instrument-distributed-tracing
关于
This skill helps developers implement OpenTelemetry for distributed tracing, covering both auto and manual instrumentation, context propagation, and integration with backends like Jaeger. Use it when debugging latency issues, understanding request flows across microservices, or migrating from legacy tracing systems. It enables correlating traces with logs and metrics for comprehensive root cause analysis.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/instrument-distributed-tracing在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Instrument Distributed Tracing
Implement OpenTelemetry distributed tracing to track requests across microservices and identify performance bottlenecks.
When to Use
- Debugging latency in distributed systems with multiple services
- Understanding request flow and dependencies between microservices
- Identifying slow database queries or external API calls within a transaction
- Correlating traces with logs and metrics for root cause analysis
- Measuring end-to-end latency from user request to response
- Migrating from legacy tracing systems (Zipkin, Jaeger) to OpenTelemetry
- Establishing SLO compliance through detailed latency percentile tracking
Inputs
- Required: List of services to instrument (languages and frameworks)
- Required: Tracing backend choice (Jaeger, Tempo, Zipkin, or vendor SaaS)
- Optional: Existing instrumentation libraries (OpenTracing, Zipkin)
- Optional: Sampling strategy requirements (percentage, rate limiting)
- Optional: Custom span attributes for business-specific metadata
Procedure
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Step 1: Set Up Tracing Backend
Deploy Jaeger or Grafana Tempo to receive and store traces.
Option A: Jaeger all-in-one (development/testing):
# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
jaeger:
image: jaegertracing/all-in-one:1.51
ports:
- "5775:5775/udp" # Zipkin compact thrift
- "6831:6831/udp" # Jaeger compact thrift
- "6832:6832/udp" # Jaeger binary thrift
- "5778:5778" # Serve configs
- "16686:16686" # Jaeger UI
- "14268:14268" # Jaeger HTTP thrift
- "14250:14250" # Jaeger GRPC
- "9411:9411" # Zipkin compatible endpoint
environment:
- COLLECTOR_ZIPKIN_HOST_PORT=:9411
- COLLECTOR_OTLP_ENABLED=true
restart: unless-stopped
Option B: Grafana Tempo (production, scalable):
# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
tempo:
image: grafana/tempo:2.3.0
command: ["-config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml"]
volumes:
- ./tempo.yaml:/etc/tempo.yaml
- tempo-data:/tmp/tempo
ports:
- "3200:3200" # Tempo HTTP
- "4317:4317" # OTLP gRPC
- "4318:4318" # OTLP HTTP
- "9411:9411" # Zipkin
restart: unless-stopped
volumes:
tempo-data:
Tempo configuration (tempo.yaml):
server:
http_listen_port: 3200
distributor:
receivers:
jaeger:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
For production with S3 storage:
storage:
trace:
backend: s3
s3:
bucket: tempo-traces
endpoint: s3.amazonaws.com
region: us-east-1
wal:
path: /tmp/tempo/wal
pool:
max_workers: 100
queue_depth: 10000
Got: Tracing backend accessible, ready to receive traces via OTLP, Jaeger UI or Grafana shows "no traces" initially.
If fail:
- Verify ports not already in use:
netstat -tulpn | grep -E '(4317|16686|3200)' - Check container logs:
docker logs jaegerordocker logs tempo - Test OTLP endpoint:
curl http://localhost:4318/v1/traces -v - For Tempo: validate config syntax with
tempo -config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml -verify-config
Step 2: Instrument Applications (Auto-Instrumentation)
Use OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for common frameworks to minimize code changes.
Python with Flask:
pip install opentelemetry-distro opentelemetry-exporter-otlp
opentelemetry-bootstrap -a install
# app.py
from flask import Flask
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import BatchSpanProcessor
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.grpc.trace_exporter import OTLPSpanExporter
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Go with Gin framework:
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/trace
go get go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/gin-gonic/gin/otelgin
package main
import (
"context"
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Node.js with Express:
npm install @opentelemetry/api \
@opentelemetry/sdk-node \
@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node \
@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc
// tracing.js
const { NodeSDK } = require('@opentelemetry/sdk-node');
const { OTLPTraceExporter } = require('@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc');
const { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } = require('@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node');
const { Resource } = require('@opentelemetry/resources');
const { SemanticResourceAttributes } = require('@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions');
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Got: Traces from instrumented services appear in Jaeger UI or Grafana, HTTP requests automatically create spans.
