escalation protocol for [scenario]"
- "What signals should we add for [risk]?"
- "How do we prevent [past crisis] from recurring?"
References
- Institute for Crisis Management
- Burson Crisis Playbook
- Harvard Business Review Crisis Research
- Edelman Trust Barometer
Related Skills
social-listening- Monitoring systemsresponse-coordinator- Crisis responsereputation-recovery- Post-crisis rebuild
Skill Metadata
- Domain: Crisis
- Complexity: Intermediate-Advanced
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 2-4 hours for system design
- Prerequisites: Access to metrics, stakeholder alignment
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
llamaguard
其他LlamaGuard是Meta推出的7-8B参数内容审核模型,专门用于过滤LLM的输入和输出内容。它能检测六大安全风险类别(暴力/仇恨、性内容、武器、违禁品、自残、犯罪计划),准确率达94-95%。开发者可通过HuggingFace、vLLM或Sagemaker快速部署,并能与NeMo Guardrails集成实现自动化安全防护。
cost-optimization
其他这个Claude Skill帮助开发者优化云成本,通过资源调整、标记策略和预留实例来降低AWS、Azure和GCP的开支。它适用于减少云支出、分析基础设施成本或实施成本治理策略的场景。关键功能包括提供成本可视化、资源规模调整指导和定价模型优化建议。
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
其他这个Skill使用bitsandbytes库量化大语言模型,能在GPU内存有限时通过8位或4位量化减少50-75%内存占用,同时保持精度损失最小。它支持INT8、NF4、FP4等多种量化格式,可与HuggingFace Transformers无缝集成,适用于需要部署更大模型或加速推理的场景。还提供QLoRA训练和8位优化器支持,让开发者能轻松实现高效模型压缩。
dispatching-parallel-agents
其他该Skill用于并行处理3个以上无依赖关系的独立故障,可为每个问题域分派专属Claude代理同时执行调查修复。它通过并发处理多个独立问题显著提升故障排查效率,特别适用于测试文件、子系统等无共享状态的场景。
