Back to Skills

commission-intelligence

guia-matthieu
Updated 2 days ago
8 views
111
20
111
View on GitHub
Otherai

About

This skill enables Claude to explain sales commission calculations, resolve payout discrepancies, and model compensation scenarios for planning. It's useful for developers building tools for sales comp analysis, quota design, or dispute resolution. The skill is based on established sales compensation principles and handles structures like quota attainment, accelerators, and split rules.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/commission-intelligence

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

Commission Intelligence

Demystify sales compensation by explaining commission calculations, identifying discrepancies, and modeling payout scenarios.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reps questioning commission statements
  • Designing or updating comp plans
  • Modeling quota and OTE scenarios
  • Resolving payout disputes
  • Planning territory changes

Methodology Foundation

Based on Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design and WorldatWork Incentive Compensation principles, covering:

  • Base + variable structures
  • Quota attainment mechanics
  • Accelerators and decelerators
  • Split and overlay rules

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Explains calculation logicFinal payout approvals
Identifies discrepanciesException handling
Models scenariosPlan design choices
Documents rules clearlyPolicy changes
Calculates examplesQuota assignments

What This Skill Does

  1. Calculation explanation - Break down how commission was computed
  2. Discrepancy identification - Find calculation errors or data issues
  3. Scenario modeling - Project earnings under different assumptions
  4. Plan documentation - Clarify complex comp plan rules
  5. Dispute resolution - Provide clear audit trail

How to Use

Explain this commission calculation:

Rep: [Name]
Role: [AE, SDR, etc.]
Quota: $[Amount]/[Period]
Closed this period: $[Amount]

Comp plan rules:
- Base: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: X% of base
- Commission rate: X% up to quota
- Accelerator: X% above quota

Deals closed:
- [List deals with amounts and close dates]

Statement shows: $[Commission Amount]
Rep expected: $[Expected Amount]

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Comp Plan Structure

Common Structures:

TypeDescription
Revenue Commission% of deal value
Quota-Based% payout based on attainment
TieredDifferent rates at different levels
DrawAdvance against future commissions
MBOBonus for specific objectives

Step 2: Calculate Attainment

Attainment % = (Closed Revenue / Quota) × 100

Example:
- Quota: $500,000
- Closed: $450,000
- Attainment: 90%

Step 3: Apply Commission Rules

Standard Calculation:

Base Commission = Closed Revenue × Commission Rate

With Quota Thresholds:
- Below 50% attainment: 0% payout (common)
- 50-100% attainment: Linear payout
- Above 100%: Accelerator rate kicks in

Accelerator Example:

Plan: 10% up to quota, 15% above quota
Quota: $500K, Closed: $600K

Commission:
- First $500K × 10% = $50,000
- Next $100K × 15% = $15,000
- Total: $65,000

Step 4: Handle Special Cases

ScenarioRule
Split dealsDivide credit per agreement
Multi-yearRecognize per year or upfront
Churn/ClawbackDeduct if customer cancels
Ramped quotaReduced quota for new hires
SPIFsOne-time bonus amounts

Step 5: Reconcile Discrepancies

Common Issues:

IssueCauseResolution
Missing dealNot in CRMAdd deal, recalculate
Wrong amountIncorrect ACVVerify contract value
Wrong rateTier confusionCheck attainment level
Split errorCredit allocationReview split agreement
TimingRevenue recognitionCheck close date vs. pay period

Examples

Example 1: Commission Explanation

Input:

Explain why Sarah's commission is $12,500:

Rep: Sarah (AE)
Quota: $200,000/quarter
Q4 Closed: $175,000

Comp plan:
- OTE: $200,000 (50/50 split)
- Variable: $100,000/year = $25,000/quarter
- At 100% attainment: Full $25K variable
- Linear payout from 50-100%
- Accelerator: 1.5x above 100%

Deals:
- Acme Corp: $80,000 (Oct 15)
- Beta Inc: $45,000 (Nov 3)
- Gamma LLC: $50,000 (Dec 20)
Total: $175,000

Output:

## Commission Breakdown: Sarah - Q4

### Step 1: Verify Closed Revenue
| Deal | Amount | Close Date | ✓ |
|------|--------|------------|---|
| Acme Corp | $80,000 | Oct 15 | ✓ Q4 |
| Beta Inc | $45,000 | Nov 3 | ✓ Q4 |
| Gamma LLC | $50,000 | Dec 20 | ✓ Q4 |
| **Total** | **$175,000** | | ✓ |

### Step 2: Calculate Attainment

Attainment = $175,000 / $200,000 = 87.5%


### Step 3: Apply Commission Formula

**Plan Rules:**
- 50% threshold: Below 50% = $0
- 50-100%: Linear from $0 to $25,000
- 100%+: 1.5x accelerator

**Calculation:**

Sarah is at 87.5% (between 50% and 100%)

Linear formula: Payout = (Attainment - 50%) / 50% × Full Variable Payout = (87.5% - 50%) / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 37.5% / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 75% × $25,000 Payout = $18,750


### ⚠️ Discrepancy Found!

**Statement shows**: $12,500
**Calculated**: $18,750
**Difference**: $6,250 underpaid

### Likely Cause

If system shows $12,500, it may be calculating:

$12,500 / $25,000 = 50% payout


This would happen if:
1. One deal not credited (Beta Inc $45K?)
2. Wrong formula (% of revenue vs % of variable)
3. Deal attributed to different quarter

### Recommended Action
1. Verify all 3 deals in commission system
2. Check if Beta Inc close date is in Q4
3. Confirm formula is linear 50-100%, not flat rate
4. Escalate to compensation admin with this breakdown

Example 2: Scenario Modeling

Input:

Model commission scenarios for Mike:

Current:
- Quota: $400,000/quarter
- OTE: $240,000 (60/40 split)
- Variable: $96,000/year = $24,000/quarter
- Rate: 6% of revenue up to quota
- Accelerator: 9% above quota

Q1 pipeline:
- Committed: $320,000
- Best case: $450,000
- Upside: $600,000

What would Mike earn in each scenario?