If fail:
- Check exporter endpoint is reachable from application
- Verify environment variables:
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://tempo:4317 - Enable debug logging:
OTEL_LOG_LEVEL=debug(Python),OTEL_LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG(Node.js) - Test with simple span: manually create a span to verify export pipeline
- Check for version conflicts between OpenTelemetry packages
Step 3: Add Manual Instrumentation
Create custom spans for business logic, database queries, and external calls.
Python manual spans:
from opentelemetry import trace
tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
def process_order(order_id):
# Create a span for the entire operation
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Go manual spans:
import (
"context"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/attribute"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/codes"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Span attributes best practices:
- Use semantic conventions:
http.method,http.status_code,db.system,db.statement - Add business context:
user.id,order.id,product.category - Include resource identifiers:
instance.id,region,availability_zone - Record errors:
span.RecordError(err)andspan.SetStatus(codes.Error, message) - Add events for significant milestones:
span.AddEvent("cache_miss")
Got: Custom spans appear in trace view, parent-child relationships correct, attributes visible in span details, errors highlighted.
If fail:
- Verify context propagation: parent span context passed to child
- Check span names are descriptive and follow naming conventions
- Ensure spans are ended (use
defer span.End()in Go,withblocks in Python) - Review attribute types: strings, ints, bools, floats only
- Validate semantic conventions: use standard attribute names where applicable
Step 4: Implement Context Propagation
Ensure trace context flows across service boundaries and async operations.
HTTP headers propagation (W3C Trace Context):
# Client side (Python with requests)
import requests
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.propagate import inject
tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
// Server side (Go with Gin)
import (
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/propagation"
)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Message queue propagation (Kafka):
# Producer
from opentelemetry.propagate import inject
from kafka import KafkaProducer
producer = KafkaProducer(bootstrap_servers=['kafka:9092'])
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
# Consumer
from opentelemetry.propagate import extract
def process_message(msg):
# Extract trace context from Kafka headers
headers = {k: v.decode('utf-8') for k, v in msg.headers}
ctx = extract(headers)
# Continue the trace
with tracer.start_as_current_span("process_order_event", context=ctx):
order_id = json.loads(msg.value)['order_id']
handle_order(order_id)
Async operations (Python asyncio):
import asyncio
from opentelemetry import trace, context
async def async_operation():
# Capture current context
token = context.attach(context.get_current())
try:
with tracer.start_as_current_span("async_database_query"):
await asyncio.sleep(0.1) # Simulated async work
return "result"
finally:
context.detach(token)
Got: Traces span multiple services, trace IDs consistent across service boundaries, parent-child relationships preserved.
If fail:
- Verify W3C Trace Context propagator configured:
otel.propagation.set_global_textmap(TraceContextTextMapPropagator()) - Check headers are passed in HTTP requests
- For Kafka: ensure headers supported by broker version (v0.11+)
- Debug with header inspection: log
traceparentheader value - Use trace visualization to identify broken trace links
Step 5: Configure Sampling Strategies
Implement sampling to reduce trace volume and cost while maintaining visibility.
Sampling strategies:
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.sampling import (
ParentBased,
TraceIdRatioBased,
StaticSampler,
Decision
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Tail-based sampling with Tempo:
Configure in tempo.yaml:
overrides:
defaults:
metrics_generator:
processors: [service-graphs, span-metrics]
storage:
path: /tmp/tempo/generator/wal
remote_write:
- url: http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/write
send_exemplars: true
# Tail sampling (requires tempo-query)
ingestion_rate_limit_bytes: 5000000
ingestion_burst_size_bytes: 10000000
Use Grafana Tempo's TraceQL for dynamic sampling:
# Sample traces with errors
{ status = error }
# Sample slow traces (>1s)
{ duration > 1s }
# Sample specific services
{ resource.service.name = "checkout-service" }
Got: Trace volume reduced to target percentage, error traces always sampled, sampling decision visible in trace metadata.
If fail:
- Verify sampler applied before tracer provider initialization
- Check sampling decision attribute in exported spans
- For tail sampling: ensure sufficient buffering (
ingestion_burst_size_bytes) - Monitor dropped traces:
otel_traces_dropped_totalmetric - Test with synthetic high-volume traffic to validate sampling rate
Step 6: Correlate Traces with Metrics and Logs
Link traces to metrics and logs for unified observability.
