run-ab-test-models
关于
This skill enables A/B testing for ML models in production using traffic splitting and statistical significance testing. It supports canary and shadow deployments to compare model versions and measure business impact. Use it to validate new models before full rollout or to make data-driven deployment decisions.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-ab-test-models在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Run A/B Test for Models
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Run controlled experiments comparing model versions with traffic split + statistical analysis.
When Use
- Deploy new model version, want validate before full rollout
- Compare multiple candidate models (different algorithms, features)
- Test impact of hyperparameter changes on business metrics
- Measure model performance in prod without risk full traffic
- Regulatory needs gradual rollout (medical ML)
- Judge cost-performance tradeoffs between model sizes
Inputs
- Required: Champion model (current prod)
- Required: Challenger model(s) (new version to test)
- Required: Traffic allocation % (e.g., 5% to challenger)
- Required: Success metrics (business + ML)
- Required: Min sample size or test duration
- Optional: Guardrail metrics (latency, error rate thresholds)
- Optional: User segments for stratified testing
Steps
Step 1: Design Experiment
Define test parameters, success criteria, statistical needs.
# ab_test/experiment_config.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import norm
@dataclass
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Experiment config with stat-sound sample size calc, typical 5-10k samples per variant for 5-10% MDE.
If fail: Sample too large? Up traffic allocation, extend duration, or accept larger MDE; verify baseline metric estimate; consider sequential testing.
Step 2: Implement Traffic Splitting
Set up routing — randomly assign requests to models.
# ab_test/traffic_router.py
import hashlib
import random
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Consistent user-to-variant assignment, accurate traffic split matches configured %, all assignments logged.
If fail: Verify hash uniform (test 10k user IDs), check user_id stable across requests (not session_id), logs capture all predictions, validate split in first 1000 requests.
Step 3: Implement Shadow Deployment (Optional)
Run challenger in parallel without affecting users (shadow mode).
# ab_test/shadow_deployment.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Any
import logging
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import time
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Champion served at normal latency, challenger logged async without blocking, prediction diffs captured.
If fail: Set challenger timeout < champion SLA, handle challenger errors gracefully, monitor memory (two models loaded), consider sampling (log 10% of shadow predictions).
Step 4: Collect and Analyze Metrics
Gather data, run statistical tests.
# ab_test/analysis.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from typing import Dict, Tuple
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Stat test results with p-values, CIs, clear decision (rollout/keep/inconclusive), typical after 7-14 days or sample size.
If fail: Verify ground truth labels available (delayed analysis maybe), check sample ratio mismatch (SRM = assignment bugs), enough sample size, look for novelty/primacy effects in early data, consider sequential testing if fixed-horizon too slow.
Step 5: Monitor Guardrail Metrics
Continuous check challenger does not violate safety thresholds.
# ab_test/guardrails.py
import pandas as pd
import logging
from typing import Dict, List
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Guardrail violations detected within 5-15 min, auto stop if critical thresholds breached (latency, errors), alerts to team.
If fail: Verify thresholds realistic (not too tight), monitoring loop runs continuous, check stop_experiment() updates routing, test alert delivery.
Step 6: Make Rollout Decision
From results, decide rollout challenger.
# ab_test/rollout_decision.py
import logging
from typing import Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Clear decision (full/gradual rollout, keep champion, extend test) with justification + action items.
If fail: Decision unclear? Subgroup analysis (segment, time, device), check interaction effects, review business context (2% lift worth eng cost?), consult stakeholders.
Checks
- Traffic split matches configured % (within 1%)
- Same user always to same variant
- Sample size calc reasonable (5-50k per variant)
- Stat tests produce p-values consistent with manual calc
- Guardrail violations trigger alerts within 5 min
- Shadow deployment shows <5% prediction divergence
- Reports include CIs
- Rollout decision documented
Pitfalls
- Sample ratio mismatch (SRM): Observed split differs from configured (95/5 becomes 92/8) = assignment bug; check hash uniformity
- Peeking: Check results before sample size inflates Type I error; use sequential testing or wait for pre-set end date
- Novelty effect: Users respond different to new model at first; run 2+ weeks for steady state
- Carryover effects: Prev variant exposure affects current; use new users or washout
- Multiple testing: Many metrics = false positive risk; correct with Bonferroni or single primary metric
- Insufficient power: Small allocation = months to detect; balance power with risk
- Ignore segments: Aggregate lift hides negative on important segments; subgroup analysis
- Attribution errors: Outcome metrics attributed to predictions (not other system changes)
See Also
deploy-ml-model-serving- Model deployment infra, versioningmonitor-model-drift- Post-rollout monitoring
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
evaluating-llms-harness
测试该Skill通过60+个学术基准测试(如MMLU、GSM8K等)评估大语言模型质量,适用于模型对比、学术研究及训练进度追踪。它支持HuggingFace、vLLM和API接口,被EleutherAI等行业领先机构广泛采用。开发者可通过简单命令行快速对模型进行多任务批量评估。
cloudflare-cron-triggers
测试这个Claude Skill提供了关于Cloudflare Cron Triggers的完整知识库,用于通过cron表达式定时执行Workers。它支持配置周期性任务、维护作业和自动化工作流,并能处理常见的cron触发错误。开发者可以用它来设置定时任务、测试cron处理器,并集成Workflows和Green Compute功能。
webapp-testing
测试该Skill为开发者提供了基于Playwright的本地Web应用测试工具集,支持自动化测试前端功能、调试UI行为、捕获屏幕截图和查看浏览器日志。它包含管理服务器生命周期的辅助脚本,可直接作为黑盒工具运行而无需阅读源码。适用于需要快速验证本地Web应用界面和交互功能的开发场景。
finishing-a-development-branch
测试这个Skill用于开发分支完成后的集成决策,当代码实现完成且测试通过时,它会引导开发者选择合适的工作流。它首先验证测试状态,然后提供合并、创建PR或清理等结构化选项。核心价值在于确保代码质量的同时,标准化分支收尾流程。