Output:

## Commission Scenarios: Mike - Q1

### Plan Summary
- Quota: $400,000
- At-quota commission: $24,000 (6% × $400K)
- Accelerator: 9% above quota

### Scenario Analysis

#### Scenario 1: Commit Only ($320K)

Attainment: 80% Revenue: $320,000

Commission at 6%: $320,000 × 6% = $19,200

Quarterly Variable: $19,200 Annualized: $76,800 vs OTE Variable ($96K): -$19,200

**Status**: Below quota, standard rate applies

---

#### Scenario 2: Best Case ($450K)

Attainment: 112.5% Revenue: $450,000

Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $50,000 × 9% = $4,500

Total Commission: $28,500

Quarterly Variable: $28,500 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$4,500 (19% bonus)

**Status**: Accelerator kicks in, strong quarter

---

#### Scenario 3: Upside ($600K)

Attainment: 150% Revenue: $600,000

Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $200,000 × 9% = $18,000

Total Commission: $42,000

Quarterly Variable: $42,000 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$18,000 (75% bonus)

**Status**: Excellent quarter, maximizing accelerator

---

### Summary Table

| Scenario | Revenue | Attainment | Commission | vs Plan |
|----------|---------|------------|------------|---------|
| Commit | $320K | 80% | $19,200 | -$4,800 |
| Best Case | $450K | 112% | $28,500 | +$4,500 |
| Upside | $600K | 150% | $42,000 | +$18,000 |

### Key Insights

1. **Break-even point**: $400K (100% attainment)
2. **Accelerator value**: Each $10K above quota = $900 extra
3. **Commit gap**: Need $80K more to hit quota
4. **Upside potential**: 75% more commission if pipeline converts

### Recommendations for Mike
1. Focus on moving $80K from Best Case to Commit
2. Push for upside deals - 9% rate is lucrative
3. Prioritize larger deals for accelerator impact

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Explaining commission math step-by-step
  • Identifying calculation discrepancies
  • Modeling what-if scenarios
  • Documenting plan rules clearly

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access actual payout systems
  • Make policy exceptions
  • Override approved calculations
  • Handle edge cases without rules

When to Escalate to Human

  • Policy exceptions or special approvals
  • Historical adjustments requiring audit
  • Plan design decisions
  • Legal or HR compensation issues

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What if Mike closes an extra $50K deal?"
  • "Show me the break-even point to hit OTE."
  • "Compare this plan to a flat 8% rate."
  • "Model the impact of increasing Mike's quota by 20%."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Document plan rules clearly
  2. Run sample calculations
  3. Verify against actual statements
  4. Build exception handling guide
  5. Create rep-facing FAQ

Checklists & Templates

Commission Dispute Resolution Checklist

  • Verify all deals in calculation
  • Confirm close dates in pay period
  • Check split/overlay credits
  • Validate attainment tier
  • Review for clawbacks/adjustments
  • Compare to plan document

Comp Plan Documentation Template

## [Role] Compensation Plan - [Year]

### Structure
- Base Salary: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: $X (X% of OTE)
- Pay Period: [Monthly/Quarterly]

### Commission Mechanics
- Quota: $X/[period]
- Base Rate: X%
- Accelerator: X% above quota
- Threshold: X% minimum attainment

### Special Rules
- Splits: [Policy]
- Clawbacks: [Policy]
- Ramping: [New hire policy]

### Examples
[Include 3 scenarios at 80%, 100%, 120%]

References

  • Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design
  • WorldatWork Incentive Compensation Handbook
  • Salesforce Sales Cloud Commission Documentation
  • Xactly Commission Best Practices

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Project commission from forecast
  • deal-risk-scoring - Prioritize high-commission deals
  • quota-planning - Set achievable targets

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 15-30 min per analysis
  • Prerequisites: Comp plan document, deal data

GitHub Repository

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Path: skills/revops/commission-intelligence
0
ai-skillsanthropicclaude-codeclaude-skillsmarketingmcp-server

Related Skills

llamaguard

Other

LlamaGuard is Meta's 7-8B parameter model for moderating LLM inputs and outputs across six safety categories like violence and hate speech. It offers 94-95% accuracy and can be deployed using vLLM, Hugging Face, or Amazon SageMaker. Use this skill to easily integrate content filtering and safety guardrails into your AI applications.

View skill

cost-optimization

Other

This Claude Skill helps developers optimize cloud costs through resource rightsizing, tagging strategies, and spending analysis. It provides a framework for reducing cloud expenses and implementing cost governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use it when you need to analyze infrastructure costs, right-size resources, or meet budget constraints.

View skill

quantizing-models-bitsandbytes

Other

This skill quantizes LLMs to 8-bit or 4-bit precision using bitsandbytes, achieving 50-75% memory reduction with minimal accuracy loss. It's ideal for running larger models on limited GPU memory or accelerating inference, supporting formats like INT8, NF4, and FP4. The skill integrates with HuggingFace Transformers and enables QLoRA training and 8-bit optimizers.

View skill

dispatching-parallel-agents

Other

This Claude Skill dispatches multiple agents to investigate and fix 3+ independent problems concurrently. It is designed for scenarios involving unrelated failures that can be resolved without shared state or dependencies. The core capability is parallel problem-solving, assigning one agent per independent problem domain to maximize efficiency.

View skill