Add trace IDs to logs (Python):
import logging
from opentelemetry import trace
# Custom log formatter with trace context
class TraceFormatter(logging.Formatter):
def format(self, record):
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Generate metrics from traces (Tempo):
# tempo.yaml
metrics_generator:
registry:
external_labels:
cluster: production
storage:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
This generates Prometheus metrics:
traces_service_graph_request_total- request count between servicestraces_span_metrics_duration_seconds- span duration histogramtraces_spanmetrics_calls_total- span call counts
Query traces from metrics (Grafana):
Add exemplar support to Prometheus datasource in Grafana:
datasources:
- name: Prometheus
type: prometheus
url: http://prometheus:9090
jsonData:
exemplarTraceIdDestinations:
- name: trace_id
datasourceName: Tempo
In Grafana dashboard, enable exemplars:
{
"fieldConfig": {
"defaults": {
"custom": {
"showExemplars": true
}
}
}
}
Got: Clicking metric exemplars opens trace, logs show trace IDs, traces link to logs, unified debugging across signals.
If fail:
- Verify exemplar support enabled in Prometheus (requires v2.26+)
- Check trace ID format matches (32-char hex)
- Ensure metrics generator enabled in Tempo config
- Validate remote write endpoint accessible from Tempo
- Test exemplar queries:
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) and on() exemplar
Validation
- Tracing backend receives spans from all instrumented services
- Traces show correct parent-child relationships across services
- Span attributes include semantic conventions and business context
- Context propagates correctly across HTTP calls and message queues
- Sampling strategy reduces trace volume to target percentage
- Error traces always sampled (if using error-aware sampling)
- Trace IDs appear in application logs with correct format
- Grafana shows traces linked from metrics via exemplars
- Log panels have data links to trace viewer
- Trace retention matches configured storage policy
Pitfalls
- Context not propagated: Forgetting to pass
contextto downstream calls breaks traces. Pass context explicitly. - Spans never ended: Missing
defer span.End()(Go) orwithblocks (Python) causes spans to remain open and memory leaks. - Over-instrumentation: Creating spans for every function causes trace bloat. Focus on service boundaries, database calls, and external APIs.
- Missing error recording: Not calling
span.RecordError()loses debugging information. Record errors in spans. - High cardinality attributes: Using unbounded values (user IDs, request bodies) as span attributes causes storage issues. Use sampling or aggregate labels.
- Incorrect span kind: Using wrong span kind (CLIENT vs SERVER vs INTERNAL) affects service graph generation. Follow semantic conventions.
- Sampling before context: Sampling decisions must respect parent trace context. Use
ParentBasedsampler to honor upstream sampling.
Related Skills
correlate-observability-signals- Unified debugging with metrics, logs, and traces linked by trace IDssetup-prometheus-monitoring- Generate metrics from traces using Tempo metrics generatorconfigure-log-aggregation- Add trace IDs to logs for correlation with distributed tracesbuild-grafana-dashboards- Visualize trace-derived metrics and exemplar links in dashboards
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
evaluating-llms-harness
测试该Skill通过60+个学术基准测试(如MMLU、GSM8K等)评估大语言模型质量,适用于模型对比、学术研究及训练进度追踪。它支持HuggingFace、vLLM和API接口,被EleutherAI等行业领先机构广泛采用。开发者可通过简单命令行快速对模型进行多任务批量评估。
cloudflare-cron-triggers
测试这个Claude Skill提供了关于Cloudflare Cron Triggers的完整知识库,用于通过cron表达式定时执行Workers。它支持配置周期性任务、维护作业和自动化工作流,并能处理常见的cron触发错误。开发者可以用它来设置定时任务、测试cron处理器,并集成Workflows和Green Compute功能。
webapp-testing
测试该Skill为开发者提供了基于Playwright的本地Web应用测试工具集,支持自动化测试前端功能、调试UI行为、捕获屏幕截图和查看浏览器日志。它包含管理服务器生命周期的辅助脚本,可直接作为黑盒工具运行而无需阅读源码。适用于需要快速验证本地Web应用界面和交互功能的开发场景。
finishing-a-development-branch
测试这个Skill用于开发分支完成后的集成决策,当代码实现完成且测试通过时,它会引导开发者选择合适的工作流。它首先验证测试状态,然后提供合并、创建PR或清理等结构化选项。核心价值在于确保代码质量的同时,标准化分支收尾流程。
